Iowa 2025-2026 Regular Session Status: Enacted

HF 2571 — A bill for an act relating to the Iowa rules of criminal procedure including commitment hearings following an acquittal based on insanity.

Last action — Signed by Governor.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 17, 2026. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Kim Reynolds (Republican) on April 09, 2026.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

73 added · 93 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent amendment to House File 2571 specifies the criteria used during commitment hearings for individuals who have been acquitted of a crime due to insanity. The updated language now explicitly includes factors such as a defendant's history of substance use and how it may affect their behavior, along with their current mental status and adherence to treatment. This change is important as it allows courts to better assess the potential risks associated with a defendant and ensures that all relevant aspects of their history are considered in the evaluation process.

→
Previous
Latest
STATE OF IOWA IMREYNLDS GOERNOR pil,226 Teooalealae ertryfaeoIwa tteptl Dsons,oa539 Dar.Sctr, Ieeyrni:
House File 2571 - Enrolled House File 2571 AN ACT RELATING TO THE IOWA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE INCLUDING COMMITMENT HEARINGS FOLLOWING AN ACQUITTAL BASED ON INSANITY.
HueFle7,nAtraigoheoaieofiialoeueildng cmimeternsolwngncutlaednnat.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF IOWA:
Tebveoseieseeyapoednhsa.
Section 1.
KmRyods\J Gvrorfoa c:
SUPREME COURT —— RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE REVISIONS.
Sceryfhente Cekfteose SAECPIOL ESONS,OWA39 1.851 WWW.GOVERNOR.IOWA.GOV 0^ PZmjVILLMA1NTAÎX hiii c-® limillHHIHHHIimUHKfHIIHHHI Wn iH Huse le 71 AN T REATNG O E OWA LS F RIINL ROEURE CLDIG COMIMNT ERIGS OLOIG N CQITAL SED N NANT.
BE T NCED Y HE NEAL SEBLY F E TTE F OA:
Setin .
SPRME ORT — LES FRIINL ROEDRE REISOS.
Iwa le f rmnal ocdue .2()() hal e amndd o dd bprarah 4, o roie:
Iowa rule of criminal procedure 2.22(8)(e) shall be amended to add subparagraph (4), to provide:
4) bene f ecnt ert ts f agrosnss hll t be he le temiing cor n sesing eher aeenat poes aik o hesevesr thrs, rtcualy hn uch abene ay e trbuabe o he nsrans f a ghy tucurd nirnmn.
(4) Absence of recent overt acts of dangerousness shall not be the sole determining factor in assessing whether a defendant poses a risk to themselves or others, particularly when such absence may be attributable to the constraints of a highly structured environment.
hen trmnig hehr a fedat s urety dnerus o hmsles r ters dr his l, he urt al onidr a rity f ctr, icudng ut ot mied :
When determining whether a defendant is currently dangerous to themselves or others under this rule, the court shall consider a variety of factors, including but not limited to:
oue ile 7, .
House File 2571, p.
2 () Oignal fns.
2 (a) Original offense.
The tre nd rcmtaces f e oignl cage r fese edig o he fednts nsniy aqutal.
The nature and circumstances of the original charge or offense leading to the defendant’s insanity acquittal.
() Bhaioal stry.
(b) Behavioral history.
he fedat's st ndc, icldig ror ilnt r ageos ct, rrspcive f e pesncer bsncef rcnt vrt ts.
The defendant’s past conduct, including prior violent or dangerous acts, irrespective of the presence or absence of recent overt acts.
() Pyciarc isory d uret enal ats.
(c) Psychiatric history and current mental status.
Te efnan's urnt schatic odtin, itoy f teamnt, heene o ratet, nd spnsvees o itevetons.
The defendant’s current psychiatric condition, history of treatment, adherence to treatment, and responsiveness to interventions.
() Sbsane se soder sor.
(d) Substance use disorder history.
The fndnts hstry f bsane se d ts mat n her eavor, icldng ror ignss f ubtace e isrer, e rlaiosip ewen ubtnce e nd ior olnt r dngrus odut, he kliood f lpse d ts tetil to crae anerunes, nd e efnan's ces tond wllnnes o ngge n bsane se eamet rorms o minan sfty.
The defendant’s history of substance use and its impact on their behavior, including prior diagnoses of substance use disorder, the relationship between substance use and prior violent or dangerous conduct, the likelihood of relapse and its potential to increase dangerousness, and the defendant’s access to and willingness to engage in substance use treatment programs to maintain safety.
() Isttuinal haior d ndpndnt ucioin.
(e) Institutional behavior and independent functioning.
Te efnan's bliy nd llnges o ngge n cil, rcraioal, uctonl, cuptinl, r oatonl atiiie;
The defendant’s ability and willingness to engage in social, recreational, educational, occupational, or vocational activities;
aitan el-ar;
maintain self-care;
emnsrte tbiiy, aapailty, d edcd rsk f ngrusess n ss srutued vionets;
demonstrate stability, adaptability, and reduced risk of dangerousness in less structured environments;
ek nd ilze pprt ytms;
seek and utilize support systems;
ad omly th ues d itrat pporitey itin a srutued vionet, ncuing y ncdnts diatng udelyng ngroses.
and comply with rules and interact appropriately within a structured environment, including any incidents indicating underlying dangerousness.
() Evionenal nlene.
(f) Environmental influence.
Te xent o ich aghy srutued ttn, sch s aopial r cued aiit, my uprss eavors at e ikly o niest n ss cntoled r rutued odtin.
The extent to which a highly structured setting, such as a hospital or secured facility, may suppress behaviors that are likely to manifest in less controlled or structured conditions.
() Epet esimny d isk sesent pot.
(g) Expert testimony and risk assessment reports.
Ealatos nd ik sssmets rvied y alfid etal halh roesinas egring e efndn's oenial dngr o hmslf r tes.
Evaluations and risk assessments provided by qualified mental health professionals regarding the defendant’s potential danger to themself or others.
Tis nldes nsdeaton f vliatd ik sssset tos nd ehoooges, cldig ay imtains n sesig n ndviul cnind o a srutued ttn.
This includes consideration of validated risk assessment tools and methodologies, including any limitations in assessing an individual confined to a structured setting.
oue ile 7, .
House File 2571, p.
3 .
3 2.
The vied les f imnl roedre all e sbmted or gilaie oucil viw o aer an cobr 6 Z .
The revised rules of criminal procedure shall be submitted for legislative council review no later than October 14, 2026.
X.
______________________________ ______________________________ PAT GRASSLEY AMY SINCLAIR Speaker of the House President of the Senate I hereby certify that this bill originated in the House and is known as House File 2571, Ninety-first General Assembly.
A , PT MY ICAIR Seaer f e oue reidnt f e ente Ihrey eriy hat is il rgiatd n he use d is on s oue ie 57, intyfrst neal sebl.
______________________________ MEGHAN NELSON Chief Clerk of the House Approved _______________, 2026 ______________________________ KIM REYNOLDS Governor
EGAN ESN nlf Lrk t he ue Aprvd ^<2Q 26 IM ^NgDS I ovrnr
View plain text versions (5)

Amendments

1 amendment

Click Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.

Action History

  1. Signed by Governor.

  2. Reported correctly enrolled, signed by Speaker and President, and sent to Governor.

  3. Message from Senate.

  4. Immediate message.

  5. Passed Senate, yeas 45, nays 0.

  6. Substituted for SF 2055.

  7. Explanation of vote.

  8. Read first time, attached to SF 2055.

  9. Message from House.

  10. Immediate message.

  11. Passed House, yeas 96, nays 0.

  12. Amendment H-8252 adopted.

  13. Amendment H-8252 filed.

  14. Placed on calendar under unfinished business.

  15. Introduced, placed on calendar.

Sponsors

  • COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 149 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (149)

149 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 149 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Shall the bill pass?

Passed 45 Yea · 0 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 30003
Democrat 16002
Total 46005
% of votes cast 90%0%0%10%
How each member voted (51)
Member Party Vote
Art Staed Democrat Yea
Catelin Drey Democrat Yea
Cindy Winckler Democrat Yea
Herman C. Quirmbach Democrat Yea
Izaah Knox Democrat Yea
Janet Petersen Democrat Yea
Janice Weiner Democrat Yea
Liz Bennett Democrat Not Voting
Matt Blake Democrat Yea
Mike Zimmer Democrat Yea
Molly Donahue Democrat Yea
Renee Hardman Democrat Yea
Sarah Trone Garriott Democrat Yea
Sarah Trone Garriott Democrat Yea
Thomas Townsend Democrat Yea
Tony Bisignano Democrat Yea
William A. Dotzler Jr. Democrat Yea
Zach Wahls Democrat Not Voting
Adrian Dickey Republican Yea
Amy Sinclair Republican Yea
Annette Sweeney Republican Yea
Carrie Koelker Republican Yea
Charlie McClintock Republican Yea
Cherielynn Westrich Republican Not Voting
Dan Dawson Republican Yea
Dan Zumbach Republican Yea
Dave Sires Republican Yea
David D. Rowley Republican Not Voting
Dawn Driscoll Republican Yea
Dennis Guth Republican Yea
Doug Campbell Republican Yea
Jack Whitver Republican Yea
Jason Schultz Republican Yea
Jeff Reichman Republican Yea
Jeff Taylor Republican Yea
Jesse Green Republican Yea
Julian B. Garrett Republican Not Voting
Kara Warme Republican Yea
Ken Rozenboom Republican Yea
Kerry Gruenhagen Republican Yea
Kevin Alons Republican Yea
Lynn Evans Republican Yea
Mark Costello Republican Yea
Mark S. Lofgren Republican Yea
Mike Bousselot Republican Yea
Mike Klimesh Republican Yea
Mike Pike Republican Yea
Sandy Salmon Republican Yea
Scott Webster Republican Yea
Tim Kraayenbrink Republican Yea
Tom Shipley Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Shall the bill pass?

Passed 98 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 19001
Democrat 29000
Republican 52001
Total 100002
% of votes cast 98%0%0%2%
How each member voted (102)
Member Party Vote
Abdul-Samad — Yea
Jr. — Yea
Best — Yea
Buck — Yea
Cahill — Yea
Carlson — Yea
Deyoe — Yea
Forbes — Yea
Fry — Yea
Graber — Yea
Gustafson — Yea
Isenhart — Yea
Kniff — Yea
Scheetz — Yea
Sexton — Yea
Sherman — Yea
Steckman — Yea
Stoltenberg — Yea
Osmundson — Not Voting
Thompson, P. — Yea
Adam Zabner Democrat Yea
Amy Nielsen Democrat Yea
Art Staed Democrat Yea
Austin Baeth Democrat Yea
Beth Wessel-Kroeschell Democrat Yea
Bob Kressig Democrat Yea
Brian Meyer Democrat Yea
David Jacoby Democrat Yea
Dr. Megan L. Srinivas Democrat Yea
Elinor A. Levin Democrat Yea
Elizabeth Wilson Democrat Yea
Eric J. Gjerde Democrat Yea
Heather Matson Democrat Yea
J.D. Scholten Democrat Yea
Jeff Cooling Democrat Yea
Jennifer Konfrst Democrat Yea
Jerome Amos Jr. Democrat Yea
Josh Turek Democrat Yea
Ken Croken Democrat Yea
Kenan Judge Democrat Yea
Lindsay James Democrat Yea
Mary Lee Madison Democrat Yea
Monica Kurth Democrat Yea
Rick L. Olson Democrat Yea
Ross Wilburn Democrat Yea
Ruth Ann Gaines Democrat Yea
Sean Bagniewski Democrat Yea
Timi M. Brown-Powers Democrat Yea
Tracy A. Ehlert Democrat Yea
Ann Meyer Republican Yea
Austin Harris Republican Yea
Barb Kniff McCulla Republican Yea
Bill Gustoff Republican Yea
Bob Henderson Republican Yea
Bobby Kaufmann Republican Not Voting
Brent Siegrist Republican Yea
Brian K. Lohse Republican Yea
Brooke Boden Republican Yea
Carter F. Nordman Republican Yea
Chad Ingels Republican Yea
Charley Thomson Republican Yea
Cindy Golding Republican Yea
Craig P. Johnson Republican Yea
Dan Gehlbach Republican Yea
David E. Young Republican Yea
David Sieck Republican Yea
Dean Fisher Republican Yea
Derek Wulf Republican Yea
Devon Wood Republican Yea
Dr. Steven P. Bradley Republican Yea
Eddie Andrews Republican Yea
Gary M. Mohr Republican Yea
Hans C. Wilz Republican Yea
Heather Hora Republican Yea
Helena Hayes Republican Yea
Henry Stone Republican Yea
Jacob Bossman Republican Yea
Jane Bloomingdale Republican Yea
John H. Wills Republican Yea
Jon Dunwell Republican Yea
Joshua Meggers Republican Yea
Mark Cisneros Republican Yea
Mark I. Thompson Republican Yea
Matt W. Windschitl Republican Yea
Matthew Rinker Republican Yea
Megan Jones Republican Yea
Michael R. Bergan Republican Yea
Mike Vondran Republican Yea
Norlin G. Mommsen Republican Yea
Pat Grassley Republican Yea
Ray Sorensen Republican Yea
Shannon Latham Republican Yea
Shannon Lundgren Republican Yea
Skyler Wheeler Republican Yea
Steven C. Holt Republican Yea
Taylor R. Collins Republican Yea
Thomas Gerhold Republican Yea
Thomas Jay Moore Republican Yea
Thomas M. Jeneary Republican Yea
Tom Determann Republican Yea
Tom Shipley Republican Yea
Zach Dieken Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HF 2571?
HF 2571 is sponsored by COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY.
What is the current status of HF 2571?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 17, 2026. Enacted.
Where can I track HF 2571?
Track HF 2571 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HF 2571

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HF 2571

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →