SB 835 — Modifies provisions relating to court procedures
Last action — Signed by Governor
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 01, 2025. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Mike Kehoe (Republican) on July 13, 2026.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
In plain language
This bill modifies various procedures related to court operations and insurance claims.
The bill updates court procedures including how insurance claims work and establishes guidelines for treatment courts. It also modifies filing fees in St. Louis and outlines new rules for garnishment procedures.
What this means for you
- Workers: Changes to garnishment rules may affect how wages are garnished, ensuring better protection for workers’ income.
Summary
CCS/HCS/SS/SCS/SBs 835 & 1111 - This act modifies provisions relating to court procedures. INSURER'S LEGAL TITLE TO CLAIM PAID AND ASSIGNMENT OF POST-LOSS INSURANCE BENEFIT (SECTION 379.135) Upon payment by an insurer of all or any part of a claimant's property damage claim, legal title to the portion of the claim paid shall vest in the insurer to the extent of such payment. No assignment or other action by the claimant shall be required for the insurer to enforce its legal title. The claimant shall retain legal title only to that portion of the property damage claim not paid by the insurer. This act prohibits assignment of post-loss benefits under any policy of insurance covering property, including, but not limited to, any right of action against the insurer or any proceeds acquired from the insurer. A person shall not solicit or accept an assignment, in whole or in part, of any post-loss insurance benefit for property damage under a contract of insurance. Any agreement to assign post-loss benefits is null and void. The provisions of this act shall not apply to an assignment, transfer, pledge, or conveyance granted to a financial institution, mortgagee, lienholder, or a subsequent purchaser of the property. A violation of this act shall be considered a level two insurance violation. This provision is substantially similar to a provision in SS/HB 3205 (2026) and in HCS/HB 3328 (2026), and is similar to a provision in SCS/SB 1543 (2026) and in the truly agreed to and finally passed SS/HB 2636 (2026). STATEWIDE COURT AUTOMATION (SECTION 476.055) This act modifies provisions of law related to the Statewide Court Automation Committee ("Committee"). Specifically, this act provides that the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Missouri, the Executive Director of the Missouri Office of Prosecution Services, and the Director of the Missouri State Public Defender System shall now serve as ex-officio members. For the House and Senate members on the Committee, one shall be a member of the majority party and one shall be a member of the minority party. Furthermore, the appointed members of the Committee shall serve for terms of two years or until their successors are appointed. Members of the Committee may also be reimbursed from the Statewide Court Automation Fund for actual expenses related to the duties of the Committee. Furthermore, this act provides that the Committee shall maintain, rather than implement, a statewide court automation system. This act also describes "confidential judicial record" for purposes of the offenses related to releasing information from a confidential judicial record as those provided by Missouri Supreme Court Rules. Currently, the Committee is required to file a report on the progress of the statewide court automation system with the chairs of certain House and Senate Committees on the February 1st, May 1st, August 1st, and November 1st of each year. Instead, this act provides that the report shall be filed electronically on January 15th of each year. Lastly, this act removes the expiration of the Committee upon completion of its duties. These provisions are identical to provisions in HCS/SB 945 (2026), in HCS/SB 1067 (2026), and in HCS/HB 3289 (2026). TREATMENT COURTS (SECTION 478.003) This act provides that in each treatment court division without a treatment court administrator or a treatment court commissioner, the court shall employ a treatment court administrator, subject to appropriations or other funds available. If other funds available are used, the source shall reimburse the state for the costs of the salary and benefits of the administrator. This provision is identical to a provision in HCS/SB 945 (2026), in HCS/SB 1067 (2026), and in HCS/HB 3289 (2026) and is similar to HB 3468 (2026). 25TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT (MARIES, PHELPS, PULASKI & TEXAS) - CIRCUIT JUDGES (SECTION 478.700) This act codifies three circuit judges, including the circuit judge approved in the FY2026 appropriation and appointed by the Governor in 2026, in the 25th Judicial Circuit, consisting of the counties of Maries, Phelps, Pulaski & Texas. The circuit judge appointed in 2026 shall serve until January 1, 2029, and then the position shall be filled by an election of a four year term in 2028 and then a full six year term in 2032 and thereafter. This provision is identical to a provision in HCS/SB 945 (2026), in HCS/SB 1067 (2026), in HCS/HBs 2968, 2427 & 3086 (2026), and HB 3229 (2026). ST. LOUIS CITY CIVIL CASE FILING FEE (SECTION 488.426) Currently, any circuit court may collect a civil case filing surcharge of an amount not to exceed $15 for the maintenance of a law library, the county's or circuit's family services and justice fund, or courtroom renovation and technology enhancement. If the circuit court reimburses the state for salaries of family court commissioners or is the circuit court in Jackson County, the surcharge may be up to $20. This act provides that the circuit court in the City of St. Louis may charge a filing surcharge up to $20. This provision is identical to a provision in HCS/SB 945 (2026), in the perfected SS#2/SCS/SB 1023 (2026), in HCS/SB 1067 (2026), in SCS/SB 1468 (2026), in SCS/HB 3000 (2026), SB 18 (2025), in HCS/HB 83 (2025), in SCS/HCS/HB 176 (2025), in SB 352 (2025), in SCS/HCS/HB 615 (2025), SB 800 (2025), in HB 1512 (2024), and in SCS/HCS/HB 2064 & HCS#2/HB 1886 (2024), and is substantially similar to a provision in SCS/SB 897 (2024), SB 1023 (2024), CCS/HCS/SS/SCS/SB 72 (2023), SB 252 (2023), HB 787 (2023), in HCS/HB 986 (2023), in the perfected HCS/HBs 994, 52 & 984 (2023), SB 1209 (2022), HB 1963 (2022), HB 143 (2021), HB 1554 (2020), HB 1224 (2019), in the perfected HCS/HB 1083 (2019), HB 1891 (2018), SB 288 (2017), HB 391 (2017), and SB 812 (2016). ATTACHMENT, EXECUTION, AND GARNISHMENTS (SECTIONS 513.380 TO 525.235) This act modifies provisions relating to attachment, execution, and garnishments. Under current law, whenever an execution against the property of any judgment debtor shall be returned unsatisfied, within five years of the return, the judgment creditor may be entitled to an order by the court rendering such judgment, requiring the judgment debtor to undergo an examination on the ability and means to satisfy the judgment, and in the case of neglect or refusal, issuing a writ of attachment and punishing the judgment debtor for contempt. This act instead provides a judgment creditor shall, upon motion made at any time before the judgment is satisfied of record and presumed paid, be entitled to such orders. Additionally, under current law, a judgment debtor may be granted immunity from prosecution by any prosecuting or circuit attorney for statements made at a judgment debtor's examination. This act instead provides that a judgment debtor shall enjoy full use and derivative immunity and that no testimony in an examination may be used against a witness, except in cases of perjury or for giving false statements. This act changes the maximum value, adjusted annually for inflation, of certain items that are exempt from attachment and execution, including household items, wedding rings and other jewelry, motor vehicles, and mobile homes. This act also modifies the homestead exemption from $15,000 to the aggregate value of $40,000. This act provides that the maximum value for the property that is exempted from attachment and execution and the amount of a homestead exemption shall be adjusted by the Revisor of Statutes every three years beginning April 1, 2029. This act outlines orders of garnishment issued for the purpose of attaching to account funds held by a financial institution, as such term is defined in the act. Such orders shall attach on the date of service, provided that the effective date of service is a banking day and made prior to the business cutoff time, in which case it shall attach the next business day. If an account receives electronic deposits for exempted funds, the attachment date shall be the date and banking day that the financial institution applies for the look-back analysis. Additionally, where there are two or more accounts, the amount may be withheld from any of the accounts belonging to the judgment debtor and attachment dates between the accounts may be different depending on the look-back analysis. If the account is held in joint tenancy with an individual not subject to the order of garnishment, the entire amount shall be withheld and the garnishee shall provide a copy of the order of garnishment to each account holder within two business days. Within 30 days of the date of the attachment of the garnishment, each account holder may file an objection or request of exemption of all or a portion of the account with the issuing court and serve their objection or request on the garnishor and the garnishee. If such objection or request is not resolved within 30 days of the timely filing of the objection or request of exemption, the garnishee may pay the garnished funds to the circuit court to be held for pending resolution. The return date for orders of garnishment shall not be less than 30 days from the effective date of service. This act also provides certain information to be included in orders of garnishment for funds held by financial institutions. No party shall seek a garnishment of account funds held by a financial institution unless there is a good-faith belief that the party to be served with the garnishment has, or will have, account assets of the judgment debtor. No more than one garnishment for the same claim and against the same judgment debtor shall be issued within any 30-day period, unless exempted by court order as detailed in the act. Furthermore, a financial institution does not have a duty to investigate or assert the defenses of a judgment debtor. A financial institution served with an order of garnishment and interrogatories shall answer within 20 days and shall release funds to the judgment debtor 60 days after an answer is submitted or sooner if required under an order to pay or paid into the court. A financial institution is not required to respond to interrogatories not related to account funds. This act does not apply to wage garnishments or garnishments of property other than account funds. Garnishees are also not required to search for, hold, or return wages or other property. The provisions relating to orders of garnishment of account funds held by financial institutions shall be implemented and administered in accordance with rules of the Supreme Court of Missouri. A garnishee acting in good faith compliance with a facially valid order of garnishment shall not be liable to any debtor, creditor, or other person for withholding, restraining, or releasing funds in reasonable reliance upon the terms of the writ or order. A garnishee shall not be required to adjudicate competing claims to property or funds, determine the legal validity of the judgment, or investigate facts outside the information contained in the writ or the garnishee's business records. A garnishee shall be liable for damages arising from a garnishment only if the garnishee fails to follow the clear and express terms of the writ or order, such failure constitutes gross negligence or willful misconduct, and actual damages are proven. A garnishee shall not be liable if correction is made within five business days after receiving written notice identifying the alleged error and the garnishee promptly releases any improperly restrained funds. However, temporarily restraining funds pending review of a claimed exemption shall not create liability if the garnishee, garnishor, and judgment debtor or other persons act as required by law. The provisions of this act relating to orders of garnishment for funds held by financial institutions shall be effective on January 1, 2028, while the provisions of this act relating to the attachment and execution are effective January 1, 2027. These provisions are identical to the truly agreed to and finally passed SS/HCS/HB 1870 (2026) and are similar to HB 275 (2025) and HB 1657 (2024). UNIFORM PUBLIC EXPRESSION PROTECTION ACT (SECTION 537.529 AND THE REPEAL OF SECTION 537.528) This act establishes the "Uniform Public Expression Protection Act". Currently, any action against a person for conduct or speech undertaken or made in connection with a public hearing or meeting in a quasi-judicial proceeding before a tribunal or decision-making body of the state or a political subdivision thereof is subject to a special motion to dismiss, a motion for judgment on the pleadings, or motion for summary judgment and any such motion shall be considered by the court on a priority or expedited basis. This act repeals this provision and creates procedures for dismissal of causes of action asserted in a civil action based on a person's: (1) Communication in a legislative, executive, judicial, administrative, or other governmental proceeding; (2) Communication on an issue under consideration or review in a legislative, executive, judicial, administrative, or other governmental proceeding; or (3) Exercise of the right of freedom of speech or of the press, the right to assemble or petition, or the right of association, guaranteed by the United States Constitution or the Missouri Constitution, on a matter of public concern. However, this act shall not apply to a cause of action asserted: (1) Against a governmental unit, as described in the act, or an employee or agent of a governmental unit acting in an official capacity; (2) By a governmental unit or an employee or agent of a governmental unit acting in an official capacity to enforce a law to protect against an imminent threat to public health or safety; or (3) Against a person primarily engaged in the business of selling or leasing goods or services if the cause of action arises out of a communication related to the sale or lease of such goods or services. No later than 60 days after a party is served with a complaint, cross-claim, counterclaim, third-party claim, or other pleading that asserts a cause of action covered by this act, or at a later time upon a showing of good cause, a party may file a special motion to dismiss. The court shall hear and rule on such motion no later than 60 days after the filing of the motion, unless the court orders a later hearing to allow for limited discovery or upon good cause. However, this act provides that the court shall hear and rule on the motion for dismissal no later than 60 days after the order allowing for discovery. This act provides that all other proceedings between the moving party and the responding party in the action, including discovery and any pending hearings or motions, shall be stayed upon the filing of the special motion to dismiss. Additionally, this act provides that the court may stay, upon motion by the moving party, a hearing or motion involving another party or discovery by another party if a ruling on such hearing or motion or discovery relates to a legal or factual issue. Any stay pursuant to this act shall remain in effect until the entry of an order ruling on the special motion to dismiss and the expiration of the time to appeal the order. A moving party may appeal an order denying the special motion to dismiss in whole or in part within 21 days of such order. If a party appeals an order ruling on a special motion to dismiss, this act provides that all proceedings between all parties shall be stayed until the conclusion of the appeal. The court may allow discovery if a party shows that specific information is necessary to establish whether a party has satisfied or failed to satisfy the requirements of this act and such information is not reasonably available without discovery. Additionally, a motion for costs and expenses, voluntary dismissal, or a motion to sever shall not be stayed. During a stay, the court upon good cause may hear and rule on any motions unrelated to the special motion to dismiss and any motions seeking a special or preliminary injunction to protect against an imminent threat to public health or safety. In ruling on a special motion to dismiss, this act provides that the court shall consider the parties' pleadings, the motion, any replies and responses to the motion, and any evidence that could be considered in a ruling on a motion for summary judgment. The court shall dismiss the cause of action with prejudice if: (1) The moving party has established that the cause of action is covered by this act; (2) The responding party has failed to establish that this act does not apply to the cause of action; and (3) Either the responding party failed to establish a prima facie case as to each essential element of the cause of action, or the moving party has established that the responding party failed to state a cause of action upon which relief can be granted or that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. A voluntary dismissal without prejudice of a cause of action that is subject to a special motion to dismiss pursuant to this act shall not affect the moving party's right to obtain a ruling on the motion and seek costs, reasonable attorneys' fees, and reasonable litigation expenses. Additionally, if the moving party prevails on the motion, this act provides that such costs, fees, and expenses shall be awarded to the moving party. A voluntary dismissal with prejudice of a cause of action that is subject to a special motion to dismiss establishes that the moving party prevailed on the motion. The responding party shall be entitled to such costs, fees, and expenses if the responding party prevails on the motion and the court finds that the motion was frivolous or filed solely with the intent to delay the proceeding. Finally, this act applies to causes of action filed or asserted on or after August 28, 2026. These provisions are identical to the truly agreed to and finally passed SB 1067 (2026), provisions in SCS/SB 1468 (2026), SB 503 (2025), in SCS/HCS/HB 615 (2025), in SCS/HCS/HB 1259 (2025), and SB 1293 (2024) and are substantially similar to HB 2666 (2026), provisions in HCS/HB 83 (2025), in SCS/HCS/HB 176 (2025), in SB 352 (2025), HB 1092 (2025), in SCS/SB 897 (2024), HB 1785 (2024), in SCS/HCS/HB 2064 & HCS#2/HB 1886 (2024), in CCS/HCS/SS/SCS/SB 72 (2023), SB 432 (2023), HB 750 (2023), SB 1219 (2022), in HCS/SS#2/SCS/SB 968 (2022), HB 2624 (2022), and HB 1151 (2021). KATIE O'BRIEN
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
629 added · 84 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendments to SB 835 involve the repeal of several existing sections related to court procedures and the introduction of new sections, including changes in how property damage claims are managed. Notably, when an insurance company pays a claimant for property damage, the insurer automatically gains legal ownership of the amount paid, simplifying the process for insurers to enforce their rights. These changes matter because they clarify the legal relationship between insurers and claimants, potentially speeding up claims resolution and reducing disputes over property damage payments. Additionally, the revisions to sections regarding garnishments streamline procedures for creditors seeking to enforce judgments against debtors, ensuring that court processes are more efficient.
SECOND REGULAR SESSION [PERFECTED][TRULYAGREED TOAND FINALLY PASSED] CONFERENCE COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILLS NOS.
835 & 1111 103RD GENERALASSEMBLY INTRODUCED5285S.11T BYANACT SENATORTo CRAWFORD.repeal sections 476.055, 478.003, 478.700, 488.426, 513.380, 513.430, 513.475, and 537.528, RSMo, and to enact in lieu thereof eleven new sections relating to court procedures, with penalty provisions and an effective date for certain sections.
5285S.05P KRISTINAMARTIN, Secretary ANACT To repeal sections 513.380, 513.430, and 513.475, RSMo, and to enact in lieu thereof five new sections relating to garnishments, with an effective date for certain sections.
Sections 476.055, 478.003, 478.700, 488.426, 513.380, 513.430, 513.475, and 513.475,537.528, RSMo, are repealed and fiveeleven new sections enacted in lieu thereof, to be known as sections 379.135, 476.055, 478.003, 478.700, 488.426, 513.380, 513.423, 513.430, 513.475, 525.235, and 525.235,537.529, to read as follows:
513.380.379.135.
[WheneverUpon anpayment executionby againstan theinsurer property of anyall judgment debtor, individual or corporate, issued from any courtpart inof thisa state,claimant's shallproperty bedamage returnedclaim, unsatisfied,legal intitle wholeto or in part, by any sheriff or other proper officer, the] A judgment creditor [in such execution, his executor, administrator or assign, may,] shall upon motion made at any time [within five years after such return so made] before the judgmentportion has been satisfied of record by the judgmentclaim creditor and before the judgment being presumed paid andshall satisfiedvest underin sectionthe 516.350,insurer be entitled to an order by the courtextent rendering such judgment, requiring the judgment debtor or, in the case of a corporate judgment debtor, its chief officer to appear before such courtpayment. at a EXPLANATION-Matter enclosed in bold-faced brackets [thus] in this bill is not enacted and is intended to be omitted in the law.
SSNo SCSassignment SBs 835 & 1111 2 time and place in said order to be named, to undergo an examination under oath touching his or herother abilityaction andby means to satisfy said judgment, and in case of neglect or refusal on the partclaimant ofshall suchbe judgmentrequired debtorfor or, in the caseinsurer of a corporate debtor, its chief officer to obeyenforce such order, such court is hereby authorized to issue a writ of attachment against said debtor, as now provided by law, and to punish him or, in the case of a corporate debtor, its chieflegal officertitle. for contempt.
The claimant shall retain legal title only to that portion of the property damage claim not paid by the insurer.
EXPLANATION-Matter enclosed in bold-faced brackets [thus] in this bill is not enacted and is intended to be omitted in the law.
CCS HCS SS SCS SBs 835 & 1111 2.
As used in this section, "assignment agreement" means any instrument by which post-loss benefits under any policy of insurance covering property, including, but not limited to, any right of action against the insurer or any proceeds acquired from the insurer are assigned, transferred, or acquired in any other manner, in whole or in part, to or from a person providing services, including, but not limited to, communicating with an insurer or on an insured's behalf or inspecting, estimating, protecting, repairing, restoring, or replacing the property or mitigating against further damage to the property.
3.
(1) A person shall not solicit or accept an assignment, in whole or in part, of any post-loss insurance benefit for property damage under a contract of insurance.
An assignment agreement is against public policy and is null and void, and any contract entered into in violation of this section shall be void and unenforceable;
and (2) The provisions of this subsection shall not apply to an assignment, transfer, pledge, or conveyance granted to a financial institution, mortgagee, lienholder, or a subsequent purchaser of the property;
and (3) The provisions of this subsection shall not apply to any covenant not to execute or contract to limit recovery under section 537.065.
4.
A violation of subsection 3 of this section shall be considered a level two violation under section 374.049.
5.
Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit an insured from authorizing or directing payment to, or paying, a person for services, materials, or any other thing which may be, or is, covered under an insurance policy.
Insurers shall issue payment directly to a person for services, materials, and other items that are covered CCS HCS SS SCS SBs 835 & 1111 under an insurance policy, when the insured agrees that any person providing such services should be paid directly, subject to applicable liens.
476.055.
1.
There is hereby established in the state treasury the "Statewide Court Automation Fund".
All moneys collected pursuant to section 488.027, as well as gifts, contributions, devises, bequests, and grants received relating to statewide court automation [of judicial record keeping], and moneys received by the [judicial system] judiciary for the dissemination of information [and], sales of publications, or other provision of electronic services developed relating to statewide court automation [of judicial record keeping], as authorized by the court automation committee, shall be credited to the fund.
Moneys credited to this fund may only be used for the purposes set forth in this section and as appropriated by the general assembly.
Any unexpended balance remaining in the statewide court automation fund at the end of each biennium shall not be subject to the provisions of section 33.080 requiring the transfer of such unexpended balance to general revenue.
The statewide court automation fund shall be administered by a court automation committee consisting of the following[:
the chief justice of the supreme court,] members:
(1) A judge from the court of appeals, four circuit judges, four associate circuit judges, four employees of [the circuit court,] circuit courts, and two employees who work full time in a municipal division of a circuit court, [the commissioner of administration,] each of whom shall be appointed by the chief justice of the Missouri supreme court;
(2) Two members of the Missouri Bar, appointed by the board of governors of the Missouri Bar;
CCS HCS SS SCS SBs 835 & 1111 (3) Two members of the house of representatives appointed by the speaker of the house, with one member being from the majority party and one member being from the minority party;
(4) Two members of the senate appointed by the president pro [tem] tempore of the senate, with one member being from the majority party and one member being from the minority party;
and (5) Four additional ex officio members as follows:
(a) The chief justice of the Missouri supreme court, or the chief justice's designee;
(b) The commissioner of administration, or the commissioner's designee;
(c) The executive director of the Missouri [Office of Prosecution Services,] office of prosecution services, or the executive director's designee;
and (d) The director of the state public defender system, [and two members of the Missouri Bar.
The judge members and employee members shall be appointed by the chief justice.
The commissioner of administration shall serve ex officio.
Show all 232 changed lines (192 more)
The members of the Missouri Bar shall be appointed by the board of governors of the Missouri Bar.
Any member of the committee may designate another person to serve on the committee in place of the committee member] or the director's designee.
The appointed members of the committee shall serve for terms of two years and until their successors are appointed and qualified.
The members of the committee shall be reimbursed from the statewide court automation fund for their actual expenses in performing their official duties on the committee.
CCS HCS SS SCS SBs 835 & 1111 3.
The committee shall develop and [implement a plan for] maintain a statewide court automation system.
The committee shall have the authority to hire consultants, review systems in other jurisdictions, and purchase goods and services to administer the provisions of this section.
The committee may implement [one or more] pilot projects in the state [for the purposes of determining the feasibility of developing and implementing such plan.
The members of the committee shall be reimbursed from the court automation fund for their actual expenses in performing their official duties on the committee] at any time.
4.
Any purchase of computer software or computer hardware that exceeds five thousand dollars shall be made pursuant to the requirements of the office of administration for lowest and best bid.
Such bids shall be subject to acceptance by the office of administration.
The court automation committee shall determine the specifications for such bids.
5.
The court automation committee shall not require any circuit court to change any operating system in such court, unless the committee provides all [necessary] personnel, funds, and equipment necessary to effectuate the required changes.
No judicial circuit or county may be reimbursed for any costs incurred pursuant to this subsection unless such judicial circuit or county has the approval of the court automation committee prior to incurring the specific cost.
6.
[Any] The court automation system, including any pilot project, shall be [implemented,] operated and maintained in accordance with strict standards for the security and privacy of confidential judicial records, as provided by supreme court rule.
Any person who knowingly CCS HCS SS SCS SBs 835 & 1111 releases information from a confidential judicial record is guilty of a class B misdemeanor.
Any person who, knowing that a judicial record is confidential, uses information from such confidential judicial record for financial gain is guilty of a class E felony.
7.
[On the first day of February, May, August and November] No later than the fifteenth of January of each year, the court automation committee shall electronically file a report on the progress of the statewide court automation system with the chairs of the following committees:
(1) The [chair of the] house budget committee, or its successor committee;
(2) The [chair of the] senate appropriations committee, or its successor committee;
(3) The [chair of the] house judiciary committee, or its successor committee;
and (4) The [chair of the] senate judiciary committee, or its successor committee.
[8.
The court automation committee established pursuant to this section may continue to function until completion of its duties prescribed by this section.] 478.003.
1.
In any judicial circuit of this state, a majority of the judges of the circuit court may designate a judge to hear cases arising in the circuit subject to the provisions of sections 478.001 to 478.009.
In lieu thereof and subject to appropriations or other funds available for such purpose, a majority of the judges of the circuit court may appoint a person or persons to act as treatment court commissioners.
Each commissioner shall be appointed for a term of four years, but may be removed at any time by a majority of the judges of the circuit court.
The CCS HCS SS SCS SBs 835 & 1111 qualifications, compensation, and retirement benefits of the commissioner shall be the same as that of an associate circuit judge.
If the compensation of a commissioner appointed pursuant to this section is provided from other than state funds, the source of such fund shall pay to and reimburse the state for the actual costs of the salary and benefits of the commissioner.
The commissioner shall have all the powers and duties of a circuit judge, except that any order, judgment or decree of the commissioner shall be confirmed or rejected by an associate circuit or circuit judge by order of record entered within the time the judge could set aside such order, judgment or decree had the same been made by the judge.
If so confirmed, the order, judgment or decree shall have the same effect as if made by the judge on the date of its confirmation.
2.
The Missouri supreme court may assign a treatment court commissioner to serve in the treatment court division of a circuit other than the circuit in which the commissioner is appointed.
The transfer shall only be ordered with the consent and approval of the presiding judge of the circuit to which the commissioner is to be assigned.
3.
A treatment court commissioner may serve as a commissioner in any treatment court as designated by the treatment court coordinating commission, subject to local court rules.
4.
In each circuit having a treatment court division that has neither a treatment court administrator nor a treatment court commissioner, the court shall employ a treatment court administrator, subject to appropriations or other funds available for such purpose.
If the compensation of an administrator employed pursuant to this subsection is provided from other than state funds, the source of such CCS HCS SS SCS SBs 835 & 1111 funds shall pay to and reimburse the state for the actual costs of the salary and benefits of the administrator.
478.700.
1.
There shall be [two] three circuit judges in the twenty-fifth judicial circuit [consisting of the counties of Maries, Phelps, Pulaski and Texas].
These judges shall sit in divisions numbered one [and], two, and three.
These judgeships shall include the circuit judgeship created in fiscal year 2026 under section 478.330.
2.
The circuit judge in division two shall be elected in 1980.
The circuit judge in division one shall be elected in 1982.
The circuit judge appointed by the governor in 2025 for division three shall serve until January 1, 2029.
A circuit judge for division three shall be elected in 2028 for a four-year term and in 2032 for a full six-year term and every six years thereafter.
488.426.
1.
The judges of the circuit court, en banc, in any circuit in this state may require any party filing a civil case in the circuit court, at the time of filing the suit, to deposit with the clerk of the court a surcharge in addition to all other deposits required by law or court rule.
Sections 488.426 to 488.432 shall not apply to proceedings when costs are waived or are to be paid by the county or state or any city.
2.
The surcharge in effect on August 28, 2001, shall remain in effect until changed by the circuit court.
The circuit court in any circuit, except the circuit court in Jackson County, the circuit court in the city of St.
Louis, or the circuit court in any circuit that reimburses the state for the salaries of family court commissioners under and pursuant to section 487.020, may change the fee to any amount not to exceed fifteen dollars.
The circuit court in Jackson County, the circuit court in the city of St.
Louis, CCS HCS SS SCS SBs 835 & 1111 or the circuit court in any circuit that reimburses the state for the salaries of family court commissioners under and pursuant to section 487.020 may change the fee to any amount not to exceed twenty dollars.
A change in the fee shall become effective and remain in effect until further changed.
3.
Sections 488.426 to 488.432 shall not apply to proceedings when costs are waived or are paid by the county or state or any city.
[4.
In addition to any fee authorized by subsection 1 of this section, any county of the first classification with more than one hundred one thousand but fewer than one hundred fifteen thousand inhabitants may impose an additional fee of ten dollars excluding cases concerning adoption and those in small claims court.
The provisions of this subsection shall expire on December 31, 2019.] 513.380.
1.
[Whenever an execution against the property of any judgment debtor, individual or corporate, issued from any court in this state, shall be returned unsatisfied, in whole or in part, by any sheriff or other proper officer, the] A judgment creditor [in such execution, his executor, administrator or assign, may,] shall upon motion made at any time [within five years after such return so made] before the judgment has been satisfied of record by the judgment creditor and before the judgment being presumed paid and satisfied under section 516.350, be entitled to an order by the court rendering such judgment, requiring the judgment debtor or, in the case of a corporate judgment debtor, its chief officer to appear before such court at a time and place in said order to be named, to undergo an examination under oath touching his or her ability and means to satisfy said judgment, and in case of neglect or refusal CCS HCS SS SCS SBs 835 & 1111 on the part of such judgment debtor or, in the case of a corporate debtor, its chief officer to obey such order, such court is hereby authorized to issue a writ of attachment against said debtor, as now provided by law, and to punish him or, in the case of a corporate debtor, its chief officer for contempt.
2.
(1) To reflect the change in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers, published by the United States Department of Labor, or its successor index, for the most SS SCS SBs 835 & 1111 3 recent three-year period ending immediately before January first preceding such April first;
and CCS HCS SS SCS SBs 835 & 1111 (2) To round to the nearest twenty-five dollars the dollar amount that represents such change.
SS SCS SBs 835 & 1111 4 (4) Any implements or professional books or tools of the trade of such person or the trade of a dependent of such CCS HCS SS SCS SBs 835 & 1111 person not to exceed three thousand dollars in value in the aggregate;
provided, however, that if proceedings under Title 11 of the United States Code are commenced by or against such person, the amount exempt in such proceedings shall not exceed in value one hundred fifty thousand dollars in the aggregate less any amount of property of such person transferred by the life insurance company or fraternal benefit society to itself in good faith if such transfer is to pay a premium or to carry out a nonforfeiture insurance option and is required to be so transferred automatically SS SCS SBs 835 & 1111 5 under a life insurance contract with such company or society that was entered into before commencement of such CCS HCS SS SCS SBs 835 & 1111 proceedings.
SS SCS SBs 835 & 1111 6 (ii) Such payment is on account of age or length of service;
and CCS HCS SS SCS SBs 835 & 1111 (iii) Such plan or contract does not qualify under Section 401(a), 403(a), 403(b), 408, 408A or 409 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (26 U.S.C.
however, the interest of any and SS SCS SBs 835 & 1111 7 all alternate payees under a qualified domestic relations order shall be exempt from any and all claims of any CCS HCS SS SCS SBs 835 & 1111 creditor, other than the state of Missouri through its department of social services.
SS SCS SBs 835 & 1111 8 a.
or CCS HCS SS SCS SBs 835 & 1111 b.
The homestead of every person, consisting of a dwelling house and appurtenances, and the land used in connection therewith, not exceeding the aggregate value of [fifteen] forty thousand dollars, which is or shall be used SS SCS SBs 835 & 1111 9 by such person as a homestead, shall, together with the CCS HCS SS SCS SBs 835 & 1111 rents, issues and products thereof, be exempt from attachment and execution.
If an account receives electronic deposits of exempt protected funds, including, SS SCS SBs 835 & 1111 10 but not limited to, funds described under subdivision (10) CCS HCS SS SCS SBs 835 & 1111 of subsection 1 of section 513.430, the attachment date for such account shall be the date and banking day that the financial institution applies for the federally required look-back analysis to determine the protected amount.
If an order of garnishment attaches to account funds held by a financial institution and the garnishee holds funds of the judgment debtor in two or more accounts, the garnishee may withhold payment of the amount attached from any accounts identifiedbelonging into thea orderjudgment ofdebtor garnishment and such accounts may have a different attachment date if necessary for the federally required look-back analysis.
The garnishee shall provide a copy of the order of garnishment to each account holder within two business days to the address provided to the garnishee by each account holder by mail or electronically if authorized by the account holder.
Each account holder may file an objection SS SCS SBs 835 & 1111 11 or request of exemption of all or a portion of the CCS HCS SS SCS SBs 835 & 1111 account with the court that issued the order of garnishment within thirty days of the date the garnishment attaches and serve their objection or request for exemption on the garnishor and the garnishee.
If the objection or request of exemption is not resolved within thirty days,days of the timely filing of the objection or request of exemption, the garnishee may pay the garnished funds to the circuit court to be held for pending resolution of the objection or request.
The garnishee shall not be liable to the joint owners if the ownership of the funds is later proven not to be the judgment debtor's.
SS SCS SBs 835 & 1111 12 8.
Funds shall be released to the CCS HCS SS SCS SBs 835 & 1111 judgment debtor sixty days after an answer is submitted, or sooner if required under an order to pay, or paid into the court if objections are filed by the judgment debtor and the financial institution is served with a copy of the objections.
The(1) provisionsA ofgarnishee subsectionsacting 1in togood 10faith compliance with a facially valid order of garnishment under this section shall not be effectiveliable Januaryto 1,any 2028.debtor, creditor, or other person for withholding, restraining, or releasing funds in reasonable reliance upon the terms of the writ or order.
(2) A garnishee shall not be required to:
(a) Adjudicate competing claims of ownership to property or funds;
(b) Determine the legal sufficiency or validity of the underlying judgment;
or (c) Investigate facts outside the information contained in the writ or the garnishee's business records.
(3) A garnishee shall be liable for damages arising from a garnishment only if:
CCS HCS SS SCS SBs 835 & 1111 (a) The garnishee fails to follow the clear and express terms of the writ or order;
(b) Such failure constitutes gross negligence or willful misconduct;
and (c) Actual damages are proven.
(4) A garnishee shall not be liable if the garnishee corrects an error within five business days after receiving written notice identifying the alleged error and promptly releases any improperly restrained funds.
(5) Temporary restraint of funds pending review of a claimed exemption shall not create liability if the garnishee, garnishor, and judgment debtor or other persons act within time frames required by law.
The provisions of subsections 1 to 11 of this section shall be effective January 1, 2028.
13.
Section537.529. B.
1.
This section shall be known and may be cited as the "Uniform Public Expression Protection Act".
2.
As used in this section, the following terms mean:
(1) "Governmental unit", any city, county, or other political subdivision of this state, or any department, division, board, or other agency of any political subdivision of this state;
(2) "Person", an individual, estate, trust, partnership, business or nonprofit entity, governmental unit, or other legal entity.
3.
Except as otherwise provided in subsection 4 of this section, the provisions of this section shall apply to any cause of action asserted in a civil action against a person based on the person's:
CCS HCS SS SCS SBs 835 & 1111 (1) Communication in a legislative, executive, judicial, administrative, or other governmental proceeding;
(2) Communication on an issue under consideration or review in a legislative, executive, judicial, administrative, or other governmental proceeding;
or (3) Exercise of the right of freedom of speech or of the press, the right to assemble or petition, or the right of association, guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of the state of Missouri, on a matter of public concern.
4.
The provisions of this section shall not apply to a cause of action asserted:
(1) Against a governmental unit or an employee or agent of a governmental unit acting or purporting to act in an official capacity;
(2) By a governmental unit or an employee or agent of a governmental unit acting in an official capacity to enforce a law to protect against an imminent threat to public health or safety;
or (3) Against a person primarily engaged in the business of selling or leasing goods or services if the cause of action arises out of a communication related to the person's sale or lease of the goods or services.
As used in this subsection, the term "goods or services" shall not include any dramatic, literary, musical, political, journalistic, or artistic work.
5.
No later than sixty days after a party is served with a complaint, crossclaim, counterclaim, third-party claim, or other pleading that asserts a cause of action to which this section applies, or at a later time upon a CCS HCS SS SCS SBs 835 & 1111 showing of good cause, a party may file a special motion to dismiss the cause of action or part of the cause of action.
6.
(1) Except as otherwise provided in this subsection:
(a) All other proceedings between the moving party and responding party in an action, including discovery and a pending hearing or motion, are stayed on the filing of a motion under subsection 5 of this section;
and (b) On motion by the moving party, the court may stay:
a.
A hearing or motion involving another party if the ruling on the hearing or motion would adjudicate a legal or factual issue that is material to the motion under subsection 5 of this section;
or b.
Discovery by another party if the discovery relates to a legal or factual issue that is material to the motion under subsection 5 of this section.
(2) A stay under subdivision (1) of this subsection remains in effect until entry of an order ruling on the motion filed under subsection 5 of this section and the expiration of the time to appeal the order.
(3) If a party appeals from an order ruling on a motion under subsection 5 of this section, all proceedings between all parties in an action are stayed.
The stay remains in effect until the conclusion of the appeal.
(4) During a stay under subdivision (1) of this subsection, the court may allow limited discovery if a party shows that specific information is necessary to establish whether a party has satisfied or failed to satisfy a burden imposed by subdivision (1) of subsection 9 of this section and is not reasonably available without discovery.
CCS HCS SS SCS SBs 835 & 1111 (5) A motion for costs and expenses under subsection 12 of this section shall not be subject to a stay under this section.
(6) A stay under this subsection does not affect a party's ability to voluntarily dismiss a cause of action or part of a cause of action or move to sever a cause of action.
(7) During a stay under this section, the court for good cause may hear and rule on:
(a) A motion unrelated to the motion under subsection 5 of this section;
and (b) A motion seeking a special or preliminary injunction to protect against an imminent threat to public health or safety.
7.
(1) The court shall hear a motion under subsection 5 of this section no later than sixty days after filing of the motion, unless the court orders a later hearing:
(a) To allow discovery under subdivision (4) of subsection 6 of this section;
or (b) For other good cause.
(2) If the court orders a later hearing under paragraph (a) of subdivision (1) of this subsection, the court shall hear the motion under subsection 5 of this section no later than sixty days after the court order allowing the discovery, subject to paragraph (b) of subdivision (1) of this subsection.
8.
In ruling on a motion under subsection 5 of this section, the court shall consider the parties' pleadings, the motion, any replies and responses to the motion, and any evidence that could be considered in ruling on a motion for summary judgment.
CCS HCS SS SCS SBs 835 & 1111 9.
(1) In ruling on a motion under subsection 5 of this section, the court shall dismiss with prejudice a cause of action or part of a cause of action if:
(a) The moving party establishes under subsection 3 of this section that this section applies;
(b) The responding party fails to establish as provided in subsection 4 of this section that this section does not apply;
and (c) Either:
a.
The responding party fails to establish a prima facie case as to each essential element of the cause of action;
or b.
The moving party establishes that:
(i) The responding party failed to state a cause of action upon which relief can be granted;
or (ii) There is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on the cause of action or part of the cause of action.
(2) A voluntary dismissal without prejudice of a responding party's cause of action, or part of a cause of action, that is the subject of a motion under subsection 5 of this section does not affect a moving party's right to obtain a ruling on the motion and seek costs, reasonable attorney's fees, and reasonable litigation expenses under subsection 12 of this section.
(3) A voluntary dismissal with prejudice of a responding party's cause of action, or part of a cause of action, that is the subject of a motion under subsection 5 of this section establishes for the purpose of subsection 12 of this section that the moving party prevailed on the motion.
CCS HCS SS SCS SBs 835 & 1111 10.
The court shall rule on a motion under subsection 5 of this section no later than sixty days after the hearing under subsection 7 of this section.
11.
A moving party may appeal within twenty-one days as a matter of right from an order denying, in whole or in part, a motion under subsection 5 of this section.
12.
On a motion under subsection 5 of this section, the court shall award costs, reasonable attorney's fees, and reasonable litigation expenses related to the motion:
(1) To the moving party if the moving party prevails on the motion;
or (2) To the responding party if the responding party prevails on the motion and the court finds that the motion was frivolous or filed solely with intent to delay the proceeding.
13.
This section shall be broadly construed and applied to protect the exercise of the right of freedom of speech and of the press, the right to assemble and petition, and the right of association, guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of the state of Missouri.
14.
In applying and construing this section, consideration shall be given to the need to promote uniformity of the law with respect to its subject matter among states that enact it.
15.
The provisions of this section shall apply to any civil action filed, or any cause of action asserted in a civil action, on or after August 28, 2026.
[537.528.
1.
Any action against a person for conduct or speech undertaken or made in connection with a public hearing or public meeting, in a quasi-judicial proceeding before a tribunal or decision-making body of the state or CCS HCS SS SCS SBs 835 & 1111 any political subdivision of the state is subject to a special motion to dismiss, motion for judgment on the pleadings, or motion for summary judgment that shall be considered by the court on a priority or expedited basis to ensure the early consideration of the issues raised by the motion and to prevent the unnecessary expense of litigation.
Upon the filing of any special motion described in this subsection, all discovery shall be suspended pending a decision on the motion by the court and the exhaustion of all appeals regarding the special motion.
2.
If the rights afforded by this section are raised as an affirmative defense and if a court grants a motion to dismiss, a motion for judgment on the pleadings or a motion for summary judgment filed within ninety days of the filing of the moving party's answer, the court shall award reasonable attorney fees and costs incurred by the moving party in defending the action.
If the court finds that a special motion to dismiss or motion for summary judgment is frivolous or solely intended to cause unnecessary delay, the court shall award costs and reasonable attorney fees to the party prevailing on the motion.
3.
Any party shall have the right to an expedited appeal from a trial court order on the special motions described in subsection 2 of this section or from a trial court's failure to rule on the motion on an expedited basis.
4.
As used in this section, a "public meeting in a quasi-judicial proceeding" means and includes any meeting established and held by a state or local governmental entity, including without limitations meetings or presentations before state, county, city, town or village councils, planning commissions, review boards or commissions.
5.
Nothing in this section limits or prohibits the exercise of a right or remedy of a party granted pursuant to another constitutional, statutory, common law or CCS HCS SS SCS SBs 835 & 1111 administrative provision, including civil actions for defamation.
6.
If any provision of this section or the application of any provision of this section to a person or circumstance is held invalid, the invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this section that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this section are severable.
7.
The provisions of this section shall apply to all causes of actions.] Section B.
Show all 232 changed rows (192 more)
View plain text versions (8)
- 5285S.11T - Truly Agreed to and Finally Passed View text pdf
- 5285S.05P - Perfected View text pdf
- 2/18/2026 - SA 1 to SS for SCS S offered & adopted (Webber)--(5285S05.03S) 2/18/2026 - Adopted View text pdf
- 5/15/2026 - CCR S offered & adopted (5285S11.1SR) 5/15/2026 - Adopted View text Current pdf
- Amended 2/18/2026 - SS for SCS S offered (Crawford)--(5285S.05F) 2/18/2026 - Adopted, as amended pdf
- Committee Substitute 5285H.07C - House Committee Substitute pdf
- Committee Substitute 5285S.04C - Senate Committee Substitute pdf
- Introduced 5285S.02I - Introduced pdf
Action History
-
Signed by Governor
-
Reported Duly Enrolled Rules, Joint Rules, Resolutions & Ethics Committee
-
Signed by Senate President Pro Tem
-
Signed by House Speaker
-
Delivered to Governor
-
CCR S offered & adopted (5285S11.1SR)
-
CCS S Third Read and Passed (5285S.11S)
-
H adopts CCR --(5285S11.1SR)
-
CCS H Third Read and Passed
-
Truly Agreed To and Finally Passed
-
S distributes CCR (5285S11.1SR)
-
S distributes CCS (5285S.11S)
-
H distributes CCR
-
House conferees appointed: Perkins, Parker, Roberts, Butz, Johnson
-
H refuses to recede and grants conference
-
Senate conferees appointed: Crawford, Henderson, Gregory (15), May, Washington
-
S refuses to concur in HCS, as amended and requests H recede or grant conference
-
HA 1 to HCS H offered & adopted (Roberts)--(5285H07.03H)
-
HA 2 to HCS H offered (Roberts)--(5285H07.04H)
-
HA 1 to HA 2 to HCS H offered & adopted (Smith (46))--(5285H07.11H)
-
HA 2 to HCS, as amended, H adopted (5285H07.04H)
-
HA 3 to HCS H offered & defeated (Bosley)--(5285H07.08H)
-
HCS, as amended, H adopted --(5285H.07C)
-
H Third Read and Passed
-
Voted Do Pass H Rules - Administrative
-
Reported Do Pass H Rules - Administrative
-
HCS Referred H Rules - Administrative
-
HCS Voted Do Pass H Financial Institutions
-
HCS Reported Do Pass H Financial Institutions
-
Hearing Conducted H Financial Institutions
-
Referred H Financial Institutions
-
H Second Read
-
S Third Read and Passed
-
H First Read
-
SS for SCS S offered (Crawford)--(5285S.05F)
-
SA 1 to SS for SCS S offered & adopted (Webber)--(5285S05.03S)
-
SS for SCS, as amended, S adopted
-
Perfected
-
Reported Truly Perfected S Rules, Joint Rules, Resolutions and Ethics Committee
-
Reported from S Insurance and Banking Committee w/SCS
-
SCS Voted Do Pass (w/SCS SBs 835 & 1111) Insurance and Banking Committee (5285S.04C)
-
Hearing Conducted S Insurance and Banking Committee
-
Hearing Cancelled S Insurance and Banking Committee
-
Second Read and Referred S Insurance and Banking Committee
-
S First Read
-
Prefiled
Sponsors
- Sandy Crawford · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 198 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (198)
198 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 198 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 835 do?
- CCS/HCS/SS/SCS/SBs 835 & 1111 - This act modifies provisions relating to court procedures. INSURER'S LEGAL TITLE TO CLAIM PAID AND ASSIGNMENT OF POST-LOSS INSURANCE BENEFIT (SECTION 379.135) Upon payment by an insurer of all or any part of a claimant's property damage claim, legal title to the portion of the claim paid shall vest in the insurer to the extent of such payment. No assignment or other action by the claimant shall be required for the insurer to enforce its legal title. The claimant shall retain legal title only to that portion of the property damage claim not paid by the insurer. This act prohibits assignment of post-loss benefits under any policy of insurance covering property, including, but not limited to, any right of action against the insurer or any proceeds acquired from the insurer. A person shall not solicit or accept an assignment, in whole or in part, of any post-loss insurance benefit for property damage under a contract of insurance. Any agreement to assign post-loss benefits is null and void. The provisions of this act shall not apply to an assignment, transfer, pledge, or conveyance granted to a financial institution, mortgagee, lienholder, or a subsequent purchaser of the property. A violation of this act shall be considered a level two insurance violation. This provision is substantially similar to a provision in SS/HB 3205 (2026) and in HCS/HB 3328 (2026), and is similar to a provision in SCS/SB 1543 (2026) and in the truly agreed to and finally passed SS/HB 2636 (2026). STATEWIDE COURT AUTOMATION (SECTION 476.055) This act modifies provisions of law related to the Statewide Court Automation Committee ("Committee"). Specifically, this act provides that the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Missouri, the Executive Director of the Missouri Office of Prosecution Services, and the Director of the Missouri State Public Defender System shall now serve as ex-officio members. For the House and Senate members on the Committee, one shall be a member of the majority party and one shall be a member of the minority party. Furthermore, the appointed members of the Committee shall serve for terms of two years or until their successors are appointed. Members of the Committee may also be reimbursed from the Statewide Court Automation Fund for actual expenses related to the duties of the Committee. Furthermore, this act provides that the Committee shall maintain, rather than implement, a statewide court automation system. This act also describes "confidential judicial record" for purposes of the offenses related to releasing information from a confidential judicial record as those provided by Missouri Supreme Court Rules. Currently, the Committee is required to file a report on the progress of the statewide court automation system with the chairs of certain House and Senate Committees on the February 1st, May 1st, August 1st, and November 1st of each year. Instead, this act provides that the report shall be filed electronically on January 15th of each year. Lastly, this act removes the expiration of the Committee upon completion of its duties. These provisions are identical to provisions in HCS/SB 945 (2026), in HCS/SB 1067 (2026), and in HCS/HB 3289 (2026). TREATMENT COURTS (SECTION 478.003) This act provides that in each treatment court division without a treatment court administrator or a treatment court commissioner, the court shall employ a treatment court administrator, subject to appropriations or other funds available. If other funds available are used, the source shall reimburse the state for the costs of the salary and benefits of the administrator. This provision is identical to a provision in HCS/SB 945 (2026), in HCS/SB 1067 (2026), and in HCS/HB 3289 (2026) and is similar to HB 3468 (2026). 25TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT (MARIES, PHELPS, PULASKI & TEXAS) - CIRCUIT JUDGES (SECTION 478.700) This act codifies three circuit judges, including the circuit judge approved in the FY2026 appropriation and appointed by the Governor in 2026, in the 25th Judicial Circuit, consisting of the counties of Maries, Phelps, Pulaski & Texas. The circuit judge appointed in 2026 shall serve until January 1, 2029, and then the position shall be filled by an election of a four year term in 2028 and then a full six year term in 2032 and thereafter. This provision is identical to a provision in HCS/SB 945 (2026), in HCS/SB 1067 (2026), in HCS/HBs 2968, 2427 & 3086 (2026), and HB 3229 (2026). ST. LOUIS CITY CIVIL CASE FILING FEE (SECTION 488.426) Currently, any circuit court may collect a civil case filing surcharge of an amount not to exceed $15 for the maintenance of a law library, the county's or circuit's family services and justice fund, or courtroom renovation and technology enhancement. If the circuit court reimburses the state for salaries of family court commissioners or is the circuit court in Jackson County, the surcharge may be up to $20. This act provides that the circuit court in the City of St. Louis may charge a filing surcharge up to $20. This provision is identical to a provision in HCS/SB 945 (2026), in the perfected SS#2/SCS/SB 1023 (2026), in HCS/SB 1067 (2026), in SCS/SB 1468 (2026), in SCS/HB 3000 (2026), SB 18 (2025), in HCS/HB 83 (2025), in SCS/HCS/HB 176 (2025), in SB 352 (2025), in SCS/HCS/HB 615 (2025), SB 800 (2025), in HB 1512 (2024), and in SCS/HCS/HB 2064 & HCS#2/HB 1886 (2024), and is substantially similar to a provision in SCS/SB 897 (2024), SB 1023 (2024), CCS/HCS/SS/SCS/SB 72 (2023), SB 252 (2023), HB 787 (2023), in HCS/HB 986 (2023), in the perfected HCS/HBs 994, 52 & 984 (2023), SB 1209 (2022), HB 1963 (2022), HB 143 (2021), HB 1554 (2020), HB 1224 (2019), in the perfected HCS/HB 1083 (2019), HB 1891 (2018), SB 288 (2017), HB 391 (2017), and SB 812 (2016). ATTACHMENT, EXECUTION, AND GARNISHMENTS (SECTIONS 513.380 TO 525.235) This act modifies provisions relating to attachment, execution, and garnishments. Under current law, whenever an execution against the property of any judgment debtor shall be returned unsatisfied, within five years of the return, the judgment creditor may be entitled to an order by the court rendering such judgment, requiring the judgment debtor to undergo an examination on the ability and means to satisfy the judgment, and in the case of neglect or refusal, issuing a writ of attachment and punishing the judgment debtor for contempt. This act instead provides a judgment creditor shall, upon motion made at any time before the judgment is satisfied of record and presumed paid, be entitled to such orders. Additionally, under current law, a judgment debtor may be granted immunity from prosecution by any prosecuting or circuit attorney for statements made at a judgment debtor's examination. This act instead provides that a judgment debtor shall enjoy full use and derivative immunity and that no testimony in an examination may be used against a witness, except in cases of perjury or for giving false statements. This act changes the maximum value, adjusted annually for inflation, of certain items that are exempt from attachment and execution, including household items, wedding rings and other jewelry, motor vehicles, and mobile homes. This act also modifies the homestead exemption from $15,000 to the aggregate value of $40,000. This act provides that the maximum value for the property that is exempted from attachment and execution and the amount of a homestead exemption shall be adjusted by the Revisor of Statutes every three years beginning April 1, 2029. This act outlines orders of garnishment issued for the purpose of attaching to account funds held by a financial institution, as such term is defined in the act. Such orders shall attach on the date of service, provided that the effective date of service is a banking day and made prior to the business cutoff time, in which case it shall attach the next business day. If an account receives electronic deposits for exempted funds, the attachment date shall be the date and banking day that the financial institution applies for the look-back analysis. Additionally, where there are two or more accounts, the amount may be withheld from any of the accounts belonging to the judgment debtor and attachment dates between the accounts may be different depending on the look-back analysis. If the account is held in joint tenancy with an individual not subject to the order of garnishment, the entire amount shall be withheld and the garnishee shall provide a copy of the order of garnishment to each account holder within two business days. Within 30 days of the date of the attachment of the garnishment, each account holder may file an objection or request of exemption of all or a portion of the account with the issuing court and serve their objection or request on the garnishor and the garnishee. If such objection or request is not resolved within 30 days of the timely filing of the objection or request of exemption, the garnishee may pay the garnished funds to the circuit court to be held for pending resolution. The return date for orders of garnishment shall not be less than 30 days from the effective date of service. This act also provides certain information to be included in orders of garnishment for funds held by financial institutions. No party shall seek a garnishment of account funds held by a financial institution unless there is a good-faith belief that the party to be served with the garnishment has, or will have, account assets of the judgment debtor. No more than one garnishment for the same claim and against the same judgment debtor shall be issued within any 30-day period, unless exempted by court order as detailed in the act. Furthermore, a financial institution does not have a duty to investigate or assert the defenses of a judgment debtor. A financial institution served with an order of garnishment and interrogatories shall answer within 20 days and shall release funds to the judgment debtor 60 days after an answer is submitted or sooner if required under an order to pay or paid into the court. A financial institution is not required to respond to interrogatories not related to account funds. This act does not apply to wage garnishments or garnishments of property other than account funds. Garnishees are also not required to search for, hold, or return wages or other property. The provisions relating to orders of garnishment of account funds held by financial institutions shall be implemented and administered in accordance with rules of the Supreme Court of Missouri. A garnishee acting in good faith compliance with a facially valid order of garnishment shall not be liable to any debtor, creditor, or other person for withholding, restraining, or releasing funds in reasonable reliance upon the terms of the writ or order. A garnishee shall not be required to adjudicate competing claims to property or funds, determine the legal validity of the judgment, or investigate facts outside the information contained in the writ or the garnishee's business records. A garnishee shall be liable for damages arising from a garnishment only if the garnishee fails to follow the clear and express terms of the writ or order, such failure constitutes gross negligence or willful misconduct, and actual damages are proven. A garnishee shall not be liable if correction is made within five business days after receiving written notice identifying the alleged error and the garnishee promptly releases any improperly restrained funds. However, temporarily restraining funds pending review of a claimed exemption shall not create liability if the garnishee, garnishor, and judgment debtor or other persons act as required by law. The provisions of this act relating to orders of garnishment for funds held by financial institutions shall be effective on January 1, 2028, while the provisions of this act relating to the attachment and execution are effective January 1, 2027. These provisions are identical to the truly agreed to and finally passed SS/HCS/HB 1870 (2026) and are similar to HB 275 (2025) and HB 1657 (2024). UNIFORM PUBLIC EXPRESSION PROTECTION ACT (SECTION 537.529 AND THE REPEAL OF SECTION 537.528) This act establishes the "Uniform Public Expression Protection Act". Currently, any action against a person for conduct or speech undertaken or made in connection with a public hearing or meeting in a quasi-judicial proceeding before a tribunal or decision-making body of the state or a political subdivision thereof is subject to a special motion to dismiss, a motion for judgment on the pleadings, or motion for summary judgment and any such motion shall be considered by the court on a priority or expedited basis. This act repeals this provision and creates procedures for dismissal of causes of action asserted in a civil action based on a person's: (1) Communication in a legislative, executive, judicial, administrative, or other governmental proceeding; (2) Communication on an issue under consideration or review in a legislative, executive, judicial, administrative, or other governmental proceeding; or (3) Exercise of the right of freedom of speech or of the press, the right to assemble or petition, or the right of association, guaranteed by the United States Constitution or the Missouri Constitution, on a matter of public concern. However, this act shall not apply to a cause of action asserted: (1) Against a governmental unit, as described in the act, or an employee or agent of a governmental unit acting in an official capacity; (2) By a governmental unit or an employee or agent of a governmental unit acting in an official capacity to enforce a law to protect against an imminent threat to public health or safety; or (3) Against a person primarily engaged in the business of selling or leasing goods or services if the cause of action arises out of a communication related to the sale or lease of such goods or services. No later than 60 days after a party is served with a complaint, cross-claim, counterclaim, third-party claim, or other pleading that asserts a cause of action covered by this act, or at a later time upon a showing of good cause, a party may file a special motion to dismiss. The court shall hear and rule on such motion no later than 60 days after the filing of the motion, unless the court orders a later hearing to allow for limited discovery or upon good cause. However, this act provides that the court shall hear and rule on the motion for dismissal no later than 60 days after the order allowing for discovery. This act provides that all other proceedings between the moving party and the responding party in the action, including discovery and any pending hearings or motions, shall be stayed upon the filing of the special motion to dismiss. Additionally, this act provides that the court may stay, upon motion by the moving party, a hearing or motion involving another party or discovery by another party if a ruling on such hearing or motion or discovery relates to a legal or factual issue. Any stay pursuant to this act shall remain in effect until the entry of an order ruling on the special motion to dismiss and the expiration of the time to appeal the order. A moving party may appeal an order denying the special motion to dismiss in whole or in part within 21 days of such order. If a party appeals an order ruling on a special motion to dismiss, this act provides that all proceedings between all parties shall be stayed until the conclusion of the appeal. The court may allow discovery if a party shows that specific information is necessary to establish whether a party has satisfied or failed to satisfy the requirements of this act and such information is not reasonably available without discovery. Additionally, a motion for costs and expenses, voluntary dismissal, or a motion to sever shall not be stayed. During a stay, the court upon good cause may hear and rule on any motions unrelated to the special motion to dismiss and any motions seeking a special or preliminary injunction to protect against an imminent threat to public health or safety. In ruling on a special motion to dismiss, this act provides that the court shall consider the parties' pleadings, the motion, any replies and responses to the motion, and any evidence that could be considered in a ruling on a motion for summary judgment. The court shall dismiss the cause of action with prejudice if: (1) The moving party has established that the cause of action is covered by this act; (2) The responding party has failed to establish that this act does not apply to the cause of action; and (3) Either the responding party failed to establish a prima facie case as to each essential element of the cause of action, or the moving party has established that the responding party failed to state a cause of action upon which relief can be granted or that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. A voluntary dismissal without prejudice of a cause of action that is subject to a special motion to dismiss pursuant to this act shall not affect the moving party's right to obtain a ruling on the motion and seek costs, reasonable attorneys' fees, and reasonable litigation expenses. Additionally, if the moving party prevails on the motion, this act provides that such costs, fees, and expenses shall be awarded to the moving party. A voluntary dismissal with prejudice of a cause of action that is subject to a special motion to dismiss establishes that the moving party prevailed on the motion. The responding party shall be entitled to such costs, fees, and expenses if the responding party prevails on the motion and the court finds that the motion was frivolous or filed solely with the intent to delay the proceeding. Finally, this act applies to causes of action filed or asserted on or after August 28, 2026. These provisions are identical to the truly agreed to and finally passed SB 1067 (2026), provisions in SCS/SB 1468 (2026), SB 503 (2025), in SCS/HCS/HB 615 (2025), in SCS/HCS/HB 1259 (2025), and SB 1293 (2024) and are substantially similar to HB 2666 (2026), provisions in HCS/HB 83 (2025), in SCS/HCS/HB 176 (2025), in SB 352 (2025), HB 1092 (2025), in SCS/SB 897 (2024), HB 1785 (2024), in SCS/HCS/HB 2064 & HCS#2/HB 1886 (2024), in CCS/HCS/SS/SCS/SB 72 (2023), SB 432 (2023), HB 750 (2023), SB 1219 (2022), in HCS/SS#2/SCS/SB 968 (2022), HB 2624 (2022), and HB 1151 (2021). KATIE O'BRIEN
- Who sponsors SB 835?
- SB 835 is sponsored by Sandy Crawford.
- What is the current status of SB 835?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 01, 2025. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 835?
- Track SB 835 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 835
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 835
Last checked for changes about 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →