ETHICS-REP CASE AND RECUSAL
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 3121 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 3121.
You're tracking HB 3121
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 3121 — ETHICS-REP CASE AND RECUSAL
Last action — Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Jason R. Bunting
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced February 06, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
8 sponsors
1 primary, 7 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (8 R).
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
- Introduced View text Current pdf
Compared against the Illinois Compiled Statutes as published AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill expands the definition of 'representation case' and imposes stricter rules on legislators and government employees regarding participation in cases involving local government and potential conflicts of interest.
-
5 ILCS 420/1-113
any State agency→ any State agency or unit of local governmentThe definition of 'representation case' now includes matters before local governments.
-
5 ILCS 420/2-104
does not prohibit participation in such a representation case by a person with whom the legislator maintains a close economic association, unless the fact of that association is used to influence or attempt to influence the State agency in the rendering of its decision.→ This Section prohibits participation in such a representation case by a person with whom the legislator maintains a close economic association.Legislators are prohibited from having any involvement in representation cases related to close economic associates.
-
5 ILCS 420/2-104
before (1) the Court of Claims of this State or (2) the Illinois Workers' Compensation Commission, when the State of Illinois is the respondent.→ if the State or unit of local government is an adverse party or if the result is an adverse effect on State or local revenue, State or local finances, or the health, safety, welfare, or relative tax burden of any State residentLegislators are barred from participating in representation cases when any adverse effect on state or local interests is involved.
-
No legislator may derive any income, compensation, or other tangible benefit from providing opinion evidence as an expert against the interests of the State or a unit of local government in any judicial or quasi-judicial proceeding before any administrative agency or court.
Legislators are prohibited from profiting from expert testimony that opposes government interests.
-
a legislator shall officially recuse himself or herself from any legislative matter in which the legislator or his or her spouse or immediate family member has a financial interest and shall include in the recusal a written explanation for the recusal.
Legislators must formally recuse themselves from matters where they or their close family members have a financial interest, with a requirement for written explanations.
-
5 ILCS 420/3-202
rep.Section 3-202 is repealed.
-
5 ILCS 420/3-203
rep.Section 3-203 is repealed.
Action History
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Jason R. Bunting
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Kevin Schmidt
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Charles Meier
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Travis Weaver
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Dan Ugaste
-
Rule 19(a) / Re-referred to Rules Committee
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. David Friess
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Dave Severin
-
Assigned to Ethics & Elections
-
Referred to Rules Committee
-
First Reading
-
Filed with the Clerk by Rep. Blaine Wilhour
Sponsors
- Blaine Wilhour · Primary
- Daniel J. Ugaste · Cosponsor
- Dave Severin · Cosponsor
- David Friess · Cosponsor
- Travis Weaver · Cosponsor
- Charles Meier · Cosponsor
- Kevin Schmidt · Cosponsor
- Jason R. Bunting · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 7 co-sponsors · 175 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Blaine Wilhour Republican
Co-sponsors (7)
- Daniel J. Ugaste Republican
- Dave Severin Republican
- David Friess Republican
- Travis Weaver Republican
- Charles Meier Republican
- Kevin Schmidt Republican
- Jason R. Bunting Republican
Not signed on (175)
175 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 175 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 3121?
- HB 3121 is sponsored by Blaine Wilhour (Republican), Daniel J. Ugaste (Republican), Dave Severin (Republican), David Friess (Republican), Travis Weaver (Republican), Charles Meier (Republican), Kevin Schmidt (Republican), and Jason R. Bunting (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 3121?
- This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced February 06, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HB 3121?
- Track HB 3121 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 3121
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 3121
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →