An Act amending Title 62 (Procurement) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in general provisions rel...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 897 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 897.
You're tracking HB 897
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 897 — An Act amending Title 62 (Procurement) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, in general provisions relating to Commonwealth Procurement Code, further providing for definitions and providing for prioritization of American-made supplies.
Last action — Referred to STATE GOVERNMENT, March 13, 2025
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced March 13, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
17 sponsors
1 primary, 16 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (15 R · 2 D) — cross-party backing.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
American-Made Prioritization in State Procurement
Bill Text
- Printer's No. 0939 View text Current
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
This bill adds definitions and establishes prioritization for American-made supplies in the Pennsylvania Procurement Code.
-
62 Pa.C.S. § 103
"American-made." Produced, manufactured, mined, grown or performed in the United States. For the purpose of this definition, produced or manufactured shall mean assembled in a location within the United States.
Adds a definition of 'American-made' to clarify what qualifies as such.
-
62 Pa.C.S. § 109
(a) Prioritization.--The department shall prioritize the procurement of American-made supplies and incorporate the prioritization into the department's procurement policies, procedures and specifications.
Creates a new section that requires the department to prioritize American-made supplies in procurement practices.
-
62 Pa.C.S. § 109
(b) Determinations.--If the Secretary of General Services determines that a particular supply is not American-made, or is American-made but not available in sufficient quantities to meet the needs of a Commonwealth agency for which the department acts as purchasing agency, the Secretary of General Services shall transmit notice of the determination to the Legislative Reference Bureau for publication in the next available issue of the Pennsylvania Bulletin.
Establishes a process for the Secretary of General Services to notify about determinations related to American-made supplies.
-
62 Pa.C.S. § 109
(c) Objections.--Beginning on the date of publication of the notice under subsection (b) and until 30 days thereafter, a person or business may file an objection to the determination in a form and manner determined by the department. A person or business shall include evidence of the particular supply being American-made or evidence of the particular supply being American-made and available in sufficient quantities. An objection under this subsection shall be considered an appeal under 2 Pa.C.S. Ch. 7 Subch. A (relating to judicial review of Commonwealth agency action).
Allows individuals or businesses to file objections to determinations regarding the availability of American-made supplies.
-
62 Pa.C.S. § 109
(d) Applicability.--If, after the adjudication of the objection under subsection (c), the determination under subsection (b) is affirmed, the prioritization requirements under subsection (a) shall not apply for the particular supply.
Clarifies that if an objection is affirmed, the prioritization of American-made supplies does not apply to that particular supply.
Action History
-
Referred to STATE GOVERNMENT, March 13, 2025
Sponsors
- Eric Davanzo · Primary
- Nathan Davidson · Cosponsor
- Russ Diamond · Cosponsor
- Joe Hamm · Cosponsor
- R. Lee James · Cosponsor
- Rob W. Kauffman · Cosponsor
- Charity Grimm Krupa · Cosponsor
- Andrew Kuzma · Cosponsor
- Milou Mackenzie · Cosponsor
- David H. Rowe · Cosponsor
- Craig T. Staats · Cosponsor
- Ryan Warner · Cosponsor
- Dane Watro · Cosponsor
- David H. Zimmerman · Cosponsor
- Brian C. Rasel · Cosponsor
- Aaron Bernstine · Cosponsor
- Ed Neilson · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 16 co-sponsors · 236 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Eric Davanzo Republican
Co-sponsors (16)
- Nathan Davidson Democratic
- Russ Diamond Republican
- Joe Hamm Republican
- R. Lee James Republican
- Rob W. Kauffman Republican
- Charity Grimm Krupa Republican
- Andrew Kuzma Republican
- Milou Mackenzie Republican
- David H. Rowe Republican
- Craig T. Staats Republican
- Ryan Warner Republican
- Dane Watro Republican
- David H. Zimmerman Republican
- Brian C. Rasel Republican
- Aaron Bernstine Republican
- Ed Neilson Democratic
Not signed on (236)
236 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 236 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 897 do?
- American-Made Prioritization in State Procurement
- Who sponsors HB 897?
- HB 897 is sponsored by Eric Davanzo (Republican), Nathan Davidson (Democratic), Russ Diamond (Republican), Joe Hamm (Republican), R. Lee James (Republican), Rob W. Kauffman (Republican), Charity Grimm Krupa (Republican), Andrew Kuzma (Republican), Milou Mackenzie (Republican), David H. Rowe (Republican), Craig T. Staats (Republican), Ryan Warner (Republican), Dane Watro (Republican), David H. Zimmerman (Republican), Brian C. Rasel (Republican), Aaron Bernstine (Republican), and Ed Neilson (Democratic).
- What is the current status of HB 897?
- This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced March 13, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HB 897?
- Track HB 897 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 897
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 897
Last checked for changes 4 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →