SB 333 — An Act amending the act of June 25, 1982 (P.L.633, No.181), known as the Regulatory Review Act, further providing for definitions, for proposed regulations and procedures for review and for final-form regulations and final-omitted regulations and procedures for review; providing for regulations deemed withdrawn; further providing for procedures for subsequent review of disapproved final-form or final-omitted regulations; and providing for concurrent resolution required for economically significant regulations.
Last action — Referred to INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS AND OPERATIONS, June 11, 2025
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced February 28, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
ModerateHow often bills like it became law.
-
Passed Senate
Current position in the legislative process.
-
6 sponsors
1 primary, 5 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (6 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
REINS Act
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
274 added · 274 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent changes to Bill SB 333 clarify the definitions and procedures surrounding "economically significant regulations" and the obligations of agencies when proposing new regulations. Specifically, the amendment formally defines what constitutes an economically significant regulation based on its potential financial impact, ensuring more transparency in the regulatory review process. This matters because it helps lawmakers and the public understand the economic implications of new rules, potentially influencing regulatory decisions and promoting accountability in government actions.
PRIOR PRINTER'S NO.
302 PRINTER'STHE NO.GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL Session of No.
895333 THE2025 GENERALINTRODUCED ASSEMBLYBY OFKEEFER, PENNSYLVANIAPHILLIPS-HILL, SENATESTEFANO, BILLMARTIN SessionAND HUTCHINSON, FEBRUARY 28, 2025 REFERRED TO INTERGOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS, FEBRUARY 28, 2025 AN ACT Amending the act of No.June 25, 1982 (P.L.633, No.181), entitled "An act providing for independent oversight and review of regulations, creating an Independent Regulatory Review Commission, providing for its powers and duties and making regulations and procedures for review and for final-formd regulations and final-omitted regulations and procedures for review;
333 2025 INTRODUCED BY KEEFER, PHILLIPS-HILL, STEFANO, MARTIN AND HUTCHINSON, FEBRUARY 28, 2025 SENATOR COLEMAN, INTERGOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS, AS AMENDED, JUNE 4, 2025 AN ACT Amending the act of June 25, 1982 (P.L.633, No.181), entitled "An act providing for independent oversight and review of regulations, creating an Independent Regulatory Review repeals," further providing for definitions, for proposedg regulations and procedures for review and for final-form regulations and final-omitted regulations and procedures for review;
Section 3 of the act of June 25, 1982 (P.L.633, No.181), known as the Regulatory Review Act, is amended by adding definitions A DEFINITION to read:
<-- Section 3.
* * * "Legislative day." A day when both houses of the General <-- Assembly are in voting session.
20250SB0333PN0895* -* 2* 20250SB0333PN0302 - *2 *- * (4) Estimates of the direct and indirect costs to the Commonwealth, to its political subdivisions and to the private sector.
* * * (i) All forms required for implementation of a PROPOSED <-- regulation must be included with the regulatory analysis form when submitted to the Legislative Reference Bureau, the committees and the commission under subsection (a).
(j) The commission shall transmit comments regarding the <-- cost estimates required under subsection (a)(4) to the Independent Fiscal Office for review.
Final-form regulations and final-omitted 20250SB0333PN0895 - 3 - regulations;
20250SB0333PN0302 - 3 - * * * (e) The commission may have until its next scheduled meeting which occurs no less than 30 days after receipt of the final- form or final-omitted regulation to approve or disapprove the final-form or final-omitted regulation.
20250SB0333PN0895 - 4 - (2) If the commission approves a regulation and a 20250SB0333PN0302 - 4 - committee has not notified the commission and the agency that it has disapproved the regulation or that it intends to review the regulation, the agency may promulgate the regulation.
If the agency does not deliver the final-form or 20250SB0333PN0895 - 5 - final-omitted regulation and required material to the commission 20250SB0333PN0302 - 5 - and the committees by the second Monday after the date by which both committee designations have been published in the Pennsylvania Bulletin, the agency shall be deemed to have withdrawn the final-form or final-omitted regulation.
A regulation shall be deemed withdrawn if there is no 20250SB0333PN0895 - 6 - provision of a State statute which explicitly states that the 20250SB0333PN0302 - 6 - agency may promulgate regulations for the specific purpose cited in the statement of need for the regulation under section 5(a) (3) and the regulatory analysis form submitted for the regulation does not comply with the requirements of section 5(a) (1.1).
(2) If either committee reports a concurrent resolution before the expiration of the [14-day] period specified in paragraph (1), the [Senate and the House of Representatives] chamber to which the concurrent resolution is reported shall 20250SB0333PN0895 - 7 - [each] have 30 calendar days or ten legislative days, 20250SB0333PN0302 - 7 - whichever is longer, from the date on which the concurrent resolution has been reported, to adopt the concurrent resolution[.] and transmit it to the other chamber.
(6) Notice as to any final disposition of a concurrent 20250SB0333PN0895 - 8 - resolution considered in accordance with this [section] 20250SB0333PN0302 - 8 - subsection shall be published in the Pennsylvania Bulletin.
(a) If the commission issues an order to approve a final- form regulation or final-omitted regulation that is an economically significant regulation or if the agency decides to proceed with a final-form regulation or final-omitted regulation that is an economically significant regulation for which the commission issued a disapproval order, the agency shall submit a 20250SB0333PN0895 - 9 - copy of the order and, if applicable, the agency response to the 20250SB0333PN0302 - 9 - Senate and the House of Representatives and shall request a concurrent resolution approving the regulation.
20250SB0333PN089520250SB0333PN0302 - 10 -
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill amends the Regulatory Review Act to enhance the review process for proposed regulations, particularly those deemed economically significant, and establishes new provisions regarding regulations deemed withdrawn.
-
Section 3
A DEFINITION
Adds a new definition section to the act.
-
Section 5(a)(4)
[Insofar as the proposed regulation relates to costs to the Commonwealth, the agency may submit in lieu of its own statement the fiscal note prepared by the Office of the Budget pursuant to section 612 of the act of April 9, 1929 (P.L.177, No.175), known as 'The Administrative Code of 1929.']→ The estimates shall be prepared by the Independent Fiscal Office and submitted to the agency for inclusion in the regulatory analysis form and shall include an estimate of the annual costs to be used to determine whether the regulation is an economically significant regulation.Removes the option for agencies to submit a fiscal note and requires cost estimates to be prepared by the Independent Fiscal Office.
-
Section 5(d.1)
The committees shall, during the public comment period, conduct a public hearing to receive comments regarding a proposed economically significant regulation. The agency shall appear at the hearing if requested by the chair of the committee.
Mandates public hearings for proposed economically significant regulations.
-
Section 5.1(j.2)(3)
[this 14-day period]→ [the period established under paragraph (2)]Clarifies the time frame for committee action on regulations.
-
Section 5.1(j.3)
[14-day]→ [the 14-day] committee review period established under subsection (j.2)(2)Adjusts the wording to align with updated review timelines.
-
Section 5.1(l)
[.]→ [the General Assembly adopts a concurrent resolution under section 7.2.]Requires a concurrent resolution for the promulgation of economically significant regulations.
-
Section 5.3
A regulation shall be deemed withdrawn if there is no provision of a State statute which explicitly states that the agency may promulgate regulations for the specific purpose cited in the statement of need for the regulation under section 5(a)(3) and the regulatory analysis form submitted for the regulation does not comply with the requirements of section 5(a)(1.1).
Establishes criteria for when a regulation is deemed withdrawn.
-
Section 7(d)
[one]→ the following apply:Modifies the introductory phrasing of the section.
-
Section 7(d)(1)
[14-calendar-day]→ [14-calendar-day]Ensures consistency in the time frame specified for reporting.
-
Section 7(d)(2)
[14-day]→ [the expiration of the 14-calendar-day period specified in this paragraph]Clarifies the timeframe for committee actions on concurrent resolutions.
Action History
-
Referred to INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS AND OPERATIONS, June 11, 2025
-
In the House
-
(Remarks see Senate Journal Page 541-542), June 10, 2025
-
Third consideration and final passage, June 10, 2025 (27-23)
-
Re-reported as committed, June 10, 2025
-
Re-referred to APPROPRIATIONS, June 9, 2025
-
Second consideration, June 9, 2025
-
First consideration, June 4, 2025
-
Reported as amended, June 4, 2025
-
Referred to INTERGOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS, Feb. 28, 2025
Sponsors
- Kristin Phillips-Hill · Cosponsor
- Michele Brooks · Cosponsor
- Dawn W. Keefer · Primary
- Patrick J. Stefano · Cosponsor
- Scott Martin · Cosponsor
- Scott E. Hutchinson · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 5 co-sponsors · 247 not signed on · 23 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Dawn W. Keefer Republican
Co-sponsors (5)
- Kristin Phillips-Hill Republican
- Michele Brooks Republican
- Patrick J. Stefano Republican
- Scott Martin Republican
- Scott E. Hutchinson Republican
Not signed on (247)
247 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 247 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 0 | 22 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 27 | 23 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 54% | 46% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (50)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anthony Williams | — | Nay |
| Amanda M. Cappelletti | Democratic | Nay |
| Art Haywood | Democratic | Nay |
| Carolyn T. Comitta | Democratic | Nay |
| Christine M. Tartaglione | Democratic | Nay |
| James Andrew Malone | Democratic | Nay |
| Jay Costa | Democratic | Nay |
| John I. Kane | Democratic | Nay |
| Judith L. Schwank | Democratic | Nay |
| Katie J. Muth | Democratic | Nay |
| Lindsey M. Williams | Democratic | Nay |
| Lisa M. Boscola | Democratic | Nay |
| Maria Collett | Democratic | Nay |
| Marty Flynn | Democratic | Nay |
| Nick Miller | Democratic | Nay |
| Nick Pisciottano | Democratic | Nay |
| Nikil Saval | Democratic | Nay |
| Patty Kim | Democratic | Nay |
| Sharif Street | Democratic | Nay |
| Steven J. Santarsiero | Democratic | Nay |
| Timothy P. Kearney | Democratic | Nay |
| Vincent J. Hughes | Democratic | Nay |
| Wayne D. Fontana | Democratic | Nay |
| Camera Bartolotta | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Gebhard | Republican | Yea |
| Cris Dush | Republican | Yea |
| Daniel Laughlin | Republican | Yea |
| David G. Argall | Republican | Yea |
| Dawn W. Keefer | Republican | Yea |
| Devlin J. Robinson | Republican | Yea |
| Doug Mastriano | Republican | Yea |
| Elder A. Vogel | Republican | Yea |
| Frank A. Farry | Republican | Yea |
| Gene Yaw | Republican | Yea |
| Greg Rothman | Republican | Yea |
| Jarrett Coleman | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Picozzi | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Pittman | Republican | Yea |
| Judy Ward | Republican | Yea |
| Kim L. Ward | Republican | Yea |
| Kristin Phillips-Hill | Republican | Yea |
| Lisa Baker | Republican | Yea |
| Lynda Schlegel Culver | Republican | Yea |
| Michele Brooks | Republican | Yea |
| Patrick J. Stefano | Republican | Yea |
| Rosemary M. Brown | Republican | Yea |
| Scott E. Hutchinson | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Martin | Republican | Yea |
| Tracy Pennycuick | Republican | Yea |
| Wayne Langerholc | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 333 do?
- REINS Act
- Who sponsors SB 333?
- SB 333 is sponsored by Kristin Phillips-Hill (Republican), Michele Brooks (Republican), Dawn W. Keefer (Republican), Patrick J. Stefano (Republican), Scott Martin (Republican), and Scott E. Hutchinson (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 333?
- This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced February 28, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track SB 333?
- Track SB 333 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 333
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 333
Last checked for changes 4 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →