SR 211 — A Resolution directing the Legislative Budget and Finance Committee to conduct a study and issue a report on the effectiveness and performance of the Municipalities Planning Code and its preparation for review and enforcement under the Department of Community and Economic Development.
Last action — (Remarks see Senate Journal Page 192-193), April 21, 2026
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced January 23, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the Senate.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
9 sponsors
1 primary, 8 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (6 D · 3 R) — cross-party backing.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
In plain language
The bill directs a study on the Municipalities Planning Code's effectiveness and performance.
This resolution asks the Legislative Budget and Finance Committee to study how well the Municipalities Planning Code works. It will evaluate its performance and readiness for review by the Department of Community and Economic Development.
Summary
Conducting an LBFC Study on the Municipal Planning Code
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
43 added · 75 removedPlain-language change summary
In the latest version of Bill SR 211, some lines were added to clarify the role of the Department of Community and Economic Development regarding the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code. The amendments emphasize that the department will not only oversee implementation but also support local governments through education and assistance. Additionally, the language was refined to highlight the need for the code to remain relevant to current needs. These changes matter because they aim to ensure that local planning regulations are effective and up-to-date, which can significantly impact community development and governance.
PRIOR PRINTER'S NO.
1401 PRINTER'STHE NO.GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE RESOLUTION Session of No.
1507211 THE2026 GENERALINTRODUCED ASSEMBLYBY OFSCHWANK, PENNSYLVANIACOSTA, SENATEKIM, BAKER, SANTARSIERO, VOGEL, FONTANA, CULVER AND COMITTA, JANUARY 23, 2026 REFERRED TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT, JANUARY 23, 2026 A RESOLUTION SessionDirecting the Legislative Budget and Finance Committee to performance of No.the Municipalities Planning Code and its and preparation for review and enforcement under the Department of Community and Economic Development.
211 2026 INTRODUCED BY SCHWANK, COSTA, KIM, BAKER, SANTARSIERO, VOGEL, FONTANA, CULVER AND COMITTA, JANUARY 23, 2026 SENATOR KEEFER, LOCAL GOVERNMENT, AS AMENDED, MARCH 17, 2026 A RESOLUTION Directing the Legislative Budget and Finance Committee to conduct a study and issue a report on the effectiveness and performance of the Municipalities Planning Code and its preparation for review and enforcement under the Department of Community and Economic Development.
and WHEREAS, The primary task of the Governor's Center for Local Government Services is to oversee the implementation and <-- enforcement of PROVIDE ASSISTANCE AND EDUCATION ON the act of <-- July 31, 1968 (P.L.805, No.247), known as the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code (Municipalities Planning Code);
and WHEREAS, The Department of Community and Economic Development is tasked to ensure that OVERSEES THE GOVERNOR'S CENTER FOR <-- LOCAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES AND IS TASKED TO ENSURE THAT PUBLICATIONS AND INFORMATION ON the Municipalities Planning Code remains current and relevant to properly meet the needs of this Commonwealth;
and <-- (4) a list of topics and issues that should be 20260SR0211PN1507 - 2 - considered prior to the General Assembly proceeding with legislation that would comprehensively update the 20260SR0211PN1401 - 2 - Municipalities Planning Code;
(5) AN EXAMINATION OF THE PREVALENCE, IMPACTS, STRENGTHS <-- AND LIMITATIONS OF TRADITIONAL ZONING PRACTICES ENABLED UNDER THE MUNICIPALITIES PLANNING CODE, INCLUDING:
(I) USE-BASED SEGREGATION OF LAND SUCH AS SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS VERSUS MULTIFAMILY, COMMERCIAL OR MIXED-USE DISTRICTS;
(II) HIERARCHICAL RESTRICTIONS, MINIMUM LOT SIZES, SETBACKS, HEIGHT LIMITS AND DENSITY CONTROLS;
AND (III) EFFECTS ON HOUSING SUPPLY, AFFORDABILITY, URBAN SPRAWL, INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS, NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER, PROPERTY VALUES AND WALKABILITY/VIBRANCY;
AND (6) A REVIEW OF INCREMENTAL REFORMS TO ZONING THAT COULD IMPROVE OUTCOMES WHILE PRESERVING COMMUNITY CONTROL AND COMPATIBILITY SUCH AS:
(I) RELAXING SINGLE-FAMILY-ONLY ZONING TO PERMIT DUPLEXES, TRIPLEXES, TOWNHOMES, COTTAGE CLUSTERS OR OTHER MISSING MIDDLE HOUSING TYPES IN APPROPRIATE AREAS;
(II) REDUCING OR ELIMINATING MINIMUM LOT SIZE REQUIREMENTS TO SUPPORT MORE EFFICIENT LAND USE;
(III) AUTHORIZING OR INCENTIVIZING ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS ON SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS WITH STREAMLINED PERMITTING;
(IV) PROMOTING MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT IN DESIGNATED CORRIDORS OR NODES TO FOSTER WALKABLE, VIBRANT COMMUNITIES WITH HOUSING NEAR JOBS AND AMENITIES;
AND (V) STREAMLINING ZONING APPROVAL PROCESSES TO MINIMIZE BUREAUCRATIC DELAYS, APPEALS AND COSTS WHILE 20260SR0211PN1507 - 3 - MAINTAINING LOCAL INPUT AND STANDARDS;
20260SR0211PN150720260SR0211PN1401 - 43 -
Action History
-
(Remarks see Senate Journal Page 192-193), April 21, 2026
-
Adopted, April 21, 2026 (46-2)
-
Reported as amended, March 17, 2026
-
Referred to LOCAL GOVERNMENT, Jan. 23, 2026
Sponsors
- Judith L. Schwank · Primary
- Jay Costa · Cosponsor
- Patty Kim · Cosponsor
- Lisa Baker · Cosponsor
- Elder A. Vogel · Cosponsor
- Wayne D. Fontana · Cosponsor
- Lynda Schlegel Culver · Cosponsor
- Carolyn T. Comitta · Cosponsor
- Steven J. Santarsiero · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 8 co-sponsors · 244 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Judith L. Schwank Democratic
Co-sponsors (8)
- Jay Costa Democratic
- Patty Kim Democratic
- Lisa Baker Republican
- Elder A. Vogel Republican
- Wayne D. Fontana Democratic
- Lynda Schlegel Culver Republican
- Carolyn T. Comitta Democratic
- Steven J. Santarsiero Democratic
Not signed on (244)
244 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 244 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 25 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 20 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 46 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 4% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (50)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anthony Williams | — | Yea |
| Amanda M. Cappelletti | Democratic | Yea |
| Art Haywood | Democratic | Yea |
| Carolyn T. Comitta | Democratic | Yea |
| Christine M. Tartaglione | Democratic | Yea |
| James Andrew Malone | Democratic | Yea |
| Jay Costa | Democratic | Yea |
| John I. Kane | Democratic | Yea |
| Judith L. Schwank | Democratic | Yea |
| Katie J. Muth | Democratic | Nay |
| Lindsey M. Williams | Democratic | Yea |
| Lisa M. Boscola | Democratic | Yea |
| Maria Collett | Democratic | Yea |
| Marty Flynn | Democratic | Yea |
| Nick Miller | Democratic | Yea |
| Nick Pisciottano | Democratic | Yea |
| Nikil Saval | Democratic | Yea |
| Patty Kim | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Sharif Street | Democratic | Yea |
| Steven J. Santarsiero | Democratic | Yea |
| Timothy P. Kearney | Democratic | Yea |
| Vincent J. Hughes | Democratic | Yea |
| Wayne D. Fontana | Democratic | Yea |
| Camera Bartolotta | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Gebhard | Republican | Yea |
| Cris Dush | Republican | Yea |
| Daniel Laughlin | Republican | Yea |
| David G. Argall | Republican | Yea |
| Dawn W. Keefer | Republican | Yea |
| Devlin J. Robinson | Republican | Yea |
| Doug Mastriano | Republican | Yea |
| Elder A. Vogel | Republican | Yea |
| Frank A. Farry | Republican | Yea |
| Gene Yaw | Republican | Yea |
| Greg Rothman | Republican | Yea |
| Jarrett Coleman | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Picozzi | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Pittman | Republican | Yea |
| Judy Ward | Republican | Yea |
| Kim L. Ward | Republican | Yea |
| Kristin Phillips-Hill | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Baker | Republican | Yea |
| Lynda Schlegel Culver | Republican | Yea |
| Michele Brooks | Republican | Yea |
| Patrick J. Stefano | Republican | Yea |
| Rosemary M. Brown | Republican | Yea |
| Scott E. Hutchinson | Republican | Nay |
| Scott Martin | Republican | Yea |
| Tracy Pennycuick | Republican | Not Voting |
| Wayne Langerholc | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SR 211 do?
- Conducting an LBFC Study on the Municipal Planning Code
- Who sponsors SR 211?
- SR 211 is sponsored by Judith L. Schwank (Democratic), Jay Costa (Democratic), Patty Kim (Democratic), Lisa Baker (Republican), Elder A. Vogel (Republican), Wayne D. Fontana (Democratic), Lynda Schlegel Culver (Republican), Carolyn T. Comitta (Democratic), and Steven J. Santarsiero (Democratic).
- What is the current status of SR 211?
- This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced January 23, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track SR 211?
- Track SR 211 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SR 211
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SR 211
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →