COURTS: Provides relative to the courts and the judiciary. (8/1/26) (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)
The bill makes changes to the operations and procedures of courts. Specific details on what these changes are are not provided.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 357 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 357.
You're tracking SB 357
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 357 — COURTS: Provides relative to the courts and the judiciary. (8/1/26) (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)
Last action — Signed by the Speaker of the House.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2026. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Jeff Landry (Republican) on May 25, 2026.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 3 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
In plain language
This bill addresses various aspects of the courts and the judiciary.
The bill makes changes to the operations and procedures of courts. Specific details on what these changes are are not provided.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
178 added · 175 removedPlain-language change summary
In Bill SB 357, a specific reference to "ACT No. 276" has been removed. This change could indicate that the bill no longer depends on or is linked to that particular act, which might simplify the legislation or clarify its intent. It's important because it could affect how the bill is understood or implemented, ensuring it stands on its own without needing to reference other legislation.
SLS 26RS-636 REENGROSSED Regular Session ENROLLED SENATE BILL NO.
357 BY SENATOR REESE COURTS.AN ACT To amend and reenactR.S.
Provides13:72.1, relative74, to76, theand courts353(B) and theR.S. judiciary.
(8/1/26)40:2405(B), ANCode ACTof ToamendandreenactR.S.13:72.1and74,andR.S.40:2405(B),toenactR.S.13:103.1,andCivil torepealR.S.13:75,relativetothecourtsandthejudiciary;toproviderelativetotheProcedure supremeArticle court;157(A) and (B)(2), and Code of Criminal Procedure Article 679(E), to enact R.S.
13:103.1 and Code of Civil Procedure Article 157(C), and to repeal R.S.
13:75 and 353(C), relative to the courts and the judiciary;
to provide relative to the supreme court;
to provide relative to thesecurity deputysecretaryoffor publicthe safetyservices;tocourts provideof relativeappeal; to a justice's primary residence;
to provide relative to the deputy secretary of public safety services;
to provide relative to a justice's primary residence;
to provide relative to filing, case management, and related technology;
to provide relative to recusal;
to provide for an effective date;
Section1.Section 1.
13:72.113:72.1, and74areherebyamendedandreenactedandR.S.74, 76, and 353(B) are herebyamended and reenacted and R.S.
Declaration of state law to federal or other courts PageA. 1 of 5 Coding:
The supreme court of this state may, by rule of court, provide that when it shall appear to the Supreme Court of the United States, or to any court of appeals of the United States, or to the courts of last resort of other states, that there are Page 1 of 6 Coding:
SLS 26RS-636 REENGROSSED SB NO.
357 A.ENROLLED involved, in any proceeding before it, questions or propositions of the laws of this state, which are determinative of the said cause, and there is no clear controlling precedent in the decisions of the supreme court of this state, such federal appellate court may certify such questions or propositions of the laws of this state to the supremecourtofthisstateforinstructionsconcerningsuchquestionsorpropositions ofstatelaw,whichcertificatethesupremecourtofthisstatemay,bywrittenopinion, answer.
The supreme court of this state may, by rule of court, provide that when it shall appear to the Supreme Court of the United States, or to any court of appeals of the United States, or to the courts of last resort of other states, that there are involved, in any proceeding before it, questions or propositions of the laws of this state, which are determinative of the said cause, and there is no clear controlling precedent in the decisions of the supreme court of this state, such federal appellate court may certify such questions or propositions of the laws of this state to the supremecourtofthisstateforinstructionsconcerningsuchquestionsorpropositions ofstatelaw,whichcertificatethesupremecourtofthisstatemay,bywrittenopinion, answer.
salary There shall may be a crier one or more criers for the supreme court, who shall be appointed by the judges of the supreme court from among the court's security personnel, and be commissioned by the civil sheriff for the parish of Orleansasadeputysheriff.ThecriershallreceivefromthestatetreasuryonhisOrleansasadeputysheriff.Thecriershall ownreceivefromthestatetreasuryonhisown warrant approved by the chief justice the sum of thirty-one hundred dollars, per annum, payable monthly.
Security personnel commissioned pursuant to this Section shall be considered members of a bona fide police agency and may additionally be designated by the court as requiring statewide police power pursuant toR.S.toR.S.40:1379.1in thesamemanneras provided forin Subsection N of that Section.
40:1379.1inUpon thesamemannerasrequest, providedthe forindeputy Subsectionsecretaryof Npublic ofsafety thatservices,or Section.his designee, may also facilitate additional security assistance for the court.
Upon* request,* the* deputy§76. secretaryof public safety services, or his designee, may also facilitate additional security assistance for the court.
PageFacsimile 2Filing, ofcase 5management, Coding:and related technology in state courts;
uniform plan A.
The supreme court mayprovide for the development of a comprehensive Page 2 of 6 Coding:
SLS 26RS-636 REENGROSSED SB NO.
357 *ENROLLED *and *uniform §103.1.plan for the use of facsimile filing, case management, and related technology by and in the courts of this state.
In exercising this authority, the court may appoint advisory committees or working groups with members representing judges, clerks of court, practicing attorneys in civil and criminal law, law enforcement,researchersandotherusersofcourtrecords,andotherswhoseexpertise and experience will assist in the preparation of the plan.
The court may provide for the implementation of the plan through recommended legislation.
B.
This Section is only applicable to appellate courts.
* * * §103.1.
13:103 to be reimbursed as a vouchered expense or otherwise allowed pursuant to an accountable plan maintained in accordance with Title 26 of the United States Code, provided that the election shall be for an entire fiscalyear, year and the total amountelectedorclaimedshallnotexceedtheamountsamountelectedorclaimedunderthisSubsectionasvoucheredexpensesactually otherwiseprovidedforincurred under that Section.would otherwise be unreimbursed, together with any amount otherwise remaining payable under R.S.
13:103 as a taxable allowance for expenses after any partial election or lack of election under this Subsection, shallnotexceedtheamountsotherwiseprovidedforunderR.S.13:103foreach month.
ReimbursementReimbursementforotherofficial forotherofficial expensespaid fromavailable funds shall be subject to the court's duly adopted rules.rules , including rules concerning any reimbursement, allowances, or payment of expenses concerning mileage, other travel, or related to performing official duties within the respective districts for those justices with a primary residence more than a fifty-mile round trip from the courthouse.
Any amounts reimbursed or payable under this Section shall not be considered employee compensation for the purposes of any public retirement system.
SectionPage 2.3 of 6 Coding:
Words which are struck through are deletions from existing law;
Show all 108 changed lines (68 more)
words in boldface type and underscored are additions.
SB NO.
357 ENROLLED D.(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, any amount paid as per diem for attending to official duties in the parish of the courthouseand relatedtravelshall notexceedthemaximumdaily expenserate allowed for employees of the United States for travel to that location as established by the United States General Services Administration, or its successor, with the limit for a particular fiscal year measured by the amount applicable ninety days before its commencement.
(2) The court shall adopt rules implementing this Subsection including relatedandsimilarlimitationsconcerningtotheperformanceofjudicialduties atotherlocationsinthestatewhennecessary.Anyamountsduepursuanttothis Subsection shall be subject to an annual limit not to exceed a total of ten per month.
This Subsection is applicable to any justice who is eligible to make an election under Subsection A of this Section.
* * * §353.
Clerks;
sheriff;
superintendent of police * * * B.
Thesheriffoftherespectiveparishes in which the courts of appeal for the first, second, third, and fifth circuits are domiciled, or one of his deputies, shall provide security for and attend each session of the court to and when necessary, execute the orders of the court.
* * * Section 2.
reimbursement bypeace officer * * * B.(1)Additionally,thereceiptofsupplementalpayfromthemunicipalpolice officers fund, the deputy sheriffs' fund, the state police fund, or out of the funds appropriatedformilitarypolicebytheMilitaryDepartment,stateofLouisiana,shall be contingent upon the recipient's beginning employment as a peace officer after January1, 1986, successfullycompleting a council-approved training program, and passing the council-approved examination within one calendar year from date of initialPage employment.4 of 6 Coding:
(2) Certified securitypersonnel of the Supreme Court of Louisiana or of any court of appeal of the state shall not be eligible to receivesupplemental paybenefits even though the peace officer has successfully completed a council-approved training program.
The commission issued to court security personnel shall remain in force and in effect at the pleasure of the employing court.
* * * Page 3 of 5 Coding:
SLS 26RS-636 REENGROSSED SB NO.
357 SectionENROLLED 3.initial employment.
R.S.(2) Certified securitypersonnel of the Supreme Court of Louisiana or of any court of appeal of the state, except those already duly commissioned as deputy sheriffsunderR.S.13:74,shallnotbeeligibletoreceivesupplementalpaybenefits even though the peace officer has successfully completed a council-approved training program.
13.75The iscommission herebyissued repealed.to court security personnel shall remain in force and in effect at the pleasure of the employing court.
The* original* instrument* andSection the3. following digest, which constitutes no part of the legislative instrument, were prepared bySenate Legislative Services.
TheCode keyword,of summary,Civil Procedure Article 157(A) and digest(B)(2) doare nothereby constituteamended partand reenacted and Code of theCivil lawProcedure orArticle proof157(C) oris indiciahereby ofenacted legislativeto intent.read as follows:
[R.S.Art.
1:13(B)157. and 24:177(E)] DIGEST SB 357 Reengrossed 2026 Regular Session Reese Presentlaw(R.S.13:72.1)providesthatthesupremecourtofthisstatemay,byruleofcourt, providethatwhenit shallappearto theU.S.
SupremeCourt,Recusal ortoof anyU.S.supreme court justice A.Apartydesiringtorecuseajusticeofthesupremecourtshallfileawritten motion therefor assigning the ground for recusal under Article 151.
courtofappeals,When thata therewritten aremotion involved,is infiled anyproceedingbeforeto it,recuse questionsa orjustice propositions of the lawssupreme ofcourt, this state, which are determinative of the saidjustice cause,may andrecuse therehimself is no clear controlling precedentinthedecisionsofthesupremecourtofthisstate,suchfederalappellatecourtmay certify such questions or propositionsrefer of the lawsmotion ofshall this state to thebe supremeheard courtby of this stateforinstructionsconcerningsuchquestionsorpropositionsofstatelaw,whichcertificate the supremeother courtjustices of thisthe statecourt. may, by written opinion, answer.
ProposedB. law retains present law, and provides that the supreme court of this state may, by rule of court, provide that when it shall appear to the U.S.
SupremeWhen Court,a justice of the supreme court recuses himself or tois anyrecused U.S.by a majority of the other justices, the court may do one of the following:
court,* or* to* the(2) courtsAppoint ofa lastretired resortofotherstates,thatjustice thereareinvolved, in anyproceeding before it, questions or propositions of the lawssupreme ofcourt thisor state,a whichsitting areor determinativeretired ofjudge the said cause, and there is no clear controlling precedent in the decisions of thea supremedistrict court ofor thisa state, such court mayof certifyappeal suchhaving questionsthe orqualifications propositions of thea lawsjustice of this state to the supreme courtcourt, ofother thisthan stateage, foras instructionsa concerningsuchjustice questionsad orhoc propositionsto ofact statefor law, which certificate the supremerecused courtjustice ofin thisthe statehearing may,and bydisposition writtenof opinion,the answer.cause.
PresentlawprovidesthatthesupremecourtofthisstateisherebyauthorizedandempoweredC. to collaboratewith anyandallothercourtsoflast resortofotherstatesand oftheU.S.
inA thereferred preparationrecusal andmotion approvalshall ofbe uniformdenied rulesunless a majority of courtthe tootherjusticesservinginthecasewhenthemotionisfiledfindsufficientgrounds makefor effectivethisrecusal andunder similarArticle laws.151.
ProposedSection law4. provides that the supreme court of this state is hereby authorized and empowered to adopt all rules it deems appropriate to administer proposed law and to collaborate with any and all other courts of last resort of other states and of the U.S.
inCode theof preparationCriminal andProcedure approvalArticle of679(E) uniformis ruleshereby ofamended courtand reenacted to makeread effectiveas thisandfollows: similar laws.
FurtherprovidesthattheprovisionsofproposedlawareapplicableandoperativeonlytotheArt. extent of any rules duly adopted by the supreme court.
Present679. law(R.S.
13:74)providesthatthereshallRecusal beacrierfor the supreme court, who shall be appointed by the judges of thean supremeappellate court,judge and bea commissionedsupreme bycourt thejustice civil* sheriff* for* thePage parish5 of Orleans6 asCoding: a deputy sheriff.
Provides that the crier shall receive from the state treasury on his own warrant approved by the chief justice the sum of $3,100.00, per annum, payable monthly.
Proposed law repeals the present law requirement that the crier shall receive from the state treasuryon his own warrantapprovedbythe chief justice the sum of $3,100.00, per annum, payable monthly.
Proposedlawprovidesthattheremaybeoneormorecriersforthesupremecourt,whoshall be appointed bythe judges of the supreme court from among the court's securitypersonnel, and be commissioned by the civil sheriff for the parish of Orleans as a deputy sheriff.
Provides that the crier shall receive from the state treasuryon his own warrant approved by the chief justice the sum of $3,100.00, per annum, payable monthly.
Further provides that securitypersonnel commissioned pursuantto proposedlawshallbeconsideredmembers of a bona fide police agency and may additionally be designated by the court as requiring Page 4 of 5 Coding:
SLS 26RS-636 REENGROSSED SB NO.
357 statewidepolicepowerpursuanttopresentlaw(R.S.40:1379.1).Providesthatuponrequest,ENROLLED theE. deputysecretaryof public safetyservices, or his designee, mayalso facilitate additional security assistance for the court.
ProposedWhen lawa providesjustice thatof anyjusticethe whosesupreme primaryresidenceiscourt morethan50recuses mileshimself fromor is recused by a majority of the courthouseother justices, the court may electhave allthe cause argued before and disposed of by the other justices or partappoint a retired justice of anythe amountsupreme duecourt underor presentsitting lawor (R.S.retired judge of a district court or of a court of appeal having the qualifications of a justice of the supreme court, other than age, to sit as a member of the court in the hearing and disposition of the cause.
13:103)A toreferred recusal motion shall be reimburseddenied asunless a voucheredmajority expenseof pursuantthe toother anjustices accountableserving planin maintainedthe incase accordancewhen withthe presentmotion lawis (Titlefiled 26find ofsufficient thegrounds U.S.for recusal under Article 671.
Code),Section provided5. that the election shall be foranentirefiscalyearandthetotalamountclaimedshallnotexceedtheamountsotherwise provided for under present law.
ProposedR.S. law provides that reimbursement for other official expenses paid from available funds shall be subject to the court's duly adopted rules.
Proposed13:75 lawand provides353(C) thatare anyhereby amountsrepealed reimbursedin undertheir proposedentirety. law shall not be considered employee compensation for the purposes of anypublic retirement system.
Presentlaw(R.S.Section6.Notwithstandinganyotherprovisionoflawtothecontrary,theprovisions ofR.S.13:103.1shallnotprohibitajusticeofthesupremecourtfromhavingadistrictoffice located anywhere within a parish from which the justice has been previously elected notwithstanding that his primary work location is otherwise to be in his district.
13:75)providesfortheretirementpayofacrieroftheSection supreme7. court after a certain continuous service period at the age of 80 years old.
FurtherThis providesSection forand theSections mannerinwhichthecriershalldrawhisretirementpay,howthelegislatureshallappropriate1, such3, pay,4, 5, and how6 theof crierthis Act shall notifybecome theeffective chiefupon justice,signature by the secretaryofgovernor state,or, andif not signed by the civilgovernor, sherifffortheparishofOrleansofcertainfactsuponhisupon retirement.Furtherprovidesfortheexpiration mannerofthetimeforbills into whichbecomelawwithout thesignaturebythegovernor,asprovidedbyArticle vacancycreatedIII, bySection such18 retirementof shallthe beConstitution filled.of Louisiana.
ProposedIf lawvetoed repealsbythe presentgovernor law.and subsequently approved by the legislature, this Act shall become effective on the day following such approval.
PresentSection law2 (R.S.of this Act shall become effective on July 1, 2026.
40:2405(B))PRESIDENT providesOF thatTHE certifiedSENATE securitySPEAKER personnelOF ofTHE theHOUSE SupremeOF CourtREPRESENTATIVES ofGOVERNOR LouisianaOF orTHE ofSTATE anyOF courtLOUISIANA ofAPPROVED: appeal of the state shall not be eligible to receive supplemental pay benefits even though the peace officer has successfully completed a council-approvedtrainingprogram.Thecommissionissuedtocourtsecuritypersonnelshall remain in force and in effect at the pleasure of the employing court.
ProposedPage law6 repealsof present6 law.Coding:
Effective August 1, 2026.
(Amends R.S.
13:72.1 and 74, R.S.
40:2405(B);
adds R.S.
13:103.1;
repeals R.S.
13:75) Summary of Amendments Adopted by Senate Committee Amendments Proposed by Senate Committee on Judiciary A to the original bill 1.
Removes the requirement that the crier shall receive from the state treasury on his own warrant approved by the chief justice the sum of $3,100.00, per annum, payable monthly.
Senate Floor Amendments to engrossed bill 1.
Makes technical changes.
2.
Removes provision relative to certain court security personnel not being eligible to receive supplemental paybenefits.
Page 5 of 5 Coding:
Show all 108 changed rows (68 more)
View plain text versions (5)
- Enrolled SB357 Enrolled Current pdf
- Engrossed SB357 Reengrossed pdf
- Engrossed SB357 Engrossed pdf
- SB357 Act View text pdf
- SB357 Original View text pdf
Amendments
5 amendments- House Floor Amendment, #5549, Villio, Adopted Adopted Show changes
- House Committee Amendment, #5230, JUD, Adopted Adopted Show changes
- House Committee Amendment, #5153, JUD, Draft Show changes
- Senate Floor Amendment, #1143, Reese, Adopted Adopted Show changes
- Senate Committee Amendment, #923, JUDA, Adopted Adopted Show changes
Click Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Signed by the Speaker of the House.
-
Signed by the Governor. Becomes Act No. 276.
-
Effective date 7/1/2026.
-
Enrolled. Signed by the President of the Senate.
-
Sent to the Governor by the Secretary of the Senate.
-
Amendments proposed by the House read and concurred in by a vote of 33 yeas and 0 nays.
-
Read third time by title, amended, roll called on final passage, yeas 98, nays 0. Finally passed, ordered to the Senate.
-
Received from the House with amendments.
-
Read by title, amended, passed to 3rd reading.
-
Scheduled for floor debate on 05/19/2026.
-
Reported without Legislative Bureau amendments.
-
Discharged from the Committee on Appropriations.
-
Referred to the Legislative Bureau.
-
Read by title, amended, recommitted to the Committee on Appropriations.
-
Reported with amendments (15-0). To be recommitted to the Committee on Appropriations.
-
Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
-
Received in the House from the Senate, read by title, lies over under the rules.
-
Senate floor amendments read and adopted. Read by title and passed by a vote of 38 yeas and 0 nays; ordered reengrossed and sent to the House. Motion to reconsider tabled.
-
Read by title. Committee amendments read and adopted. Ordered engrossed and passed to third reading and final passage.
-
Reported with amendments.
-
Introduced in the Senate; read by title. Rules suspended. Read second time and referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
-
Prefiled and under the rules provisionally referred to the Committee on Judiciary A.
Sponsors
- Mike Reese · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 146 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Mike Reese Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (146)
146 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 146 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 25 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democrat | 7 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Total | 33 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 0% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. President | — | Yea |
| Edward J. Price | Democrat | Yea |
| Gary Carter | Democrat | Yea |
| Gerald Boudreaux | Democrat | Yea |
| Jay Luneau | Democrat | Yea |
| Jimmy Harris | Democrat | Yea |
| Katrina R. Jackson-Andrews | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Larry Selders | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Regina Barrow | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Royce Duplessis | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Sam Jenkins | Democrat | Yea |
| Sidney Barthelemy II | Democrat | Yea |
| Adam Bass | Republican | Yea |
| Alan Seabaugh | Republican | Yea |
| Beth Mizell | Republican | Yea |
| Blake Miguez | Republican | Yea |
| Bob Hensgens | Republican | Yea |
| Brach Jerad Myers | Republican | Not Voting |
| Caleb Kleinpeter | Republican | Yea |
| Eddie J. Lambert | Republican | Yea |
| Franklin J. Foil | Republican | Yea |
| Glen Womack | Republican | Yea |
| Gregory A. Miller | Republican | Yea |
| Heather Cloud | Republican | Yea |
| Jeremy Stine | Republican | Yea |
| John C. "Jay" Morris | Republican | Yea |
| Jr., William "Bill" Wheat | Republican | Yea |
| Kirk Talbot | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Abraham | Republican | Yea |
| Michael "Big Mike" Fesi | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Reese | Republican | Yea |
| Patrick Connick | Republican | Yea |
| Patrick McMath | Republican | Yea |
| Rick Edmonds | Republican | Yea |
| Robert "Bob" Owen | Republican | Yea |
| Robert Allain | Republican | Not Voting |
| Stewart Jr. Cathey | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas A. Pressly | Republican | Yea |
| Valarie Hodges | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 28 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 64 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 98 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (105)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Amedee | — | Yea |
| Galle | — | Yea |
| Stagni | — | Yea |
| Mr. Speaker | — | Not Voting |
| Johnson, T. | — | Yea |
| Landry, T. | — | Yea |
| St. Blanc | — | Yea |
| Adrian Fisher | Democrat | Yea |
| Aimee Adatto Freeman | Democrat | Yea |
| Alonzo L. Knox | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Carpenter | Democrat | Yea |
| C. Denise Marcelle | Democrat | Yea |
| Candace N. Newell | Democrat | Yea |
| Chasity Martinez | Democrat | Yea |
| Dana Henry | Democrat | Yea |
| Delisha Boyd | Democrat | Yea |
| Ed Murray | Democrat | Yea |
| Edmond Jordan | Democrat | Yea |
| Gerald Boudreaux | Democrat | Yea |
| III, Ed Larvadain | Democrat | Yea |
| Joy Walters | Democrat | Yea |
| Jr., Kyle M. Green | Democrat | Yea |
| Ken Brass | Democrat | Yea |
| Mandie Landry | Democrat | Yea |
| Marcus Anthony Bryant | Democrat | Yea |
| Pat Moore | Democrat | Yea |
| Rashid Armand Young | Democrat | Yea |
| Robby Carter | Democrat | Yea |
| Rodney Lyons | Democrat | Yea |
| Roy Daryl Adams | Democrat | Yea |
| Shaun Raphael Mena | Democrat | Yea |
| Sr., Wilford Carter | Democrat | Yea |
| Steven Jackson | Democrat | Yea |
| Sylvia Elaine Taylor | Democrat | Yea |
| Tammy T. Phelps | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Tehmi Jahi Chassion | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Vanessa Caston LaFleur | Democrat | Yea |
| Annie Spell | Republican | Yea |
| Barbara Reich Freiberg | Republican | Yea |
| Beth Anne Billings | Republican | Yea |
| Brett F. Geymann | Republican | Yea |
| Brian Leonard Glorioso | Republican | Yea |
| Bryan Fontenot | Republican | Yea |
| Chad Michael Boyer | Republican | Yea |
| Chance Keith Henry | Republican | Yea |
| Christopher Turner | Republican | Yea |
| Danny McCormick | Republican | Yea |
| Daryl Andrew Deshotel | Republican | Yea |
| Debbie Villio | Republican | Yea |
| Dixon Wallace McMakin | Republican | Not Voting |
| Dodie Horton | Republican | Yea |
| Emily Chenevert | Republican | Yea |
| Foy Bryan Gadberry | Republican | Yea |
| Francis C. Thompson | Republican | Not Voting |
| Gregory A. Miller | Republican | Yea |
| III, Roger William Wilder | Republican | Yea |
| III, Vincent E. Cox | Republican | Yea |
| IV, Gerald "Beau" Beaullieu | Republican | Yea |
| Jack McFarland | Republican | Yea |
| Jacob Braud | Republican | Yea |
| Jacob Jules Landry | Republican | Yea |
| Jason Brian DeWitt | Republican | Yea |
| Jeffrey "Jeff" Fons Wiley | Republican | Yea |
| Jeremy LaCombe | Republican | Yea |
| Jerome Zeringue | Republican | Yea |
| Jessica Domangue | Republican | Yea |
| John E. Wyble | Republican | Yea |
| Joseph A. Orgeron | Republican | Yea |
| Josh Carlson | Republican | Yea |
| Jr., Dennis Bamburg | Republican | Yea |
| Jr., John R. Illg | Republican | Yea |
| Jr., Michael Robert Bayham | Republican | Yea |
| Kathy Edmonston | Republican | Yea |
| Kellee Hennessy Dickerson | Republican | Yea |
| Kim Carver | Republican | Yea |
| Kimberly Landry Coates | Republican | Yea |
| Larry A. Bagley | Republican | Not Voting |
| Lauren Ventrella | Republican | Yea |
| Laurie Schlegel | Republican | Yea |
| Les Farnum | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Wright | Republican | Yea |
| Michael "Gabe" Firment | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Charles Echols | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Melerine | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Johnson | Republican | Yea |
| Neil Riser | Republican | Yea |
| Nicholas Muscarello | Republican | Yea |
| Paul Sawyer | Republican | Yea |
| Phillip Eric Tarver | Republican | Yea |
| Polly Thomas | Republican | Yea |
| R. Dewith Carrier | Republican | Yea |
| Raymond J. Crews | Republican | Yea |
| Reese "Skip" Broussard | Republican | Yea |
| Rhonda Gaye Butler | Republican | Yea |
| Robert "Bob" Owen | Republican | Yea |
| Rodney Schamerhorn | Republican | Yea |
| Ryan Bourriaque | Republican | Yea |
| Shane Mack | Republican | Yea |
| Sr., Peter F. Egan | Republican | Yea |
| Stephanie H. Berault | Republican | Yea |
| Stephanie Hilferty | Republican | Not Voting |
| Timothy P. Kerner | Republican | Yea |
| Tony Bacala | Republican | Yea |
| Troy Jude Hebert | Republican | Yea |
| Wayne McMahen | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 26 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 38 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. President | — | Yea |
| Edward J. Price | Democrat | Yea |
| Gary Carter | Democrat | Yea |
| Gerald Boudreaux | Democrat | Yea |
| Jay Luneau | Democrat | Yea |
| Jimmy Harris | Democrat | Yea |
| Katrina R. Jackson-Andrews | Democrat | Yea |
| Larry Selders | Democrat | Yea |
| Regina Barrow | Democrat | Yea |
| Royce Duplessis | Democrat | Yea |
| Sam Jenkins | Democrat | Yea |
| Sidney Barthelemy II | Democrat | Yea |
| Adam Bass | Republican | Yea |
| Alan Seabaugh | Republican | Yea |
| Beth Mizell | Republican | Yea |
| Blake Miguez | Republican | Not Voting |
| Bob Hensgens | Republican | Yea |
| Brach Jerad Myers | Republican | Yea |
| Caleb Kleinpeter | Republican | Yea |
| Eddie J. Lambert | Republican | Yea |
| Franklin J. Foil | Republican | Yea |
| Glen Womack | Republican | Yea |
| Gregory A. Miller | Republican | Yea |
| Heather Cloud | Republican | Yea |
| Jeremy Stine | Republican | Yea |
| John C. "Jay" Morris | Republican | Yea |
| Jr., William "Bill" Wheat | Republican | Yea |
| Kirk Talbot | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Abraham | Republican | Yea |
| Michael "Big Mike" Fesi | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Reese | Republican | Yea |
| Patrick Connick | Republican | Yea |
| Patrick McMath | Republican | Yea |
| Rick Edmonds | Republican | Yea |
| Robert "Bob" Owen | Republican | Yea |
| Robert Allain | Republican | Yea |
| Stewart Jr. Cathey | Republican | Yea |
| Thomas A. Pressly | Republican | Yea |
| Valarie Hodges | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 357?
- SB 357 is sponsored by Mike Reese (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 357?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2026. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 357?
- Track SB 357 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 357
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 357
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →