Property tax revenue shifts: exemption: recreation and park districts.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 93 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 93.
You're tracking SB 93
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 93 — Property tax revenue shifts: exemption: recreation and park districts.
Last action — From Assembly without further action.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2001-2002 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
- Amended 06/04/01 - Amended Senate Current pdf June 04, 2001
- Amended 03/27/01 - Amended Senate pdf March 27, 2001
- Introduced 01/16/01 - Introduced pdf January 16, 2001
- SB93 View text html
Action History
-
From Assembly without further action.
-
Set, second hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
-
Joint Rule 61(a) (10) & (11) suspended.
-
Placed on Standing Committee on Appropriations suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Standing Committee on Appropriations (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Standing Committee on Appropriations.
-
To Standing Committee on Local Government.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 1473.) To Assembly.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 13. Noes 0. Page 1382.) Read second time. Amended. To third reading.
-
Set for hearing May 31.
-
Placed on Standing Committee on Appropriations suspense file.
-
Set for hearing April 30.
-
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Standing Committee on Appropriations (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 541.) Re-referred to Standing Committee on Appropriations.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to committee.
-
Set for hearing April 4.
-
To Standing Committee on Local Government.
-
From print. May be acted upon on or after February 16.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Standing Committee on Rules for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Bates · Cosponsor
- Figueroa · Primary
- Machado · Cosponsor
- Oller · Cosponsor
- Chavez · Cosponsor
- Robert Pacheco · Cosponsor
- Strom-Martin · Cosponsor
- Chesbro · Cosponsor
- Pavley · Cosponsor
- Torlakson · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 9 co-sponsors · 112 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Figueroa
Co-sponsors (9)
- Bates
- Machado
- Oller
- Chavez
- Robert Pacheco
- Strom-Martin
- Chesbro
- Pavley
- Torlakson
Not signed on (112)
112 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 112 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Canciamilla | — | Yea |
| Daucher | — | Yea |
| Diaz | — | Yea |
| La | — | Yea |
| Suer | — | Yea |
| Lowenthal | — | Yea |
| Negrete | — | Yea |
| Salinas | — | Yea |
| Cogdill | — | Yea |
| Harman | — | Not Voting |
| McLeod | — | Yea |
| Wiggins | — | Yea |
| Correa | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 39 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ackerman | — | Yea |
| Alarcon | — | Yea |
| Alpert | — | Yea |
| Battin | — | Yea |
| Bowen | — | Yea |
| Brulte | — | Yea |
| Burton | — | Yea |
| Costa | — | Yea |
| Dunn | — | Yea |
| Escutia | — | Yea |
| Figueroa | — | Yea |
| Haynes | — | Yea |
| Johannessen | — | Yea |
| Karnette | — | Yea |
| Kuehl | — | Yea |
| Machado | — | Yea |
| Margett | — | Yea |
| McClintock | — | Yea |
| McPherson | — | Yea |
| Monteith | — | Yea |
| Morrow | — | Yea |
| Murray | — | Yea |
| O'Connell | — | Yea |
| Oller | — | Yea |
| Ortiz | — | Yea |
| Peace | — | Yea |
| Perata | — | Yea |
| Polanco | — | Yea |
| Poochigian | — | Yea |
| Scott | — | Yea |
| Sher | — | Yea |
| Soto | — | Yea |
| Speier | — | Yea |
| Vasconcellos | — | Yea |
| Vincent | — | Yea |
| Romero | — | Yea |
| Knight | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
| Chesbro | — | Yea |
| Johnson, Natasha | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alpert | — | Yea |
| Battin | — | Yea |
| Bowen | — | Yea |
| Burton | — | Yea |
| Escutia | — | Yea |
| Johannessen | — | Yea |
| Karnette | — | Yea |
| McPherson | — | Yea |
| Murray | — | Yea |
| Perata | — | Yea |
| Poochigian | — | Yea |
| Speier | — | Yea |
| Johnson, Natasha | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (12)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alpert | — | Yea |
| Battin | — | Yea |
| Bowen | — | Yea |
| Burton | — | Yea |
| Escutia | — | Yea |
| Johannessen | — | Yea |
| Karnette | — | Yea |
| McPherson | — | Yea |
| Murray | — | Yea |
| Perata | — | Yea |
| Poochigian | — | Yea |
| Speier | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ackerman | — | Yea |
| Margett | — | Yea |
| Perata | — | Yea |
| Soto | — | Yea |
| Torlakson | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 93?
- SB 93 is sponsored by Bates, Figueroa, Machado, Oller, Chavez, Robert Pacheco, Strom-Martin, Chesbro, Pavley, and Torlakson.
- What is the current status of SB 93?
- This bill died with 2001-2002 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 93?
- Track SB 93 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 93
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 93
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →