Public utilities: procurement: minority-, women-, disabled veteran-owned business enterprises.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1918 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1918.
You're tracking AB 1918
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1918 — Public utilities: procurement: minority-, women-, disabled veteran-owned business enterprises.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 456, Statutes of 2010.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 16, 2010. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 7 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
(1) Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical, gas, water, and telephone corporations. Existing law authorizes the commission to establish rules for all public utilities, subject to control by the Legislature. Existing law directs the commission to require every electrical, gas, water, and telephone corporation with annual gross revenues exceeding $25,000,000, and their regulated subsidiaries and affiliates, to implement a program developed by the commission to encourage, recruit, and utilize minority-, women-, and disabled veteran-owned business enterprises, as defined, in the procurement of contracts from those corporations or from their regulated subsidiaries and affiliates, and to require the reporting of certain information. The commission, by rulemaking, has adopted General Order 156, applicable to certain electrical, gas, and telephone corporations, to effectuate these requirements. This bill would extend the minority-, women-, and disabled veteran-owned business enterprises procurement requirements to wireless telecommunications service providers with gross annual revenues of more than $25,000,000 and would encourage each electrical, gas, water, wireless telecommunications service provider, and telephone corporation that is not required to submit a plan to voluntarily adopt a plan for increasing women, minority, and disabled veteran business enterprise procurement in all categories. (2) Existing law requires the commission to recommend a program and legislation for carrying out the policy of aiding the interests of women, minority, and disabled veteran business enterprises in order to preserve specified objectives. This bill would require the commission, in regards to disabled veteran business enterprises, to ensure that those recommended programs and legislation are consistent with the disabled veteran business enterprise certification eligibility requirements imposed by the Department of General Services and that the recommendations include only those disabled veteran business enterprises certified by the Department of General Services. (3) Existing law requires the commission, by rule or order, to adopt criteria for verifying and determining eligibility of women, minority, and disabled veteran business enterprises for procurement contracts. This bill would instead require the commission to adopt the Department of General Services' disabled veteran business enterprise certification eligibility requirements for verifying and determining eligibility of disabled veteran business enterprises for procurement contracts and would prohibit the commission from deeming eligible those disabled veteran business enterprises that are not certified by the Department of General Services. (4) Existing law requires any person or corporation that falsely represents a business as a women, minority, or disabled veteran business enterprise in the procurement of, or the attempt to procure, contracts from certain electrical, gas, water, or telephone corporations to receive a prescribed punishment. This bill would add wireless telecommunications service providers to that list of corporations and would instead require the punishment for falsely representing a business as a disabled veteran enterprise to conform to penalties imposed pursuant to specified law. (5) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Sections 8281 and 8283 of the Public Utilities Code proposed by AB 2758 of the 2009–10 Regular Session that would become operative only if AB 2758 and this bill are both enacted and become effective before January 1, 2011, and this bill is enacted after AB 2758. (6) Under existing law, a violation of any rules or orders of the commission is a crime. In addition, any person or corporation who falsely represents a business as a woman, minority, or disabled veteran business enterprise for the purposes of the programs discussed above is subject to criminal penalties. Because a violation of the requirements of the bill would be a crime under those provisions, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/29/10 - Chaptered Current pdf September 29, 2010
- Enrolled 08/31/10 - Enrolled pdf August 31, 2010
- Amended 08/19/10 - Amended Senate pdf August 19, 2010
- Amended 06/29/10 - Amended Senate pdf June 29, 2010
- Amended 04/05/10 - Amended Assembly pdf April 05, 2010
- Introduced 02/16/10 - Introduced pdf February 16, 2010
- AB1918 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 456, Statutes of 2010.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and to the Governor at 3 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 51. Noes 27. Page 6651.)
-
Passed on file.
-
Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Ayes 49. Noes 27. Page 6562.)
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 25 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 22. Noes 11. Page 4791.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
Read third time, amended. To second reading.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 0.) (June 22).
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on V.A. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (June 15).
-
Referred to Coms. on E., U., & C. and V.A.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 45. Noes 26. Page 5249.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (May 12).
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (April 20).
-
Re-referred to Com. on J.,E.D., & E.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on J.,E.D., & E. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on J.,E.D., & E.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Davis · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 4 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Davis
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 56 | 28 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 60 | 30 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (90)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Nay |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Gilmore | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Nay |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 10 | 0 | 6 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 23 | 11 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 28% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Nay |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Cogdill | — | Nay |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Not Voting |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Nay |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Not Voting |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 0% | 0% | 33% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 18% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Dutton | — | Nay |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Not Voting |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 46 | 27 | 0 | 12 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 50 | 29 | 0 | 12 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 32% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (91)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fong | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Saldana | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Nay |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Tom | — | Nay |
| Evans | — | Not Voting |
| Audra | — | Nay |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| De | — | Not Voting |
| La | — | Not Voting |
| Torre | — | Not Voting |
| Fletcher | — | Not Voting |
| John | — | Not Voting |
| A. | — | Not Voting |
| Perez | — | Not Voting |
| Garrick | — | Nay |
| Hagman | — | Nay |
| Harkey | — | Not Voting |
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Blakeslee | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Not Voting |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Nay |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Nay |
| Adams | — | Nay |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Nay |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nestande | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Silva | — | Nay |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Not Voting |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Emmerson | — | Nay |
| Coto | — | Not Voting |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Nay |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Nay |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 11 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 61% | 28% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (18)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Charles | — | Not Voting |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Nay |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| Norby | — | Nay |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Bradford | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1918 do?
- (1) Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical, gas, water, and telephone corporations. Existing law authorizes the commission to establish rules for all public utilities, subject to control by the Legislature. Existing law directs the commission to require every electrical, gas, water, and telephone corporation with annual gross revenues exceeding $25,000,000, and their regulated subsidiaries and affiliates, to implement a program developed by the commission to encourage, recruit, and utilize minority-, women-, and disabled veteran-owned business enterprises, as defined, in the procurement of contracts from those corporations or from their regulated subsidiaries and affiliates, and to require the reporting of certain information. The commission, by rulemaking, has adopted General Order 156, applicable to certain electrical, gas, and telephone corporations, to effectuate these requirements. This bill would extend the minority-, women-, and disabled veteran-owned business enterprises procurement requirements to wireless telecommunications service providers with gross annual revenues of more than $25,000,000 and would encourage each electrical, gas, water, wireless telecommunications service provider, and telephone corporation that is not required to submit a plan to voluntarily adopt a plan for increasing women, minority, and disabled veteran business enterprise procurement in all categories. (2) Existing law requires the commission to recommend a program and legislation for carrying out the policy of aiding the interests of women, minority, and disabled veteran business enterprises in order to preserve specified objectives. This bill would require the commission, in regards to disabled veteran business enterprises, to ensure that those recommended programs and legislation are consistent with the disabled veteran business enterprise certification eligibility requirements imposed by the Department of General Services and that the recommendations include only those disabled veteran business enterprises certified by the Department of General Services. (3) Existing law requires the commission, by rule or order, to adopt criteria for verifying and determining eligibility of women, minority, and disabled veteran business enterprises for procurement contracts. This bill would instead require the commission to adopt the Department of General Services' disabled veteran business enterprise certification eligibility requirements for verifying and determining eligibility of disabled veteran business enterprises for procurement contracts and would prohibit the commission from deeming eligible those disabled veteran business enterprises that are not certified by the Department of General Services. (4) Existing law requires any person or corporation that falsely represents a business as a women, minority, or disabled veteran business enterprise in the procurement of, or the attempt to procure, contracts from certain electrical, gas, water, or telephone corporations to receive a prescribed punishment. This bill would add wireless telecommunications service providers to that list of corporations and would instead require the punishment for falsely representing a business as a disabled veteran enterprise to conform to penalties imposed pursuant to specified law. (5) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Sections 8281 and 8283 of the Public Utilities Code proposed by AB 2758 of the 2009–10 Regular Session that would become operative only if AB 2758 and this bill are both enacted and become effective before January 1, 2011, and this bill is enacted after AB 2758. (6) Under existing law, a violation of any rules or orders of the commission is a crime. In addition, any person or corporation who falsely represents a business as a woman, minority, or disabled veteran business enterprise for the purposes of the programs discussed above is subject to criminal penalties. Because a violation of the requirements of the bill would be a crime under those provisions, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 1918?
- AB 1918 is sponsored by Davis.
- What is the current status of AB 1918?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 16, 2010. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 1918?
- Track AB 1918 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1918
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1918
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →