INSURANCE/PROPERTY: Provides relative to fortified roof endorsement offers
This means homeowners could benefit from coverage upgrades if their roofs need replacement.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 759 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 759.
You're tracking HB 759
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 759 — INSURANCE/PROPERTY: Provides relative to fortified roof endorsement offers
Last action — Read by title and returned to the Calendar, subject to call.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the House. Introduced February 27, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
ModerateHow often bills like it became law.
-
Passed House
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
In plain language
The bill mandates homeowners' insurers to offer fortified roof endorsements for certain residential structures.
This bill requires homeowners' insurance providers to offer an endorsement for upgrading nonfortified roofs when covered damage occurs. It clarifies eligibility criteria and premium refund conditions related to fortified roofs.
What this means for you
- Consumers: This means homeowners could benefit from coverage upgrades if their roofs need replacement.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
73 added · 40 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of HB 759 adds clarity and detail to the existing requirements for homeowners' insurance policies regarding roof upgrades. It specifies that insurers must include considerations for roof age and condition when determining eligibility for the fortified roof endorsement, which helps homeowners better understand their options for upgrading roofs to meet safety standards. This change is important because it aims to ensure that more homes can benefit from enhancements that may reduce damage from severe weather, improving overall safety and resilience in affected areas.
HLS 26RS-1197 ORIGINALENGROSSED Regular Session HOUSE BILL NO.
and to provideclarify forgeographic relatedarea matters.upgrade requirements;
to outline eligibility determinations and premium refunds;
to provide for the use of roof age andconditionasratingfactors;toprovideforapplicability;andtoprovideforrelated matters.
AnyAnyauthorizedinsurerwritinghomeowners'insurancepoliciesshalloffer authorized insurer writing homeowners' insurance policies, or producer thereof, shall offer an endorsement to upgrade an insured's nonfortified home residential structure to comply with the fortified roof standards of the Insurance Institute for Business and Home Safety, if the insured incurs damage covered by the policy that requires the roof to be replaced.
C.Page 1 of 3 CODING:
Insurers required to make an endorsement offer pursuant to this Section shall file endorsement forms and accompanying rates with the department by October 1, 2023.
The requirements of this Section shall applyonlyto homeowners' Page 1 of 2 CODING:
HLS 26RS-1197 ORIGINALENGROSSED HB NO.
759 policiesC. covering residential structures that are eligible to be retrofitted to comply with the fortified roof standards of the Insurance Institute for Business and Home Safety.
IfInsurers aninsurersellsrequired anendorsementprovidedforinto thismake Sectionan andendorsement thereafteroffer discoversthattheinsuredstructureisnoteligibletoberetrofittedtothefortifiedroofpursuant standardsto ofthis theSection Insuranceshall Institutefile forendorsement Businessforms and Homeaccompanying Safety,rates thewith insurer shall refund to the insureddepartment anyby premiumsOctober collected1, under2023. the endorsement, less the costs of determining the structure was not eligible.
The requirements of this Section shall applyonlyto homeowners' policiescoveringresidentialstructureswitharoofthatwasinstalledwithintenyears of the date of offering the policy or renewal that are eligible to be retrofitted to comply with the fortified roof standards of the Insurance Institute for Business and Home Safety.
If an insurer sells an endorsement provided for in this Section and thereafter discovers that the insured structure is not eligible to be retrofitted to the fortified roof standards of the Insurance Institute for Business and Home Safety, the insurer shall refund to the insured any premiums collected under the endorsement, less the costs of determining the structure was not eligible.
AnThisSectionshallnotbeconstruedtoprohibitaninsurerfromvoluntarily insureroffering shallthe notendorsement failprovided tofor complyin this Section for a homeowners' policy covering a residential structure with a roof installed more than ten years after the provisionsdate of the policy being offered or renewed, and this Section basedshall onnot be construed to prohibit an insurer from using the age or condition of the roof ofas a rating factor in determining the residentialpremium structure;to be charged for the endorsement.
however, the insurer may include the roof's ageandcondition as a ratingfactorin determiningthe premium to be charged for the endorsement.
1:13(B) and 24:177(E)] HB 759 OriginalEngrossed 2026 Regular Session Firment Abstract:
ClarifiesOutlines the requirements for mandatory fortified roof endorsement offers inof homeowners'fortified insuranceroof policies.endorsements inhomeowners'insurancepolicies.
PresentSpecifiestheageeligibilitycriteriaforroofsthat lawqualifyforthesemandatoryofferswhileallowingforvoluntaryoffersonolderroofs. requires insurers writing homeowners’ insurance to offer an endorsement allowing an insured to upgrade a nonfortified residential structure to meet the fortified roof standards of the Insurance Institute for Business and Home Safety when covered damage requires roof replacement.
Present law requires insurers writing homeowners' insurance to offer an endorsement allowing an insured to upgrade a nonfortified residential structure to meet the fortified roof standards of the Insurance Institute for Business and Home Safety when covered damage requires roof replacement.
ProposedPage law2 retainsof present3 lawCODING: and clarifies that:
Wordsinstruckthroughtypearedeletionsfromexistinglaw;wordsunderscored are additions.
HLS 26RS-1197 ENGROSSED HB NO.
759 Proposed law retains present law and clarifies that:
(3) Aninsurershallnotfailtocomplywiththeendorsement-offerrequirementbasedonProposed law revises the ageapplicability ofprovision to specify that the roof,requirements butapply mayonly useto homeowners' policies covering residential structures with a roof agethat andwas conditioninstalled aswithin rating10 factorsyears inof determiningthe date of offering the endorsementpolicy premium.or renewal and that are eligible to be retrofitted to comply with fortified roof standards.
(4) Proposed law mandates that an insurer shall not fail to comply with the endorsement-offer requirement based on the age of the roof;
however, the insurer may use roof age and condition as rating factors in determining the endorsement premium.
Proposed law further clarifies that nothing in present law prohibits an insurerfromvoluntarilyofferingtheendorsementforahomeowners'policycovering a residential structure with a roof installed more than 10 years before the date of the policybeingofferedorrenewed,andthatnothingprohibitsaninsurerfromusingthe age or condition of the roof as a rating factor in determining the premium for the endorsement.
22:1483.2) PageSummary 2 of 2Amendments CODING:Adopted by House The Committee Amendments Proposed by House Committee on Insurance to the original bill:
1.
Clarify that the requirement for the fortified roof endorsement applies exclusively to authorized insurers issuing homeowners' policies, not to individual insurance producers or agents.
2.
Establish that the required endorsement is applicable exclusively to homeowners' insurance for residential properties with roofs installed within the last 10 years, if those roofs can be upgraded to meet the specified standards at the time of policy issuance or renewal.
3.
Specify that insurers may voluntarily offer the endorsement for homes with roofs older than 10 years, and it confirms that nothing in the bill prevents insurers from using the age or condition of the roof as a rating factor when determining the premium for that endorsement.
4.
Make technical changes.
Page 3 of 3 CODING:
View plain text versions (2)
- Engrossed HB759 Engrossed Current pdf
- HB759 Original View text pdf
Amendments
6 amendments- Senate Committee Amendment, #2528, INS, Adopted Adopted Show changes
- Senate Committee Amendment, #2482, INS, Draft Show changes
- House Committee Amendment, #2332, INS, Adopted Adopted Show changes
- House Committee Amendment, #2290, INS, Draft Show changes
- House Committee Amendment, #2274, INS, Draft Show changes
- House Committee Amendment, #2183, INS, Draft Show changes
Click Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Read by title and returned to the Calendar, subject to call.
-
Reported without Legislative Bureau amendments. Read by title and passed to third reading and final passage.
-
Committee amendments read and adopted. Read by title and referred to the Legislative Bureau.
-
Reported with amendments.
-
Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Insurance.
-
Read third time by title, roll called on final passage, yeas 97, nays 0. Finally passed, title adopted, ordered to the Senate.
-
Received in the Senate. Rules suspended. Read first time by title and placed on the Calendar for a second reading.
-
Scheduled for floor debate on 03/30/2026.
-
Read by title, amended, ordered engrossed, passed to 3rd reading.
-
Reported with amendments (13-0).
-
Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Insurance.
-
Prefiled.
-
Under the rules, provisionally referred to the Committee on Insurance.
-
First appeared in the Interim Calendar on 2/27/2026.
Sponsors
- Michael "Gabe" Firment · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 146 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Michael "Gabe" Firment Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (146)
146 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 146 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 63 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Democrat | 27 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 97 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (105)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Speaker | — | Yea |
| Amedee | — | Yea |
| Galle | — | Yea |
| Stagni | — | Yea |
| Johnson, T. | — | Yea |
| Landry, T. | — | Yea |
| St. Blanc | — | Yea |
| Adrian Fisher | Democrat | Yea |
| Aimee Adatto Freeman | Democrat | Yea |
| Alonzo L. Knox | Democrat | Yea |
| Barbara Carpenter | Democrat | Yea |
| C. Denise Marcelle | Democrat | Yea |
| Candace N. Newell | Democrat | Yea |
| Chasity Martinez | Democrat | Yea |
| Dana Henry | Democrat | Yea |
| Delisha Boyd | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Ed Murray | Democrat | Yea |
| Edmond Jordan | Democrat | Yea |
| Gerald Boudreaux | Democrat | Yea |
| III, Ed Larvadain | Democrat | Yea |
| Joy Walters | Democrat | Yea |
| Jr., Kyle M. Green | Democrat | Yea |
| Ken Brass | Democrat | Yea |
| Mandie Landry | Democrat | Yea |
| Marcus Anthony Bryant | Democrat | Yea |
| Pat Moore | Democrat | Yea |
| Rashid Armand Young | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Robby Carter | Democrat | Yea |
| Rodney Lyons | Democrat | Yea |
| Roy Daryl Adams | Democrat | Yea |
| Shaun Raphael Mena | Democrat | Yea |
| Sr., Wilford Carter | Democrat | Yea |
| Steven Jackson | Democrat | Yea |
| Sylvia Elaine Taylor | Democrat | Yea |
| Tammy T. Phelps | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Tehmi Jahi Chassion | Democrat | Yea |
| Vanessa Caston LaFleur | Democrat | Yea |
| Annie Spell | Republican | Not Voting |
| Barbara Reich Freiberg | Republican | Yea |
| Beth Anne Billings | Republican | Yea |
| Brett F. Geymann | Republican | Yea |
| Brian Leonard Glorioso | Republican | Yea |
| Bryan Fontenot | Republican | Yea |
| Chad Michael Boyer | Republican | Yea |
| Chance Keith Henry | Republican | Yea |
| Christopher Turner | Republican | Yea |
| Danny McCormick | Republican | Yea |
| Daryl Andrew Deshotel | Republican | Yea |
| Debbie Villio | Republican | Yea |
| Dixon Wallace McMakin | Republican | Yea |
| Dodie Horton | Republican | Yea |
| Emily Chenevert | Republican | Yea |
| Foy Bryan Gadberry | Republican | Yea |
| Francis C. Thompson | Republican | Yea |
| Gregory A. Miller | Republican | Yea |
| III, Roger William Wilder | Republican | Yea |
| III, Vincent E. Cox | Republican | Yea |
| IV, Gerald "Beau" Beaullieu | Republican | Yea |
| Jack McFarland | Republican | Yea |
| Jacob Braud | Republican | Yea |
| Jacob Jules Landry | Republican | Yea |
| Jason Brian DeWitt | Republican | Yea |
| Jeffrey "Jeff" Fons Wiley | Republican | Yea |
| Jeremy LaCombe | Republican | Yea |
| Jerome Zeringue | Republican | Yea |
| Jessica Domangue | Republican | Yea |
| John E. Wyble | Republican | Yea |
| Joseph A. Orgeron | Republican | Yea |
| Josh Carlson | Republican | Yea |
| Jr., Dennis Bamburg | Republican | Yea |
| Jr., John R. Illg | Republican | Yea |
| Jr., Michael Robert Bayham | Republican | Yea |
| Kathy Edmonston | Republican | Yea |
| Kellee Hennessy Dickerson | Republican | Yea |
| Kim Carver | Republican | Yea |
| Kimberly Landry Coates | Republican | Yea |
| Larry A. Bagley | Republican | Not Voting |
| Lauren Ventrella | Republican | Not Voting |
| Laurie Schlegel | Republican | Yea |
| Les Farnum | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Wright | Republican | Not Voting |
| Michael "Gabe" Firment | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Charles Echols | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Melerine | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Johnson | Republican | Yea |
| Neil Riser | Republican | Yea |
| Nicholas Muscarello | Republican | Yea |
| Paul Sawyer | Republican | Yea |
| Phillip Eric Tarver | Republican | Yea |
| Polly Thomas | Republican | Yea |
| R. Dewith Carrier | Republican | Yea |
| Raymond J. Crews | Republican | Yea |
| Reese "Skip" Broussard | Republican | Yea |
| Rhonda Gaye Butler | Republican | Yea |
| Robert "Bob" Owen | Republican | Yea |
| Rodney Schamerhorn | Republican | Yea |
| Ryan Bourriaque | Republican | Yea |
| Shane Mack | Republican | Yea |
| Sr., Peter F. Egan | Republican | Yea |
| Stephanie H. Berault | Republican | Yea |
| Stephanie Hilferty | Republican | Yea |
| Timothy P. Kerner | Republican | Yea |
| Tony Bacala | Republican | Not Voting |
| Troy Jude Hebert | Republican | Yea |
| Wayne McMahen | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 759?
- HB 759 is sponsored by Michael "Gabe" Firment (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 759?
- This bill has passed the House. Introduced February 27, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track HB 759?
- Track HB 759 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 759
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 759
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →