HB 1008 — COLLEGES/FACULTY: Prohibits public postsecondary education institutions from retaliating against faculty members for disclosing certain alleged violations or exercising academic freedom or free speech
Last action — Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the House. Introduced March 25, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.
Odds of enactment
Moderate chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Passed House
Current position in the legislative process.
-
13 sponsors
1 primary, 12 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (11 R · 2 D) — cross-party backing.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
136 added · 138 removedPlain-language change summary
The revised version of Bill HB 1008 adds specific protections for faculty members at public postsecondary institutions regarding academic freedom and free speech. The key change involves replacing "penalties" with "remedies," emphasizing support and solutions for faculty rather than punitive measures. This shift matters because it encourages a safe environment for open dialogue in educational settings, ensuring that faculty can express their ideas without fear of retaliation.
HLS 26RS-1749 ENGROSSEDREENGROSSED Regular Session HOUSE BILL NO.
1008 BY REPRESENTATIVEREPRESENTATIVES OWENOWEN, AMEDEE, BAYHAM, BRAUD, DICKERSON, DOMANGUE, EDMONSTON, EGAN, HORTON, JACKSON, MCCORMICK, SCHAMERHORN, AND WALTERS COLLEGES/FACULTY:
Prohibits public postsecondary education institutions from retaliating against faculty members for disclosing certain alleged violations or exercising academic freedom or free speech AN ACT To enactPartenact Part XV of Chapter 26 of Title 17 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes of 1950, to be comprised of R.S.
toprohibitapublicpostsecondaryeducationinstitutionto fromretaliatingprohibit apublicpostsecondaryeducationinstitutionfromretaliating against a faculty member for disclosing certain alleged violations or exercising academicfreedomorfreespeech;toprovidefordefinitions;toprovideforpenalties;academicfreedomorfreespeech;toprovidefordefinitions;toprovideforremedies;
to providerequire forthe remedies;Board of Regents to adopt a uniform policy relative to reporting and investigations;torequirepublicpostsecondaryeducationinstitutionstoadheretothe policy;
to require the Board of Regents to adopt a uniform policy relative to reporting and investigations;
to require public postsecondary education institutions to adhere to the policy;
to provide for applicability;
The legislature finds that academic freedom and the free exchange of ideas are essential to the mission of public postsecondary education in Louisiana.
Faculty members must be free to teach, conduct research, publish, and engage in the rigorous exchange of ideas and evidence to educate students.
This Act protects legitimate academic freedomandfreespeechwhilepreservingtheauthorityofinstitutionstoenforceprofessional standards of conduct.
Page 1 of 6 CODING:
Wordsinstruckthroughtypearedeletionsfromexistinglaw;wordsunderscored are additions.
HLS 26RS-1749 REENGROSSED HB NO.
1008 Section 2.
Page(1) 1"Academic freedom" means the right of 6faculty CODING:members to teach, research,publish,andexpressviewsonmatterswithintheirfieldofexpertisewithout interference, consistent with professional standards and any applicable state law.
Wordsinstruckthroughtypearedeletionsfromexistinglaw;wordsunderscoredAcademic arefreedom additions.includes the freedom to educate and to engage in the open exchange of ideas and evidence but does not include threatening, intimidating, harassing, demeaning, abusive, or coercive language or conduct.
HLS 26RS-1749 ENGROSSED HB NO.
1008 (1) "Academic freedom" means the right of faculty members to teach, research,publish,andexpressviewsonmatterswithintheirfieldofexpertisewithout interference, consistent with professional standards and institutional policies.
(3) "Free speech" means expression protected under the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, as interpreted by the United StatesStatesSupremeCourt,andArticleI,Section7oftheConstitution SupremeofLouisiana.This Court,protection anddoes Articlenot I,include Sectionthreatening, 7intimidating, ofharassing, thedemeaning, Constitutionor ofcoercive Louisiana.conduct.
(5) "Retaliate against or harm" means to inflict any adverse action, such as discharge, demotion, suspension, denial of promotion or tenure, reduction in payor benefits,Page harassment,2 threats,of negative6 evaluations,CODING: reassignment, or any action causing financial, professional, or emotional harm.
Wordsinstruckthroughtypearedeletionsfromexistinglaw;wordsunderscored are additions.
HLS 26RS-1749 REENGROSSED HB NO.
1008 benefits, harassment, threats, negative evaluations, reassignment, or any action causing financial, professional, or emotional harm.
(a) Disclosing or reporting concerns about any alleged violation of law, regulatorypolicy,regulatory policy, or ethical standard or anyanyother other alleged act of improprietyrelatedimpropriety related to academic, administrative, or operational matters at the institution, including but not limited to reporting concerns to any supervisor, institutional official, state or federalagency, legislator,legislator,law law enforcementofficer,or thepublicaboutthe public about waste, fraud, abuse, misconduct, or threats to public health, safety, or institutional integrity.
Page(c) 2Exercising free speech during student instruction consistent with his academic field and the subject matter of 6the CODING:course.
Wordsinstruckthroughtypearedeletionsfromexistinglaw;wordsunderscored are additions.
HLS 26RS-1749 ENGROSSED HB NO.
1008 (c) Exercising free speech during student instruction consistent with his academic field and the subject matter of the course.
(2) A faculty member is not required to give prior notice to the institution relativeto anyoftheactionsprovidedforinanyoftheactionsprovidedforinSubparagraphs(1)(a)through(d)ofthis Subparagraphs(1)(a)through(c)ofthis Subsection in order for the protection provided in this Section against being retaliated against or harmed to apply.
C.(3) The protections of this Subsection applyonlywhen the facultymember's conductisconsistentwithanyapplicablestatelawanddoesnot involvethreatening, demeaning, intimidating, harassing, abusive, or coercive language or conduct.
AnyC.(1) institutionA that,facultymember oraggrieved individualbya who,violation violates the provisions of Paragraph (B)(1) of this Section shallmayseek beall subjectremediesavailable to:to civil plaintiffs under applicable state and federal law.
(1) Civil penalties of not less than ten thousand dollars and not more than one hundred thousand dollars per violation.
(2) Injunctive relief to prevent further violations.
(3) Referral to the attorneygeneral or district attorneyfor potential criminal prosecutionunderapplicablelaws,includingbutnotlimitedtomalfeasanceinoffice as provided in R.S.
14:134 et seq.
D.(1) Anyinstitution that violates the provisions of Paragraph (B)(1) of this Section shall be liable for all harm caused to the faculty member, including but not limited to:
(a) Financial harm, including but not limited to lost wages, benefits, or opportunities.
(b) Professional harm, including but not limited to damage to reputation, career advancement, or research opportunities.
(c) Emotional harm,including but not limited to distress, anxiety, or mental anguish.
Show all 99 changed lines (59 more)
(2) An aggrieved faculty member may bring a civil action in a court of competent jurisdiction within two years of the violation of Paragraph (B)(1) of this Section.
Remedies shall include:
HLS 26RS-1749 ENGROSSEDREENGROSSED HB NO.
1008 (a)(2) Reinstatement,backpay,andrestorationofbenefitsortenurestatusiftheIn facultyaccordance memberwith provesArticle byXII, aSection preponderance10(B) of the evidenceConstitution thatof Louisiana, an adverseinstitution actionshall againstnot himbe wasentitled retaliationto forsovereign conductimmunity provided for inviolations of Paragraph (B)(1) of this Section.
(b)D. Compensatorydamages,includingtrebledamagesforwillfulviolations.
(c)Nothing Reasonablein attorneyfeesthis andPart courtshall costs.be construed to do any of the following:
(d) Punitive damages of up to five hundred thousand dollars for egregious or repeated violations.
(3) In accordance with Article X, Section 10(B) of the Constitution of Louisiana, an institution shall not be entitled to sovereign immunity for violations of Paragraph (B)(1) of this Section.
E.
Nothing in this Part shall be construed to do either of the following:
F.(3) Limit or restrict the authority of an institution to enforce standards of professional conduct, including but not limited to prohibitions on threats, intimidation, harassment, or demeaning or abusive language as provided inapplicable state law, Board of Regents policies, or institutional policies.
E.
G.F.
Each institution shall submit a written report to the legislature byMarchby March first annually relative to any complaints it receives pertaining to violations of Paragraph (B)(1) of this Section and action taken to resolve such complaints.
Section 2.3.
The provisions of R.S.
17:3399.51 as enacted by Section 1 of this Act shall be applied retroactivelyto January 1, 2025, as well as prospectively.
Page 4 of 6 CODING:
Wordsinstruckthroughtypearedeletionsfromexistinglaw;wordsunderscored are additions.
HLS 26RS-1749 ENGROSSED HB NO.
1008 Section 3.
DIGESTPage ThedigestprintedbelowwaspreparedbyHouseLegislative4 Services.of 6 CODING:
Wordsinstruckthroughtypearedeletionsfromexistinglaw;wordsunderscored are additions.
HLS 26RS-1749 REENGROSSED HB NO.
1008 DIGEST ThedigestprintedbelowwaspreparedbyHouseLegislative Services.
1:13(B) and 24:177(E)] HB 1008 EngrossedReengrossed 2026 Regular Session Owen Abstract:
(Proposed(2) lawProvides definesthat "freea speech"faculty asmember expressionis protectednot underrequired to give prior notice to the Firstinstitution AmendmentoftheU.S.Constitution,relative asinterpretedbytheU.S.to any of those actions in order for proposed law protections to apply.
SupremeCourt,(3) andProvides Articlethat I,these Sectionprotections 7apply ofonly when the Constitution of La.) (2) Provides that a faculty membermember's conduct is notconsistent requiredwith toany giveapplicable priorpresent noticelaw toand thedoes institutionnot relativeinvolve tothreatening, anydemeaning, ofintimidating, thoseharassing, actionsabusive, inor ordercoercive forlanguage proposedor lawconduct. protections to apply.
(3)(4) ProvidesAuthorizes thatan anyaggrieved institutionfaculty that,member or individual who, violates this prohibition is subjecttocivil penaltiesof$10,000-$100,000dollarsperviolation, injunctiverelief to preventseek furtherall violations,remedies andavailable referral to thecivil attorneygeneralplaintiffs orunder districtapplicable attorneypresent forlaw potentialand criminalfederal prosecution.law.
(4)(5) ProvidesthataninstitutionthatviolatesthisprohibitionisliableforallharmscausedProvides tothat thean facultyinstitution member,shall includingnot financialbe harm,entitled professionalto harm,sovereign andimmunity emotionalwith harm.respect to violations of proposed law.
(5)(6) AuthorizesRequires an aggrieved faculty member to bring a civil action within two years of aviolationofproposedlawandprovidesforremediesincludingreinstatement,back pay, and restoration of benefits or tenure status if the facultyBd. member proves by a preponderanceof the evidencethat an adverseaction against him wasretaliation for conduct provided for in proposed law;
compensatory damages, including treble damagesforwillfulviolations;reasonableattorneyfeesandcourtcosts;andpunitive damages of up to $500,000 for egregious or repeated violations.
Page 5 of 6 CODING:
Wordsinstruckthroughtypearedeletionsfromexistinglaw;wordsunderscored are additions.
HLS 26RS-1749 ENGROSSED HB NO.
1008 (6) Provides that an institution shall not be entitled to sovereign immunity with respect to violations of proposed law.
(7) Requires the Bd.
(8)(7) Requires each institution to submit a written report to the legislature byMarchby March first annually relative to any complaints it receives pertaining to violations of proposed law and resolutions relative to such complaints.
Proposed law provides that nothing in proposed law shall be construed to do eitherany of the following:
(2) Prohibit an institution from denying tenure, promotion, or any other benefit to a faculty member who fails to satisfy established, codified performance standards, rubrics, teaching effectivenesscriteria,researchexpectations,effectiveness servicecriteria,researchexpectations, requirements,servicerequirements, or other legitimate academic or institutional criteria, as long as such decision is not made in retaliation for conduct provided for in proposed law.
ProposedPage law5 providesof that6 proposedCODING: law shall be applied retroactively to Jan.
1,Wordsinstruckthroughtypearedeletionsfromexistinglaw;wordsunderscored 2025,are asadditions. well as prospectively.
HLS 26RS-1749 REENGROSSED HB NO.
1008 (3) Limit or restrict an institution's authority to enforce standards of professional conduct, including but not limited to prohibitions on threats, intimidation, harassment,ordemeaningorabusivelanguageasprovidedinanyapplicablepresent law, Board of Regents policies, or institutional policies.
The House Floor Amendments to the engrossed bill:
1.
Remove provisions providing for penalties and liability.
2.
Add that proposed law protections apply only when the faculty member's conduct is consistent with applicable present law and does not involve threatening, demeaning, intimidating, harassing, abusive, or coercive language or conduct.
3.
Add that nothing in proposed law shall be construed to limit or restrict an institution'sauthoritytoenforcestandardsofprofessionalconduct,includingbut not limited to prohibitionsonthreats,intimidation,harassment,ordemeaningor abusive language as provided in any applicable present law, Board of Regents policies, or institutional policies.
4.
Revise provisions relative to remedies.
5.
Revise definitions of "academic freedom" and "free speech".
6.
Remove retroactive application.
7.
Add legislative findings.
Show all 99 changed rows (59 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- Engrossed HB1008 Reengrossed pdf
- Engrossed HB1008 Engrossed Current pdf
- HB1008 Original View text pdf
Amendments
5 amendments- House Floor Amendment, #4390, Owen, Charles, Adopted Adopted Show changes
- House Floor Amendment, #3966, Owen, Charles, Adopted Adopted Show changes
- House Committee Amendment, #3794, EDUC, Adopted Adopted Show changes
- House Committee Amendment, #3587, EDUC, Draft Show changes
- House Committee Amendment, #3576, EDUC, Draft Show changes
Click Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
-
Received in the Senate. Read first time by title and placed on the Calendar for a second reading.
-
Called from the calendar.
-
Read third time by title, amended, roll called on final passage, yeas 103, nays 0. The bill, having received two-thirds vote of the elected members, was finally passed, title adopted, ordered to the Senate.
-
Read by title, returned to the calendar.
-
Notice given.
-
Scheduled for floor debate on 04/27/2026.
-
Scheduled for floor debate on 04/22/2026.
-
Read by title, amended, ordered engrossed, passed to 3rd reading.
-
Reported with amendments (11-0).
-
Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Education.
-
Read by title. Lies over under the rules.
Sponsors
- Joy Walters · Cosponsor
- Rodney Schamerhorn · Cosponsor
- Danny McCormick · Cosponsor
- Steven Jackson · Cosponsor
- Dodie Horton · Cosponsor
- Peter F. Egan Sr. · Cosponsor
- Kathy Edmonston · Cosponsor
- Jessica Domangue · Cosponsor
- Jacob Braud · Cosponsor
- Michael Robert Bayham Jr. · Cosponsor
- Beryl Amedée · Cosponsor
- Charles Owen · Primary
- Kellee Hennessy Dickerson · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 12 co-sponsors · 134 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Charles Owen Republican
Co-sponsors (12)
- Joy Walters Democrat
- Rodney Schamerhorn Republican
- Danny McCormick Republican
- Steven Jackson Democrat
- Dodie Horton Republican
- Sr., Peter F. Egan Republican
- Kathy Edmonston Republican
- Jessica Domangue Republican
- Jacob Braud Republican
- Jr., Michael Robert Bayham Republican
- Beryl Amedée Republican
- Kellee Hennessy Dickerson Republican
Not signed on (134)
134 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 134 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 67 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 103 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (105)
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 1008?
- HB 1008 is sponsored by Joy Walters (Democrat), Rodney Schamerhorn (Republican), Danny McCormick (Republican), Steven Jackson (Democrat), Dodie Horton (Republican), Sr., Peter F. Egan (Republican), Kathy Edmonston (Republican), Jessica Domangue (Republican), Jacob Braud (Republican), Jr., Michael Robert Bayham (Republican), Beryl Amedée (Republican), Charles Owen (Republican), and Kellee Hennessy Dickerson (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 1008?
- This bill has passed the House. Introduced March 25, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track HB 1008?
- Track HB 1008 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 1008
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 1008
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →