Subpoena Abuse Prevention Act
Consumers could benefit from enhanced privacy regarding their personal communications and records.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when S 4594 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on S 4594.
You're tracking S 4594
We'll email you the moment it moves.
S 4594 — Subpoena Abuse Prevention Act
Last action — Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced May 20, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the Senate.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (1 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
In plain language
The bill limits the use of administrative subpoenas for customer records and communications.
This legislation seeks to amend how administrative subpoenas can be used by government entities regarding customer information. It aims to protect constitutional rights and enhance transparency in the use of such subpoenas.
What this means for you
- Workers: Workers may have increased protections against surveillance of their communications and activities.
- Consumers: Consumers could benefit from enhanced privacy regarding their personal communications and records.
Bill Text
- Introduced Introduced in Senate Current html May 20, 2026
Compared against current U.S. Code AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill amends section 2703 of title 18, United States Code, to restrict the use of administrative subpoenas regarding customer communications and records, and adds protections for constitutionally protected activities.
-
18 U.S.C. § 2703(c)(2)
(C)Subparagraph (C) is removed, which may limit the government's ability to access certain subscriber information without a warrant.
-
18 U.S.C. § 2703(c)(2)
, provided that for any administrative, grand jury, or trial subpoena, the governmental entity identifies the subscriber or customer by name, address, temporarily assigned network address, or account identifier (such as a username)
Introduces a requirement that subpoenas must specify the subscriber or customer to limit bulk data collection.
-
18 U.S.C. § 2703(c)
(4) Protections for constitutionally protected activities.--(A) In general.--A governmental entity may not use a subpoena to require the disclosures described in paragraph (2) if a purpose of the subpoena is to--(i) investigate, monitor, or otherwise acquire information about activities, or any person's engagement in activities, that are exercises of free speech, press, religion, assembly, or petition, or are otherwise protected by the Constitution of the United States; or (ii) retaliate against any person for their engagement in activities that are exercises of free speech, press, religion, assembly, or petition, or are otherwise protected by the Constitution of the United States.
Prohibits use of subpoenas to investigate or retaliate against constitutionally protected activities.
-
18 U.S.C. § 2703(c)
(B) Required certification.--(i) In general.--A governmental entity using a subpoena to require the disclosures described in paragraph (2) from a service provider shall provide a certification under penalty of perjury attesting that the subpoena is being made for a legitimate and lawful purpose, and not with a purpose described in subparagraph (A)--(I) to the service provider; and (II) when applying for a preclusion of notice order under section 2705(b), to the court in such application. (ii) Absence of certification.--A subpoena to require the disclosures described in paragraph (2) from a service provider shall not be valid, and a preclusion of notice order under section 2705(b) for such subpoena shall not issue, unless the subpoena includes the certification described in clause (i).
Requires governmental entities to certify that subpoenas are for legitimate purposes and not for investigating protected activities.
-
18 U.S.C. § 2703(c)
(5) Required disclosures to service provider.--(A) In general.--Except as provided in subparagraph (B)--(i) the service provider--(I) may notify a customer or subscriber of the receipt of the subpoena; and (II) may consult with an attorney in order to obtain legal advice or assistance regarding the subpoena; and (ii) the government entity shall inform the service provider that it--(I) is not being directed to not notify any other person of the existence of the subpoena; (II) may notify the customer or subscriber of the receipt of the subpoena; and (III) may consult with an attorney in order to obtain legal advice or assistance regarding the subpoena.
Allows service providers to notify customers about subpoena receipt and seek legal advice.
-
18 U.S.C. § 2703(c)
(B) Exception for nondisclosure orders.--If a governmental entity described in subparagraph (A) obtains a preclusion of notice order under section 2705(b)--(i) such order may limit the right of the service provider described in subparagraph (A)(i)(I); and (ii) the governmental entity shall modify the required disclosures described in subclauses (I) and (II) of subparagraph (A)(ii) to be consistent with the terms of the order.
Specifies that if there is a nondisclosure order, it may restrict the right of service providers to notify customers.
-
18 U.S.C. § 2703(c)
(6) Reporting of federal use of administrative subpoenas.--Each Federal governmental entity that uses an administrative subpoena to require the disclosure of information under this subsection shall annually publicly publish a report containing, for the 1-year period preceding the date of the report--(A) the number of administrative subpoenas issued by the governmental entity, disaggregated by the statutory authority under which the administrative subpoenas were issued; and (B) the number of accounts for which the governmental entity received information through an administrative subpoena, disaggregated by the statutory authority under which the administrative subpoenas were issued.
Mandates annual public reporting on the use of administrative subpoenas by federal entities.
Action History
-
Introduced in Senate
-
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Sponsors
- Cynthia M. Lummis · Cosponsor
- Ron Wyden · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 545 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Wyden, Ron Democratic
Co-sponsors (1)
- Lummis, Cynthia M. Republican
Not signed on (545)
545 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 545 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors S 4594?
- S 4594 is sponsored by Lummis, Cynthia M. (Republican) and Wyden, Ron (Democratic).
- What is the current status of S 4594?
- This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced May 20, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track S 4594?
- Track S 4594 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on S 4594
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of S 4594
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →