Corporation taxes: water's-edge election: inverted corporations.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1067 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1067.
You're tracking SB 1067
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1067 — Corporation taxes: water's-edge election: inverted corporations.
Last action — Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 24. Noes 12. Page 2856.)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2003-2004 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/17/03 - Amended Senate Current pdf June 17, 2003
- Amended 04/24/03 - Amended Senate pdf April 24, 2003
- Introduced 02/27/03 - Introduced pdf February 27, 2003
- SB1067 View text html
Action History
-
Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 24. Noes 12. Page 2856.)
-
Read third time. Refused passage. (Ayes 26. Noes 12. Page 2283.) Motion to reconsider made by Senator Speier. Reconsideration granted.
-
Read second time. To third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 5. Page 1921.)
-
Set for hearing July 21.
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Standing Committee on Appropriations (Ayes 4. Noes 3. Page 1768.) Re-referred to Standing Committee on Appropriations.
-
Testimony taken. Hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to committee. Set for hearing June 25.
-
Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Set for hearing June 11.
-
Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Set for hearing May 7.
-
Re-referred to Standing Committee on Revenue and Taxation.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to committee.
-
To Standing Committee on Rules.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after March 30.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Standing Committee on Rules for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Speier · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Speier
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 24 | 11 | 0 | 4 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 24 | 12 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 30% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Alarcon | — | Yea |
| Alpert | — | Yea |
| Bowen | — | Yea |
| Burton | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Dunn | — | Yea |
| Escutia | — | Yea |
| Figueroa | — | Yea |
| Karnette | — | Yea |
| Kuehl | — | Yea |
| Machado | — | Yea |
| Murray | — | Yea |
| Ortiz | — | Yea |
| Perata | — | Yea |
| Scott | — | Yea |
| Sher | — | Yea |
| Soto | — | Yea |
| Speier | — | Yea |
| Vasconcellos | — | Yea |
| Vincent | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Ackerman | — | Nay |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Battin | — | Nay |
| Torlakson | — | Not Voting |
| McClintock | — | Nay |
| Morrow | — | Nay |
| Oller | — | Nay |
| Poochigian | — | Nay |
| Brulte | — | Not Voting |
| Margett | — | Not Voting |
| McPherson | — | Not Voting |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Johnson, Natasha | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 25 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 25 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 66% | 34% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (38)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Alarcon | — | Yea |
| Alpert | — | Yea |
| Bowen | — | Yea |
| Burton | — | Yea |
| Hollingsworth | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
| Dunn | — | Yea |
| Escutia | — | Yea |
| Figueroa | — | Yea |
| Karnette | — | Yea |
| Kuehl | — | Yea |
| Machado | — | Yea |
| McPherson | — | Yea |
| Murray | — | Yea |
| Ortiz | — | Yea |
| Perata | — | Yea |
| Scott | — | Yea |
| Sher | — | Yea |
| Soto | — | Yea |
| Speier | — | Yea |
| Vasconcellos | — | Yea |
| Denham | — | Nay |
| Ackerman | — | Nay |
| Ducheny | — | Yea |
| Battin | — | Nay |
| Brulte | — | Nay |
| Margett | — | Nay |
| McClintock | — | Nay |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Morrow | — | Nay |
| Oller | — | Nay |
| Poochigian | — | Nay |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Florez | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 42% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (12)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alpert | — | Yea |
| Burton | — | Yea |
| Escutia | — | Yea |
| Karnette | — | Yea |
| Machado | — | Yea |
| Murray | — | Yea |
| Speier | — | Yea |
| Battin | — | Nay |
| Poochigian | — | Nay |
| Aanestad | — | Nay |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Johnson, Natasha | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 57% | 43% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cedillo | — | Yea |
| Alpert | — | Yea |
| Bowen | — | Yea |
| Burton | — | Yea |
| Poochigian | — | Nay |
| Ashburn | — | Nay |
| Knight | — | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1067?
- SB 1067 is sponsored by Speier.
- What is the current status of SB 1067?
- This bill died with 2003-2004 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1067?
- Track SB 1067 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1067
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1067
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →