A bill for an act relating to voting membership on joint 911 service boards.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SF 271 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SF 271.
You're tracking SF 271
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SF 271 — A bill for an act relating to voting membership on joint 911 service boards.
Last action — Subcommittee: Klimesh, Sires, and Wahls.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced February 11, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the Senate.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
- Introduced View text Current pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill limits voting membership on the joint 911 service board to only those political subdivisions located within the county that have a public safety agency serving territory within that county.
-
Section 34A.3, subsection 1, paragraph a, subparagraph (1)
Each political subdivision of the state located within the county and having a public safety agency serving territory within the county→ Each political subdivision of the state that is located within the county and has a public safety agency serving territory within the countyThis change clarifies that only political subdivisions located within the county can have voting membership.
-
Section 34A.3, subsection 1, paragraph a, subparagraph (1)
Each private safety agency operating within the area and each political subdivision of the state not located within the county, but having a public safety agency operating within the area, is entitled to nonvoting membership on the board.→ Each private safety agency operating within the area is entitled to nonvoting membership on the board.This eliminates nonvoting membership for political subdivisions not located within the county.
Action History
-
Subcommittee: Klimesh, Sires, and Wahls.
-
Introduced, referred to Local Government.
Sponsors
- Mike Klimesh · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 149 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Mike Klimesh Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (149)
149 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 149 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SF 271?
- SF 271 is sponsored by Mike Klimesh (Republican).
- What is the current status of SF 271?
- This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced February 11, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track SF 271?
- Track SF 271 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SF 271
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SF 271
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →