Pennsylvania 2025_0 Regular Session Status: In Committee 13 D cosponsors

HB 1247 — An Act amending Title 42 (Judiciary and Judicial Procedure) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in rules of evidence, providing for prohibition of deception during custodial interrogation of individual with intellectual disability or autism.

Last action — Laid on the table, April 13, 2026

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced April 17, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.

Prognosis

Stalled 26% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

Low

How often bills like it became law.

  • In Committee

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 13 sponsors

    1 primary, 12 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (13 D).

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Deceptive Interrogation with Intellectual Disabilities or Autism 

Bill Text

How this bill changes current law

10 changes Share ↗

AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.

This bill prohibits the use of deception during custodial interrogation of individuals with intellectual disability or autism, making any resulting confessions inadmissible unless proven voluntary.

  • Title 42

    § 6145. Prohibition of deception during custodial interrogation of individual with intellectual disability or autism.

    This establishes a new section that prohibits deceptive practices during the interrogation of certain vulnerable individuals.

  • Title 42

    A law enforcement officer may not use deception during a custodial interrogation of an individual with an intellectual disability or autism.

    This explicitly forbids law enforcement from using deception when interacting with individuals who have intellectual disabilities or autism.

  • Title 42

    An oral, a written or a sign language confession of an individual with an intellectual disability or autism made as the result of a custodial interrogation conducted at a police station or other place of detention... shall be presumed to be inadmissible as evidence against the individual making the confession in a criminal proceeding or a juvenile court proceeding... if, during the custodial interrogation, a law enforcement officer knowingly engages in deception.

    This creates a legal presumption that confessions obtained through deceptive practices are inadmissible in court.

  • Title 42

    The presumption of inadmissibility of the confession may be overcome by a preponderance of the evidence that the confession was voluntarily given, based on the totality of the circumstances.

    This allows the Commonwealth to rebut the presumption of inadmissibility by demonstrating that the confession was voluntarily made.

  • Title 42

    The burden of going forward with the evidence and the burden of proving that the confession was voluntary shall be on the Commonwealth.

    This places the responsibility on the Commonwealth to prove a confession was voluntary after deception has been claimed.

  • Title 42

    An objection to the failure of the Commonwealth to call all material witnesses on the issue of whether the confession was voluntary must be made in the trial court.

    This specifies the procedural requirement for raising an objection concerning the voluntariness of the confession in court.

  • Title 42

    "Deception." The knowing communication of false facts about evidence or unauthorized statements regarding leniency by a law enforcement officer to an individual subject to custodial interrogation.

    This defines the term 'deception' in the context of custodial interrogations.

  • Title 42

    "Individual with an intellectual disability or autism." As defined in section 5992 (relating to definitions).

    This provides a clear definition to identify the individuals covered under this new prohibition.

  • Title 42

    "Law enforcement officer." As defined in section 5950(d) (relating to confidential communications involving law enforcement officers).

    This ensures clarity in identifying who is restricted from using deception based on existing definitions.

  • Title 42

    "Place of detention." A building or police station that is a place of operation for a State or municipal police department...

    This defines what constitutes a place of detention relevant to the prohibition on deceptive practices.

Action History

  1. Laid on the table, April 13, 2026

  2. First consideration, April 13, 2026

  3. Reported as committed, April 13, 2026

  4. Referred to JUDICIARY, April 17, 2025

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 12 co-sponsors · 240 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (12)

Not signed on (240)

240 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 240 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 1247 do?
Deceptive Interrogation with Intellectual Disabilities or Autism 
Who sponsors HB 1247?
HB 1247 is sponsored by Liz Hanbidge (Democratic), Jose Giral (Democratic), Johanny Cepeda-Freytiz (Democratic), Carol Hill-Evans (Democratic), Tarik Khan (Democratic), Danielle Friel Otten (Democratic), Kristine C. Howard (Democratic), Benjamin V. Sanchez (Democratic), Joseph C. Hohenstein (Democratic), Melissa L. Shusterman (Democratic), Michael H. Schlossberg (Democratic), Perry S. Warren (Democratic), and Ed Neilson (Democratic).
What is the current status of HB 1247?
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced April 17, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track HB 1247?
Track HB 1247 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 1247

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 1247

Last checked for changes 4 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →