Health care coverage: quality rating.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2533 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2533.
You're tracking AB 2533
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2533 — Health care coverage: quality rating.
Last action — Died on Senate inactive file.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care. Existing law makes a willful violation of the act's requirements a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law requires every health care service plan and certain health insurers, on or before July 1, 1999, to file with the respective departments a description of policies and procedures related to economic profiling, as defined, utilized by the plan or insurer and its medical groups and individual practice associations and requires the Director of the Department of Managed Health Care and the Insurance Commissioner to make these filings available to the public upon request with certain exceptions. Existing law requires each plan or health insurer using economic profiling to provide, upon request, a copy of economic profiling information to the profiled individual, group, or association. Existing law also requires each plan or insurer, as a contract condition, to require its contracting medical groups and individual practice associations that maintain economic profiles of individual providers to provide, upon request, a copy to the profiled individual providers. This bill would expand these provisions to apply to quality rating, as defined, utilized by the plan or insurer with respect to a particular physician, provider, medical group, or individual practice association. The bill would also require the department filings to be made immediately upon adoption of the policies and procedures and within 30 days of making any changes to the policies and procedures. The bill would modify the required content of the filings, as specified, and would require a plan or insurer that submitted a filing prior to January 1, 2011, to update the filing by March 31, 2011, to comply with the bill's requirements and to reflect the plan's or insurer's current policies and procedures. Because a willful violation of the bill's requirements with respect to health care service plans would be a crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/23/10 - Amended Senate Current pdf June 23, 2010
- Amended 05/06/10 - Amended Assembly pdf May 06, 2010
- Introduced 02/19/10 - Introduced pdf February 19, 2010
- AB2533 View text html
Action History
-
Died on Senate inactive file.
-
To inactive file on motion of Senator Padilla.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
From Consent Calendar.
-
Read second time. To Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and to Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 30).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 5127.)
-
Read third time, amended, and returned to third reading. (Page 5025.).
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
From Consent Calendar.
-
Read second time. To Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (April 21).
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 19. Noes 0.) (April 6).
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Fuentes · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Fuentes
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Not Voting |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 83 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 89 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Not Voting |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Not Voting |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (18)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (24)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2533 do?
- Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care. Existing law makes a willful violation of the act's requirements a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law requires every health care service plan and certain health insurers, on or before July 1, 1999, to file with the respective departments a description of policies and procedures related to economic profiling, as defined, utilized by the plan or insurer and its medical groups and individual practice associations and requires the Director of the Department of Managed Health Care and the Insurance Commissioner to make these filings available to the public upon request with certain exceptions. Existing law requires each plan or health insurer using economic profiling to provide, upon request, a copy of economic profiling information to the profiled individual, group, or association. Existing law also requires each plan or insurer, as a contract condition, to require its contracting medical groups and individual practice associations that maintain economic profiles of individual providers to provide, upon request, a copy to the profiled individual providers. This bill would expand these provisions to apply to quality rating, as defined, utilized by the plan or insurer with respect to a particular physician, provider, medical group, or individual practice association. The bill would also require the department filings to be made immediately upon adoption of the policies and procedures and within 30 days of making any changes to the policies and procedures. The bill would modify the required content of the filings, as specified, and would require a plan or insurer that submitted a filing prior to January 1, 2011, to update the filing by March 31, 2011, to comply with the bill's requirements and to reflect the plan's or insurer's current policies and procedures. Because a willful violation of the bill's requirements with respect to health care service plans would be a crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 2533?
- AB 2533 is sponsored by Fuentes.
- What is the current status of AB 2533?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2533?
- Track AB 2533 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2533
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2533
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →