United States 119th Congress Status: In Committee Bipartisan · 2 D · 2 R cosponsors

HR 8966 — Subpoena Abuse Prevention Act

Last action — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced May 21, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.

Odds of enactment

Low chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Advancing 38% · moderate confidence
  • In Committee

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 4 sponsors

    1 primary, 3 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (2 D · 2 R) — cross-party backing.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

In plain language

The bill addresses issues related to the use of subpoenas in legal proceedings.

This legislation aims to prevent the misuse of subpoenas, ensuring they are used appropriately in legal contexts. It seeks to protect individuals and organizations from abusive subpoena practices.

Bill Text

How this bill changes current law

6 changes Share ↗

Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.

The bill amends 18 U.S.C. § 2703 to prohibit certain uses of administrative subpoenas concerning customer communications and records, and establishes new requirements and reporting for such subpoenas.

  • 18 U.S.C. § 2703(c)

    subparagraph (C)

    Subparagraph (C) concerning disclosures requiring an administrative subpoena is removed.

  • 18 U.S.C. § 2703(c)(2)

    provided that for any administrative, grand jury, or trial subpoena, the governmental entity identifies the subscriber or customer by name, address, temporarily assigned network address, or account identifier (such as a username)

    This new phrase requires the identification of the subscriber or customer for subpoenas.

  • 18 U.S.C. § 2703(c)

    (4) Protections for constitutionally protected activities.-- (A) In general.--A governmental entity may not use a subpoena to require the disclosures described in paragraph (2) if a purpose of the subpoena is to-- (i) investigate, monitor, or otherwise acquire information about activities, or any person's engagement in activities, that are exercises of free speech, press, religion, assembly, or petition, or are otherwise protected by the Constitution of the United States; or (ii) retaliate against any person for their engagement in activities that are exercises of free speech, press, religion, assembly, or petition, or are otherwise protected by the Constitution of the United States.

    This addition prohibits using subpoenas to investigate or retaliate against constitutionally protected activities.

  • 18 U.S.C. § 2703(c)

    (B) Required certification.-- (i) In general.--A governmental entity using a subpoena to require the disclosures described in paragraph (2) from a service provider shall provide a certification under penalty of perjury attesting that the subpoena is being made for a legitimate and lawful purpose, and not with a purpose described in subparagraph (A)-- (I) to the service provider; and (II) when applying for a preclusion of notice order under section 2705(b), to the court in such application. (ii) Absence of certification.--A subpoena to require the disclosures described in paragraph (2) from a service provider shall not be valid, and a preclusion of notice order under section 2705(b) for such subpoena shall not issue, unless the subpoena includes the certification described in clause (i).

    This requires certification that the subpoena has a legitimate purpose, making it invalid without this certification.

  • 18 U.S.C. § 2703(c)

    (5) Required disclosures to service provider.-- (A) In general.--Except as provided in subparagraph (B)-- (i) the service provider-- (I) may notify a customer or subscriber of the receipt of the subpoena; and (II) may consult with an attorney in order to obtain legal advice or assistance regarding the subpoena; and (ii) the government entity shall inform the service provider that it-- (I) is not being directed to not notify any other person of the existence of the subpoena; (II) may notify the customer or subscriber of the receipt of the subpoena; and (III) may consult with an attorney in order to obtain legal advice or assistance regarding the subpoena. (B) Exception for nondisclosure orders.--If a governmental entity described in subparagraph (A) obtains a preclusion of notice order under section 2705(b)-- (i) such order may limit the right of the service provider described in subparagraph (A)(i)(I); and (ii) the governmental entity shall modify the required disclosures described in subclauses (I) and (II) of subparagraph (A)(ii) to be consistent with the terms of the order.

    This change generally allows service providers to notify customers of subpoenas and seek legal advice, with exceptions for certain nondisclosure orders.

  • 18 U.S.C. § 2703(c)

    (6) Reporting of federal use of administrative subpoenas.--Each Federal governmental entity that uses an administrative subpoena to require the disclosure of information under this subsection shall annually publicly publish a report containing, for the 1-year period preceding the date of the report-- (A) the number of administrative subpoenas issued by the governmental entity, disaggregated by the statutory authority under which the administrative subpoenas were issued; and (B) the number of accounts for which the governmental entity received information through an administrative subpoena, disaggregated by the statutory authority under which the administrative subpoenas were issued.

    This mandates annual public reporting of the use of administrative subpoenas by federal governmental entities.

Action History

  1. Introduced in House

  2. Introduced in House

  3. Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 543 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (3)

Not signed on (543)

543 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 543 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HR 8966?
HR 8966 is sponsored by Massie, Thomas (Republican), Kelly, Robin L. (Democratic), Burlison, Eric (Republican), and Espaillat, Adriano (Democratic).
What is the current status of HR 8966?
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced May 21, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track HR 8966?
Track HR 8966 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HR 8966

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HR 8966

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →