Louisiana 2026 Regular Session Status: Enacted 1 R cosponsors

HB 22 — RETIREMENT/CLERKS COURT: Provides relative to the Clerks' of Court Retirement System (EN INCREASE APV)

Last action — Signed by the Governor. Becomes Act No. 279.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 20, 2026. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Jeff Landry (Republican) on May 22, 2026.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 72% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

In plain language

The bill adjusts provisions of the Clerks' of Court Retirement System.

This legislation makes changes to the retirement system for Clerks of Court. It aims to increase the actuarial present value of the system.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

129 added · 227 removed

Plain-language change summary

In the latest version of Bill HB 22, a reference to "ACT No. 279" has been removed. This change simplifies the bill by eliminating unnecessary details that may no longer be relevant or applicable. It matters because it helps keep the legislation clear and focused, making it easier for everyone to understand what the bill is about.

→
Previous
Latest
HLS 26RS-219 ENGROSSED Regular Session HOUSE BILL NO.
ENROLLED Regular Session HOUSE BILL NO.
22 BY REPRESENTATIVE BACALA RETIREMENT/CLERKS COURT:
22 BY REPRESENTATIVE BACALA AN ACT ToamendandreenactR.S.11:1549,toenactR.S.11:1550,andtorepealR.S.11:105(A)(2), 106(A)(2), 107(A)(2), 107.1(A)(2), 242(B)(2), 243(A)(2), and 246(A)(2), relative to the Clerks' of Court Retirement and Relief Fund;
Provides relative to the Clerks' of Court Retirement System AN ACT ToamendandreenactR.S.11:1549,toenactR.S.11:1550,andtorepealR.S.11:105(A)(2), 106(A)(2), 107(A)(2), 107.1(A)(2), 242(B)(2), 243(A)(2), and 246(A)(2), relative to the Clerks' of Court Retirement and Relief Fund;
The Subject to the limitations of this Section, the board of trustees may, upon majorityvote oftheboard,usefunds in thefundingdeposit account to grant or provide a cost-of-living adjustment to retired members who have been retired retirees, beneficiaries, and survivors if benefits have been paid on the retiree's or member's record for at least one full calendar year as provided for in Subsection D, Page 1 of 8 CODING:
The Subject to the limitations of this Section, the board of trustees may, upon majorityvote of the board, use funds in thefundingdeposit accountto grantor provide a cost-of-living adjustment to retired members who have been retired retirees, beneficiaries, and survivors if benefits have been paid on the retiree's or member's record for at least one full calendar year as provided for in Subsection D, but only in the event that:
Wordsinstruckthroughtypearedeletionsfromexistinglaw;wordsunderscored are additions.
HLS 26RS-219 ENGROSSED HB NO.
22 but only in the event that:
Anycost-of-livingadjustmentprovidedbytheboardinaccordancewiththisSection shall begin on a date to be determined by the board following the approval of the most recent actuarial valuation by the board of trustees and adoption by the Public Retirement Systems' Actuarial Committee.
Anycost-of-livingadjustmentprovidedbytheboardinaccordancewiththisSection shall begin on a date to be determined by the board following the approval of the Page 1 of 5 CODING:
(1) At the end of the system's current fiscal year the funded ratio of the system, as of the end of the previous fiscal year,equals or exceeds the target ratio as of that date for the system, and (2) TheleveloftheConsumerPriceIndexforAllUrbanConsumers(CPI-U) for the current fiscal year is at least three percent higher than the level of the CPI-U for the fiscal year in which the last cost-of-living adjustment was granted.
Wordsinstruckthroughtypearedeletionsfromexistinglaw;wordsunderscored are additions.
HB NO.
22 ENROLLED most recent actuarial valuation by the board of trustees and adoption by the Public Retirement Systems' Actuarial Committee.
(1) At the end of the system's current fiscal year the funded ratio of the system, as of the end of the previous fiscal year,equals or exceedsthe target ratio as of that date for the system, and (2) TheleveloftheConsumerPriceIndexforAllUrbanConsumers(CPI-U) for the current fiscal year is at least three percent higher than the level of the CPI-U for the fiscal year in which the last cost-of-living adjustment was granted.
As used in this Section, the "funded ratio" as of any fiscal year end shall be defined as the ratio of the actuarial value of assets to the level percentage of payroll entry age normal actuarial accrued liability under the funding method prescribed by the office of the legislative auditor.
As used in this Section, the "funded ratio" as of anyfiscal year end shall be defined as the ratio of the actuarial value of assets to the level percentage of payroll entry age normal actuarial accrued liability under the funding method prescribed by the office of the legislative auditor.
Page 2 of 8 CODING:
(c) The amount of each change in funded ratio due to mergers or changes in actuarial methods or assumptions occurring after the 1986 Fiscal Year end.
(d) For each change in funded ratio due to mergers or changes in actuarial methods or assumptions occurring after the 1986 Fiscal Year end, an amount of opposite arithmetic sign from such change in funded ratio equal in absolute value to thenumberoffiscalyearssincethechangeinfundedratiomultipliedbyone-thirtieth of the original change in funded ratio due to the merger or change in actuarial Page 2 of 5 CODING:
HLS 26RS-219 ENGROSSED HB NO.
HB NO.
22 (c) The amount of each change in funded ratio due to mergers or changes in actuarial methods or assumptions occurring after the 1986 Fiscal Year end.
22 ENROLLED methods or assumptions.
(d) For each change in funded ratio due to mergers or changes in actuarial methods or assumptions occurring after the 1986 Fiscal Year end, an amount of opposite arithmetic sign from such change in funded ratio equal in absolute value to thenumberoffiscalyearssincethechangeinfundedratiomultipliedbyone-thirtieth of the original change in funded ratio due to the merger or change in actuarial methods or assumptions.
(b) Thesystem hasafundedratioofatleasteightypercentandtheboardhas not granted a cost-of-living adjustment in either of the two most recent fiscal years.
(b) Thesystemhasafundedratioofatleasteightypercentandtheboardhas not granted a cost-of-living adjustment in either of the two most recent fiscal years.
Page 3 of 8 CODING:
(2) Grantacost-of-livingadjustmentthatisamonthlyincreaseofthebenefit of each recipient in a dollar amount that is a multiple or a fraction of the number of years of credited service accrued at retirement of the retiree or at death of the member plus a multiple or a fraction of the number of years since retirement of the retireeorsincedeathofthemembertotheeffectivedateoftheadjustment.
Thetotal actuarialpresentvalueofacost-of-livingadjustmentgrantedinaccordancewiththis Paragraph shall not exceedthe actuarialpresentvalueofacost-of-livingadjustment granted pursuant to Paragraph (1) of this Subsection.
Page 3 of 5 CODING:
HLS 26RS-219 ENGROSSED HB NO.
HB NO.
22 (2) Grantacost-of-livingadjustmentthatisamonthlyincreaseofthebenefit of each recipient in a dollar amount that is a multiple or a fraction of the number of years of credited service accrued at retirement of the retiree or at death of the member plus a multiple or a fraction of the number of years since retirement of the retireeorsincedeathofthemembertotheeffectivedateoftheadjustment.
22 ENROLLED E.
Thetotal actuarialpresentvalueofacost-of-livingadjustmentgrantedinaccordancewiththis Paragraph shall not exceedtheactuarialpresentvalueofa cost-of-livingadjustment granted pursuant to Paragraph (1) of this Subsection.
The board may grant a cost-of-living adjustment of up to two percent of the current benefit to all eligible retirees,beneficiaries,and survivors who aresixty- five years of age or over.
E.
The board may grant a cost-of-living adjustment of up to two percent of the currentbenefit to all eligible retirees, beneficiaries, and survivors who aresixty- five years of age or over.
Page 4 of 8 CODING:
D.(1) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, the board of trusteesmayinanyfiscalyeardirectthatfunds fromtheaccountbechargedforonly the following purposes:
Wordsinstruckthroughtypearedeletionsfromexistinglaw;wordsunderscored are additions.
HLS 26RS-219 ENGROSSED HB NO.
22 D.(1) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, the board of trusteesmayinanyfiscalyeardirectthatfundsfromtheaccountbechargedforonly the following purposes:
(d) Toprovideforcost-of-livingadjustments,inaccordancewithapplicable law.
(d) Toprovideforcost-of-livingadjustments, inaccordancewithapplicable law.
(2) In no event shall the funds charged from the account exceed the outstanding account balance.
Page 4 of 5 CODING:
(3) If the board of trustees elects to charge funds from the funding deposit accountpursuantto Subparagraph (1)(c)of this Subsection, the percentreductionin the minimum recommended employer contribution rate otherwise applicable shall bedeterminedbydividingtheinterest-adjustedvalueofthechargesfromthefunding depositaccountbytheprojectedpayrollforthefiscalyearforwhichthecontribution rate is to be reduced.
Wordsinstruckthroughtypearedeletionsfromexistinglaw;wordsunderscored are additions.
HB NO.
22 ENROLLED (2) In no event shall the funds charged from the account exceed the outstanding account balance.
(3) If the board of trustees elects to charge funds from the funding deposit accountpursuant to Subparagraph (1)(c)of this Subsection, thepercentreductionin the minimum recommended employer contribution rate otherwise applicable shall bedeterminedbydividingtheinterest-adjustedvalueofthechargesfromthefunding depositaccountbytheprojectedpayrollforthefiscalyearforwhichthecontribution rate is to be reduced.
Section 2.
Section 2.R.S.
R.S.
This Act shall become effectiveupon signature bythe governor or, if not signedbythegovernor,uponexpirationofthetimeforbillstobecomelawwithoutsignature by the governor, as provided by Article III, Section 18 of the Constitution of Louisiana.
This Act shall become effective upon signature bythe governor or, if not signedbythegovernor,uponexpirationofthetimeforbillstobecomelawwithoutsignature by the governor, as provided by Article III, Section 18 of the Constitution of Louisiana.
Show all 105 changed rows (65 more)
Previous
Latest
Page 5 of 8 CODING:
SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA APPROVED:
Wordsinstruckthroughtypearedeletionsfromexistinglaw;wordsunderscored are additions.
Page 5 of 5 CODING:
HLS 26RS-219 ENGROSSED HB NO.
22 DIGEST ThedigestprintedbelowwaspreparedbyHouseLegislative Services.
It constitutes nopart of the legislative instrument.
The keyword, one-liner, abstract, and digest do not constitute part of the law or proof or indicia of legislative intent.
[R.S.
1:13(B) and 24:177(E)] HB 22 Engrossed 2026 Regular Session Bacala Abstract:
Provides relative to cost-of-living adjustments and calculation of employer contributions for the Clerks' of Court Retirement and Relief Fund.
Present law authorizes certain statewide retirement systems including the Clerks' of Court Retirement and Relief Fund (Clerks) to grant adjustments in monthly benefits, commonly calledcost-of-livingadjustments (COLAs),to retireesandotherbeneficiaries.
Provides for eligibility, timing, and the amount of the COLA.
Limits the authority to grant a COLA based on the funding percentage of the system and the time the last COLA was granted.
Present law, applicable to certainstatewide systems, authorizes the Clerks board of trustees to set an employer contribution rate above the actuarially required contribution rate calculatedinaccordancewithpresentlaw.
Allowstheboardtosetaratebetweenthecurrent rate and the actuarially required minimum rate.
Allows the board to set the rate up to 3% higher than the actuariallyrequired rate.
Presentlaw,applicabletocertainstatewidesystemsincludingClerks,providesforafunding deposit account (FDA) for accumulation of the additional employer contributions collected as a result of the board setting an employer contribution rate above the actuariallyrequired rate.
Specifies the purposes for which the money in the FDA may be used, one of which is providing COLAs.
Proposed law retains present law.
Present law authorizes the Clerks board of trustees to grant a COLA to eligible benefit recipients who have been retired at least one full year.
Limits the COLA to the lesser of 2.5% or $40 per month.
Proposed law specifies that all retirees, beneficiaries, and survivors are eligible to receive COLAs.
Requires the FDA to be the source of funding.
Proposed law increases the maximum COLA to 3% and removes the $40 per month cap.
Proposed law provides that the COLA begins on a date as determined by the board of trustees following board approval of the actuarialvaluation and subsequent adoption bythe Public Retirement Systems' Actuarial Committee (PRSAC).
Present law limits the authority of certain statewide system boards to grant a COLA based on the funding level and date of the most recent COLA.
A board may grant a COLA if the system is:
(1) At least 90% funded and no COLA was granted in the most recent fiscal year.
(2) At least 80% funded and no COLA was granted in either of the two most recent fiscal years.
(3) At least70%fundedandno COLAwasgrantedinanyofthethreemost recentfiscal years.
Page 6 of 8 CODING:
Wordsinstruckthroughtypearedeletionsfromexistinglaw;wordsunderscored are additions.
HLS 26RS-219 ENGROSSED HB NO.
22 Proposed law retains present law and authorizes the Clerks board to grant a COLA in any fiscal year in which the system is at least 100% funded.
Specifies that the funded ratio as of anyfiscal yearend shall be defined as the ratio of the actuarial value of assets to the level percentage of payroll entry age normal actuarial accrued liability.
Present law provides that, unless the legislature or the system board specifies otherwise, a COLA shall be an increase in the monthly benefit of each recipient in the dollar amount equal to:
(1) The total of number of years of creditedserviceaccruedat retirement or at the death of the member or retiree.
(2) The number of years since retirement or since the death of the member or retiree.
Present law provides that if there are not sufficient funds to fund the benefit at the rate of $1 per year for the total number of years, then the rate shall be reduced in proportion to the amount of funds that are available in the FDA to fund the COLA.
ProposedlawallowstheClerksboardtograntaCOLAofadollaramountbasedontheyears of service and the years since the benefit payments began.
Allows the board to use more than $1 as the multiplier and to have differentmultipliers.
Limits the selection of multiples used in the calculation by prohibiting the total actuarial present value of an increase under proposed law from exceeding the actuarial present value of a COLA that increases each recipient's benefit by 3%.
Proposed law otherwise retains present law.
Present law, applicable to certain statewide systems including Clerks, authorizes the board of trustees to use excess investment income to provide a supplemental COLA equal to 2% of the original benefit to all retirees and beneficiaries who are 65 years of age or older.
Limits the authority to years in which the actuarial rate of return exceeds the valuation interest rate.
PresentlawgoverningtheFDAallowsFDAmoneytobeusedto fundanyCOLAotherwise authorized by law.
ProposedlawauthorizestheClerksboardtograntaCOLAofupto2%ofthecurrentbenefit to recipients who are 65 years of age or over funded by money in the FDA.
Specifies that this may be in addition to any other COLA granted.
Proposed law otherwise retains present law.
Present law provides relative to the authorityof the board of trustees to grant a COLA in a year in which the legislature fails to enact legislation granting a COLA.
Present law prohibits the governing authority from granting a COLA during any calendar year prior to the final adjournment of the regular session of the legislature.
Present law provides that a COLA cannot be granted until a lapse of at least one-half of the fiscal year and the funded ratio of the previous fiscal year exceeds the target ratio defined in present law.
Proposed law removes the limitations of present law for Clerks.
Effective upon signature of governor or lapse of time for gubernatorial action.
(Amends R.S.
11:1549;
Adds R.S.
11:1550;
Repeals R.S.
11:105(A)(2), 106(A)(2), 107(A)(2), 107.1(A)(2), 242(B)(2), 243(A)(2), and 246(A)(2)) Page 7 of 8 CODING:
Wordsinstruckthroughtypearedeletionsfromexistinglaw;wordsunderscored are additions.
HLS 26RS-219 ENGROSSED HB NO.
22 Summary of Amendments Adopted by House The Committee Amendments Proposed by House Committee on Retirement to the original bill:
1.
Change when a cost-of-living adjustment begins to a date determined by the board of trustees.
Page 8 of 8 CODING:
View plain text versions (4)

Amendments

2 amendments

Click Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.

Action History

  1. Signed by the Governor. Becomes Act No. 279.

  2. Effective date: 05/22/2026.

  3. Received from the Senate without amendments.

  4. Enrolled and signed by the Speaker of the House.

  5. Signed by the President of the Senate.

  6. Sent to the Governor for executive approval.

  7. Rules suspended. Read by title, passed by a vote of 32 yeas and 0 nays, and ordered returned to the House. Motion to reconsider tabled.

  8. Reported without Legislative Bureau amendments. Read by title and passed to third reading and final passage.

  9. Read by title and referred to the Legislative Bureau.

  10. Reported favorably.

  11. Read by title. Recommitted to the Committee on Finance.

  12. Reported favorably.

  13. Read second time by title and referred to the Committee on Retirement.

  14. Received in the Senate. Read first time by title and placed on the Calendar for a second reading.

  15. Read third time by title, roll called on final passage, yeas 92, nays 1. The bill, having received two-thirds vote of the elected members, was finally passed, title adopted, ordered to the Senate.

  16. Scheduled for floor debate on 03/26/2026.

  17. Read by title, amended, ordered engrossed, passed to 3rd reading.

  18. Reported with amendments (13-0).

  19. Read by title, under the rules, referred to the Committee on Retirement.

  20. First appeared in the Interim Calendar on 1/23/2026.

  21. Prefiled.

  22. Under the rules, provisionally referred to the Committee on Retirement.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 146 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (146)

146 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 146 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

FINAL PASSAGE (#958)

Passed 32 Yea · 0 Nay · 7 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 1000
Republican 22005
Democrat 9002
Total 32007
% of votes cast 82%0%0%18%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Mr. President — Yea
Edward J. Price Democrat Yea
Gary Carter Democrat Yea
Gerald Boudreaux Democrat Yea
Jay Luneau Democrat Yea
Jimmy Harris Democrat Yea
Katrina R. Jackson-Andrews Democrat Yea
Larry Selders Democrat Not Voting
Regina Barrow Democrat Yea
Royce Duplessis Democrat Not Voting
Sam Jenkins Democrat Yea
Sidney Barthelemy II Democrat Yea
Adam Bass Republican Yea
Alan Seabaugh Republican Yea
Beth Mizell Republican Yea
Blake Miguez Republican Not Voting
Bob Hensgens Republican Yea
Brach Jerad Myers Republican Yea
Caleb Kleinpeter Republican Yea
Eddie J. Lambert Republican Not Voting
Franklin J. Foil Republican Yea
Glen Womack Republican Yea
Gregory A. Miller Republican Yea
Heather Cloud Republican Yea
Jeremy Stine Republican Yea
John C. "Jay" Morris Republican Yea
Jr., William "Bill" Wheat Republican Yea
Kirk Talbot Republican Yea
Mark Abraham Republican Yea
Michael "Big Mike" Fesi Republican Yea
Mike Reese Republican Yea
Patrick Connick Republican Not Voting
Patrick McMath Republican Yea
Rick Edmonds Republican Yea
Robert "Bob" Owen Republican Yea
Robert Allain Republican Yea
Stewart Jr. Cathey Republican Yea
Thomas A. Pressly Republican Not Voting
Valarie Hodges Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

FINAL PASSAGE (#116)

Passed 92 Yea · 1 Nay · 12 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6100
Republican 59009
Democrat 27003
Total 921012
% of votes cast 88%1%0%11%
How each member voted (105)
Member Party Vote
Mr. Speaker — Yea
Galle — Yea
Stagni — Yea
Amedee — Nay
Johnson, T. — Yea
Landry, T. — Yea
St. Blanc — Yea
Adrian Fisher Democrat Yea
Aimee Adatto Freeman Democrat Not Voting
Alonzo L. Knox Democrat Yea
Barbara Carpenter Democrat Not Voting
C. Denise Marcelle Democrat Yea
Candace N. Newell Democrat Yea
Chasity Martinez Democrat Yea
Dana Henry Democrat Yea
Delisha Boyd Democrat Yea
Ed Murray Democrat Yea
Edmond Jordan Democrat Yea
Gerald Boudreaux Democrat Yea
III, Ed Larvadain Democrat Yea
Joy Walters Democrat Yea
Jr., Kyle M. Green Democrat Yea
Ken Brass Democrat Yea
Mandie Landry Democrat Yea
Marcus Anthony Bryant Democrat Yea
Pat Moore Democrat Yea
Rashid Armand Young Democrat Yea
Robby Carter Democrat Yea
Rodney Lyons Democrat Yea
Roy Daryl Adams Democrat Yea
Shaun Raphael Mena Democrat Yea
Sr., Wilford Carter Democrat Not Voting
Steven Jackson Democrat Yea
Sylvia Elaine Taylor Democrat Yea
Tammy T. Phelps Democrat Yea
Tehmi Jahi Chassion Democrat Yea
Vanessa Caston LaFleur Democrat Yea
Annie Spell Republican Not Voting
Barbara Reich Freiberg Republican Yea
Beth Anne Billings Republican Yea
Brett F. Geymann Republican Not Voting
Brian Leonard Glorioso Republican Yea
Bryan Fontenot Republican Yea
Chad Michael Boyer Republican Yea
Chance Keith Henry Republican Yea
Christopher Turner Republican Yea
Danny McCormick Republican Not Voting
Daryl Andrew Deshotel Republican Yea
Debbie Villio Republican Yea
Dixon Wallace McMakin Republican Yea
Dodie Horton Republican Yea
Emily Chenevert Republican Yea
Foy Bryan Gadberry Republican Yea
Francis C. Thompson Republican Yea
Gregory A. Miller Republican Yea
III, Roger William Wilder Republican Yea
III, Vincent E. Cox Republican Yea
IV, Gerald "Beau" Beaullieu Republican Yea
Jack McFarland Republican Yea
Jacob Braud Republican Not Voting
Jacob Jules Landry Republican Yea
Jason Brian DeWitt Republican Yea
Jeffrey "Jeff" Fons Wiley Republican Yea
Jeremy LaCombe Republican Yea
Jerome Zeringue Republican Yea
Jessica Domangue Republican Yea
John E. Wyble Republican Yea
Joseph A. Orgeron Republican Yea
Josh Carlson Republican Yea
Jr., Dennis Bamburg Republican Yea
Jr., John R. Illg Republican Yea
Jr., Michael Robert Bayham Republican Not Voting
Kathy Edmonston Republican Yea
Kellee Hennessy Dickerson Republican Not Voting
Kim Carver Republican Yea
Kimberly Landry Coates Republican Yea
Larry A. Bagley Republican Not Voting
Lauren Ventrella Republican Yea
Laurie Schlegel Republican Yea
Les Farnum Republican Yea
Mark Wright Republican Yea
Michael "Gabe" Firment Republican Yea
Michael Charles Echols Republican Yea
Michael Melerine Republican Yea
Mike Johnson Republican Yea
Neil Riser Republican Yea
Nicholas Muscarello Republican Yea
Paul Sawyer Republican Yea
Phillip Eric Tarver Republican Yea
Polly Thomas Republican Not Voting
R. Dewith Carrier Republican Yea
Raymond J. Crews Republican Yea
Reese "Skip" Broussard Republican Yea
Rhonda Gaye Butler Republican Yea
Robert "Bob" Owen Republican Yea
Rodney Schamerhorn Republican Not Voting
Ryan Bourriaque Republican Yea
Shane Mack Republican Yea
Sr., Peter F. Egan Republican Yea
Stephanie H. Berault Republican Yea
Stephanie Hilferty Republican Yea
Timothy P. Kerner Republican Yea
Tony Bacala Republican Yea
Troy Jude Hebert Republican Yea
Wayne McMahen Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 22?
HB 22 is sponsored by Tony Bacala (Republican).
What is the current status of HB 22?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 20, 2026. Enacted.
Where can I track HB 22?
Track HB 22 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 22

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 22

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →