Change and eliminate payment provisions for road construction costs relating to utility facilities
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when LB 542 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on LB 542.
You're tracking LB 542
We'll email you the moment it moves.
LB 542 — Change and eliminate payment provisions for road construction costs relating to utility facilities
Last action — Indefinitely postponed
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Legislature
-
4To Executive
-
5Enacted
This bill is in committee in the Legislature. Introduced January 22, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the Legislature.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
- Introduced View text Current pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill updates definitions and changes provisions related to utility facilities in Nebraska's statutes.
-
Section 14-2113
the natural gas supply and the water supply of the district for domestic, mechanical, public, and fire purposes→ the natural gas supply and the water supply of the districtThis change removes the specification of the purposes for which the gas and water supply is managed.
-
Section 39-1304.02
the purpose of this section: ,→ For purposesThis change corrects the introductory phrase to improve clarity.
-
Section 39-1304.02
Cost includes the term cost of relocation shall include the entire amount paid by a such utility properly attributable to any such alteration, change, moving, or relocation after deducting therefrom any increase in value of the new facility and any salvage value derived from the old facility; .→ the term cost of relocation shall include the entire amount paid by a utility properly attributable to any such alteration, change, moving, or relocation after deducting any increase in value of the new facility and any salvage value derived from the old facility.This change clarifies the definition of 'cost' for relocation without altering its meaning.
-
Section 39-1304.02
to accomplish such alteration, change, moving, or relocation of a utility facility located in, over, along, or under any highway which at any time was on or designated as a part of the National System of Interstate and Defense Highways but has been removed for any reason shall not be paid by the state on or after July 1, 1993, and the total amount paid from May 5, 1983, until July 1, 1993, including any federal-aid funds, shall not exceed five million dollars.This change removes outdated payment terms related to utility facility relocations that are no longer applicable.
-
Section 39-1304.02
of the state highway system; or→ of the state highway system;This change removes the unnecessary conjunction 'or' at the end of the list.
-
Section 39-1304.02
Utility facility includes:→ Utility facility means:This change adjusts the terminology for definition clarity.
Action History
-
Indefinitely postponed
-
Title printed. Carryover bill
-
Notice of hearing for February 24, 2025
-
Referred to Transportation and Telecommunications Committee
-
Date of introduction
Sponsors
- Robert Dover · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 48 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (48)
48 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 48 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors LB 542?
- LB 542 is sponsored by Robert Dover.
- What is the current status of LB 542?
- This bill is in committee in the Legislature. Introduced January 22, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track LB 542?
- Track LB 542 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on LB 542
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of LB 542
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →