AB 791 — Oakland Unified School District: governance.
Last action — From Senate committee without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to assume all the rights, duties, and powers of the governing board of the Oakland Unified School District and to appoint an administrator to act on behalf of the Superintendent in exercising the authority of the Superintendent over the school district. The authority of the Superintendent and the administrator over the school district is required to continue until certain enumerated conditions are met, including the completion of an improvement plan for the district. Existing law requires the County Office Fiscal Crisis and Management Assistance Team (FCMAT) to prepare the improvement plan for the school district, as provided, by July 1, 2003, and requires FCMAT to report on the implementation of the plan, as specified. This bill would require the Superintendent to return the authority for each operational area for which the most recent annual progress report prepared and submitted by FCMAT recommends the authority be returned to the governing board by July 1 of each year. The bill would provide that, if FCMAT recommends in its most recent progress report that authority over any operational area or areas be within the authority of the state administrator, the Superintendent would be authorized, in his or her sole discretion, to require that authority for the operational area or areas be returned to, or retained by, the state administrator. (2) Existing law requires the governing board of the Oakland Unified School District to serve without compensation as an advisory body during the period that the Superintendent is exercising authority over the district. This bill would entitle the members of the governing board to receive full compensation for services, once authority for one or more operational areas is returned to the governing board, that they would have received prior to the transfer of authority to operate the district to the Superintendent. (3) This bill would declare that due to the unique circumstances regarding governance of the school district, a general statute cannot be made applicable.
Bill Text
- Amended 05/06/09 - Amended Assembly Current pdf May 06, 2009
- Amended 04/14/09 - Amended Assembly pdf April 14, 2009
- Introduced 02/26/09 - Introduced pdf February 26, 2009
- AB791 View text html
Action History
-
From Senate committee without further action.
-
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 46. Noes 29. Page 1763.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (May 20).
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (April 29).
-
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on ED. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Swanson · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Swanson
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 50 | 30 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 55 | 32 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 35% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (92)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Duvall | — | Nay |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Evans | — | Not Voting |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Gaines | — | Nay |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Saldana | — | Not Voting |
| Gilmore | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Nay |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Not Voting |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 24% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Duvall | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 27% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 791 do?
- (1) Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to assume all the rights, duties, and powers of the governing board of the Oakland Unified School District and to appoint an administrator to act on behalf of the Superintendent in exercising the authority of the Superintendent over the school district. The authority of the Superintendent and the administrator over the school district is required to continue until certain enumerated conditions are met, including the completion of an improvement plan for the district. Existing law requires the County Office Fiscal Crisis and Management Assistance Team (FCMAT) to prepare the improvement plan for the school district, as provided, by July 1, 2003, and requires FCMAT to report on the implementation of the plan, as specified. This bill would require the Superintendent to return the authority for each operational area for which the most recent annual progress report prepared and submitted by FCMAT recommends the authority be returned to the governing board by July 1 of each year. The bill would provide that, if FCMAT recommends in its most recent progress report that authority over any operational area or areas be within the authority of the state administrator, the Superintendent would be authorized, in his or her sole discretion, to require that authority for the operational area or areas be returned to, or retained by, the state administrator. (2) Existing law requires the governing board of the Oakland Unified School District to serve without compensation as an advisory body during the period that the Superintendent is exercising authority over the district. This bill would entitle the members of the governing board to receive full compensation for services, once authority for one or more operational areas is returned to the governing board, that they would have received prior to the transfer of authority to operate the district to the Superintendent. (3) This bill would declare that due to the unique circumstances regarding governance of the school district, a general statute cannot be made applicable.
- Who sponsors AB 791?
- AB 791 is sponsored by Swanson.
- What is the current status of AB 791?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 791?
- Track AB 791 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 791
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 791
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →