Student financial aid: eligibility: California Dream Act of 2010.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1460 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1460.
You're tracking SB 1460
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1460 — Student financial aid: eligibility: California Dream Act of 2010.
Last action — Died on file.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires that a person, other than a nonimmigrant alien, as defined, who has attended high school in California for 3 or more years, who has graduated from a California high school or attained the equivalent thereof, who has registered at or attends an accredited institution of higher education in California not earlier than the fall semester or quarter of the 2001–02 academic year, and who, if he or she is an alien without lawful immigration status, has filed a prescribed affidavit, is exempt from paying nonresident tuition at the California Community Colleges and the California State University. This bill would enact the California Dream Act of 2010. The bill, as of July 1, 2011, would exempt a person who has attended, for 3 or more years, at least one of which shall have been in a high school, and graduated from, secondary school in California from paying nonresident tuition at the California Community Colleges and the California State University. Under the bill, persons attending and graduating from California technical schools and adult schools, as well as high schools, would be included within the scope of this provision. (2) The Donahoe Higher Education Act sets forth, among other things, the missions and functions of California's public and independent segments of higher education, and their respective institutions of higher education. Provisions of the act apply to the University of California only to the extent that the Regents of the University of California, by appropriate resolution, act to make a provision applicable. In any action in which a state court finds that a specified law, or any similar provision adopted by the regents, is unlawful, existing law authorizes the court to order the administering entity that is the subject of the lawsuit to terminate any waiver awarded under that statute or action, as equitable relief, prohibits the award of money damages, tuition refund or waiver, or other retroactive relief, and provides that the California Community Colleges, the California State University, and the University of California are immune from the imposition of any award of money damages, tuition refund or waiver, or other retroactive relief in a lawsuit. This bill would amend the Donahoe Higher Education Act, as of July 1, 2011, to require the Trustees of the California State University and the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges, and to request the regents, to establish procedures and forms that enable persons who are exempt from paying nonresident tuition under the provision described in (1) above, or who meet equivalent requirements adopted by the regents, to apply for, and participate in, all student aid programs administered by these segments to the full extent permitted by federal law, except as provided. This provision would apply to the University of California only if the regents, by appropriate resolution, act to make it applicable. If a state court finds that this provision, or a similar provision adopted by the regents, is unlawful, this bill would provide that the same limitations described above would apply. This bill would further provide that, on and after January 1, 2011, a student attending the California State University, the California Community Colleges, or the University of California who is exempt from paying nonresident tuition under the provision described above would be eligible to receive a scholarship derived from nonstate funds received, for the purpose of scholarships, by the segment at which he or she is a student. Existing federal law requires that a state may provide that an alien who is not lawfully present in the United States is eligible for any state or local public benefit for which that alien would otherwise be ineligible under a specified federal law only through enactment of a state law that affirmatively provides for that eligibility. This bill would find and declare that the amendments to the Donahoe Higher Education Act described above are state laws within the meaning of this federal provision. (3) Existing law establishes the California Community Colleges under the administration of the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges. Existing law authorizes the establishment of community college districts under the administration of community college governing boards, and authorizes these districts to provide instruction, for prescribed fees, at community college campuses throughout the state. Existing law authorizes the waiver of these fees for, among others, students who are eligible under income standards established by the board of governors. This bill, as of July 1, 2011, would require community college districts to waive the fees of persons who are exempt from nonresident tuition under the provision described in (1) above, and who otherwise qualify for a waiver under this provision, under regulations and procedures adopted by the board of governors. Because the bill would impose new duties on community college districts with respect to determining eligibility for fee waivers, the bill would constitute a state-mandated local program. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill Text
- Enrolled 09/02/10 - Enrolled Current pdf September 02, 2010
- Amended 08/20/10 - Amended Assembly pdf August 20, 2010
- Amended 08/16/10 - Amended Assembly pdf August 16, 2010
- Amended 06/02/10 - Amended Senate pdf June 02, 2010
- Amended 04/21/10 - Amended Senate pdf April 21, 2010
- Introduced 02/19/10 - Introduced pdf February 19, 2010
- SB1460 View text html
Action History
-
Died on file.
-
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
-
Vetoed by Governor.
-
Enrolled. To Governor at 4 p.m.
-
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 21. Noes 12. Page 5105.) To enrollment.
-
In Senate.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 48. Noes 27. Page 6936.) To Senate.
-
Assembly Rule 69(d) suspended. (Ayes 49. Noes 27. Page 6491.)
-
Read third time. Amended. (Ayes 48. Noes 27. Page 6435.) To third reading.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
Read second time. Amended. To second reading.
-
(Heard in committee August 12.)
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.)
-
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
(Heard in committee on June 22.)
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
To Com. on HIGHER ED.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 24. Noes 9. Page 3785.) To Assembly.
-
(June 2 amended measure version corrected June 10.)
-
Read second time. Amended. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 3. Page 3676.)
-
(Suspense - for vote only.)
-
Set for hearing May 27.
-
Placed on APPR suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 3.
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2. Page 3184.)
-
Set for hearing April 14.
-
To Com. on ED.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 23.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Brian W. Jones · Cosponsor
- Ammiano · Cosponsor
- Brownley · Cosponsor
- Cedillo · Primary
- John A. Perez · Cosponsor
- De Leon · Cosponsor
- Salas · Cosponsor
- Correa · Cosponsor
- Coto · Cosponsor
- DeSaulnier · Cosponsor
- Ducheny · Cosponsor
- Eng · Cosponsor
- Florez · Cosponsor
- Furutani · Cosponsor
- Hancock · Cosponsor
- Leno · Cosponsor
- Ma · Cosponsor
- Mendoza · Cosponsor
- Nava · Cosponsor
- Romero · Cosponsor
- Torlakson · Cosponsor
- Torrico · Cosponsor
- Wiggins · Cosponsor
- Yee · Cosponsor
- Stephen C. Padilla · Cosponsor
- Vince Fong · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 25 co-sponsors · 96 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Cedillo
Co-sponsors (25)
- Jones, Brian W. Republican
- Ammiano
- Brownley
- John A. Perez
- De Leon
- Salas
- Correa
- Coto
- DeSaulnier
- Ducheny
- Eng
- Florez
- Furutani
- Hancock
- Leno
- Ma
- Mendoza
- Nava
- Romero
- Torlakson
- Torrico
- Wiggins
- Yee
- Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic
- Vince Fong
Not signed on (96)
96 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 96 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 53 | 28 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 57 | 30 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 33% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (90)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Nay |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Not Voting |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Not Voting |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Not Voting |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 20 | 12 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 22 | 12 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 30% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Cogdill | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Simitian | — | Not Voting |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Not Voting |
| Denham | — | Not Voting |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 53 | 28 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 56 | 29 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 62% | 32% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Gilmore | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Not Voting |
| Audra | — | Not Voting |
| Galgiani | — | Not Voting |
| Huber | — | Nay |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Not Voting |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 72% | 28% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (18)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 22% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Not Voting |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 23 | 8 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 25 | 9 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 23% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Cogdill | — | Nay |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Not Voting |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Hollingsworth | — | Not Voting |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Not Voting |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 27% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Not Voting |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Not Voting |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 22% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1460 do?
- (1) Existing law requires that a person, other than a nonimmigrant alien, as defined, who has attended high school in California for 3 or more years, who has graduated from a California high school or attained the equivalent thereof, who has registered at or attends an accredited institution of higher education in California not earlier than the fall semester or quarter of the 2001–02 academic year, and who, if he or she is an alien without lawful immigration status, has filed a prescribed affidavit, is exempt from paying nonresident tuition at the California Community Colleges and the California State University. This bill would enact the California Dream Act of 2010. The bill, as of July 1, 2011, would exempt a person who has attended, for 3 or more years, at least one of which shall have been in a high school, and graduated from, secondary school in California from paying nonresident tuition at the California Community Colleges and the California State University. Under the bill, persons attending and graduating from California technical schools and adult schools, as well as high schools, would be included within the scope of this provision. (2) The Donahoe Higher Education Act sets forth, among other things, the missions and functions of California's public and independent segments of higher education, and their respective institutions of higher education. Provisions of the act apply to the University of California only to the extent that the Regents of the University of California, by appropriate resolution, act to make a provision applicable. In any action in which a state court finds that a specified law, or any similar provision adopted by the regents, is unlawful, existing law authorizes the court to order the administering entity that is the subject of the lawsuit to terminate any waiver awarded under that statute or action, as equitable relief, prohibits the award of money damages, tuition refund or waiver, or other retroactive relief, and provides that the California Community Colleges, the California State University, and the University of California are immune from the imposition of any award of money damages, tuition refund or waiver, or other retroactive relief in a lawsuit. This bill would amend the Donahoe Higher Education Act, as of July 1, 2011, to require the Trustees of the California State University and the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges, and to request the regents, to establish procedures and forms that enable persons who are exempt from paying nonresident tuition under the provision described in (1) above, or who meet equivalent requirements adopted by the regents, to apply for, and participate in, all student aid programs administered by these segments to the full extent permitted by federal law, except as provided. This provision would apply to the University of California only if the regents, by appropriate resolution, act to make it applicable. If a state court finds that this provision, or a similar provision adopted by the regents, is unlawful, this bill would provide that the same limitations described above would apply. This bill would further provide that, on and after January 1, 2011, a student attending the California State University, the California Community Colleges, or the University of California who is exempt from paying nonresident tuition under the provision described above would be eligible to receive a scholarship derived from nonstate funds received, for the purpose of scholarships, by the segment at which he or she is a student. Existing federal law requires that a state may provide that an alien who is not lawfully present in the United States is eligible for any state or local public benefit for which that alien would otherwise be ineligible under a specified federal law only through enactment of a state law that affirmatively provides for that eligibility. This bill would find and declare that the amendments to the Donahoe Higher Education Act described above are state laws within the meaning of this federal provision. (3) Existing law establishes the California Community Colleges under the administration of the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges. Existing law authorizes the establishment of community college districts under the administration of community college governing boards, and authorizes these districts to provide instruction, for prescribed fees, at community college campuses throughout the state. Existing law authorizes the waiver of these fees for, among others, students who are eligible under income standards established by the board of governors. This bill, as of July 1, 2011, would require community college districts to waive the fees of persons who are exempt from nonresident tuition under the provision described in (1) above, and who otherwise qualify for a waiver under this provision, under regulations and procedures adopted by the board of governors. Because the bill would impose new duties on community college districts with respect to determining eligibility for fee waivers, the bill would constitute a state-mandated local program. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
- Who sponsors SB 1460?
- SB 1460 is sponsored by Jones, Brian W. (Republican), Ammiano, Brownley, Cedillo, John A. Perez, De Leon, Salas, Correa, Coto, DeSaulnier, Ducheny, Eng, Florez, Furutani, Hancock, Leno, Ma, Mendoza, Nava, Romero, Torlakson, Torrico, Wiggins, Yee, Padilla, Stephen C. (Democratic), and Vince Fong.
- What is the current status of SB 1460?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1460?
- Track SB 1460 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1460
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1460
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →