California 2009-2010 Regular Session Status: To Executive

SB 86 — Public postsecondary education: executive officer compensation.

Last action — Stricken from Senate file.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law establishes the University of California, which is administered by the Regents of the University of California, the California State University, which is administered by the Trustees of the California State University, and the California Community Colleges, which is administered by the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges, as the 3 segments of public postsecondary education in this state. Existing law authorizes the regents, the trustees, and the board to employ officers and other employees. This bill would prohibit the trustees from increasing the monetary compensation, as defined, of, or approving a monetary bonus for, any executive officer, as defined, of the California State University in any fiscal year in which the General Fund appropriation to the California State University in the annual Budget Act is less than, or equal to, the General Fund appropriation to the university in the annual Budget Act for the immediately preceding fiscal year. The bill would request the regents to not increase the monetary compensation of, or approve a monetary bonus for, any executive officer, as defined, of the University of California, in any fiscal year in which the General Fund appropriation to the University of California in the annual Budget Act is less than, or equal to, the General Fund appropriation to the university in the annual Budget Act for the immediately preceding fiscal year.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Stricken from Senate file.

  2. In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)

  3. Vetoed by Governor.

  4. Enrolled. To Governor at 11 a.m.

  5. Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 32. Noes 5. Page 2367.) To enrollment.

  6. In Senate. To unfinished business.

  7. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 77. Noes 1. Page 3076.) To Senate.

  8. Read third time. Amended. (Page 3040.) To third reading.

  9. From inactive file to third reading file.

  10. Notice of motion to remove from inactive file given by Assembly Member Torrico.

  11. Placed on inactive file on request of Assembly Member Krekorian.

  12. Read second time. To third reading.

  13. Placed on second reading file.

  14. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  15. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 22. Noes 14. Page 516.) To Assembly.

  16. Read second time. To third reading.

  17. Placed on second reading file.

  18. Withdrawn from committee.

  19. To Com. on RLS.

  20. Read first time.

  21. From print. May be acted upon on or after February 20.

  22. Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • DeSaulnier · Cosponsor
  • Dutton · Cosponsor
  • Romero · Cosponsor
  • Yee · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 118 not signed on · 2 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Yee

Co-sponsors (3)

  • DeSaulnier
  • Dutton
  • Romero

Not signed on (118)

118 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 118 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 33 Yea · 5 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 30503
Democratic 2000
Republican 1000
Total 33503
% of votes cast 80%12%0%7%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Cedillo — Nay
Cogdill — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Dutton — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hollingsworth — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Nay
Lowenthal — Yea
Negrete — Yea
Runner — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Ashburn — Yea
Benoit — Yea
Oropeza — Not Voting
Pavley — Nay
Romero — Yea
Simitian — Nay
Steinberg — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wolk — Nay
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Harman — Yea
Huff — Yea
Kehoe — Not Voting
Maldonado — Yea
Price — Yea
Walters — Yea
Wyland — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Correa — Yea
Cox — Yea
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Yea
Florez — Not Voting
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 88 Yea · 2 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 83101
Democratic 2100
Republican 3000
Total 88201
% of votes cast 97%2%0%1%
How each member voted (91)
Member Party Vote
Tran — Yea
Bill — Yea
Tom — Yea
Ammiano — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Beall — Yea
Eng — Yea
Feuer — Yea
Fuentes — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Garrick — Yea
Hagman — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hayashi — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
De — Yea
La — Yea
Torre — Yea
De — Yea
Leon — Yea
Huber — Yea
Huffman — Yea
Fletcher — Yea
Fong — Yea
Bonnie — Yea
Lowenthal — Yea
V. — Yea
Manuel — Yea
Perez — Yea
John — Yea
A. — Yea
Perez — Yea
Portantino — Yea
Salas — Yea
Saldana — Yea
Audra — Yea
Carter — Yea
Chesbro — Yea
Conway — Yea
Cook — Yea
Coto — Yea
Davis — Yea
Duvall — Yea
Knight — Yea
Krekorian — Yea
Logue — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Miller — Yea
Monning — Yea
Nestande — Yea
Ruskin — Yea
Silva — Yea
Smyth — Yea
Solorio — Yea
Torlakson — Yea
Torres — Yea
Charles — Nay
Furutani — Not Voting
Villines — Yea
Bass — Yea
Adams — Yea
Blakeslee — Yea
Block — Yea
Blumenfield — Yea
Brownley — Yea
Buchanan — Yea
Harkey — Yea
Hill — Yea
Jeffries — Yea
Lieu — Yea
Ma — Yea
Nava — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Skinner — Yea
Swanson — Yea
Torrico — Yea
Emmerson — Yea
Evans — Yea
DeVore — Yea
Yamada — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Gilmore — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Caballero, Anna M. Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Niello, Roger W. Republican Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 23 Yea · 14 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 211302
Democratic 2001
Republican 0100
Total 231403
% of votes cast 58%35%0%8%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Yee — Yea
Cedillo — Not Voting
Hancock — Yea
Harman — Nay
Hollingsworth — Nay
Negrete — Yea
Corbett — Yea
Huff — Nay
Kehoe — Yea
Runner — Nay
Leno — Yea
Ducheny — Yea
Liu — Yea
McLeod — Yea
Oropeza — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Simitian — Yea
Alquist — Yea
Benoit — Nay
Dutton — Nay
Steinberg — Yea
Wiggins — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Wright — Yea
Aanestad — Nay
Ashburn — Nay
Maldonado — Not Voting
Romero — Yea
Walters — Nay
Wyland — Nay
Cogdill — Nay
Correa — Yea
Cox — Nay
DeSaulnier — Yea
Denham — Nay
Florez — Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Lowenthal, Josh Democratic Yea
Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic Yea
Strickland, Tony Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 86 do?
Existing law establishes the University of California, which is administered by the Regents of the University of California, the California State University, which is administered by the Trustees of the California State University, and the California Community Colleges, which is administered by the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges, as the 3 segments of public postsecondary education in this state. Existing law authorizes the regents, the trustees, and the board to employ officers and other employees. This bill would prohibit the trustees from increasing the monetary compensation, as defined, of, or approving a monetary bonus for, any executive officer, as defined, of the California State University in any fiscal year in which the General Fund appropriation to the California State University in the annual Budget Act is less than, or equal to, the General Fund appropriation to the university in the annual Budget Act for the immediately preceding fiscal year. The bill would request the regents to not increase the monetary compensation of, or approve a monetary bonus for, any executive officer, as defined, of the University of California, in any fiscal year in which the General Fund appropriation to the University of California in the annual Budget Act is less than, or equal to, the General Fund appropriation to the university in the annual Budget Act for the immediately preceding fiscal year.
Who sponsors SB 86?
SB 86 is sponsored by DeSaulnier, Dutton, Romero, and Yee.
What is the current status of SB 86?
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 86?
Track SB 86 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 86

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 86

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →