SB 407 — Property transfers: plumbing fixtures replacement.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 587, Statutes of 2009.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) Existing law authorizes public entities that supply water, by the adoption of an ordinance or resolution pursuant to specified procedures, to adopt and enforce a water conservation program. Existing law requires certain disclosures to be made upon the transfer of real estate. Existing law requires that all water closets or urinals sold or installed in the state use no more than an average of 1.6 gallons or one gallon per flush, respectively. This bill would establish requirements for residential and commercial real property built and available for use on or before January 1, 1994, for replacing plumbing fixtures that are not water conserving, as defined as noncompliant plumbing fixtures. On and after January 1, 2014, the bill would require, for all building alterations or improvements to single-family residential real property, as defined, that water-conserving plumbing fixtures replace other noncompliant plumbing fixtures as a condition for issuance of a certificate of final completion and occupancy or final permit approval by the local building department. By creating a new duty to inspect for local officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require, on or before January 1, 2017, that all noncompliant plumbing fixtures in any single-family residential real property shall be replaced by the property owner with water-conserving plumbing fixtures. The bill would require, on or before January 1, 2019, that all noncompliant plumbing fixtures in multifamily residential real property and commercial real property, as defined, be replaced with water-conserving plumbing fixtures. The bill would require, on and after January 1, 2014, for specified building alterations or improvements to multifamily residential real property and commercial real property, that water-conserving plumbing fixtures replace other noncompliant plumbing fixtures as a condition for issuance of a certificate of final completion and occupancy or final permit approval by the local building department. By creating a new duty to inspect for local officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require, on and after January 1, 2017, that a seller or transferor of single-family residential real property, multifamily residential real property, or commercial real property disclose to a purchaser or transferee, in writing, specified requirements for replacing plumbing fixtures, and whether the real property includes noncompliant plumbing. The bill would require, on and after January 1, 2017, a seller of certain residential real property to make a specified disclosure in this regard. The bill would permit an owner or the owner's agent to enter rental property for the purpose of installing, repairing, testing, and maintaining water-conserving plumbing fixtures, as specified, and would require, on and after January 1, 2019, that the water-conserving plumbing fixtures prescribed by the bill operate at the manufacturer's rated water consumption at the time that a tenant takes possession, as specified. The bill would provide that the application of its requirements may be postponed up to one year, as specified, with respect to a building for which a demolition permit has been issued. The bill would permit a city or county or retail water supplier to enact a local ordinance or policy that promotes compliance with the bill's provisions or that will result in greater water savings than otherwise provided by the bill. The bill would provide that any city, county, or city and county that has adopted an ordinance requiring retrofit of noncompliant plumbing fixtures prior to July 1, 2009, is exempt from its requirements so long as the ordinance remains in effect. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/11/09 - Chaptered Current pdf October 11, 2009
- Enrolled 09/15/09 - Enrolled pdf September 15, 2009
- Amended 09/04/09 - Amended Assembly pdf September 04, 2009
- Amended 08/31/09 - Amended Assembly pdf August 31, 2009
- Amended 07/01/09 - Amended Assembly pdf July 01, 2009
- Amended 05/20/09 - Amended Senate pdf May 20, 2009
- Amended 04/23/09 - Amended Senate pdf April 23, 2009
- Amended 04/13/09 - Amended Senate pdf April 13, 2009
- Introduced 02/26/09 - Introduced pdf February 26, 2009
- SB407 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 587, Statutes of 2009.
-
Approved by Governor.
-
Enrolled. To Governor at 1 p.m.
-
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 25. Noes 15. Page 2419.) To enrollment.
-
In Senate. To unfinished business.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 45. Noes 29. Page 3340.) To Senate.
-
Read third time. Amended. (Page 3039.) To third reading.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
Read second time. Amended. To second reading.
-
(Heard in committee on August 27.)
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.)
-
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
(Heard in committee on July 8.)
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
-
(Heard in committee on June 30.)
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on H. & C.D. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.)
-
Re-referred to Coms. on JUD. and H. & C.D.
-
To Coms. on H. & C.D. and JUD.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 22. Noes 15. Page 1190.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time. Amended. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 3. Noes 1. Page 875.)
-
Set for hearing May 12.
-
Set, first hearing. Testimony taken. Further hearing to be set.
-
Set for hearing May 5.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 7. Noes 3. Page 609.) Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Set for hearing April 21.
-
Re-referred to Coms. on T. & H. and RLS.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
To Com. on RLS.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 28.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Stephen C. Padilla · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 5 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Padilla, Stephen C. Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 24 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 26 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 37% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (41)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Nay |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Benoit | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Nay |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 50 | 29 | 0 | 6 |
| Democratic | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 51 | 32 | 0 | 8 |
| % of votes cast | 56% | 35% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Nay |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Charles | — | Not Voting |
| De | — | Not Voting |
| La | — | Not Voting |
| Torre | — | Not Voting |
| Galgiani | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Torres | — | Not Voting |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Nay |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 73% | 27% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (22)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 30% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 14 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 23 | 15 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 38% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Nay |
| Florez | — | Nay |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Nay |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| Ducheny | — | Not Voting |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Benoit | — | Nay |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Nay |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 20% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 27% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 407 do?
- (1) Existing law authorizes public entities that supply water, by the adoption of an ordinance or resolution pursuant to specified procedures, to adopt and enforce a water conservation program. Existing law requires certain disclosures to be made upon the transfer of real estate. Existing law requires that all water closets or urinals sold or installed in the state use no more than an average of 1.6 gallons or one gallon per flush, respectively. This bill would establish requirements for residential and commercial real property built and available for use on or before January 1, 1994, for replacing plumbing fixtures that are not water conserving, as defined as noncompliant plumbing fixtures. On and after January 1, 2014, the bill would require, for all building alterations or improvements to single-family residential real property, as defined, that water-conserving plumbing fixtures replace other noncompliant plumbing fixtures as a condition for issuance of a certificate of final completion and occupancy or final permit approval by the local building department. By creating a new duty to inspect for local officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require, on or before January 1, 2017, that all noncompliant plumbing fixtures in any single-family residential real property shall be replaced by the property owner with water-conserving plumbing fixtures. The bill would require, on or before January 1, 2019, that all noncompliant plumbing fixtures in multifamily residential real property and commercial real property, as defined, be replaced with water-conserving plumbing fixtures. The bill would require, on and after January 1, 2014, for specified building alterations or improvements to multifamily residential real property and commercial real property, that water-conserving plumbing fixtures replace other noncompliant plumbing fixtures as a condition for issuance of a certificate of final completion and occupancy or final permit approval by the local building department. By creating a new duty to inspect for local officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require, on and after January 1, 2017, that a seller or transferor of single-family residential real property, multifamily residential real property, or commercial real property disclose to a purchaser or transferee, in writing, specified requirements for replacing plumbing fixtures, and whether the real property includes noncompliant plumbing. The bill would require, on and after January 1, 2017, a seller of certain residential real property to make a specified disclosure in this regard. The bill would permit an owner or the owner's agent to enter rental property for the purpose of installing, repairing, testing, and maintaining water-conserving plumbing fixtures, as specified, and would require, on and after January 1, 2019, that the water-conserving plumbing fixtures prescribed by the bill operate at the manufacturer's rated water consumption at the time that a tenant takes possession, as specified. The bill would provide that the application of its requirements may be postponed up to one year, as specified, with respect to a building for which a demolition permit has been issued. The bill would permit a city or county or retail water supplier to enact a local ordinance or policy that promotes compliance with the bill's provisions or that will result in greater water savings than otherwise provided by the bill. The bill would provide that any city, county, or city and county that has adopted an ordinance requiring retrofit of noncompliant plumbing fixtures prior to July 1, 2009, is exempt from its requirements so long as the ordinance remains in effect. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 407?
- SB 407 is sponsored by Padilla, Stephen C. (Democratic).
- What is the current status of SB 407?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 407?
- Track SB 407 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 407
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 407
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →