SB 1023 — Special districts: consolidation and reorganization.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 68, Statutes of 2010.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 requires a local agency formation commission to approve, without an election, a consolidation or reorganization of 2 or more local agencies, if a majority of the members of each of the legislative bodies of the agencies adopt substantially similar resolutions of application making proposals either for the consolidation of districts or for the reorganization of all or any part of the districts into a single local agency, as specified. The Community Services District Law authorizes the organization of a community services district for various purposes, including, among others, the collection, treatment, or disposal of sewage, wastewater, recycled water, and stormwater, providing fire protection services, and providing public library services. This bill would, until January 1, 2018, authorize the local agency formation commission to approve or conditionally approve an expedited reorganization of specified districts into a community services district, with the same powers, duties, responsibilities, obligations, liabilities, and jurisdiction of the district proposed to be dissolved, unless the governing body of the district proposed to be dissolved files a resolution of objection with the commission, as specified. The bill would also, until January 1, 2018, authorize the El Dorado County Local Agency Formation Commission to approve, disapprove, or conditionally approve an accelerated reorganization of the Tahoe Paradise Resort Improvement District under specified circumstances, and would declare the need for a special statute addressing that reorganization.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 07/09/10 - Chaptered Current pdf July 09, 2010
- Enrolled 06/25/10 - Enrolled pdf June 25, 2010
- Amended 04/27/10 - Amended Senate pdf April 27, 2010
- Introduced 02/11/10 - Introduced pdf February 11, 2010
- SB1023 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 68, Statutes of 2010.
-
Approved by Governor.
-
Enrolled. To Governor at 4:15 p.m.
-
In Senate. To enrollment.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 5811.) To Senate.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
(Heard in Committee on June 16.)
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.)
-
To Com. on L. GOV.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 31. Noes 0. Page 3477.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 3444.)
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
Set for hearing May 5.
-
To Com. on L. GOV.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 14.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Evans · Cosponsor
- Wiggins · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Wiggins
Co-sponsors (1)
- Evans
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 79 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 85 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Not Voting |
| Conway | — | Not Voting |
| Fuller | — | Not Voting |
| Bass | — | Not Voting |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Not Voting |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 29 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 32 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 0% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Not Voting |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Dutton | — | Not Voting |
| Liu | — | Not Voting |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Not Voting |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1023 do?
- The Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 requires a local agency formation commission to approve, without an election, a consolidation or reorganization of 2 or more local agencies, if a majority of the members of each of the legislative bodies of the agencies adopt substantially similar resolutions of application making proposals either for the consolidation of districts or for the reorganization of all or any part of the districts into a single local agency, as specified. The Community Services District Law authorizes the organization of a community services district for various purposes, including, among others, the collection, treatment, or disposal of sewage, wastewater, recycled water, and stormwater, providing fire protection services, and providing public library services. This bill would, until January 1, 2018, authorize the local agency formation commission to approve or conditionally approve an expedited reorganization of specified districts into a community services district, with the same powers, duties, responsibilities, obligations, liabilities, and jurisdiction of the district proposed to be dissolved, unless the governing body of the district proposed to be dissolved files a resolution of objection with the commission, as specified. The bill would also, until January 1, 2018, authorize the El Dorado County Local Agency Formation Commission to approve, disapprove, or conditionally approve an accelerated reorganization of the Tahoe Paradise Resort Improvement District under specified circumstances, and would declare the need for a special statute addressing that reorganization.
- Who sponsors SB 1023?
- SB 1023 is sponsored by Evans and Wiggins.
- What is the current status of SB 1023?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1023?
- Track SB 1023 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1023
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1023
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →