AB 945 — Secretary of Food and Agriculture regulation: equine drugs: fruits, nuts, and vegetables standards.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 262, Statutes of 2009.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 26, 2009. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law prohibits, as specified, the showing of a horse at a public horse show, competition, or sale if the horse has been administered a prohibited substance. Existing law exempts from these provisions on the drugging of horses any individual horse show, competition, or sale that is certified by the Secretary of Food and Agriculture, with a 30-day written notice of a public hearing to the advisory committee, if the secretary determines that specified criteria are satisfied. This bill would delete the exemption from the provisions on the drugging of horses applicable to any horse show, competition, or sale certified by the secretary. Existing law generally creates standards for fruits, nuts, and vegetables. Existing law requires the Secretary of Food and Agriculture to create an industry-funded standardization program for the purpose of implementing these standards. Existing law requires the secretary to adopt regulations that he or she determines are reasonably necessary to carry out this program, including, but not limited to, establishing assessment rates and procedures for payment of assessments. Existing law repeals the standardization program provisions on January 1, 2010. This bill would extend the repeal date until January 1, 2015.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/11/09 - Chaptered Current pdf October 11, 2009
- Enrolled 09/17/09 - Enrolled pdf September 17, 2009
- Amended 04/13/09 - Amended Assembly pdf April 13, 2009
- Introduced 02/26/09 - Introduced pdf February 26, 2009
- AB945 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 262, Statutes of 2009.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and to the Governor at 11:30 a.m.
-
In Assembly. To enrollment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 2338.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (August 17).
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Joint Rule 62(a) suspended.
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (July 7).
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Referred to Com. on F. & A.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 1456.)
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 29).
-
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 15).
-
Re-referred to Com. on AGRI.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on AGRI. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on AGRI.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 29.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Committee on Agriculture · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Committee on Agriculture
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 36 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (41)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Ashburn | — | Yea |
| Benoit | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Not Voting |
| Florez | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Dutton | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Simitian | — | Yea |
| Steinberg | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Aanestad | — | Yea |
| Alquist | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Yea |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wright | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| DeSaulnier | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Padilla, Stephen C. | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 69% | 0% | 0% | 31% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yee | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Oropeza | — | Not Voting |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Kehoe | — | Yea |
| Walters | — | Yea |
| Wyland | — | Not Voting |
| Corbett | — | Yea |
| Cox | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 0% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Not Voting |
| Maldonado | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 77 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 85 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (92)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Carter | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Bill | — | Yea |
| Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Charles | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Blakeslee | — | Yea |
| Eng | — | Yea |
| Evans | — | Yea |
| Feuer | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Torre | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Not Voting |
| Furutani | — | Yea |
| Fletcher | — | Yea |
| Bonnie | — | Yea |
| V. | — | Yea |
| Manuel | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Portantino | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Saldana | — | Not Voting |
| Coto | — | Yea |
| Bass | — | Not Voting |
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Gilmore | — | Yea |
| Hagman | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Hayashi | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huber | — | Yea |
| Jeffries | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Lieu | — | Yea |
| Logue | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nava | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Ruskin | — | Yea |
| Silva | — | Yea |
| Smyth | — | Not Voting |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Tran | — | Yea |
| Villines | — | Yea |
| Adams | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Not Voting |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Blumenfield | — | Yea |
| Brownley | — | Yea |
| Buchanan | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huffman | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Nestande | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Swanson | — | Yea |
| Torrico | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Emmerson | — | Yea |
| Davis | — | Yea |
| DeVore | — | Yea |
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Garrick | — | Not Voting |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Caballero, Anna M. | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Fong, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Lowenthal, Josh | Democratic | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Niello, Roger W. | Republican | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Charles | — | Yea |
| De | — | Yea |
| Leon | — | Yea |
| Fuentes | — | Yea |
| John | — | Yea |
| A. | — | Yea |
| Perez | — | Yea |
| Audra | — | Yea |
| Duvall | — | Yea |
| Krekorian | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Price | — | Yea |
| Skinner | — | Yea |
| Solorio | — | Yea |
| Ammiano | — | Yea |
| Harkey | — | Yea |
| Miller | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Strickland, Tony | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Yamada | — | Yea |
| Tom | — | Yea |
| Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Conway | — | Yea |
| Ma | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 945 do?
- Existing law prohibits, as specified, the showing of a horse at a public horse show, competition, or sale if the horse has been administered a prohibited substance. Existing law exempts from these provisions on the drugging of horses any individual horse show, competition, or sale that is certified by the Secretary of Food and Agriculture, with a 30-day written notice of a public hearing to the advisory committee, if the secretary determines that specified criteria are satisfied. This bill would delete the exemption from the provisions on the drugging of horses applicable to any horse show, competition, or sale certified by the secretary. Existing law generally creates standards for fruits, nuts, and vegetables. Existing law requires the Secretary of Food and Agriculture to create an industry-funded standardization program for the purpose of implementing these standards. Existing law requires the secretary to adopt regulations that he or she determines are reasonably necessary to carry out this program, including, but not limited to, establishing assessment rates and procedures for payment of assessments. Existing law repeals the standardization program provisions on January 1, 2010. This bill would extend the repeal date until January 1, 2015.
- Who sponsors AB 945?
- AB 945 is sponsored by Committee on Agriculture.
- What is the current status of AB 945?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 26, 2009. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 945?
- Track AB 945 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 945
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 945
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →