Kentucky 2026 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate Bipartisan · 3 R · 1 D cosponsors

SB 281 — AN ACT relating to grandparent visitation.

Last action — recommitted to Appropriations & Revenue (H)

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced February 27, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.

Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · high confidence
  • Passed Senate

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 4 sponsors

    4 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (3 R · 1 D) — cross-party backing.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 1 recorded vote so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Summary

Amend KRS 405.021 to establish a clear and convincing standard of evidence in determining grandparent visitation; establish factors the court may consider in determining the best interests of the child; remove rebuttable presumption standard; amend KRS 620.090 to conform.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

123 added · 119 removed

123 line(s) added, 119 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
UNOFFICIAL COPY 26 RS BR 2388 AN ACT relating to grandparent visitation.
UNOFFICIAL COPY 26 RS SB 281/GA AN ACT relating to grandparent visitation.
(1) (a) The Circuit Court may grant reasonable visitation rights to either the paternal or maternal grandparents of a child and issue any necessary orders to enforce the decree if the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that:
(1) (a) The Circuit Court may grant reasonable visitation rights to either the paternal or maternal grandparents of a child and issue any necessary orders to enforce the decree if:
The court finds by clear and convincing evidence that:
a.
and 2.
and b.
Visitation with the grandparent[ it Determines that it] is in the best interests[interest] of the child[ to do so].
Visitation with the grandparent[ it Determines that it] is in the best interests[interest] of the child;
or[ to do so] 2.
Someone other than a parent is the grandchild's custodian and the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that visitation with the grandparent is in the best interests of the child.
(c) Potential detriments and benefits to the child from granting visitation, including whether the loss of the relationship between the petitioner and child is likely to harm the child or cause emotional distress to the child;
(c) Potential detriments and benefits to the child from granting visitation, including whether the loss of the relationship between the petitioner and Page 1 of 5 SB028110.100 - 2388 - XXXX 3/17/2026 2:49 PM GA UNOFFICIAL COPY 26 RS SB 281/GA child is likely to harm the child or cause emotional distress to the child;
(d) Effect granting visitation would have on the child's relationship with the parents;
(d) Effect granting visitation would have on the child's relationship with the parents or custodian;
(e) Physical and emotional health of all the adults involved, parents and Page 1 of 5 XXXX 2/26/2026 6:40 PM Jacketed UNOFFICIAL COPY 26 RS BR 2388 grandparents alike;
(e) Physical and emotional health of all the adults involved, custodian, parents, and grandparents alike;
and (i) Special circumstance when the parent of the child who is the son or daughter of the grandparent is deceased or the marriage of the parent has been dissolved.
and (i) Special circumstance when the parent of the child who is the son or daughter of the grandparent is deceased or the marriage of the parent has been dissolved[ (b) If the parent of the child who is the son or daughter of the grandparent is deceased, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that visitation with the grandparent is in the best interest of the child if the grandparent can prove a pre-existing significant and viable relationship with the child.
[(b) If the parent of the child who is the son or daughter of the grandparent is deceased, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that visitation with the grandparent is in the best interest of the child if the grandparent can prove a pre-existing significant and viable relationship with the child.
There exist any other facts that establish that the loss of the relationship between the grandparent and the child is likely to harm the child.] (3)[(2)] The action under this section shall be brought in the Circuit Court of[in] the county in which the child resides.
There exist any other facts that establish that the loss of the relationship between the grandparent and the child is likely to harm the child].
(4)[(3)] The Circuit Court may grant noncustodial parental visitation rights to the grandparent of a child if the parent of the child who is the son or daughter of the Page 2 of 5 XXXX 2/26/2026 6:40 PM Jacketed UNOFFICIAL COPY 26 RS BR 2388 grandparent is deceased and the grandparent has assumed the financial obligation of child support owed by the deceased parent, unless the court determines that the visitation is not in the best interests[interest] of the child under subsections (1) and (2) of this section.
Page 2 of 5 SB028110.100 - 2388 - XXXX 3/17/2026 2:49 PM GA UNOFFICIAL COPY 26 RS SB 281/GA (3)[(2)] The action under this section shall be brought in the Circuit Court of[in] the county in which the child resides.
(4)[(3)] The Circuit Court may grant noncustodial parental visitation rights to the grandparent of a child if the parent of the child who is the son or daughter of the grandparent is deceased and the grandparent has assumed the financial obligation of child support owed by the deceased parent, unless the court determines that the visitation is not in the best interests[interest] of the child under subsections (1) and (2) of this section.
or c.
or Page 3 of 5 SB028110.100 - 2388 - XXXX 3/17/2026 2:49 PM GA UNOFFICIAL COPY 26 RS SB 281/GA c.
Preference shall be Page 3 of 5 XXXX 2/26/2026 6:40 PM Jacketed UNOFFICIAL COPY 26 RS BR 2388 given to available and qualified relatives of the child considering the wishes of the parent or other person exercising custodial control or supervision, if known.
Preference shall be given to available and qualified relatives of the child considering the wishes of the parent or other person exercising custodial control or supervision, if known.
(5) The child shall remain in temporary custody with the cabinet for a period of time not to exceed forty-five (45) days from the date of the removal from his home.
(5) The child shall remain in temporary custody with the cabinet for a period of time Page 4 of 5 SB028110.100 - 2388 - XXXX 3/17/2026 2:49 PM GA UNOFFICIAL COPY 26 RS SB 281/GA not to exceed forty-five (45) days from the date of the removal from his home.
The court may extend such time after making written findings establishing the need for the extension and after Page 4 of 5 XXXX 2/26/2026 6:40 PM Jacketed UNOFFICIAL COPY 26 RS BR 2388 finding that the extension is in the child's best interest.
The court may extend such time after making written findings establishing the need for the extension and after finding that the extension is in the child's best interest.
Page 5 of 5 XXXX 2/26/2026 6:40 PM Jacketed
Page 5 of 5 SB028110.100 - 2388 - XXXX 3/17/2026 2:49 PM GA
View plain text versions (2)

How this bill changes current law

4 changes Share ↗

Compared against the Kentucky Revised Statutes as published AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.

The bill modifies the criteria and standards for granting grandparent visitation rights in Kentucky.

  • KRS 405.021

    if it determines that it is in the best interest of the child to do so. → if: 1. The court finds by clear and convincing evidence that: a. There are compelling factors to overcome the presumption that a fit parent acts in the best interests of the child; and b. Visitation with the grandparent is in the best interests of the child; or 2. Someone other than a parent is the grandchild's custodian and the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that visitation with the grandparent is in the best interests of the child.

    Changes the standard for granting visitation from a determination of best interest to include compelling factors and the status of the child's custodian.

  • KRS 405.021

    that it is in the best interest of the child to do so. → that it is in the best interests of the child.

    Clarifies wording regarding what the court must determine regarding the best interests of the child.

  • KRS 405.021

    there shall be a rebuttable presumption that visitation with the grandparent is in the best interest of the child if the grandparent can prove a pre-existing significant and viable relationship with the child.

    Removes the rebuttable presumption for visitation when a parent is deceased, changing the burden of proof.

  • KRS 405.021

    the grandparent has a significant and viable relationship with the child as established in KRS 405.021(1)(c). → visitation with the grandparent is in the best interests of the child.

    Modifies the requirement for consideration of grandparent visitation rights in the context of custody decisions.

Action History

  1. recommitted to Appropriations & Revenue (H)

  2. 2nd reading, to Rules

  3. floor amendment (1) filed

  4. reported favorably, 1st reading, to Calendar

  5. to Judiciary (H)

  6. to Committee on Committees (H)

  7. received in House

  8. 3rd reading, passed 36-0 with Committee Substitute (1)

  9. passed over and retained in the Orders of the Day

  10. posted for passage in the Regular Orders of the Day for Monday, March 16 2026

  11. 2nd reading, to Rules

  12. reported favorably, 1st reading, to Calendar with Committee Substitute (1)

  13. to Judiciary (S)

  14. to Committee on Committees (S)

  15. introduced in Senate

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

4 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 134 not signed on

Sponsors (4)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (134)

134 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 134 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

PASS SB 281 w/ SCS 1

Passed 36 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 5000
Republican 31002
Total 36002
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (38)
Member Party Vote
Cassie Chambers Armstrong Democrat Yea
Gary Clemons Democrat Yea
Gerald A. Neal Democrat Yea
Karen Berg Democrat Yea
Keturah J. Herron Democrat Yea
Aaron Reed Republican Yea
Amanda Mays Bledsoe Republican Yea
Brandon J. Storm Republican Yea
Christian McDaniel Republican Yea
Craig Richardson Republican Yea
Danny Carroll Republican Yea
David P. Givens Republican Yea
Donald Douglas Republican Yea
Gary Boswell Republican Yea
Greg Elkins Republican Yea
Jared Carpenter Republican Yea
Jason Howell Republican Not Voting
Jason Nemes Republican Yea
Jimmy Higdon Republican Yea
Julie Raque Adams Republican Yea
Lindsey Tichenor Republican Yea
Matt Nunn Republican Yea
Matthew Deneen Republican Yea
Max Wise Republican Yea
Michael Meredith Republican Not Voting
Nick Wilson Republican Yea
Phillip Wheeler Republican Yea
Rick Girdler Republican Yea
Robby Mills Republican Yea
Robert Stivers Republican Yea
Robin L. Webb Republican Yea
Scott Madon Republican Yea
Shelley Funke Frommeyer Republican Yea
Stephen West Republican Yea
Steve Rawlings Republican Yea
Tom Smith Republican Yea
Wade Williams Republican Yea
Walker Thomas Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 281 do?
Amend KRS 405.021 to establish a clear and convincing standard of evidence in determining grandparent visitation; establish factors the court may consider in determining the best interests of the child; remove rebuttable presumption standard; amend KRS 620.090 to conform.
Who sponsors SB 281?
SB 281 is sponsored by Gerald A. Neal (Democrat), Matthew Deneen (Republican), Danny Carroll (Republican), and Rick Girdler (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 281?
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced February 27, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
Where can I track SB 281?
Track SB 281 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 281

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 281

Last checked for changes about 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →