SB 281 — AN ACT relating to grandparent visitation.
Last action — recommitted to Appropriations & Revenue (H)
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced February 27, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Passed Senate
Current position in the legislative process.
-
4 sponsors
4 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (3 R · 1 D) — cross-party backing.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
Amend KRS 405.021 to establish a clear and convincing standard of evidence in determining grandparent visitation; establish factors the court may consider in determining the best interests of the child; remove rebuttable presumption standard; amend KRS 620.090 to conform.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
123 added · 119 removed123 line(s) added, 119 removed.
UNOFFICIAL COPY 26 RS BRSB 2388281/GA AN ACT relating to grandparent visitation.
(1) (a) The Circuit Court may grant reasonable visitation rights to either the paternal or maternal grandparents of a child and issue any necessary orders to enforce the decree ifif: the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that:
The court finds by clear and convincing evidence that:
a.
and 2.b.
Visitation with the grandparent[ it Determines that it] is in the best interests[interest] of the child[child; to do so].
or[ to do so] 2.
Someone other than a parent is the grandchild's custodian and the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that visitation with the grandparent is in the best interests of the child.
(c) Potential detriments and benefits to the child from granting visitation, including whether the loss of the relationship between the petitioner and Page 1 of 5 SB028110.100 - 2388 - XXXX 3/17/2026 2:49 PM GA UNOFFICIAL COPY 26 RS SB 281/GA child is likely to harm the child or cause emotional distress to the child;
(d) Effect granting visitation would have on the child's relationship with the parents;parents or custodian;
(e) Physical and emotional health of all the adults involved, parentscustodian, andparents, Pageand 1 of 5 XXXX 2/26/2026 6:40 PM Jacketed UNOFFICIAL COPY 26 RS BR 2388 grandparents alike;
and (i) Special circumstance when the parent of the child who is the son or daughter of the grandparent is deceased or the marriage of the parent has been dissolved.dissolved[ (b) If the parent of the child who is the son or daughter of the grandparent is deceased, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that visitation with the grandparent is in the best interest of the child if the grandparent can prove a pre-existing significant and viable relationship with the child.
[(b) If the parent of the child who is the son or daughter of the grandparent is deceased, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that visitation with the grandparent is in the best interest of the child if the grandparent can prove a pre-existing significant and viable relationship with the child.
There exist any other facts that establish that the loss of the relationship between the grandparent and the child is likely to harm the child.]child]. (3)[(2)] The action under this section shall be brought in the Circuit Court of[in] the county in which the child resides.
(4)[(3)]Page The2 Circuit Court may grant noncustodial parental visitation rights to the grandparent of a5 childSB028110.100 if- the2388 parent- of the child who is the son or daughter of the Page 2 of 5 XXXX 2/26/20263/17/2026 6:402:49 PM JacketedGA UNOFFICIAL COPY 26 RS BRSB 2388281/GA grandparent(3)[(2)] isThe deceasedaction andunder thethis grandparentsection hasshall assumedbe thebrought financialin obligation of child support owed by the deceasedCircuit parent,Court unlessof[in] the courtcounty determines that the visitation is not in thewhich best interests[interest] of the child underresides. subsections (1) and (2) of this section.
(4)[(3)] The Circuit Court may grant noncustodial parental visitation rights to the grandparent of a child if the parent of the child who is the son or daughter of the grandparent is deceased and the grandparent has assumed the financial obligation of child support owed by the deceased parent, unless the court determines that the visitation is not in the best interests[interest] of the child under subsections (1) and (2) of this section.
or Page 3 of 5 SB028110.100 - 2388 - XXXX 3/17/2026 2:49 PM GA UNOFFICIAL COPY 26 RS SB 281/GA c.
Preference shall be Page 3 of 5 XXXX 2/26/2026 6:40 PM Jacketed UNOFFICIAL COPY 26 RS BR 2388 given to available and qualified relatives of the child considering the wishes of the parent or other person exercising custodial control or supervision, if known.
(5) The child shall remain in temporary custody with the cabinet for a period of time Page 4 of 5 SB028110.100 - 2388 - XXXX 3/17/2026 2:49 PM GA UNOFFICIAL COPY 26 RS SB 281/GA not to exceed forty-five (45) days from the date of the removal from his home.
The court may extend such time after making written findings establishing the need for the extension and after Page 4 of 5 XXXX 2/26/2026 6:40 PM Jacketed UNOFFICIAL COPY 26 RS BR 2388 finding that the extension is in the child's best interest.
Page 5 of 5 SB028110.100 - 2388 - XXXX 2/26/20263/17/2026 6:402:49 PM JacketedGA
Compared against the Kentucky Revised Statutes as published AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill modifies the criteria and standards for granting grandparent visitation rights in Kentucky.
-
KRS 405.021
if it determines that it is in the best interest of the child to do so.→ if: 1. The court finds by clear and convincing evidence that: a. There are compelling factors to overcome the presumption that a fit parent acts in the best interests of the child; and b. Visitation with the grandparent is in the best interests of the child; or 2. Someone other than a parent is the grandchild's custodian and the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that visitation with the grandparent is in the best interests of the child.Changes the standard for granting visitation from a determination of best interest to include compelling factors and the status of the child's custodian.
-
KRS 405.021
that it is in the best interest of the child to do so.→ that it is in the best interests of the child.Clarifies wording regarding what the court must determine regarding the best interests of the child.
-
KRS 405.021
there shall be a rebuttable presumption that visitation with the grandparent is in the best interest of the child if the grandparent can prove a pre-existing significant and viable relationship with the child.Removes the rebuttable presumption for visitation when a parent is deceased, changing the burden of proof.
-
KRS 405.021
the grandparent has a significant and viable relationship with the child as established in KRS 405.021(1)(c).→ visitation with the grandparent is in the best interests of the child.Modifies the requirement for consideration of grandparent visitation rights in the context of custody decisions.
Action History
-
recommitted to Appropriations & Revenue (H)
-
2nd reading, to Rules
-
floor amendment (1) filed
-
reported favorably, 1st reading, to Calendar
-
to Judiciary (H)
-
to Committee on Committees (H)
-
received in House
-
3rd reading, passed 36-0 with Committee Substitute (1)
-
passed over and retained in the Orders of the Day
-
posted for passage in the Regular Orders of the Day for Monday, March 16 2026
-
2nd reading, to Rules
-
reported favorably, 1st reading, to Calendar with Committee Substitute (1)
-
to Judiciary (S)
-
to Committee on Committees (S)
-
introduced in Senate
Sponsors
- Gerald A. Neal · Primary
- Matthew Deneen · Primary
- Danny Carroll · Primary
- Rick Girdler · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 134 not signed on
Sponsors (4)
- Gerald A. Neal Democrat
- Matthew Deneen Republican
- Danny Carroll Republican
- Rick Girdler Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (134)
134 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 134 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 31 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (38)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Cassie Chambers Armstrong | Democrat | Yea |
| Gary Clemons | Democrat | Yea |
| Gerald A. Neal | Democrat | Yea |
| Karen Berg | Democrat | Yea |
| Keturah J. Herron | Democrat | Yea |
| Aaron Reed | Republican | Yea |
| Amanda Mays Bledsoe | Republican | Yea |
| Brandon J. Storm | Republican | Yea |
| Christian McDaniel | Republican | Yea |
| Craig Richardson | Republican | Yea |
| Danny Carroll | Republican | Yea |
| David P. Givens | Republican | Yea |
| Donald Douglas | Republican | Yea |
| Gary Boswell | Republican | Yea |
| Greg Elkins | Republican | Yea |
| Jared Carpenter | Republican | Yea |
| Jason Howell | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jason Nemes | Republican | Yea |
| Jimmy Higdon | Republican | Yea |
| Julie Raque Adams | Republican | Yea |
| Lindsey Tichenor | Republican | Yea |
| Matt Nunn | Republican | Yea |
| Matthew Deneen | Republican | Yea |
| Max Wise | Republican | Yea |
| Michael Meredith | Republican | Not Voting |
| Nick Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Phillip Wheeler | Republican | Yea |
| Rick Girdler | Republican | Yea |
| Robby Mills | Republican | Yea |
| Robert Stivers | Republican | Yea |
| Robin L. Webb | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Madon | Republican | Yea |
| Shelley Funke Frommeyer | Republican | Yea |
| Stephen West | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Rawlings | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Smith | Republican | Yea |
| Wade Williams | Republican | Yea |
| Walker Thomas | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 281 do?
- Amend KRS 405.021 to establish a clear and convincing standard of evidence in determining grandparent visitation; establish factors the court may consider in determining the best interests of the child; remove rebuttable presumption standard; amend KRS 620.090 to conform.
- Who sponsors SB 281?
- SB 281 is sponsored by Gerald A. Neal (Democrat), Matthew Deneen (Republican), Danny Carroll (Republican), and Rick Girdler (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 281?
- This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced February 27, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track SB 281?
- Track SB 281 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 281
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 281
Last checked for changes about 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →