United States 119th Congress Status: In Committee 1 R cosponsors

HR 9022 — Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2027

Last action — Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1377 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1181, H.R. 9022, H.R. 8595 and H.R. 9237. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 1181 and H.R. 9237 under a closed rule and H.R. 9022 and H.R. 8595 under a structured rule. The resolution provides for one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit on each bill.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced May 22, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.

Odds of enactment

Low chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Stalled 16% · moderate confidence
  • In Committee

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

In plain language

This bill provides funding for energy and water development programs.

The bill allocates financial resources for various energy and water development initiatives. It aims to support programs related to energy production, water management, and infrastructure.

Bill Text

What Congress says this changes

H. Rept. 119-667

Published by the reporting committee Not generated — this is the committee's own “Changes in Existing Law Made by the Bill, as Reported”.

Text to be removed appears in [brackets]. Newly inserted text is italicised in the official report and cannot be marked in this plain-text rendition — read the official PDF ↗ for the authoritative formatting.

changes in existing law made by 
the bill, as reported, are shown as follows (existing law 
proposed to be omitted is enclosed in black brackets, new 
matter is printed in italics, and existing law in which no 
change is proposed is shown in roman):

 WATER INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE NATION ACT

 * * * * * * *

 TITLE III--NATURAL RESOURCES

 * * * * * * *

 Subtitle J--California Water

 * * * * * * *

SEC. 4007. STORAGE.

 (a) Definitions.--In this subtitle:
 (1) Federally owned storage project.--The term 
 ``federally owned storage project'' means any project 
 involving a surface water storage facility in a 
 Reclamation State--
 (A) to which the United States holds title; 
 and
 (B) that was authorized to be constructed, 
 operated, and maintained pursuant to the 
 reclamation laws.
 (2) State-led storage project.--The term ``State-led 
 storage project'' means any project in a Reclamation 
 State that--
 (A) involves a groundwater or surface water 
 storage facility constructed, operated, and 
 maintained by any State, department of a State, 
 subdivision of a State, or public agency 
 organized pursuant to State law; and
 (B) provides a benefit in meeting any 
 obligation under Federal law (including 
 regulations).
 (b) Federally Owned Storage Projects.--
 (1) Agreements.--On the request of any State, any 
 department, agency, or subdivision of a State, or any 
 public agency organized pursuant to State law, the 
 Secretary of the Interior may negotiate and enter into 
 an agreement on behalf of the United States for the 
 design, study, and construction or expansion of any 
 federally owned storage project in accordance with this 
 section.
 (2) Federal cost share.--Subject to the requirements 
 of this subsection, the Secretary of the Interior may 
 participate in a federally owned storage project in an 
 amount equal to not more than 50 percent of the total 
 cost of the federally owned storage project.
 (3) Commencement.--The construction of a federally 
 owned storage project that is the subject of an 
 agreement under this subsection shall not commence 
 until the Secretary of the Interior--
 (A) determines that the proposed federally 
 owned storage project is feasible in accordance 
 with the reclamation laws;
 (B) secures an agreement providing upfront 
 funding as is necessary to pay the non-Federal 
 share of the capital costs; and
 (C) determines that, in return for the 
 Federal cost-share investment in the federally 
 owned storage project, at least a proportionate 
 share of the project benefits are Federal 
 benefits, including water supplies dedicated to 
 specific purposes such as environmental 
 enhancement and wildlife refuges.
 (4) Environmental laws.--In participating in a 
 federally owned storage project under this subsection, 
 the Secretary of the Interior shall comply with all 
 applicable environmental laws, including the National 
 Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et 
 seq.).
 (c) State-Led Storage Projects.--
 (1) In general.--Subject to the requirements of this 
 subsection, the Secretary of the Interior may 
 participate in a State-led storage project in an amount 
 equal to not more than 25 percent of the total cost of 
 the State-led storage project.
 (2) Request by governor.--Participation by the 
 Secretary of the Interior in a State-led storage 
 project under this subsection shall not occur unless--
 (A) the participation has been requested by 
 the Governor of the State in which the State-
 led storage project is located;
 (B) the State or local sponsor determines, 
 and the Secretary of the Interior concurs, 
 that--
 (i) the State-led storage project is 
 technically and financially feasible 
 and provides a Federal benefit in 
 accordance with the reclamation laws;
 (ii) sufficient non-Federal funding 
 is available to complete the State-led 
 storage project; and
 (iii) the State-led storage project 
 sponsors are financially solvent;
 (C) the Secretary of the Interior determines 
 that, in return for the Federal cost-share 
 investment in the State-led storage project, at 
 least a proportional share of the project 
 benefits are the Federal benefits, including 
 water supplies dedicated to specific purposes 
 such as environmental enhancement and wildlife 
 refuges; and
 (D) the Secretary of the Interior submits to 
 Congress a written notification of these 
 determinations within 30 days of making such 
 determinations.
 (3) Environmental laws.--When participating in a 
 State-led storage project under this subsection, the 
 Secretary shall comply with all applicable 
 environmental laws, including the National 
 Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et 
 seq.).
 (4) Information.--When participating in a State-led 
 storage project under this subsection, the Secretary of 
 the Interior--
 (A) may rely on reports prepared by the 
 sponsor of the State-led storage project, 
 including feasibility (or equivalent) studies, 
 environmental analyses, and other pertinent 
 reports and analyses; but
 (B) shall retain responsibility for making 
 the independent determinations described in 
 paragraph (2).
 (d) Authority To Provide Assistance.--The Secretary of the 
Interior may provide financial assistance under this subtitle 
to carry out projects within any Reclamation State.
 (e) Rights To Use Capacity.--Subject to compliance with State 
water rights laws, the right to use the capacity of a federally 
owned storage project or State-led storage project for which 
the Secretary of the Interior has entered into an agreement 
under this subsection shall be allocated in such manner as may 
be mutually agreed to by the Secretary of the Interior and each 
other party to the agreement.
 (f) Compliance With California Water Bond.--
 (1) In general.--The provision of Federal funding for 
 construction of a State-led storage project in the 
 State of California shall be subject to the condition 
 that the California Water Commission shall determine 
 that the State-led storage project is consistent with 
 the California Water Quality, Supply, and 
 Infrastructure Improvement Act, approved by California 
 voters on November 4, 2014.
 (2) Applicability.--This subsection expires on the 
 date on which State bond funds available under the Act 
 referred to in paragraph (1) are expended.
 (g) Partnership and Agreements.--The Secretary of the 
Interior, acting through the Commissioner, may partner or enter 
into an agreement regarding the water storage projects 
identified in section 103(d)(1) of the Water Supply, 
Reliability, and Environmental Improvement Act (Public Law 108-
361; 118 Stat. 1688) with local joint powers authorities formed 
pursuant to State law by irrigation districts and other local 
water districts and local governments within the applicable 
hydrologic region, to advance those projects.
 (h) Authorization of Appropriations.--
 (1) $335,000,000 of funding in section 4011(e) is 
 authorized to remain available until expended.
 (2) Projects can only receive funding if enacted 
 appropriations legislation designates funding to them 
 by name, after the Secretary recommends specific 
 projects for funding pursuant to this section and 
 transmits such recommendations to the appropriate 
 committees of Congress.
 (i) Sunset.--This section shall apply only to federally owned 
storage projects and State-led storage projects that the 
Secretary of the Interior determines to be feasible before 
January 1, [2021] 2027.
 (j) Consistency With State Law.--Nothing in this section 
preempts or modifies any obligation of the United States to act 
in conformance with applicable State law.
 (k) Calfed Authorization.--Title I of Public Law 108-361 (the 
Calfed Bay-Delta Authorization Act) (118 Stat. 1681; 123 Stat. 
2860; 128 Stat. 164; 128 Stat. 2312) (as amended by section 207 
of Public Law 114-113) is amended by striking ``2017'' each 
place it appears and inserting ``2019''.

 * * * * * * *

SEC. 4013. DURATION.

 This subtitle shall expire on the date that is 5 years after 
the date of its enactment, with the exception of--
 (1) [section 4004, which shall expire 10 years after 
 the date of its enactment] section 4004, which shall 
 expire on December 16, 2034; and
 (2) projects under construction in sections 4007, 
 4009(a), and 4009(c) on or before December 16, 2026.

 * * * * * * *

 ---------- 

 RECLAMATION WASTEWATER AND GROUNDWATER STUDY AND 
 FACILITIES ACT

 * * * * * * *

 TITLE XVI--RECLAMATION WASTEWATER AND GROUNDWATER STUDIES

 * * * * * * *

SEC. 1602. GENERAL AUTHORITY.

 (a) The Secretary of the Interior (hereafter ``Secretary''), 
acting pursuant to the Reclamation Act of 1902 (Act of June 17, 
1902, 32 Stat. 388) and Acts amendatory thereof and 
supplementary thereto (hereafter ``Federal reclamation laws''), 
is directed to undertake a program to investigate and identify 
opportunities for reclamation and reuse of municipal, 
industrial, domestic, and agricultural wastewater, and 
naturally impaired ground and surface waters, for the design 
and construction of demonstration and permanent facilities to 
reclaim and reuse wastewater, and to conduct research, 
including desalting, for the reclamation of wastewater and 
naturally impaired ground and surface waters.
 (b) Such program shall be limited to the States and areas 
referred to in section 1 of the Reclamation Act of 1902 (Act of 
June 17, 1902, 32 Stat. 388) as amended, and the State of 
Hawaii.
 (c) The Secretary is authorized to enter into such agreements 
and promulgate such regulations as may be necessary to carry 
out the purposes and provisions of this title.
 (d) The secretary shall not investigate, promote or 
implement, pursuant to this title, any project intended to 
reclaim and reuse agricultural wastewater generated in the 
service area of the San Luis Unit of the Central Valley 
Project, California, except those measures recommended for 
action by the San Joaquin Valley Drainage Program in the report 
entitled A Management Plan for Agricultural Subsurface Drainage 
and Related Problems on the Westside San Joaquin Valley 
(September 1990).
 (e) Authorization of New Water Recycling and Reuse 
Projects.--
 (1) Submission to the secretary.--
 (A) In general.--Non-Federal interests may 
 submit proposals for projects eligible to be 
 authorized pursuant to this section in the form 
 of completed feasibility studies to the 
 Secretary.
 (B) Eligible projects.--A project shall be 
 considered eligible for consideration under 
 this section if the project reclaims and 
 reuses--
 (i) municipal, industrial, domestic, 
 or agricultural wastewater; or
 (ii) impaired ground or surface 
 waters.
 (C) Guidelines.--Within 60 days of the 
 enactment of this Act the Secretary shall issue 
 guidelines for feasibility studies for water 
 recycling and reuse projects to provide 
 sufficient information for the formulation of 
 the studies.
 (2) Review by the secretary.--The Secretary shall 
 review each feasibility study received under paragraph 
 (1)(A) for the purpose of--
 (A) determining whether the study, and the 
 process under which the study was developed, 
 each comply with Federal laws and regulations 
 applicable to feasibility studies of water 
 recycling and reuse projects; and
 (B) the project is technically and 
 financially feasible and provides a Federal 
 benefit in accordance with the reclamation 
 laws.
 (3) Submission to congress.--Not later than 180 days 
 after the date of receipt of a feasibility study 
 received under paragraph (1)(A), the Secretary shall 
 submit to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 
 of the Senate and the Committee on Natural Resources of 
 the House of Representatives a report that describes--
 (A) the results of the Secretary's review of 
 the study under paragraph (2), including a 
 determination of whether the project is 
 feasible;
 (B) any recommendations the Secretary may 
 have concerning the plan or design of the 
 project; and
 (C) any conditions the Secretary may require 
 for construction of the project.
 (4) Eligibility for funding.--The non-Federal project 
 sponsor of any project determined by the Secretary to 
 be feasible under paragraph (3)(A) shall be eligible to 
 apply to the Secretary for funding for the Federal 
 share of the costs of planning, designing and 
 constructing the project pursuant to subsection (f).
 (f) Competitive Grant Program for the Funding of Water 
Recycling and Reuse Projects.--
 (1) Establishment.--The Secretary shall establish a 
 competitive grant program under which the non-Federal 
 project sponsor of any project determined by the 
 Secretary to be feasible under subsection (e)(3)(A) 
 shall be eligible to apply for funding for the 
 planning, design, and construction of the project, 
 subject to subsection (g)(2).
 (2) Priority.--When funding projects under paragraph 
 (1), the Secretary shall give funding priority to 
 projects that meet one or more of the criteria listed 
 in paragraph (3) and are located in an area that--
 (A) has been identified by the United States 
 Drought Monitor as experiencing severe, 
 extreme, or exceptional drought at any time in 
 the 4-year period before such funds are made 
 available; or
 (B) was designated as a disaster area by a 
 State during the 4-year period before such 
 funds are made available.
 (3) Criteria.--The project criteria referred to in 
 paragraph (2) are the following:
 (A) Projects that are likely to provide a 
 more reliable water supply for States and local 
 governments.
 (B) Projects that are likely to increase the 
 water management flexibility and reduce impacts 
 on environmental resources from projects 
 operated by Federal and State agencies.
 (C) Projects that are regional in nature.
 (D) Projects with multiple stakeholders.
 (E) Projects that provide multiple benefits, 
 including water supply reliability, eco-system 
 benefits, groundwater management and 
 enhancements, and water quality improvements.
 (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--
 (1) There is authorized to be appropriated to the 
 Secretary of the Interior an additional [$50,000,000] 
 $177,500,000 to remain available until expended.
 (2) Projects can only receive funding if enacted 
 appropriations legislation designates funding to them 
 by name, after the Secretary recommends specific 
 projects for funding pursuant to subsection (f) and 
 transmits such recommendations to the appropriate 
 committees of Congress.

 * * * * * * *

 ---------- 

 WATER DESALINATION ACT OF 1996

 * * * * * * * 
 
SEC. 4. DESALINATION DEMONSTRATION AND DEVELOPMENT.

 (a) In General.--In order to further demonstrate the 
feasibility of desalination processes investigated either 
independently or in research conducted pursuant to section 3, 
the Secretary shall administer and conduct a demonstration and 
development program for water desalination and related 
activities, including the following:
 (1) Desalination plants and modules.--Conduct or 
 contract for technical work, including the design, 
 construction, and testing of plants and modules to 
 develop desalination processes and concepts, including 
 modulesspecifically designed for brine management.
 (2) Projects.--
 (A) In general.--Subject to the requirements 
 of this subsection, the Secretary of the 
 Interior may participate in an eligible 
 desalination project in an amount equal to not 
 more than 25 percent of the total cost of the 
 eligible desalination project.
 (B) Eligible desalination project.--The term 
 ``eligible desalination project'' means any 
 project in a Reclamation State, that--
 (i) involves an ocean or brackish 
 water desalination facility either 
 constructed, operated and maintained; 
 or sponsored by any State, department 
 of a State, subdivision of a State or 
 public agency organized pursuant to a 
 State law; and
 (ii) provides a Federal benefit in 
 accordance with the reclamation laws 
 (including regulations).
 (C) State role.--Participation by the 
 Secretary of the Interior in an eligible 
 desalination project under this subsection 
 shall not occur unless--
 (i) the project is included in a 
 state-approved plan or federal 
 participation has been requested by the 
 Governor of the State in which the 
 eligible desalination project is 
 located; and
 (ii) the State or local sponsor 
 determines, and the Secretary of the 
 Interior concurs, that--
 (I) the eligible desalination 
 project is technically and 
 financially feasible and 
 provides a Federal benefit in 
 accordance with the reclamation 
 laws;
 (II) sufficient non-Federal 
 funding is available to 
 complete the eligible 
 desalination project; and
 (III) the eligible 
 desalination project sponsors 
 are financially solvent; and
 (iii) the Secretary of the Interior 
 submits to Congress a written 
 notification of these determinations 
 within 30 days of making such 
 determinations.
 (D) Environmental laws.--When participating 
 in an eligible desalination project under this 
 subsection, the Secretary shall comply with all 
 applicable environmental laws, including the 
 National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 
 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
 (E) Information.--When participating in an 
 eligible desalination project under this 
 subsection, the Secretary of the Interior--
 (i) may rely on reports prepared by 
 the sponsor of the eligible 
 desalination project, including 
 feasibility (or equivalent) studies, 
 environmental analyses, and other 
 pertinent reports and analyses; but
 (ii) shall retain responsibility for 
 making the independent determinations 
 described in subparagraph (C).
 (F) Authorization of appropriations.--
 (i) [$30,000,000] $106,500,000 of 
 funding is authorized to remain 
 available until expended; and
 (ii) Projects can only receive 
 funding if enacted appropriations 
 legislation designates funding to them 
 by name, after the Secretary recommends 
 specific projects for funding pursuant 
 to this subsection and transmits such 
 recommendations to the appropriate 
 committees of Congress.
 (3) Byproducts.--Study methods for the marketing of 
 byproducts resulting from the desalting of water to 
 offset the costs of treatment and to reduce 
 environmental impacts of those byproducts.
 (4) Economic surveys.--Conduct economic studies and 
 surveys to determine present and prospective costs of 
 producing water for beneficial purposes in various 
 locations by desalination processes compared to other 
 methods.
 (b) Cooperative Agreements.--Federal participation in 
desalination activities may be conducted through cooperative 
agreements, including cost-sharing agreements, with non-Federal 
public utilities and State and local governmental agencies and 
other entities, in order to develop recommendations for Federal 
participation in processes and plants utilizing desalting 
technologies for the production of water.
 (c) Prioritization.--In carrying out demonstration and 
development activities under this section, the Secretary shall 
prioritize projects--
 (1) for the benefit of drought-stricken States and 
 communities;
 (2) for the benefit of States that have authorized 
 funding for research and development of desalination 
 technologies and projects;
 (3) that can reduce reliance on imported water 
 supplies that have an impact on species listed under 
 the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et 
 seq.); and
 (4) that demonstrably leverage the experience of 
 international partners with considerable expertise in 
 desalination, such as the State of Israel.
 (d) Water Production.--The Secretary shall provide, as part 
of the annual budget submission to Congress, an estimate of how 
much water has been produced and delivered in the past fiscal 
year using processes and facilities developed or demonstrated 
using assistance provided under sections 3 and 4. This 
submission shall include, to the extent practicable, available 
information on a detailed water accounting by process and 
facility and the cost per acre foot of water produced and 
delivered.

 * * * * * * *

 ---------- 

 SECTION 103 OF THE CALFED BAY-DELTA AUTHORIZATION ACT

SEC. 103. BAY DELTA PROGRAM.

 (a) In General.--
 (1) Record of decision as general framework.--The 
 Record of Decision is approved as a general framework 
 for addressing the Calfed Bay-Delta Program, including 
 its components relating to water storage, ecosystem 
 restoration, water supply reliability (including new 
 firm yield), conveyance, water use efficiency, water 
 quality, water transfers, watersheds, the Environmental 
 Water Account, levee stability, governance, and 
 science.
 (2) Requirements.--
 (A) In general.--The Secretary and the heads 
 of the Federal agencies are authorized to carry 
 out the activities described in subsections (c) 
 through (f) consistent with--
 (i) the Record of Decision;
 (ii) the requirement that Program 
 activities consisting of protecting 
 drinking water quality, restoring 
 ecological health, improving water 
 supply reliability (including 
 additional storage, conveyance, and new 
 firm yield), and protecting Delta 
 levees will progress in a balanced 
 manner; and
 (iii) this title.
 (B) Multiple benefits.--In selecting 
 activities and projects, the Secretary and the 
 heads of the Federal agencies shall consider 
 whether the activities and projects have 
 multiple benefits.
 (b) Authorized Activities.--The Secretary and the heads of 
the Federal agencies are authorized to carry out the activities 
described in subsections (c) through (f) in furtherance of the 
Calfed Bay-Delta Program as set forth in the Record of 
Decision, subject to the cost-share and other provisions of 
this title, if the activity has been--
 (1) subject to environmental review and approval, as 
 required under applicable Federal and State law; and
 (2) approved and certified by the relevant Federal 
 agency, following consultation and coordination with 
 the Governor, to be consistent with the Record of 
 Decision.
 (c) Authorizations for Federal Agencies Under Applicable 
Law.--
 (1) Secretary of the interior.--The Secretary of the 
 Interior is authorized to carry out the activities 
 described in paragraphs (1) through (10) of subsection 
 (d), to the extent authorized under the reclamation 
 laws, the Central Valley Project Improvement Act (title 
 XXXIV of Public Law 102-575; 106 Stat. 4706), the Fish 
 and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.), 
 the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et 
 seq.), and other applicable law.
 (2) Administrator of the environmental protection 
 agency.--The Administrator of the Environmental 
 Protection Agency is authorized to carry out the 
 activities described in paragraphs (3), (5), (6), (7), 
 (8), and (9) of subsection (d), to the extent 
 authorized under the Federal Water Pollution Control 
 Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), the Safe Drinking Water 
 Act (42 U.S.C. 300f et seq.), and other applicable law.
 (3) Secretary of the army.--The Secretary of the Army 
 is authorized to carry out the activities described in 
 paragraphs (1), (2), (6), (7), (8), and (9) of 
 subsection (d), to the extent authorized under flood 
 control, water resource development, and other 
 applicable law.
 (4) Secretary of commerce.--The Secretary of Commerce 
 is authorized to carry out the activities described in 
 paragraphs (2), (6), (7), and (9) of subsection (d), to 
 the extent authorized under the Fish and Wildlife 
 Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.), the 
 Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et 
 seq.), and other applicable law.
 (5) Secretary of agriculture.--The Secretary of 
 Agriculture is authorized to carry out the activities 
 described in paragraphs (3), (5), (6), (7), (8), and 
 (9) of subsection (d), to the extent authorized under 
 title XII of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 
 3801 et seq.), the Farm Security and Rural Investment 
 Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-171; 116 Stat. 134) 
 (including amendments made by that Act), and other 
 applicable law.
 (d) Description of Activities Under Applicable Law.--
 (1) Water storage.--
 (A) In general.--Activities under this 
 paragraph consist of--
 (i) planning and feasibility studies 
 for projects to be pursued with 
 project-specific study for enlargement 
 of--
 (I) the Shasta Dam in Shasta 
 County; and
 (II) the Los Vaqueros 
 Reservoir in Contra Costa 
 County;
 (ii) planning and feasibility studies 
 for the following projects requiring 
 further consideration--
 (I) the Sites Reservoir in 
 Colusa County; and
 (II) the Upper San Joaquin 
 River storage in Fresno and 
 Madera Counties;
 (iii) developing and implementing 
 groundwater management and groundwater 
 storage projects; and
 (iv) comprehensive water management 
 planning.
 (B) Storage project authorization and 
 balanced calfed implementation.--
 (i) In general.--If on completion of 
 the feasibility study for a project 
 described in clause (i) or (ii) of 
 subparagraph (A), the Secretary, in 
 consultation with the Governor, 
 determines that the project should be 
 constructed in whole or in part with 
 Federal funds, the Secretary shall 
 submit the feasibility study to 
 Congress.
 (ii) Finding of imbalance.--If 
 Congress fails to authorize 
 construction of the project by the end 
 of the next full session following the 
 submission of the feasibility study, 
 the Secretary, in consultation with the 
 Governor, shall prepare a written 
 determination making a finding of 
 imbalance for the Calfed Bay-Delta 
 Program.
 (iii) Report on rebalancing.--
 (I) In general.--If the 
 Secretary makes a finding of 
 imbalance for the Program under 
 clause (ii), the Secretary, in 
 consultation with the Governor, 
 shall, not later than 180 days 
 after the end of the full 
 session described in clause 
 (ii), prepare and submit to 
 Congress a report on the 
 measures necessary to rebalance 
 the Program.
 (II) Schedules and 
 alternatives.--The report shall 
 include preparation of revised 
 schedules and identification of 
 alternatives to rebalance the 
 Program, including resubmission 
 of the project to Congress with 
 or without modification, 
 construction of other projects, 
 and construction of other 
 projects that provide 
 equivalent water supply and 
 other benefits at equal or 
 lesser cost.
 (C) Water supply and yield study.--
 (i) In general.--The Secretary, 
 acting through the Bureau of 
 Reclamation and in coordination with 
 the State, shall conduct a study of 
 available water supplies and existing 
 and future needs for water--
 (I) within the units of the 
 Central Valley Project;
 (II) within the area served 
 by Central Valley Project 
 agricultural, municipal, and 
 industrial water service 
 contractors; and
 (III) within the Calfed Delta 
 solution area.
 (ii) Relationship to prior study.--In 
 conducting the study, the Secretary 
 shall incorporate and revise, as 
 necessary, the results of the study 
 required by section 3408(j) of the 
 Central Valley Project Improvement Act 
 of 1992 (Public Law 102-575; 106 Stat. 
 4730).
 (iii) Report.--Not later than 1 year 
 after the date of enactment of this 
 Act, the Secretary shall submit to the 
 appropriate authorizing and 
 appropriating committees of the Senate 
 and the House of Representatives a 
 report describing the results of the 
 study, including--
 (I) new firm yield and water 
 supply improvements, if any, 
 for Central Valley Project 
 agricultural water service 
 contractors and municipal and 
 industrial water service 
 contractors, including those 
 identified in Bulletin 160;
 (II) all water management 
 actions or projects, including 
 those identified in Bulletin 
 160, that would--
 (aa) improve firm 
 yield or water supply; 
 and
 (bb) if taken or 
 constructed, balance 
 available water 
 supplies and existing 
 demand with due 
 recognition of water 
 right priorities and 
 environmental needs;
 (III) the financial costs of 
 the actions and projects 
 described under subclause (II); 
 and
 (IV) the beneficiaries of 
 those actions and projects and 
 an assessment of the 
 willingness of the 
 beneficiaries to pay the 
 capital costs and operation and 
 maintenance costs of the 
 actions and projects.
 (D) Management.--The Secretary shall conduct 
 activities related to developing groundwater 
 storage projects to the extent authorized under 
 law.
 (E) Comprehensive water planning.--The 
 Secretary shall conduct activities related to 
 comprehensive water management planning to the 
 extent authorized under law.
 (2) Conveyance.--
 (A) South delta actions.--
 (i) In general.--In the case of the 
 South Delta, activities under this 
 subparagraph consist of--
 (I) the South Delta 
 Improvements Program through 
 actions to--
 (aa) increase the 
 State Water Project 
 export limit to 8,500 
 cfs;
 (bb) install 
 permanent, operable 
 barriers in the South 
 Delta, under which 
 Federal agencies shall 
 cooperate with the 
 State to accelerate 
 installation of the 
 permanent, operable 
 barriers in the South 
 Delta, with an intent 
 to complete that 
 installation not later 
 than September 30, 
 2007;
 (cc) evaluate, 
 consistent with the 
 Record of Decision, 
 fish screens and intake 
 facilities at the Tracy 
 Pumping Plant 
 facilities; and
 (dd) increase the 
 State Water Project 
 export to the maximum 
 capability of 10,300 
 cfs;
 (II) reduction of 
 agricultural drainage in South 
 Delta channels, and other 
 actions necessary to minimize 
 the impact of drainage on 
 drinking water quality;
 (III) evaluation of lower San 
 Joaquin River floodway 
 improvements;
 (IV) installation and 
 operation of temporary barriers 
 in the South Delta until fully 
 operable barriers are 
 constructed; and
 (V) actions to protect 
 navigation and local diversions 
 not adequately protected by 
 temporary barriers.
 (ii) Actions to increase pumping.--
 Actions to increase pumping shall be 
 accomplished in a manner consistent 
 with the Record of Decision requirement 
 to avoid redirected impacts and adverse 
 impacts to fishery protection and with 
 any applicable Federal or State law 
 that protects--
 (I) water diversions and use 
 (including avoidance of 
 increased costs of diversion) 
 by in-Delta water users 
 (including in-Delta 
 agricultural users that have 
 historically relied on water 
 diverted for use in the Delta);
 (II) water quality for 
 municipal, industrial, 
 agricultural, and other uses; 
 and
 (III) water supplies for 
 areas of origin.
 (B) North delta actions.--In the case of the 
 North Delta, activities under this subparagraph 
 consist of--
 (i) evaluation and implementation of 
 improved operational procedures for the 
 Delta Cross Channel to address fishery 
 and water quality concerns;
 (ii) evaluation of a screened 
 through-Delta facility on the 
 Sacramento River; and
 (iii) evaluation of lower Mokelumne 
 River floodway improvements.
 (C) Interties.--Activities under this 
 subparagraph consist of--
 (i) evaluation and construction of an 
 intertie between the State Water 
 Project California Aqueduct and the 
 Central Valley Project Delta Mendota 
 Canal, near the City of Tracy, as an 
 operation and maintenance activity, 
 except that the Secretary shall design 
 and construct the intertie in a manner 
 consistent with a possible future 
 expansion of the intertie capacity (as 
 described in subsection (f)(1)(B)); and
 (ii) assessment of a connection of 
 the Central Valley Project to the 
 Clifton Court Forebay of the State 
 Water Project, with a corresponding 
 increase in the screened intake of the 
 Forebay.
 (D) Program to meet standards.--
 (i) In general.--Prior to increasing 
 export limits from the Delta for the 
 purposes of conveying water to south-
 of-Delta Central Valley Project 
 contractors or increasing deliveries 
 through an intertie, the Secretary 
 shall, not later than 1 year after the 
 date of enactment of this Act, in 
 consultation with the Governor, develop 
 and initiate implementation of a 
 program to meet all existing water 
 quality standards and objectives for 
 which the Central Valley Project has 
 responsibility.
 (ii) Measures.--In developing and 
 implementing the program, the Secretary 
 shall include, to the maximum extent 
 feasible, the measures described in 
 clauses (iii) through (vii).
 (iii) Recirculation program.--The 
 Secretary shall incorporate into the 
 program a recirculation program to 
 provide flow, reduce salinity 
 concentrations in the San Joaquin 
 River, and reduce the reliance on the 
 New Melones Reservoir for meeting water 
 quality and fishery flow objectives 
 through the use of excess capacity in 
 export pumping and conveyance 
 facilities.
 (iv) Best management practices 
 plan.--
 (I) In general.--The 
 Secretary shall develop and 
 implement, in coordination with 
 the State's programs to improve 
 water quality in the San 
 Joaquin River, a best 
 management practices plan to 
 reduce the water quality 
 impacts of the discharges from 
 wildlife refuges that receive 
 water from the Federal 
 Government and discharge salt 
 or other constituents into the 
 San Joaquin River.
 (II) Coordination with 
 interested parties.--The plan 
 shall be developed in 
 coordination with interested 
 parties in the San Joaquin 
 Valley and the Delta.
 (III) Coordination with 
 entities that discharge 
 water.--The Secretary shall 
 also coordinate activities 
 under this clause with other 
 entities that discharge water 
 into the San Joaquin River to 
 reduce salinity concentrations 
 discharged into the River, 
 including the timing of 
 discharges to optimize their 
 assimilation.
 (v) Acquisition of water.--The 
 Secretary shall incorporate into the 
 program the acquisition from willing 
 sellers of water from streams tributary 
 to the San Joaquin River or other 
 sources to provide flow, dilute 
 discharges of salt or other 
 constituents, and to improve water 
 quality in the San Joaquin River below 
 the confluence of the Merced and San 
 Joaquin Rivers, and to reduce the 
 reliance on New Melones Reservoir for 
 meeting water quality and fishery flow 
 objectives.
 (vi) Purpose.--The purpose of the 
 authority and direction provided to the 
 Secretary under this subparagraph is to 
 provide greater flexibility in meeting 
 the existing water quality standards 
 and objectives for which the Central 
 Valley Project has responsibility so as 
 to reduce the demand on water from New 
 Melones Reservoir used for that purpose 
 and to assist the Secretary in meeting 
 any obligations to Central Valley 
 Project contractors from the New 
 Melones Project.
 (vii) Updating of new melones 
 operating plan.--The Secretary shall 
 update the New Melones operating plan 
 to take into account, among other 
 things, the actions described in this 
 title that are designed to reduce the 
 reliance on New Melones Reservoir for 
 meeting water quality and fishery flow 
 objectives, and to ensure that actions 
 to enhance fisheries in the Stanislaus 
 River are based on the best available 
 science.
 (3) Water use efficiency.--
 (A) Water conservation projects.--Activities 
 under this paragraph include water conservation 
 projects that provide water supply reliability, 
 water quality, and ecosystem benefits to the 
 California Bay-Delta system.
 (B) Technical assistance.--Activities under 
 this paragraph include technical assistance for 
 urban and agricultural water conservation 
 projects.
 (C) Water recycling and desalination 
 projects.--Activities under this paragraph 
 include water recycling and desalination 
 projects, including groundwater remediation 
 projects and projects identified in the Bay 
 Area Water Plan and the Southern California 
 Comprehensive Water Reclamation and Reuse Study 
 and other projects, giving priority to projects 
 that include regional solutions to benefit 
 regional water supply and reliability needs.
 (D) Water measurement and transfer actions.--
 Activities under this paragraph include water 
 measurement and transfer actions.
 (E) Urban water conservation.--Activities 
 under this paragraph include implementation of 
 best management practices for urban water 
 conservation.
 (F) Reclamation and recycling projects.--
 (i) Projects.--This subparagraph 
 applies to--
 (I) projects identified in 
 the Southern California 
 Comprehensive Water Reclamation 
 and Reuse Study, dated April 
 2001 and authorized by section 
 1606 of the Reclamation 
 Wastewater and Groundwater 
 Study and Facilities Act (43 
 U.S.C. 390h-4); and
 (II) projects identified in 
 the San Francisco Bay Area 
 Regional Water Recycling 
 Program described in the San 
 Francisco Bay Area Regional 
 Water Recycling Program 
 Recycled Water Master Plan, 
 dated December 1999 and 
 authorized by section 1611 of 
 the Reclamation Wastewater and 
 Groundwater Study and 
 Facilities Act (43 U.S.C. 390h-
 9).
 (ii) Deadline.--Not later than 180 
 days after the date of enactment of 
 this Act, the Secretary shall--
 (I) complete the review of 
 the existing studies of the 
 projects described in clause 
 (i); and
 (II) make the feasibility 
 determinations described in 
 clause (iii).
 (iii) Feasibility determinations.--A 
 project described in clause (i) is 
 presumed to be feasible if the 
 Secretary determines for the project--
 (I) in consultation with the 
 affected local sponsoring 
 agency and the State, that the 
 existing planning and 
 environmental studies for the 
 project (together with 
 supporting materials and 
 documentation) have been 
 prepared consistent with Bureau 
 of Reclamation procedures for 
 projects under consideration 
 for financial assistance under 
 the Reclamation Wastewater and 
 Groundwater Study and 
 Facilities Act (43 U.S.C. 390h 
 et seq.); and
 (II) that the planning and 
 environmental studies for the 
 project (together with 
 supporting materials and 
 documentation) demonstrate that 
 the project will contribute to 
 the goals of improving water 
 supply reliability in the 
 Calfed solution area or the 
 Colorado River Basin within the 
 State and otherwise meets the 
 requirements of section 1604 of 
 the Reclamation Wastewater and 
 Groundwater Study and 
 Facilities Act (43 U.S.C. 390h-
 2).
 (iv) Report.--Not later than 90 days 
 after the date of completion of a 
 feasibility study or the review of a 
 feasibility study under this 
 subparagraph, the Secretary shall 
 submit to the appropriate authorizing 
 and appropriating committees of the 
 Senate and the House of Representatives 
 a report describing the results of the 
 study or review.
 (4) Water transfers.--Activities under this paragraph 
 consist of--
 (A) increasing the availability of existing 
 facilities for water transfers;
 (B) lowering transaction costs through permit 
 streamlining; and
 (C) maintaining a water transfer information 
 clearinghouse.
 (5) Integrated regional water management plans.--
 Activities under this paragraph consist of assisting 
 local and regional communities in the State in 
 developing and implementing integrated regional water 
 management plans to carry out projects and programs 
 that improve water supply reliability, water quality, 
 ecosystem restoration, and flood protection, or meet 
 other local and regional needs, in a manner that is 
 consistent with, and makes a significant contribution 
 to, the Calfed Bay-Delta Program.
 (6) Ecosystem restoration.--
 (A) In general.--Activities under this 
 paragraph consist of--
 (i) implementation of large-scale 
 restoration projects in San Francisco 
 Bay and the Delta and its tributaries;
 (ii) restoration of habitat in the 
 Delta, San Pablo Bay, and Suisun Bay 
 and Marsh, including tidal wetland and 
 riparian habitat;
 (iii) fish screen and fish passage 
 improvement projects, including the 
 Sacramento River Small Diversion Fish 
 Screen Program;
 (iv) implementation of an invasive 
 species program, including prevention, 
 control, and eradication;
 (v) development and integration of 
 Federal and State agricultural programs 
 that benefit wildlife into the 
 Ecosystem Restoration Program;
 (vi) financial and technical support 
 for locally-based collaborative 
 programs to restore habitat while 
 addressing the concerns of local 
 communities;
 (vii) water quality improvement 
 projects to manage or reduce 
 concentrations of salinity, selenium, 
 mercury, pesticides, trace metals, 
 dissolved oxygen, turbidity, sediment, 
 and other pollutants;
 (viii) land and water acquisitions to 
 improve habitat and fish spawning and 
 survival in the Delta and its 
 tributaries;
 (ix) integrated flood management, 
 ecosystem restoration, and levee 
 protection projects;
 (x) scientific evaluations and 
 targeted research on Program 
 activities; and
 (xi) strategic planning and tracking 
 of Program performance.
 (B) Reporting requirements.--The Secretary or 
 the head of the relevant Federal agency (as 
 appropriate under clause (ii)) shall provide to 
 the appropriate authorizing committees of the 
 Senate and the House of Representatives and 
 other appropriate parties in accordance with 
 this subparagraph--
 (i) an annual ecosystem program plan 
 report in accordance with subparagraph 
 (C); and
 (ii) detailed project reports in 
 accordance with subparagraph (D).
 (C) Annual ecosystem program plan.--
 (i) In general.--Not later than 
 October 1 of each year, with respect to 
 each ecosystem restoration action 
 carried out using Federal funds under 
 this title, the Secretary, in 
 consultation with the Governor, shall 
 submit to the appropriate authorizing 
 committees of the Senate and the House 
 of Representatives an annual ecosystem 
 program plan report.
 (ii) Purposes.--The purposes of the 
 report are--
 (I) to describe the projects 
 and programs to implement this 
 subsection in the following 
 fiscal year; and
 (II) to establish priorities 
 for funding the projects and 
 programs for subsequent fiscal 
 years.
 (iii) Contents.--The report shall 
 describe--
 (I) the goals and objectives 
 of the programs and projects;
 (II) program accomplishments;
 (III) major activities of the 
 programs;
 (IV) the Federal agencies 
 involved in each project or 
 program identified in the plan 
 and the cost-share arrangements 
 with cooperating agencies;
 (V) the resource data and 
 ecological monitoring data to 
 be collected for the 
 restoration projects and how 
 the data are to be integrated, 
 streamlined, and designed to 
 measure the effectiveness and 
 overall trend of ecosystem 
 health in the Bay-Delta 
 watershed;
 (VI) implementation schedules 
 and budgets;
 (VII) existing monitoring 
 programs and performance 
 measures;
 (VIII) the status and 
 effectiveness of measures to 
 minimize the impacts of the 
 program on agricultural land; 
 and
 (IX) a description of 
 expected benefits of the 
 restoration program relative to 
 the cost.
 (iv) Special rule for land 
 acquisition using federal funds.--For 
 each ecosystem restoration project 
 involving land acquisition using 
 Federal funds under this title, the 
 Secretary shall--
 (I) identify the specific 
 parcels to be acquired in the 
 annual ecosystem program plan 
 report under this subparagraph; 
 or
 (II) not later than 150 days 
 before the project is approved, 
 provide to the appropriate 
 authorizing committees of the 
 Senate and the House of 
 Representatives, the United 
 States Senators from the State, 
 and the United States 
 Representative whose district 
 would be affected, notice of 
 any such proposed land 
 acquisition using Federal funds 
 under this title submitted to 
 the Federal or State agency.
 (D) Detailed project reports.--
 (i) In general.--In the case of each 
 ecosystem restoration program or 
 project funded under this title that is 
 not specifically identified in an 
 annual ecosystem program plan under 
 subparagraph (C), not later than 45 
 days prior to approval, the Secretary, 
 in coordination with the State, shall 
 submit to the appropriate authorizing 
 committees of the Senate and the House 
 of Representatives recommendations on 
 the proposed program or project.
 (ii) Contents.--The recommendations 
 shall--
 (I) describe the selection of 
 the program or project, 
 including the level of public 
 involvement and independent 
 science review;
 (II) describe the goals, 
 objectives, and implementation 
 schedule of the program or 
 project, and the extent to 
 which the program or project 
 addresses regional and 
 programmatic goals and 
 priorities;
 (III) describe the monitoring 
 plans and performance measures 
 that will be used for 
 evaluating the performance of 
 the proposed program or 
 project;
 (IV) identify any cost-
 sharing arrangements with 
 cooperating entities;
 (V) identify how the proposed 
 program or project will comply 
 with all applicable Federal and 
 State laws, including the 
 National Environmental Policy 
 Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et 
 seq.); and
 (VI) in the case of any 
 program or project involving 
 the acquisition of private land 
 using Federal funds under this 
 title--
 (aa) describe the 
 process and timing of 
 notification of 
 interested members of 
 the public and local 
 governments;
 (bb) describe the 
 measures taken to 
 minimize impacts on 
 agricultural land 
 pursuant to the Record 
 of Decision; and
 (cc) include 
 preliminary management 
 plans for all 
 properties to be 
 acquired with Federal 
 funds, including an 
 overview of existing 
 conditions (including 
 habitat types in the 
 affected project area), 
 the expected ecological 
 benefits, preliminary 
 cost estimates, and 
 implementation 
 schedules.
 (7) Watersheds.--Activities under this paragraph 
 consist of--
 (A) building local capacity to assess and 
 manage watersheds affecting the Delta system;
 (B) technical assistance for watershed 
 assessments and management plans; and
 (C) developing and implementing locally-based 
 watershed conservation, maintenance, and 
 restoration actions.
 (8) Water quality.--Activities under this paragraph 
 consist of--
 (A) addressing drainage problems in the San 
 Joaquin Valley to improve downstream water 
 quality (including habitat restoration projects 
 that improve water quality) if--
 (i) a plan is in place for monitoring 
 downstream water quality improvements; 
 and
 (ii) State and local agencies are 
 consulted on the activities to be 
 funded;
 except that no right, benefit, or privilege is 
 created as a result of this subparagraph;
 (B) implementation of source control programs 
 in the Delta and its tributaries;
 (C) developing recommendations through 
 scientific panels and advisory council 
 processes to meet the Calfed Bay-Delta Program 
 goal of continuous improvement in Delta water 
 quality for all uses;
 (D) investing in treatment technology 
 demonstration projects;
 (E) controlling runoff into the California 
 aqueduct, the Delta-Mendota Canal, and other 
 similar conveyances;
 (F) addressing water quality problems at the 
 North Bay Aqueduct;
 (G) supporting and participating in the 
 development of projects to enable San Francisco 
 Bay Area water districts, and water entities in 
 San Joaquin and Sacramento Counties, to work 
 cooperatively to address their water quality 
 and supply reliability issues, including--
 (i) connections between aqueducts, 
 water transfers, water conservation 
 measures, institutional arrangements, 
 and infrastructure improvements that 
 encourage regional approaches; and
 (ii) investigations and studies of 
 available capacity in a project to 
 deliver water to the East Bay Municipal 
 Utility District under its contract 
 with the Bureau of Reclamation, dated 
 July 20, 2001, in order to determine if 
 such capacity can be utilized to meet 
 the objectives of this subparagraph;
 (H) development of water quality exchanges 
 and other programs to make high quality water 
 available for urban and other users;
 (I) development and implementation of a plan 
 to meet all Delta water quality standards for 
 which the Federal and State water projects have 
 responsibility;
 (J) development of recommendations through 
 science panels and advisory council processes 
 to meet the Calfed Bay-Delta Program goal of 
 continuous improvement in water quality for all 
 uses; and
 (K) projects that are consistent with the 
 framework of the water quality component of the 
 Calfed Bay-Delta Program.
 (9) Science.--Activities under this paragraph consist 
 of--
 (A) supporting establishment and maintenance 
 of an independent science board, technical 
 panels, and standing boards to provide 
 oversight and peer review of the Program;
 (B) conducting expert evaluations and 
 scientific assessments of all Program elements;
 (C) coordinating existing monitoring and 
 scientific research programs;
 (D) developing and implementing adaptive 
 management experiments to test, refine, and 
 improve scientific understandings;
 (E) establishing performance measures, and 
 monitoring and evaluating the performance of 
 all Program elements; and
 (F) preparing an annual science report.
 (10) Diversification of water supplies.--Activities 
 under this paragraph consist of actions to diversify 
 sources of level 2 refuge supplies and modes of 
 delivery to refuges while maintaining the diversity of 
 level 4 supplies pursuant to section 3406(d)(2) of the 
 Central Valley Project Improvement Act (Public Law 102-
 575; 106 Stat. 4723).
 (e) New and Expanded Authorizations for Federal Agencies.--
 (1) In general.--The heads of the Federal agencies 
 described in this subsection are authorized to carry 
 out the activities described in subsection (f) during 
 each of fiscal years 2005 through 2022, in coordination 
 with the Governor.
 (2) Secretary of the interior.--The Secretary of the 
 Interior is authorized to carry out the activities 
 described in paragraphs (1), (2), and (4) of subsection 
 (f).
 (3) Administrator of the environmental protection 
 agency and the secretaries of agriculture and 
 commerce.--The Administrator of the Environmental 
 Protection Agency, the Secretary of Agriculture, and 
 the Secretary of Commerce are authorized to carry out 
 the activities described in subsection (f)(4).
 (4) Secretary of the army.--The Secretary of the Army 
 is authorized to carry out the activities described in 
 paragraphs (3) and (4) of subsection (f).
 (f) Description of Activities Under New and Expanded 
Authorizations.--
 (1) Conveyance.--Of the amounts authorized to be 
 appropriated under section 109, not more than 
 $184,000,000 may be expended for the following:
 (A) San luis reservoir.--Funds may be 
 expended for feasibility studies, evaluation, 
 and implementation of the San Luis Reservoir 
 lowpoint improvement project, except that 
 Federal participation in any construction of an 
 expanded Pacheco Reservoir shall be subject to 
 future congressional authorization.
 (B) Intertie.--Funds may be expended for 
 feasibility studies and evaluation of increased 
 capacity of the intertie between the State 
 Water Project California Aqueduct and the 
 Central Valley Project Delta Mendota Canal.
 (C) Franks tract.--Funds may be expended for 
 feasibility studies and actions at Franks Tract 
 to improve water quality in the Delta.
 (D) Clifton court forebay and the tracy 
 pumping plant.--Funds may be expended for 
 feasibility studies and design of fish screen 
 and intake facilities at Clifton Court Forebay 
 and the Tracy Pumping Plant facilities.
 (E) Drinking water intake facilities.--
 (i) In general.--Funds may be 
 expended for design and construction of 
 the relocation of drinking water intake 
 facilities to in-Delta water users.
 (ii) Drinking water quality.--The 
 Secretary shall coordinate actions for 
 relocating intake facilities on a time 
 schedule consistent with subsection 
 (d)(2)(A)(i)(I)(bb) or take other 
 actions necessary to offset the 
 degradation of drinking water quality 
 in the Delta due to the South Delta 
 Improvement Program.
 (F) New melones reservoir.--
 (i) In general.--In addition to the 
 other authorizations granted to the 
 Secretary by this title, the Secretary 
 shall acquire water from willing 
 sellers and undertake other actions 
 designed to decrease releases from the 
 New Melones Reservoir for meeting water 
 quality standards and flow objectives 
 for which the Central Valley Project 
 has responsibility to assist in meeting 
 allocations to Central Valley Project 
 contractors from the New Melones 
 Project.
 (ii) Purpose.--The authorization 
 under this subparagraph is solely meant 
 to add flexibility for the Secretary to 
 meet any obligations of the Secretary 
 to the Central Valley Project 
 contractors from the New Melones 
 Project by reducing demand for water 
 dedicated to meeting water quality 
 standards in the San Joaquin River.
 (iii) Funding.--Of the amounts 
 authorized to be appropriated under 
 section 109, not more than $30,000,000 
 may be expended to carry out clause 
 (i).
 (G) Recirculation of export water.--Funds may 
 be used to conduct feasibility studies, 
 evaluate, and, if feasible, implement the 
 recirculation of export water to reduce 
 salinity and improve dissolved oxygen in the 
 San Joaquin River.
 (2) Environmental water account.--
 (A) In general.--Of the amounts authorized to 
 be appropriated under section 109, not more 
 than $90,000,000 may be expended for 
 implementation of the Environmental Water 
 Account.
 (B) Nonreimbursable federal expenditure.--
 Expenditures under subparagraph (A) shall be 
 considered a nonreimbursable Federal 
 expenditure in recognition of the payments of 
 the contractors of the Central Valley Project 
 to the Restoration Fund created by the Central 
 Valley Project Improvement Act (Title XXXIV of 
 Public Law 102-575; 106 Stat. 4706).
 (C) Use of restoration fund.--
 (i) In general.--Of the amounts 
 appropriated for the Restoration Fund 
 for each fiscal year, an amount not to 
 exceed $10,000,000 for any fiscal year 
 may be used to implement the 
 Environmental Water Account to the 
 extent those actions are consistent 
 with the fish and wildlife habitat 
 restoration and improvement purposes of 
 the Central Valley Project Improvement 
 Act.
 (ii) Accounting.--Any such use of the 
 Restoration Fund shall count toward the 
 33 percent of funds made available to 
 the Restoration Fund that, pursuant to 
 section 3407(a) of the Central Valley 
 Project Improvement Act, are otherwise 
 authorized to be appropriated to the 
 Secretary to carry out paragraphs (4) 
 through (6), (10) through (18), and 
 (20) through (22) of section 3406(b) of 
 that Act.
 (iii) Federal funding.--The 
 $10,000,000 limitation on the use of 
 the Restoration Fund for the 
 Environmental Water Account under 
 clause (i) does not limit the 
 appropriate amount of Federal funding 
 for the Environmental Water Account.
 (3) Levee stability.--
 (A) In general.--For purposes of implementing 
 the Calfed Bay-Delta Program), the Secretary of 
 the Army is authorized to undertake the 
 construction and implementation of levee 
 stability programs or projects for such 
 purposes as flood control, ecosystem 
 restoration, water supply, water conveyance, 
 and water quality objectives.
 (B) Report.--Not later than 180 days after 
 the date of enactment of this Act, the 
 Secretary of the Army shall submit to the 
 appropriate authorizing and appropriating 
 committees of the Senate and the House of 
 Representatives a report that describes the 
 levee stability reconstruction projects and 
 priorities that will be carried out under this 
 title during each of fiscal years 2005 through 
 2022.
 (C) Justification.--
 (i) In general.--Notwithstanding 
 section 209 of the Flood Control Act of 
 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962-2), in carrying 
 out levee stability programs and 
 projects pursuant to this paragraph, 
 the Secretary of the Army may determine 
 that the programs and projects are 
 justified by the benefits of the 
 project purposes described in 
 subparagraph (A), and the programs and 
 projects shall require no additional 
 economic justification if the Secretary 
 of the Army further determines that the 
 programs and projects are cost 
 effective.
 (ii) Applicability.--Clause (i) shall 
 not apply to any separable element 
 intended to produce benefits that are 
 predominantly unrelated to the project 
 purposes described in subparagraph (A).
 (D) Projects.--Of the amounts authorized to 
 be appropriated under section 109, not more 
 than $90,000,000 may be expended to--
 (i) reconstruct Delta levees to a 
 base level of protection (also known as 
 the ``Public Law 84-99 standard'') as 
 described in the Record of Decision;
 (ii) enhance the stability of levees 
 that have particular importance in the 
 system through the Delta Levee Special 
 Improvement Projects Program;
 (iii) develop best management 
 practices to control and reverse land 
 subsidence on Delta islands;
 (iv) develop a Delta Levee Emergency 
 Management and Response Plan that will 
 enhance the ability of Federal, State, 
 and local agencies to rapidly respond 
 to levee emergencies;
 (v) develop a Delta Risk Management 
 Strategy after assessing the 
 consequences of Delta levee failure 
 from floods, seepage, subsidence, and 
 earthquakes;
 (vi) reconstruct Delta levees using, 
 to the maximum extent practicable, 
 dredged materials from the Sacramento 
 River, the San Joaquin River, and the 
 San Francisco Bay in reconstructing 
 Delta levees;
 (vii) coordinate Delta levee projects 
 with flood management, ecosystem 
 restoration, and levee protection 
 projects of the lower San Joaquin River 
 and lower Mokelumne River floodway 
 improvements and other projects under 
 the Sacramento-San Joaquin 
 Comprehensive Study; and
 (viii) evaluate and, if appropriate, 
 rehabilitate the Suisun Marsh levees.
 (4) Program management, oversight, and 
 coordination.--
 (A) In general.--Of the amounts authorized to 
 be appropriated under section 109, not more 
 than [$32,600,000] $40,000,000 may be expended 
 by the Secretary or the other heads of Federal 
 agencies, either directly or through grants, 
 contracts, or cooperative agreements with 
 agencies of the State, for--
 (i) Program support;
 (ii) Program-wide tracking of 
 schedules, finances, and performance;
 (iii) multiagency oversight and 
 coordination of Program activities to 
 ensure Program balance and integration;
 (iv) development of interagency 
 cross-cut budgets and a comprehensive 
 finance plan to allocate costs in 
 accordance with the beneficiary pays 
 provisions of the Record of Decision;
 (v) coordination of public outreach 
 and involvement, including tribal, 
 environmental justice, and public 
 advisory activities in accordance with 
 the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 
 U.S.C. App.); and
 (vi) development of Annual Reports.
 (B) Program-wide activities.--Of the amount 
 referred to in subparagraph (A), not less than 
 50 percent of the appropriated amount shall be 
 provided to the California Bay-Delta Authority 
 to carry out Program-wide management, 
 oversight, and coordination activities.

 * * * * * * *

 ---------- 

 SECTION 10609 OF THE NORTHWESTERN NEW MEXICO 
 RURAL WATER PROJECTS ACT 

 * * * * * * * 
 
SEC. 10609. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

 (a) Authorization of Appropriations for Navajo-Gallup Water 
Supply Project.--
 (1) In general.--There is authorized to be 
 appropriated to the Secretary to plan, design, and 
 construct the Project [$1,815,000,000] $1,970,000,000 
 for the period of fiscal years 2009 through 2024, to 
 remain available until expended.
 (2) Adjustments.--The amount under paragraph (1) 
 shall be adjusted by such amounts as may be required by 
 reason of changes since 2007 in construction costs, as 
 indicated by engineering cost indices applicable to the 
 types of construction involved.
 (3) Use.--In addition to the uses authorized under 
 paragraph (1), amounts made available under that 
 paragraph may be used for the conduct of related 
 activities to comply with Federal environmental laws.
 (4) Operation and maintenance.--
 (A) In general.--There are authorized to be 
 appropriated such sums as are necessary to 
 operate and maintain the Project consistent 
 with this subtitle.
 (B) Expiration.--The authorization under 
 subparagraph (A) shall expire 10 years after 
 the year the Secretary declares the Project to 
 be substantially complete.
 (b) Appropriations for Conjunctive Use Wells.--
 (1) San juan wells.--There is authorized to be 
 appropriated to the Secretary for the planning, design, 
 construction, rehabilitation, and operation and 
 maintenance of conjunctive use wells under section 
 10606(b) $30,000,000, as adjusted under paragraph (3), 
 for the period of fiscal years 2009 through 2019.
 (2) Wells in the Little Colorado and Rio Grande 
 Basins.--There are authorized to be appropriated to the 
 Secretary for the planning, design, construction, 
 rehabilitation, and operation and maintenance of 
 conjunctive use wells under section 10606(c) such sums 
 as are necessary for the period of fiscal years 2009 
 through 2024.
 (3) Adjustments.--The amount under paragraph (1) 
 shall be adjusted by such amounts as may be required by 
 reason of changes since 2008 in construction costs, as 
 indicated by engineering cost indices applicable to the 
 types of construction or rehabilitation involved.
 (4) Nonreimbursable expenditures.--Amounts made 
 available under paragraphs (1) and (2) shall be 
 nonreimbursable to the United States.
 (5) Use.--In addition to the uses authorized under 
 paragraphs (1) and (2), amounts made available under 
 that paragraph may be used for the conduct of related 
 activities to comply with Federal environmental laws.
 (6) Limitation.--Appropriations authorized under 
 paragraph (1) shall not be used for operation or 
 maintenance of any conjunctive use wells at a time in 
 excess of 3 years after the well is declared 
 substantially complete.
 (c) San Juan River Irrigation Projects.--
 (1) In general.--There are authorized to be 
 appropriated to the Secretary--
 (A) to carry out section 10607(a)(1), not 
 more than $7,700,000, as adjusted under 
 paragraph (2), for the period of fiscal years 
 2009 through 2016, to remain available until 
 expended; and
 (B) to carry out section 10607(a)(2), not 
 more than $15,400,000, as adjusted under 
 paragraph (2), for the period of fiscal years 
 2009 through 2019, to remain available until 
 expended.
 (2) Adjustment.--The amounts made available under 
 paragraph (1) shall be adjusted by such amounts as may 
 be required by reason of changes since January 1, 2004, 
 in construction costs, as indicated by engineering cost 
 indices applicable to the types of construction 
 involved in the rehabilitation.
 (3) Nonreimbursable expenditures.--Amounts made 
 available under this subsection shall be 
 nonreimbursable to the United States.
 (d) Other Irrigation Projects.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary to carry out section 10608 
$11,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 2009 through 2019.
 (e) Cultural Resources.--
 (1) In general.--The Secretary may use not more than 
 4 percent of amounts made available under subsections 
 (a), (b), and (c) for the survey, recovery, protection, 
 preservation, and display of archaeological resources 
 in the area of a Project facility or conjunctive use 
 well.
 (2) Nonreimbursable expenditures.--Any amounts made 
 available under paragraph (1) shall be nonreimbursable.
 (f) Fish and Wildlife Facilities.--
 (1) In general.--In association with the development 
 of the Project, the Secretary may use not more than 2 
 percent of amounts made available under subsections 
 (a), (b), and (c) to purchase land and construct and 
 maintain facilities to mitigate the loss of, and 
 improve conditions for the propagation of, fish and 
 wildlife if any such purchase, construction, or 
 maintenance will not affect the operation of any water 
 project or use of water.
 (2) Nonreimbursable expenditures.--Any amounts 
 expended under paragraph (1) shall be nonreimbursable.

 * * * * * * *

 ---------- 

 FORT PECK RESERVATION RURAL WATER SYSTEM ACT OF 2000

 * * * * * * *

SEC. 9. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

 (a) Assiniboine and Sioux Rural Water System.--There are 
authorized to be appropriated--
 (1) to the Bureau of Reclamation through fiscal year 
 [2026] 2028, $124,000,000 for the planning, design, and 
 construction of the Assiniboine and Sioux Rural Water 
 System; and
 (2) to the Bureau of Indian Affairs such sums as are 
 necessary for the operation and maintenance of the 
 Assiniboine and Sioux Rural Water System.
 (b) Dry Prairie Rural Water System.--There is authorized to 
be appropriated, through fiscal year [2026] 2028, $51,000,000 
for the planning, design, and construction of the Dry Prairie 
Rural Water System.
 (c) Cost Indexing.--The funds authorized to be appropriated 
may be increased or decreased by such amounts as are justified 
by reason of ordinary fluctuations in development costs 
incurred after October 1, 1998, as indicated by engineering 
cost indices applicable for the type of construction involved.

 Changes in the Application of Existing Law

 Pursuant to clause 3(f)(1)(A) of rule XIII of the Rules of 
the House of Representatives, the following statements are 
submitted describing the effect of provisions in the 
accompanying bill that directly or indirectly change the 
application of existing law.

 TITLE I--CORPS OF ENGINEERS

 Language has been included under Corps of Engineers, 
Investigations, providing for detailed studies and plans and 
specifications of projects prior to construction.
 Language has been included under Corps of Engineers, 
Construction, stating that funds can be used for the 
construction of river and harbor, flood and storm damage 
reduction, shore protection, aquatic ecosystem restoration, and 
related projects authorized by law, and for detailed studies 
and plans and specifications of such projects.
 Language has been included under Corps of Engineers, 
Construction, providing funds from the Inland Waterways Trust 
Fund and the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund.
 Language has been included under Corps of Engineers, 
Mississippi River and Tributaries, providing funds from the 
Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund.
 Language has been included under the Corps of Engineers, 
Operation and Maintenance, stating that funds can be used for: 
the operation, maintenance, and care of existing river and 
harbor, flood and storm damage reduction, aquatic ecosystem 
restoration, and related projects authorized by law; providing 
security for infrastructure owned or operated by the Corps, 
including administrative buildings and laboratories; 
maintaining authorized harbor channels provided by a state, 
municipality, or other public agency that serve essential 
navigation needs of general commerce; surveying and charting 
northern and northwestern lakes and connecting waters; clearing 
and straightening channels; and removing obstructions to 
navigation.
 Language has been included under Corps of Engineers, 
Operation and Maintenance, providing funds from the Harbor 
Maintenance Trust Fund; providing for the use of funds from a 
special account for resource protection, research, 
interpretation, and maintenance activities at outdoor 
recreation areas; and allowing use of funds to cover the cost 
of operation and maintenance of dredged material disposal 
facilities for which fees have been collected.
 Language has been included under Corps of Engineers, 
Operation and Maintenance, providing that one percent of the 
total amount of funds provided for each of the programs, 
projects, or activities funded under the Operation and 
Maintenance heading shall not be allocated to a field operating 
activity until the fourth quarter of the fiscal year and 
permitting the use of these funds for emergency activities as 
determined by the Chief of Engineers to be necessary and 
appropriate.
 Language has been included under Corps of Engineers, 
Expenses, regarding support of the Humphreys Engineer Support 
Center Activity, the Institute for Water Resources, the United 
States Army Engineer Research and Development Center, and the 
United States Army Corps of Engineers Finance Center.
 Language has been included under Corps of Engineers, 
Expenses, providing that funds are available for official 
reception and representation expenses.
 Language has been included under Corps of Engineers, 
Expenses, prohibiting the use of other funds in Title I of this 
Act for the activities funded in Expenses.
 Language has been included under Corps of Engineers, 
Expenses, permitting any Flood Control and Coastal Emergency 
appropriation to be used to fund the supervision and general 
administration of emergency operations, repairs, and other 
activities in response to any flood, hurricane or other natural 
disaster.
 Language has been included to provide for funding for the 
Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works.
 Language has been included under Corps of Engineers, Water 
Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Program, permitting the 
Corps to collect and expend certain fees.
 Language has been included under Corps of Engineers, 
General Provisions, section 101, providing that none of the 
funds may be available for obligation or expenditure through a 
reprogramming of funds except in certain circumstances.
 Language has been included under Corps of Engineers, 
General Provisions, section 102, providing that the allocation 
of funds be made in accordance with the provisions of this 
title and report accompanying this Act.
 Language has been included under Corps of Engineers, 
General Provisions, section 103, prohibiting the execution of 
any contract for a program, project, or activity which commits 
funds in excess of the amount appropriated (to include funds 
reprogrammed under section 101) that remain unobligated.
 Language has been included under Corps of Engineers, 
General Provisions, section 104, providing for transfer 
authority to the Fish and Wildlife Service for mitigation for 
lost fisheries.
 Language has been included under Corps of Engineers, 
General Provisions, section 105, prohibiting certain dredged 
material disposal activities.
 Language has been included under Corps of Engineers, 
General Provisions, section 106, regarding reallocations at a 
Corps of Engineers project.
 Language has been included under Corps of Engineers, 
General Provisions, section 107, regarding the allocation of 
additional funding.
 Language has been included under Corps of Engineers, 
General Provisions, section 108, allowing the possession of 
firearms at water resources development projects under certain 
circumstances.
 Language has been included under Corps of Engineers, 
General Provisions, section 109, requiring access to 
information by Congress.

 TITLE II--DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

 Language has been included under Bureau of Reclamation, 
Water and Related Resources, providing that funds are available 
for fulfilling federal responsibilities to Native Americans and 
for grants to and cooperative agreements with state and local 
governments and Indian tribes.
 Language has been included under Bureau of Reclamation, 
Water and Related Resources, allowing fund transfers within the 
overall appropriation to the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund 
and the Lower Colorado River Basin Development Fund; providing 
that such sums as necessary may be advanced to the Colorado 
River Dam Fund; and transfers may be increased or decreased 
within the overall appropriation.
 Language has been included under Bureau of Reclamation, 
Water and Related Resources, providing for funds to be derived 
from the Reclamation Fund, the Water Storage Enhancements 
Receipts account established by section 4011(e) of Public Law 
114-322, or the special fee account established by 16 U.S.C. 
6806; that funds contributed under 43 U.S.C. 395 by non-federal 
entities shall be available for expenditure; and that funds 
advanced under 43 U.S.C. 397a are to be credited to the Water 
and Related Resources account and available for expenditure.
 Language has been included under Bureau of Reclamation, 
Water and Related Resources, providing that funds certain funds 
appropriated under this heading shall be deposited in the San 
Gabriel Restoration Fund established by section 110 of title I 
of appendix D of Public Law 106-554.
 Language has been included under Bureau of Reclamation, 
Water and Related Resources, providing that funds may be used 
for high priority projects carried out by the Youth 
Conservation Corps, as authorized by 16 U.S.C. 1706.
 Language has been included under Bureau of Reclamation, 
Central Valley Project Restoration Fund, allowing the Bureau of 
Reclamation to expend such sums as may be collected in fiscal 
year 2024.
 Language has been included under Bureau of Reclamation, 
Central Valley Project Restoration Fund, directing the Bureau 
of Reclamation to assess and collect the full amount of 
additional mitigation and restoration payments authorized by 
section 3407(d) of Public Law 102-575.
 Language has been included under Bureau of Reclamation, 
Central Valley Project Restoration Fund, providing that none of 
the funds under the heading may be used for the acquisition or 
lease of water for in-stream purposes if the water is already 
committed to in-stream purposes by a court order adopted by 
consent or decree. Language has been included under Bureau of 
Reclamation, California Bay-Delta Restoration (CALFED), 
permitting the transfer of funds to appropriate accounts of 
other participating federal agencies to carry out authorized 
programs; allowing funds made available under this heading to 
be used for the federal share of the costs of the CALFED 
Program management; and requiring that CALFED implementation be 
carried out with clear performance measures demonstrating 
concurrent progress in achieving the goals and objectives of 
the program. Language has been included under Bureau of 
Reclamation, Policy and Administration, providing that funds 
are to be derived from the Reclamation Fund and prohibiting the 
use of any other appropriation in the Act for activities 
budgeted as policy and administration expenses. Language has 
been included under Bureau of Reclamation, Policy and 
Administration, providing that funds are available for official 
reception and representation expenses.
 Language has been included under Bureau of Reclamation, 
Administrative Provision, providing for the purchase of motor 
vehicles for replacement.
 Language has been included under General Provisions, 
Department of the Interior, section 201, providing that none of 
the funds may be available for obligation or expenditure 
through a reprogramming of funds except in certain 
circumstances.
 Language has been included under General Provisions, 
Department of the Interior, section 202, regarding the San Luis 
Unit and the Kesterson Reservoir in California.
 Language has been included under General Provisions, 
Department of the Interior, section 203, extending the 
authorization for certain provisions of the WIIN Act.
 Language has been included under General Provisions, 
Department of the Interior, section 204, extending the 
authorization for the Calfed Bay-Delta Authorization Act.
 Language has been included under General Provisions, 
Department of the Interior, section 205, extending the 
authorization for the Northwestern New Mexico Rural Water 
Projects Act.
 Language has been included under General Provisions, 
Department of the Interior, section 206, extending the 
authorization for the Fort Peck Rural Water System Act.

 TITLE III--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

 Language has been included under Critical Minerals and 
Energy Innovation for the purchase, construction, and 
acquisition of plant and capital equipment.
 Language has been included under Cybersecurity, Energy 
Security, and Emergency Response for the purchase, 
construction, and acquisition of plant and capital equipment.
 Language has been included under Electricity for the 
purchase, construction, and acquisition of plant and capital 
equipment, and allowing for the reprogramming of funds without 
restriction on certain activities.
 Language has been included under Nuclear Energy for the 
purchase, construction, and acquisition of plant and capital 
equipment.
 Language has been included under Hydrocarbons and 
Geothermal Energy for the acquisition of interest, including 
defeasible and equitable interest in any real property or any 
facility or for plant or facility acquisition or expansion, and 
for conducting inquires, technological investigations, and 
research concerning the extraction, processing, use and 
disposal of mineral substances without objectionable social and 
environmental costs under 30 U.S.C. 3, 1602, and 1603.
 Language has been included under the Naval Petroleum and 
Oil Shale Reserves permitting the use of unobligated balances.
 Language has been included under Non-Defense Environmental 
Cleanup for the purchase, construction, and acquisition of 
plant and capital equipment, and to allow collections to be 
expended for mercury storage costs.
 Language has been included under Uranium Enrichment 
Decontamination and Decommissioning Fund for uranium enrichment 
facility decontamination and decommissioning, remedial actions, 
and other activities.
 Language has been included under Science providing for the 
purchase, construction, and acquisition of plant and capital 
equipment; and for the purchase of motor vehicles.
 Language has been included under Title 17 Innovative 
Technology Loan Guarantee Program crediting fees collected 
pursuant to section 1702(h) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 as 
offsetting collections to this account and making fees 
collected under section 1702(h) in excess of the appropriated 
amount unavailable for expenditure until appropriated.
 Language has been included under Title 17 Innovative 
Technology Loan Guarantee Program providing for loan guarantees 
for the construction of small modular reactors or advanced 
nuclear reactors eligible under section 1703(b)(4) of the 
Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 16513(b)(4)).
 Language has been included under Title 17 Innovative 
Technology Loan Guarantee Program prohibiting the subordination 
of certain interests.
 Language has been included under Departmental 
Administration providing for the hire of passenger vehicles and 
for official reception and representation expenses.
 Language has been included under Departmental 
Administration providing, notwithstanding the provisions of the 
Anti-Deficiency Act, such additional amounts as necessary to 
cover increases in the estimated cost of work for others, as 
long as such increases are offset by revenue increases of the 
same or greater amounts.
 Language has been included under Departmental 
Administration, notwithstanding 31 U.S.C. 3302, and consistent 
with the authorization in Public Law 95-238, permitting the 
Department of Energy to use revenues to offset appropriations. 
The appropriations language for this account reflects the total 
estimated program funding to be reduced as revenues are 
received.
 Language has been included under Weapons Activities for the 
purchase, construction, and acquisition of plant and capital 
equipment.
 Language has been included under Defense Nuclear 
Nonproliferation for the purchase, construction, and 
acquisition of plant and capital equipment.
 Language has been included under Naval Reactors for the 
acquisition of real property, plant, and capital equipment, 
facilities, and facility expansion.
 Language has been included under Naval Reactors 
transferring certain funds to Nuclear Energy.
 Language has been included under Federal Salaries and 
Expenses providing funds for official reception and 
representation expenses.
 Language has been included under Defense Environmental 
Cleanup for the purchase, construction, and acquisition of 
plant and capital equipment.
 Language has been included under Other Defense Activities 
for the purchase, construction, and acquisition of plant and 
capital equipment.
 Language has been included under Bonneville Power 
Administration Fund providing funds for official reception and 
representation expenses and precluding any new direct loan 
obligations.
 Language has been included under Southeastern Power 
Administration providing funds for official reception and 
representation expenses.
 Language has been included under Southeastern Power 
Administration providing that, notwithstanding 31 U.S.C. 3302 
and 16 U.S.C. 825s, amounts collected from the sale of power 
and related services shall be credited to the account as 
discretionary offsetting collections and remain available until 
expended for the sole purpose of funding the annual expenses of 
the Southeastern Power Administration; and providing that 
amounts collected to recover purchase power and wheeling 
expenses shall be credited to the account as offsetting 
collections and remain available until expended for the sole 
purpose of making purchase power and wheeling expenditures.
 Language has been included under Southwestern Power 
Administration providing funds for official reception and 
representation expenses.
 Language has been included under Southwestern Power 
Administration providing that, notwithstanding 31 U.S.C. 3302 
and 16 U.S.C. 825s, amounts collected from the sale of power 
and related services shall be credited to the account as 
discretionary offsetting collections and remain available until 
expended for the sole purpose of funding the annual expenses of 
the Southwestern Power Administration; and providing that 
amounts collected to recover purchase power and wheeling 
expenses shall be credited to the account as offsetting 
collections and remain available until expended for the sole 
purpose of making purchase power and wheeling expenditures.
 Language has been included under Construction, 
Rehabilitation, Operation and Maintenance, Western Area Power 
Administration, providing funds for official reception and 
representation expenses.
 Language has been included under Construction, 
Rehabilitation, Operation and Maintenance, Western Area Power 
Administration providing that, notwithstanding 31 U.S.C. 3302, 
16 U.S.C. 825s, and 43 U.S.C. 392a, amounts collected from the 
sale of power and related services shall be credited to the 
account as discretionary offsetting collections and remain 
available until expended for the sole purpose of funding the 
annual expenses of the Western Area Power Administration; 
providing that amounts collected to recover purchase power and 
wheeling expenses shall be credited to the account as 
offsetting collections and remain available until expended for 
the sole purpose of making purchase power and wheeling 
expenditures.
 Language has been included under Falcon and Amistad 
Operating and Maintenance Fund providing that, notwithstanding 
68 Stat. 255 and 31 U.S.C. 3302, amounts collected from the 
sale of power and related services shall be credited to the 
account as discretionary offsetting collections and remain 
available until expended for the sole purpose of funding the 
annual expenses of the hydroelectric facilities of those dams 
and associated Western Area Power Administration activities.
 Language has been included under Falcon and Amistad 
Operating and Maintenance Fund providing that the Western Area 
Power Administration may accept a limited amount of 
contributions from the United States power customers of the 
Falcon and Amistad Dams for use by the Commissioner of the 
United States Section of the International Boundary and Water 
Commission for operating and maintenance of hydroelectric 
facilities.
 Language has been included under Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission to permit the hire of passenger motor vehicles, to 
provide official reception and representation expenses, and to 
permit the use of revenues collected to reduce the 
appropriation as revenues are received.
 Language has been included under Department of Energy, 
General Provisions, section 301, prohibiting the use of funds 
to prepare or initiate requests for proposals or other 
solicitations or arrangements for programs that have not yet 
been fully funded by the Congress; requiring notification and 
reporting requirements for certain funding awards; limiting the 
use of multi-year funding mechanisms; providing that none of 
the funds may be available for obligation or expenditure 
through a reprogramming of funds except in certain 
circumstances; and providing that unexpended balances of prior 
appropriations may be transferred and merged with new 
appropriation accounts established in this Act.
 Language has been included under Department of Energy, 
General Provisions, section 302, providing that funds for 
intelligence activities are deemed to be specifically 
authorized for purposes of section 504 of the National Security 
Act of 1947 during fiscal year 2027 until enactment of the 
Intelligence Authorization Act for fiscal year 2027.
 Language has been included under Department of Energy, 
General Provisions, section 303, prohibiting the use of funds 
for capital construction of high hazard nuclear facilities 
unless certain independent oversight is conducted.
 Language has been included under Department of Energy, 
General Provisions, section 304, prohibiting the use of funds 
to approve critical decision-2 or critical decision-3 for 
certain construction projects, unless a separate independent 
cost estimate has been developed for that critical decision.
 Language has been included under Department of Energy, 
General Provisions, section 305, regarding project management.
 Language has been included under Department of Energy, 
General Provisions, section 306, to prohibit certain payments.
 Language has been included under Department of Energy, 
General Provisions, section 307, regarding criteria for the 
sale of petroleum products from the Strategic Petroleum 
Reserve.
 Language has been included under Department of Energy, 
General Provisions, section 308, regarding research security.
 Language has been included under Department of Energy, 
General Provisions, section 309, regarding access to nuclear 
weapons production facilities.
 Language has been included under Department of Energy, 
General Provisions, section 310, regarding SBIR/STTR 
activities.
 Language has been included under Department of Energy, 
General Provisions, section 311, regarding the implementation 
of certain requirements for federal buildings.
 Language has been included under Department of Energy, 
General Provisions, section 312, regarding indirect cost rates.
 Language has been included under Department of Energy, 
General Provisions, section 313, making certain funds available 
for nuclear projects.

 TITLE IV--INDEPENDENT AGENCIES

 Language has been included under Appalachian Regional 
Commission providing for the hire of passenger vehicles and 
services authorized by section 3109 of title 5, United States 
Code.
 Language has been included under Delta Regional Authority 
allowing the expenditure of funds as authorized by the Delta 
Regional Authority Act of 2000, notwithstanding sections 
382F(d), 382M, and 382N of said Act.
 Language has been included under Denali Commission allowing 
the expenditure of funds notwithstanding section 306(g) of the 
Denali Commission Act of 1998, and providing for cost-share 
requirements for Commission-funded construction projects in 
distressed and non-distressed communities, as defined by 
section 307 of the Denali Commission Act of 1998, as amended.
 Language has been included under Denali Commission allowing 
funding to be available for payment of a non-federal share for 
certain programs.
 Language has been included under Northern Border Regional 
Commission allowing the expenditure of funds, notwithstanding 
section 15751(b) of title 40, United States Code.
 Language has been included under Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission (NRC), Salaries and Expenses, that provides for 
salaries and other support costs for the Office of the 
Commission.
 Language has been included under Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission, Salaries and Expenses that provides for official 
representation expenses and permits the use of revenues from 
licensing fees, inspections services, and other services for 
salaries and expenses to reduce the appropriation as revenues 
are received.
 Language has been included under Office of Inspector 
General that provides for the use of revenues from licensing 
fees, inspections services, and other services for salaries and 
expenses, notwithstanding section 3302 of title 31, United 
States Code, to reduce the appropriation as revenues are 
received.
 Language has been included under Independent Agencies, 
General Provisions, section 401, requiring the NRC to comply 
with certain procedures when responding to congressional 
requests for information.
 Language has been included under Independent Agencies, 
General Provisions, section 402, providing that none of the 
funds for the NRC may be available for obligation or 
expenditure through a reprogramming of funds except in certain 
circumstances.

 TITLE V--GENERAL PROVISIONS

 Language has been included under General Provisions, 
section 501, prohibiting the use of funds in this Act to 
influence congressional action on any legislation or 
appropriation matters pending before the Congress.
 Language has been included under General Provisions, 
section 502, prohibiting the transfer of funds except pursuant 
to a transfer made by, or transfer authority provided in this 
or any other appropriations Act, or certain other authorities, 
and requiring a report.
 Language has been included under General Provisions, 
section 503, prohibiting funds from being used to maintain or 
establish computer networks unless such networks block the 
viewing, downloading, or exchange of pornography.
 Language has been included under General Provisions, 
section 504, prohibiting funds for private consolidated interim 
storage of commercial spent nuclear fuel.
 Language has been included under General Provisions, 
section 505, establishing a spending reduction account.

 Appropriations Not Authorized by Law

 Pursuant to clause 3(f)(1)(B) of rule XIII of the Rules of 
the House of Representatives, the following table lists the 
appropriations in the accompanying bill which are not 
authorized by law for the period concerned:

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] 

 Transfers of Funds

 Pursuant to clause 3(f)(2) of rule XIII of the Rules of the 
House of Representatives, the following is submitted describing 
the transfer of funds provided in the accompanying bill:

 TITLE I--CORPS OF ENGINEERS--CIVIL

 Under section 104, ``General Provisions--Corps of 
Engineers--Civil'', $8,733,000 under the heading ``Operation 
and Maintenance'' may be transferred to the Fish and Wildlife 
Service to mitigate for fisheries lost due to Corps projects.

 TITLE II--BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

 Under ``Bureau of Reclamation--Water and Related 
Resources'', $23,335,000 is available for transfer to the Upper 
Colorado River Basin Fund and $112,611,000 is available for 
transfer to the Lower Colorado River Basin Development Fund. 
Such funds as may be necessary may be advanced to the Colorado 
River Dam Fund. Additionally, $5,053,000 is available for 
transfer into the San Gabriel Basin Restoration Fund 
established by section 110 of title I of division B of appendix 
D of Public Law 106-554. The amounts of transfers may be 
increased or decreased within the overall appropriation under 
the heading.
 Under ``Bureau of Reclamation--California Bay-Delta 
Restoration'', such sums as may be necessary to carry out 
authorized purposes may be transferred to appropriate accounts 
of other participating federal agencies.

 TITLE III--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

 Under ``Atomic Energy Defense Activities--National Nuclear 
Security Administration--Naval Reactors'', $98,770,000 shall be 
transferred to ``Department of Energy--Energy Programs--Nuclear 
Energy'' for the Advanced Test Reactor.
 Under section 301, ``General Provisions--Department of 
Energy'', unexpended balances of prior appropriations provided 
for activities in this Act may be available for appropriation 
accounts for such activities established pursuant to this 
title. Available balances may be merged with funds in the 
applicable established accounts and thereafter may be accounted 
for as one fund for the same time period as originally enacted.
 Under section 313, ``General Provisions--Department of 
Energy'', portions of certain unobligated balances provided in 
Public Law 117-58 shall be transferred to ``Department of 
Energy--Energy Programs--Nuclear Energy''. Further, certain 
amounts provided to ``Department of Energy--Energy Programs--
Title 17 Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program'' shall 
be derived by transfer from Public Law 117-58.

 Rescissions of Funds

 The bill does not contain any rescissions, as defined in 
clause 3(f)(2) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives.

 Disclosure of Earmarks and Congressionally Directed Spending Items

 The following table is submitted in compliance with clause 
9 of rule XXI of the Rules of the House of Representatives, and 
lists the congressional earmarks (as defined in paragraph (e) 
of clause 9) contained in the bill or in this report. Neither 
the bill nor the report contains any limited tax benefits or 
limited tariff benefits as defined in paragraphs (f) or (g) of 
clause 9 of rule XXI.

 ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT
 [Community Project Funding]
 Amounts shown over the presidential budget request level (``Additional Amount'' column) are considered Community Project Funding for the purpose of House rules.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Budget Request Additional Total Amount
 Agency Account Project Name; Recipient Amount Amount Provided State House Requestor(s)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Construction Alaska Regional Ports (Port of Nome Modification), AK; $11,600,000 $1,200,000 $12,800,000 AK Begich
 (Civil) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Construction Western Rural Water, AZ, NV, MT, ID, NM, UT & WY ................ 2,750,000 2,750,000 AZ Stanton
 (Civil) (Arizona Environmental Infrastructure, AZ); U.S. Army
 Corps of Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Construction Western Rural Water, AZ, NV, MT, ID, NM, UT & WY ................ 2,850,000 2,850,000 AZ Stanton
 (Civil) (Arizona Environmental Infrastructure, AZ--City of
 Chandler); U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Construction Western Rural Water, AZ, NV, MT, ID, NM, UT & WY ................ 2,175,000 2,175,000 AZ Stanton
 (Civil) (Arizona Environmental Infrastructure, AZ--City of
 Tempe); U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Construction Western Rural Water, AZ, NV, MT, ID, NM, UT & WY ................ 2,250,000 2,250,000 AZ Grijalva
 (Civil) (Arizona Environmental Infrastructure, AZ--Pima
 County); U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Construction Murietta Creek, CA; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ................ 4,929,000 4,929,000 CA Issa
 (Civil)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Construction Oakland-Alameda Estuary, Section 219, CA; U.S. Army ................ 1,782,000 1,782,000 CA Simon
 (Civil) Corps of Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Construction Salinas, Section 219, CA; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ................ 2,000,000 2,000,000 CA Lofgren
 (Civil)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Construction El Paso County, Section 219, CO; U.S. Army Corps of ................ 3,750,000 3,750,000 CO Crank
 (Civil) Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Construction Delaware Coastal System Program, DE; U.S. Army Corps of ................ 1,000,000 1,000,000 DE McBride
 (Civil) Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Construction Broward County, Section 219, FL; U.S. Army Corps of ................ 1,266,000 1,266,000 FL Wasserman Schultz
 (Civil) Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Construction Florida Keys Water Improvements, Section 109, FL; U.S. ................ 4,333,000 4,333,000 FL Gimenez
 (Civil) Army Corps of Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Construction Cook County and Lake County, Section 219, IL; U.S. Army ................ 2,000,000 2,000,000 IL Kelly (IL)
 (Civil) Corps of Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Construction Upper Mississippi River - Illinois WW System, IL, IA, ................ 250,000,000 250,000,000 IL Budzinski, Graves
 (Civil) MN, MO & WI; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (MO), Sorensen
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Construction Will County, Section 219, IL (Village of Plainfield); ................ 1,000,000 1,000,000 IL Underwood
 (Civil) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Construction Calumet Region, Section 219, IN; U.S. Army Corps of ................ 2,000,000 2,000,000 IN Mrvan
 (Civil) Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Construction McAlpine Shoreline Protection, IN; U.S. Army Corps of ................ 2,000,000 2,000,000 IN Houchin
 (Civil) Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Construction Southern and Eastern Kentucky, Section 531, KY; U.S. ................ 10,050,000 10,050,000 KY Rogers (KY)
 (Civil) Army Corps of Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Construction Oakland County, Section 219, MI; U.S. Army Corps of ................ 2,100,000 2,100,000 MI Stevens
 (Civil) Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Construction Madison County, Section 219, MS; U.S. Army Corps of ................ 9,000,000 9,000,000 MS Guest
 (Civil) Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Construction North Carolina, Section 5113, NC (Cape Fear Public ................ 2,393,000 2,393,000 NC Rouzer
 (Civil) Utilities); U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Construction Brigantine Inlet to Great Egg Harbor Inlet (Absecon ................ 30,000,000 30,000,000 NJ Van Drew
 (Civil) Island), NJ; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Construction Hudson-Raritan Estuary, NY & NJ; U.S. Army Corps of ................ 1,700,000 1,700,000 NY Torres (NY)
 (Civil) Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Construction Ohio & North Dakota Environmental Infrastructure, ................ 2,000,000 2,000,000 OH Kaptur
 (Civil) Section 594, OH & ND (City of Perrysburg); U.S. Army
 Corps of Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Construction Ohio & North Dakota Environmental Infrastructure, ................ 563,000 563,000 OH Miller (OH)
 (Civil) Section 594, OH & ND (Marshfield Lake Dam); U.S. Army
 Corps of Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Construction Portland Metropolitan Levee System, OR; U.S. Army Corps ................ 2,000,000 2,000,000 OR Dexter
 (Civil) of Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Construction Myrtle Beach, SC; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ................ 2,900,000 2,900,000 SC Fry
 (Civil)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Construction Tipton, Haywood, and Fayette Counties, Section 219, TN; ................ 10,000,000 10,000,000 TN Kustoff
 (Civil) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Construction Matagorda Ship Channel (Widening and Deepening), TX; ................ 31,253,000 31,253,000 TX Cloud
 (Civil) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Construction Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 30,000,000 100,000,000 130,000,000 TX Weber
 (Civil)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Construction/ Section Brandenburg, KY; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ................ 50,000 50,000 KY Guthrie
 (Civil) 14
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Construction/ Section Brigantine Island, Northern End, NJ; U.S. Army Corps of ................ 50,000 50,000 NJ Van Drew
 (Civil) 103 Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Construction/ Section Mid Coastside Water Treatment Plant, CA; U.S. Army Corps ................ 400,000 400,000 CA Liccardo
 (Civil) 205 of Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Construction/ Section San Francisquito Creek, CA; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ................ 325,000 325,000 CA Mullin
 (Civil) 205
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Construction/ Section DuPage River Stream Enhancement Project, IL; U.S. Army ................ 1,000,000 1,000,000 IL Foster
 (Civil) 206 Corps of Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Construction/ Section Wild Rice River, MN; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ................ 400,000 400,000 MN Fischbach
 (Civil) 1135
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Investigations St. George Harbor Improvement, AK; U.S. Army Corps of ................ 300,000 300,000 AK Begich
 (Civil) Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Investigations Coyote Dam, CA; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ................ 1,858,000 1,858,000 CA Huffman
 (Civil)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Investigations Malibu Creek Watershed, CA; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ................ 2,500,000 2,500,000 CA Sherman
 (Civil)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Investigations Washington Aqueduct Backup Water Supply, DC; U.S. Army ................ 425,000 425,000 DC Norton
 (Civil) Corps of Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Investigations Fort Pierce, St. Lucie County, FL; U.S. Army Corps of ................ 1,669,000 1,669,000 FL Mast
 (Civil) Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Investigations Shingle Creek and Kissimmee River, FL; U.S. Army Corps ................ 600,000 600,000 FL Soto
 (Civil) of Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Investigations Volusia County, FL; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ................ 750,000 750,000 FL Fine, Mills
 (Civil)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Investigations St. Tammany Parish Flood Risk Management, LA; U.S. Army ................ 3,250,000 3,250,000 LA Scalise
 (Civil) Corps of Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Investigations Chautauqua Lake Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration, NY; U.S. ................ 600,000 600,000 NY Langworthy
 (Civil) Army Corps of Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Investigations Coastal Texas Protection and Restoration Study, TX; U.S. 1,463,000 9,200,000 10,663,000 TX Weber
 (Civil) Army Corps of Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Investigations City of Norfolk, VA; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ................ 600,000 600,000 VA Scott (VA)
 (Civil)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Investigations/ River Basin Commissions (Mid-Atlantic River Basin ................ 715,000 715,000 NJ Watson Coleman
 (Civil) Remaining Items Commissions: Delaware River Basin Commission); U.S.
 Army Corps of Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Mississippi River and Morganza to the Gulf, LA; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ................ 162,000,000 162,000,000 LA Scalise
 (Civil) Tributaries/
 Construction
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Operation and Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, FL; U.S. 6,755,000 7,500,000 14,255,000 FL Mast
 (Civil) Maintenance Army Corps of Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Operation and Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, Lake Seminole, FL, AL & GA; 8,746,000 1,558,000 10,304,000 FL Bishop (GA)
 (Civil) Maintenance U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Operation and Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, GA; U.S. Army Corps of 6,295,000 7,870,000 14,165,000 GA Carter (GA)
 (Civil) Maintenance Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Operation and Brunswick Harbor, GA; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 10,170,000 7,500,000 18,210,000 GA Carter (GA)
 (Civil) Maintenance
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Operation and Savannah Harbor, GA; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 47,635,000 6,350,000 53,985,000 GA Carter (GA)
 (Civil) Maintenance
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Operation and Missouri River, Sioux City to the Mouth, IA, KS, MO & 18,387,000 6,300,000 24,687,000 IA Graves (MO)
 (Civil) Maintenance NE; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Operation and Mississippi River Between Missouri River and Minneapolis 75,951,000 20,000,000 95,951,000 IL Miller (IL)
 (Civil) Maintenance (MVR Portion), IL; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Operation and Mississippi River Between Missouri River and Minneapolis 34,661,000 11,600,000 46,261,000 IL Onder
 (Civil) Maintenance (MVS Portion), IL; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Operation and Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, NC; U.S. Army Corps of 8,446,000 7,500,000 15,946,000 NC Murphy
 (Civil) Maintenance Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Operation and Lockwoods Folly River, NC; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ................ 1,050,000 1,050,000 NC Rouzer
 (Civil) Maintenance
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Operation and Conneaut Harbor, OH; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1,437,000 16,200,000 17,637,000 OH Joyce (OH)
 (Civil) Maintenance
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Operation and Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX; U.S. Army Corps of 26,666,000 16,600,000 43,266,000 TX Cloud
 (Civil) Maintenance Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Operation and Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX; U.S. Army Corps of 49,843,000 12,740,000 62,583,000 TX Weber
 (Civil) Maintenance Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Operation and Houston Ship Channel, TX; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 81,391,000 30,850,000 112,241,000 TX Babin
 (Civil) Maintenance
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Operation and Norfolk Harbor, VA; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 62,881,000 7,000,000 69,881,000 VA Kiggans, Scott (VA)
 (Civil) Maintenance
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Operation and Winter Harbor, Mathews County, VA; U.S. Army Corps of ................ 2,000,000 2,000,000 VA Wittman
 (Civil) Maintenance Engineers
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Army Corps of Engineers Operation and Two Rivers Harbor, WI; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ................ 1,800,000 1,800,000 WI Grothman
 (Civil) Maintenance
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOI/Bureau of Reclamation Water and Related Central Valley Project, Sacramento River Division, CA; ................ 2,750,000 2,750,000 CA Thompson (CA)
 Resources Bureau of Reclamation
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOI/Bureau of Reclamation Water and Related San Gabriel Restoration Fund, CA; Bureau of Reclamation ................ 5,053,000 5,053,000 CA Chu, Cisneros
 Resources
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOI/Bureau of Reclamation Water and Related Ventura River Project, CA; Bureau of Reclamation ................ 1,000,000 1,000,000 CA Brownley
 Resources
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOI/Bureau of Reclamation Water and Related Roza Irrigation District, Yakima River Basin Water ................ 3,000,000 3,000,000 WA Newhouse
 Resources Enhancement Project; Bureau of Reclamation
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOI/Bureau of Reclamation Water and Related San Joaquin Valley Golden Mussel Watercraft Inspection ................ 5,000,000 5,000,000 CA Costa, Fong
 Resources/Regional Program, CA; Bureau of Reclamation
 Programs
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Source: H. Rept. 119-667 · govinfo

Action History

  1. The House Committee on Appropriations reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-667, by Mr. Fleischmann.

  2. The House Committee on Appropriations reported an original measure, H. Rept. 119-667, by Mr. Fleischmann.

  3. Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 581.

  4. Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1377 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1181, H.R. 9022, H.R. 8595 and H.R. 9237. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 1181 and H.R. 9237 under a closed rule and H.R. 9022 and H.R. 8595 under a structured rule. The resolution provides for one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit on each bill.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 546 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (546)

546 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 546 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HR 9022?
HR 9022 is sponsored by Fleischmann, Charles J. "Chuck" (Republican).
What is the current status of HR 9022?
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced May 22, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track HR 9022?
Track HR 9022 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HR 9022

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HR 9022

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →