California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: To Executive

SB 734 — Transportation.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 200, Statutes of 2009.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

(1) Existing law provides that every person riding a bicycle upon a highway has all the rights applicable to the driver of a vehicle and is subject to specified provisions in the Vehicle Code, including the rules of the road and specified equipment requirements. Existing law also does not prohibit the operation of bicycles on any shoulder of a highway. This bill would define a "bicycle path crossing" as either that portion of a roadway included within the prolongation or connection of the boundary lines of a bike path, as defined, at intersections where the intersecting roadways meet at approximately right angles or as any portion of a roadway distinctly indicated for bicycle crossing by lines or other markings on the surface, except as specified. This bill would also permit the operation of bicycles on any sidewalk, on any bicycle path within a highway, or along any crosswalk or bicycle path crossing. (2) Existing law requires the Department of Transportation, in cooperation with the California Transportation Commission, transportation planning agencies, and county transportation commissions and local governments, to develop guidelines for the development of the state transportation improvement program and the incorporation of projects into that program. This bill would delete an obsolete provision of this requirement. (3) Existing law makes it unlawful for any person to park or leave standing any vehicle in a stall or space designated for disabled persons and disabled veterans, unless the vehicle displays either a special identification license plate or a distinguishing placard. A violation of this provision is an infraction. Existing law requires that a distinctive sign be displayed in the stall or the space that clearly and conspicuously states specified information, including, among other things, "Minimum Fine $250" and also requires that a person convicted of this provision be punished according to a schedule of fines for first, 2nd, or 3rd or more offenses. This bill would require that the sign display only "Minimum Fine $250" and would make a conforming, cross-reference change to these provisions. (4) Existing law requires the issuing agency or the processing agency to mail the results of the initial administrative review, including a reason for the denial of a cancellation of a notice of parking violations or delinquent parking violations, to the person contesting the notice of parking violations or delinquent parking violations and places a similar notification requirement on an administrative examiner following an administrative review hearing. This bill would require the issuing agency or the processing agency, following an initial review, to include in the notice to the person notification of the ability to request an administrative hearing, and to include the existing required notice of the written procedure for waiving prepayment of the parking penalty based upon an inability to pay. Because this bill would increase the level of service of a city or county processing agency and because a violation of these provisions would be a crime under an existing provision of law, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (5) Under existing law, the Department of Motor Vehicles is required to obtain the submission of a valid smog check certificate of compliance or noncompliance, as appropriate, upon the initial registration, or upon the transfer of ownership and registration of specified motor vehicles. Existing law exempts the transfer of a motor vehicle that is 4 or less model-years old from this requirement. This bill would provide the above exemption does not apply to diesel-powered vehicles. (6) Existing law creates the High Polluter Repair or Removal Account in the Vehicle Inspection and Repair Fund and creates the Enhanced Fleet Modernization Subaccount in the High Polluter Removal and Repair Account. This bill would correct the name of that account to refer to the High Polluter Repair or Removal Account. (7) Existing law exempts certain vehicles owned by the United States, any state or its political subdivision, or any municipality in this state from fees specified in the Vehicle Code, except for fees for duplicate plates, certificates, or cards. This bill would exempt vehicles owned by a public entity formed by a regional transportation authority as a nonprofit public benefit corporation, designated as a consolidated transportation services agency, and charged with administering a countywide coordinated paratransit plan, from registration fees, except fees for duplicate plates, certificates, or cards. (8) Existing law exempts a driver employed by an electrical corporation, a gas corporation, a telephone corporation, a water corporation, or a public water district from hours-of-service regulations while operating a public utility or public water district vehicle during the emergency restoration of service. This bill would instead exempt those drivers from all hours-of-service regulations while operating a public utility or public water district vehicle. (9) The bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to the Health and Safety Code and the Vehicle Code. (10) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 200, Statutes of 2009.

  2. Approved by Governor.

  3. Enrolled. To Governor at 1 p.m.

  4. Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2282.) To enrollment.

  5. In Senate. To unfinished business.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2854.) To Senate.

  7. Read third time. Amended. (Page 2757.) To third reading.

  8. From Consent Calendar to third reading.

  9. Read second time. To Consent Calendar.

  10. (Heard in committee on July 8.)

  11. From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.)

  12. (Heard in committee on June 29.)

  13. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  14. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.

  15. To Com. on TRANS.

  16. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  17. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 930.) To Assembly.

  18. To Special Consent Calendar.

  19. Read second time. To third reading.

  20. From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

  21. Set for hearing May 11.

  22. From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 709.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  23. Set for hearing April 28.

  24. To Com. on T. & H.

  25. Read first time.

  26. From print. May be acted upon on or after March 30.

  27. Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 41 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 38000
Democratic 2000
Republican 1000
Total 41000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Cedillo — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Huff — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Benoit — Yea
Hollingsworth — Yea
Maldonado — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Price — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Denham — Yea
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 90 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 84001
Democratic 3000
Republican 3000
Total 90001
% of votes cast 99%0%0%1%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Hagman — Yea
Bill — Yea
Tom — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Beall — Yea
Charles — Yea
Evans — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Furutani — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Audra — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Yea
Coto — Yea
Duvall — Yea
Hall — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nava — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Villines — Yea
Adams — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Bass — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Not Voting
Hayashi — Yea
Huber — Yea
Knight — Yea
Logue — Yea
Ma — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Tran — Yea
Carter — Yea
Cook — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Eng — Yea
Davis — Yea
DeVore — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 20 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 18001
Democratic 1000
Republican 1000
Total 20001
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (21)
Member Party Vote
Hall — Yea
Duvall — Yea
Charles — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Audra — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Miller — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Solorio — Not Voting
Harkey — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 16 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 15001
Republican 1000
Total 16001
% of votes cast 94%0%0%6%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Eng — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Conway — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Miller — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Blumenfield — Not Voting
Buchanan — Yea
Furutani — Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 37 Yea · 0 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 33003
Democratic 3000
Republican 1000
Total 37003
% of votes cast 93%0%0%8%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Cedillo — Not Voting
Wyland — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Cogdill — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Harman — Yea
Hollingsworth — Yea
Huff — Yea
Kehoe — Yea
Leno — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Steinberg — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Benoit — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Liu — Yea
Maldonado — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Romero — Not Voting
Walters — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Florez — Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 734 do?
(1) Existing law provides that every person riding a bicycle upon a highway has all the rights applicable to the driver of a vehicle and is subject to specified provisions in the Vehicle Code, including the rules of the road and specified equipment requirements. Existing law also does not prohibit the operation of bicycles on any shoulder of a highway. This bill would define a "bicycle path crossing" as either that portion of a roadway included within the prolongation or connection of the boundary lines of a bike path, as defined, at intersections where the intersecting roadways meet at approximately right angles or as any portion of a roadway distinctly indicated for bicycle crossing by lines or other markings on the surface, except as specified. This bill would also permit the operation of bicycles on any sidewalk, on any bicycle path within a highway, or along any crosswalk or bicycle path crossing. (2) Existing law requires the Department of Transportation, in cooperation with the California Transportation Commission, transportation planning agencies, and county transportation commissions and local governments, to develop guidelines for the development of the state transportation improvement program and the incorporation of projects into that program. This bill would delete an obsolete provision of this requirement. (3) Existing law makes it unlawful for any person to park or leave standing any vehicle in a stall or space designated for disabled persons and disabled veterans, unless the vehicle displays either a special identification license plate or a distinguishing placard. A violation of this provision is an infraction. Existing law requires that a distinctive sign be displayed in the stall or the space that clearly and conspicuously states specified information, including, among other things, "Minimum Fine $250" and also requires that a person convicted of this provision be punished according to a schedule of fines for first, 2nd, or 3rd or more offenses. This bill would require that the sign display only "Minimum Fine $250" and would make a conforming, cross-reference change to these provisions. (4) Existing law requires the issuing agency or the processing agency to mail the results of the initial administrative review, including a reason for the denial of a cancellation of a notice of parking violations or delinquent parking violations, to the person contesting the notice of parking violations or delinquent parking violations and places a similar notification requirement on an administrative examiner following an administrative review hearing. This bill would require the issuing agency or the processing agency, following an initial review, to include in the notice to the person notification of the ability to request an administrative hearing, and to include the existing required notice of the written procedure for waiving prepayment of the parking penalty based upon an inability to pay. Because this bill would increase the level of service of a city or county processing agency and because a violation of these provisions would be a crime under an existing provision of law, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (5) Under existing law, the Department of Motor Vehicles is required to obtain the submission of a valid smog check certificate of compliance or noncompliance, as appropriate, upon the initial registration, or upon the transfer of ownership and registration of specified motor vehicles. Existing law exempts the transfer of a motor vehicle that is 4 or less model-years old from this requirement. This bill would provide the above exemption does not apply to diesel-powered vehicles. (6) Existing law creates the High Polluter Repair or Removal Account in the Vehicle Inspection and Repair Fund and creates the Enhanced Fleet Modernization Subaccount in the High Polluter Removal and Repair Account. This bill would correct the name of that account to refer to the High Polluter Repair or Removal Account. (7) Existing law exempts certain vehicles owned by the United States, any state or its political subdivision, or any municipality in this state from fees specified in the Vehicle Code, except for fees for duplicate plates, certificates, or cards. This bill would exempt vehicles owned by a public entity formed by a regional transportation authority as a nonprofit public benefit corporation, designated as a consolidated transportation services agency, and charged with administering a countywide coordinated paratransit plan, from registration fees, except fees for duplicate plates, certificates, or cards. (8) Existing law exempts a driver employed by an electrical corporation, a gas corporation, a telephone corporation, a water corporation, or a public water district from hours-of-service regulations while operating a public utility or public water district vehicle during the emergency restoration of service. This bill would instead exempt those drivers from all hours-of-service regulations while operating a public utility or public water district vehicle. (9) The bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to the Health and Safety Code and the Vehicle Code. (10) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Who sponsors SB 734?
SB 734 is sponsored by Bonnie Lowenthal.
What is the current status of SB 734?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 734?
Track SB 734 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 734

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 734

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →