A bill for an act requiring the state fire marshal to conduct a study on the consolidation of fire protecti...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SF 594 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SF 594.
You're tracking SF 594
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SF 594 — A bill for an act requiring the state fire marshal to conduct a study on the consolidation of fire protection services, and including effective date provisions.
Last action — Rereferred to Local Government.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced March 10, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Passed Senate
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
90 added · 132 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of Senate File 594 adds more specific requirements for the advisory committee overseeing fire protection services. It now includes a licensed attorney with relevant experience and representatives from both larger and smaller cities, as well as counties with a population of 90,000 or more. These changes are important because they ensure that the committee has a diverse range of perspectives and expertise, which can lead to better decisions about fire protection services in Iowa.
Senate File 594 - IntroducedReprinted SENATE FILE 594 BY COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT (SUCCESSOR TO SSB 1206) (As Amended and Passed by the Senate March 18, 2025) A BILL FOR An Act requiring the state fire marshal to conduct a study on the consolidation of fire protection services.services, and including effective date provisions.
TLSBSF 2814SV594 (3)(4) 91 ll/jsll/js/mb S.F.
AtThe leastIowa oneemergency representativemanagement fromassociation. a city having a population of thirty-seven thousand or more as determined by the 2020 federal decennial census.
At least one representativeattorney fromlicensed ato citypractice havinglaw ain populationthis ofstate lesswith thanexperience fiverepresenting thousandentities asassociated determinedwith byfire theprotection 2020services. federal decennial census.
At least one representative from a countycity having a population of ninetythirty-seven thousand or more as determined by the 2020 federal decennial census.
At least one representative from a countycity having a population of less than seven thousand five hundredthousand as determined by the 2020 federal decennial census.
At least one representative from a county having a population of ninety thousand or more as determined by the 2020 federal decennial census.
k.
2.SF 594 (4) 91 -1- ll/js/mb 1/3 S.F.
The594 countywide2. fire protection services study shall LSB 2814SV (3) 91 -1- ll/js 1/4 S.F.
594The countywide fire protection services study shall include all of the following:
The analysis under this paragraph SF 594 (4) 91 -2- ll/js/mb 2/3 S.F.
594 must include outlines of any current or proposed fire protection service programs under chapter 28E, 357B, 357F, 357G, or 357J, and any other legal agreement, contract, or consolidated effort, including as part of a district.
An analysis of countywide fire protection services in LSBother 2814SVstates, (3)with 91an -2-emphasis ll/json 2/4midwest S.F.states, including an analysis of those fire protection programs in comparison to the fire protection needs of this state.
594 other states, with an emphasis on midwest states, including an analysis of those fire protection programs in comparison to the fire protection needs of this state.
Recommendations for the implementation of countywide fire protection services in this state including proposed functionality and an emphasis on the potential impact of implementation on the followingfour most populous counties in this state as determined by the 2020 federal decennial census:census, along with surrounding counties if a multicounty approach to fire protection services would be more beneficial based on the study’s findings.
(1) The county in this state with the highest population.
(2) Two of the next five most populous counties in this state giving preference to those counties that have implemented countywide emergency medical services in accordance with chapter 422D.
The selection of the two counties out of the next five most populous counties in this state shall be determined by the state fire marshal in consultation with the stakeholders outlined in subsection 1.
(3) The least populous county in this state.
(4) Two of the next five least populous counties in this state giving preference to those counties that have implemented countywide emergency medical services in accordance with chapter 422D.
The selection of the two counties out of the next five least populous counties in this state shall be determined by the state fire marshal in consultation with the stakeholders outlined in subsection 1.
EXPLANATIONSF The594 inclusion(4) of91 this-3- explanationll/js/mb does3/3 not constitute agreement with the explanation’s substance by the members of the general assembly.
This bill requires the state fire marshal, in consultation with a variety of stakeholders, to submit a report of a countywide fire protection services study’s findings to the LSB 2814SV (3) 91 -3- ll/js 3/4 S.F.
594 general assembly on or before June 30, 2026.
The bill provides that the study must include all of the following:
a cost analysis for upfront and ongoing costs to provide consolidated countywide fire protection services systems including proposed funding mechanisms and the potential effect a countywide fire protection service could have on local authority expenditures and budgets;
an analysis of current fire protection coverage including current response times and recommendations for placement of service stations to maximize fire protection coverage and emergency response times;
an analysis of current and future staffing needs including a proposed employment structure that focuses on adequate employee pay and volunteer staffing including benefits, stipends, or other compensation allowed in accordance with local, state, or federal law;
an analysis of current fire protection equipment and future fire protection equipment needs including proposed placement of fire protection equipment in service stations;
an analysis of current communication and dispatch challenges including proposed recommendations for more efficient and effective communications;
an analysis of the need for city and township fire protection services in relation to the implementation of a countywide fire protection service;
an analysis of existing countywide fire protection service programs in this state and midwest states;
and recommendations for the implementation of countywide fire protection services in this state with an emphasis on the effects the consolidated services could have on particular counties.
The bill takes effect upon enactment.
LSB 2814SV (3) 91 -4- ll/js 4/4
Amendments
1 amendmentClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Rereferred to Local Government.
-
Placed on calendar under unfinished business.
-
Placed on calendar.
-
Committee vote: Yeas, 17. Nays, 3. Excused, 1.
-
Committee report, recommending passage.
-
Subcommittee recommends passage.
-
Subcommittee Meeting: [].
-
Subcommittee reassigned: Blom, Latham and McBurney.
-
Tabled until future meeting.
-
Subcommittee Meeting: 03/27/2025 12:00PM House Lounge 2.
-
Subcommittee: Blom, Determann and McBurney.
-
Read first time, referred to Local Government.
-
Message from Senate.
-
Immediate message.
-
Passed Senate, yeas 48, nays 0.
-
Amendment S-3028 filed, adopted.
-
Committee report, approving bill.
-
Introduced, placed on calendar.
Sponsors
- COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 149 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (149)
149 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 149 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 15 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 49 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 96% | 0% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (51)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Celsi | — | Not Voting |
| De Witt | — | Yea |
| Art Staed | Democrat | Yea |
| Cindy Winckler | Democrat | Yea |
| Herman C. Quirmbach | Democrat | Yea |
| Izaah Knox | Democrat | Yea |
| Janet Petersen | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Janice Weiner | Democrat | Yea |
| Liz Bennett | Democrat | Yea |
| Matt Blake | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Zimmer | Democrat | Yea |
| Molly Donahue | Democrat | Yea |
| Sarah Trone Garriott | Democrat | Yea |
| Sarah Trone Garriott | Democrat | Yea |
| Thomas Townsend | Democrat | Yea |
| Tony Bisignano | Democrat | Yea |
| William A. Dotzler Jr. | Democrat | Yea |
| Zach Wahls | Democrat | Yea |
| Adrian Dickey | Republican | Yea |
| Amy Sinclair | Republican | Yea |
| Annette Sweeney | Republican | Yea |
| Carrie Koelker | Republican | Yea |
| Charlie McClintock | Republican | Yea |
| Cherielynn Westrich | Republican | Yea |
| Dan Dawson | Republican | Yea |
| Dan Zumbach | Republican | Yea |
| Dave Sires | Republican | Yea |
| David D. Rowley | Republican | Yea |
| Dawn Driscoll | Republican | Yea |
| Dennis Guth | Republican | Yea |
| Doug Campbell | Republican | Yea |
| Jack Whitver | Republican | Yea |
| Jason Schultz | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Reichman | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Taylor | Republican | Yea |
| Jesse Green | Republican | Yea |
| Julian B. Garrett | Republican | Yea |
| Kara Warme | Republican | Yea |
| Ken Rozenboom | Republican | Yea |
| Kerry Gruenhagen | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin Alons | Republican | Yea |
| Lynn Evans | Republican | Yea |
| Mark Costello | Republican | Yea |
| Mark S. Lofgren | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Bousselot | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Klimesh | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Pike | Republican | Yea |
| Sandy Salmon | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Webster | Republican | Yea |
| Tim Kraayenbrink | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Shipley | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SF 594?
- SF 594 is sponsored by COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT.
- What is the current status of SF 594?
- This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced March 10, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track SF 594?
- Track SF 594 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SF 594
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SF 594
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →