Courts.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 556 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 556.
You're tracking SB 556
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 556 — Courts.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 596, Statutes of 2009.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) Existing law provides that the judgment of a small claims court may be enforced as provided for the enforcement of judgments of other courts. Existing law requires the clerk of the small claims court to charge and collect specified fees for the issuance of a writ of execution or an abstract of judgment, and for an application for an order of examination of a judgment debtor. This bill would require the clerk of the small claims court to charge and collect all fees associated with the enforcement of small claims court judgments, including, among other things, statutory fees for preparing and issuing, and recording and indexing, an abstract of judgment or a certified copy of a judgment, statutory fees for filing a notice of judgment lien on personal property, and statutory fees for issuing a writ for the enforcement of the judgment, as specified. (2) Existing law requires a conservator served pursuant to specified provisions of law to appear at a hearing and represent a spouse alleged to lack legal capacity for a proposed transaction involving community property. Existing law authorizes the court, in its discretion, to appoint an investigator to review the proposed transaction and report to the court regarding its advisability. This bill would limit the authority of the court to appoint an investigator pursuant to that provision to those cases in which the appointment is necessary. The bill would authorize the court to order the cost of the review and report by a court investigator to be paid out of the proceeds of the transaction or otherwise as the court may direct, if the court determines that its order would not cause a hardship. (3) Existing law provides that delinquent fines, state or local penalties, forfeitures, restitution fines and orders, and any other amounts imposed by a superior court upon a person or entity for criminal offenses, that total at least $100 in the aggregate, may be referred by the court, county, or state to the Franchise Tax Board for collection, as specified. This bill would additionally authorize the referral of delinquent bail amounts imposed by a superior court to the Franchise Tax Board for collection pursuant to this provision.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/11/09 - Chaptered Current pdf October 11, 2009
- Enrolled 09/10/09 - Enrolled pdf September 10, 2009
- Amended 07/07/09 - Amended Assembly pdf July 07, 2009
- Amended 06/26/09 - Amended Assembly pdf June 26, 2009
- Amended 05/28/09 - Amended Assembly pdf May 28, 2009
- Amended 04/15/09 - Amended Senate pdf April 15, 2009
- Introduced 02/27/09 - Introduced pdf February 27, 2009
- SB556 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 596, Statutes of 2009.
-
Approved by Governor.
-
Enrolled. To Governor at 1 p.m.
-
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2270.) To enrollment.
-
In Senate. To unfinished business.
-
Read third time. Passed. To Senate.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
(Heard in committee on July 15.)
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.)
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
(Heard in committee on June 23.)
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.)
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
To Com. on JUD.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 623.) To Assembly.
-
To Special Consent Calendar.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing April 20.
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 383.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing March 31.
-
To Com. on JUD.
-
Read first time.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 30.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Committee on Judiciary · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Committee on Judiciary
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 38 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 41 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (41)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 75 | 1 | 0 | 9 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 81 | 1 | 0 | 9 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 1% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| V. | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| De | — | Not Voting |
| Leon | — | Not Voting |
| Hall | — | Not Voting |
| Duvall | — | Not Voting |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Not Voting |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Not Voting |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Not Voting |
| Davis | — | Not Voting |
| DeVore | — | Not Voting |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Not Voting |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 34 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 38 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Not Voting |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 556 do?
- (1) Existing law provides that the judgment of a small claims court may be enforced as provided for the enforcement of judgments of other courts. Existing law requires the clerk of the small claims court to charge and collect specified fees for the issuance of a writ of execution or an abstract of judgment, and for an application for an order of examination of a judgment debtor. This bill would require the clerk of the small claims court to charge and collect all fees associated with the enforcement of small claims court judgments, including, among other things, statutory fees for preparing and issuing, and recording and indexing, an abstract of judgment or a certified copy of a judgment, statutory fees for filing a notice of judgment lien on personal property, and statutory fees for issuing a writ for the enforcement of the judgment, as specified. (2) Existing law requires a conservator served pursuant to specified provisions of law to appear at a hearing and represent a spouse alleged to lack legal capacity for a proposed transaction involving community property. Existing law authorizes the court, in its discretion, to appoint an investigator to review the proposed transaction and report to the court regarding its advisability. This bill would limit the authority of the court to appoint an investigator pursuant to that provision to those cases in which the appointment is necessary. The bill would authorize the court to order the cost of the review and report by a court investigator to be paid out of the proceeds of the transaction or otherwise as the court may direct, if the court determines that its order would not cause a hardship. (3) Existing law provides that delinquent fines, state or local penalties, forfeitures, restitution fines and orders, and any other amounts imposed by a superior court upon a person or entity for criminal offenses, that total at least $100 in the aggregate, may be referred by the court, county, or state to the Franchise Tax Board for collection, as specified. This bill would additionally authorize the referral of delinquent bail amounts imposed by a superior court to the Franchise Tax Board for collection pursuant to this provision.
- Who sponsors SB 556?
- SB 556 is sponsored by Committee on Judiciary.
- What is the current status of SB 556?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 556?
- Track SB 556 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 556
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 556
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →