SB 10 — Voter-approved local assessment: vehicles.
Last action — From Assembly without further action.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law authorizes certain counties to impose a local vehicle license fee not exceeding $10 per vehicle, as provided, for the privilege of operating specified vehicles on public roads in the county. Existing law requires a county imposing this fee to contract with the Department of Motor Vehicles to collect and administer the fee, as specified. This bill would authorize counties and the City and County of San Francisco to impose a voter-approved local assessment for specified vehicles if certain conditions, including approval by local voters, are met. The bill would require the county or the city and county to contract with the department to collect and administer the assessment, as provided. The Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law authorize various deductions against the income that is otherwise subject to tax under those laws, including a deduction for local taxes that were paid or incurred by a taxpayer. This bill would require the Franchise Tax Board to notify the department of estimated revenue losses to the state resulting from taxpayers deducting, for purposes of the Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law, the voter-approved local assessments authorized by this bill. This bill would require the department to transmit from the assessments collected an amount equal to these reported losses for deposit in the General Fund.
Bill Text
- Amended 07/08/09 - Amended Assembly Current pdf July 08, 2009
- Amended 05/28/09 - Amended Senate pdf May 28, 2009
- Amended 04/13/09 - Amended Senate pdf April 13, 2009
- Introduced 12/01/08 - Introduced pdf December 01, 2008
- SB10 View text html
Action History
-
From Assembly without further action.
-
Motion to reconsider continued to August 31.
-
Motion to reconsider made by Assembly Member Torlakson.
-
Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 35. Noes 29. Page 4365.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
Placed on second reading file.
-
(Ayes 45. Noes. 26. Page 3945.)
-
Withdrawn from committee.
-
Set, second hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
-
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
(Heard in committee on July 6.)
-
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.)
-
Set, first hearing. Referred to REV. & TAX. suspense file.
-
(Heard in committee on June 29.)
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX. (Ayes 9. Noes 5.) Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
-
To Coms. on TRANS. and REV. & TAX.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 21. Noes 16. Page 1146.) To Assembly.
-
Read second time. Amended. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 5. Page 1066.)
-
(Suspense - for vote only.)
-
Set for hearing May 28.
-
Placed on APPR suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 4.
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 3. Page 638.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing April 22.
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX. (Ayes 6. Noes 4. Page 498.) Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
-
Set for hearing April 14.
-
To Coms. on T. & H. and REV. & TAX.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after January 1.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Leno · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Leno
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 39 | 30 | 0 | 16 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 42 | 32 | 0 | 17 |
| % of votes cast | 46% | 35% | 0% | 19% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Carter | — | Nay |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Gilmore | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Nay |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| V. | — | Not Voting |
| Manuel | — | Not Voting |
| Perez | — | Not Voting |
| Saldana | — | Not Voting |
| Fuentes | — | Not Voting |
| Hall | — | Not Voting |
| Huber | — | Not Voting |
| Miller | — | Not Voting |
| Monning | — | Not Voting |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Not Voting |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Not Voting |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Not Voting |
| Hernandez | — | Not Voting |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Not Voting |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Not Voting |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 20% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Not Voting |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 19 | 15 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 21 | 16 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 53% | 40% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Cogdill | — | Nay |
| Ducheny | — | Not Voting |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Negrete | — | Not Voting |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Benoit | — | Nay |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Not Voting |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Nay |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Nay |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 7 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 54% | 38% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Not Voting |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Cox | — | Nay |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 0% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Not Voting |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 38% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Runner | — | Nay |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 36% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Harman | — | Nay |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 10 do?
- Existing law authorizes certain counties to impose a local vehicle license fee not exceeding $10 per vehicle, as provided, for the privilege of operating specified vehicles on public roads in the county. Existing law requires a county imposing this fee to contract with the Department of Motor Vehicles to collect and administer the fee, as specified. This bill would authorize counties and the City and County of San Francisco to impose a voter-approved local assessment for specified vehicles if certain conditions, including approval by local voters, are met. The bill would require the county or the city and county to contract with the department to collect and administer the assessment, as provided. The Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law authorize various deductions against the income that is otherwise subject to tax under those laws, including a deduction for local taxes that were paid or incurred by a taxpayer. This bill would require the Franchise Tax Board to notify the department of estimated revenue losses to the state resulting from taxpayers deducting, for purposes of the Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law, the voter-approved local assessments authorized by this bill. This bill would require the department to transmit from the assessments collected an amount equal to these reported losses for deposit in the General Fund.
- Who sponsors SB 10?
- SB 10 is sponsored by Leno.
- What is the current status of SB 10?
- This bill died with 2009-2010 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 10?
- Track SB 10 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 10
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 10
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →