SB 4F — Property Tax Administration
Last action — Chapter No. 2026-240
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced May 28, 2026. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Ron DeSantis (Republican) on June 24, 2026.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
4 sponsors
2 primary, 2 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (2 R · 1 D) — cross-party backing.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 3 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
In plain language
The bill revises property tax definitions and limitations on government levies.
This legislation updates definitions related to property taxes and changes limits on the maximum millage rates for certain governments. It also allows for longer ballot summaries for proposed Constitutional amendments.
Summary
Property Tax Administration; Revising the definitions of the terms "maximum total county ad valorem taxes levied" and "maximum total municipal ad valorem taxes levied" to conform to changes made by the act; revising limitations on the maximum millage rate that may be levied by certain units of government; authorizing the ballot summary of a specified proposed amendment or revision of the State Constitution to exceed a specified word limit, etc.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
21 added · 28 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of the bill SB 4F removes a requirement for property appraisers to include notices about constitutional amendments in their tax-related documents. Instead, the amended bill allows for changes to maximum tax rates for certain governmental units and enables longer ballot summaries for proposed amendments. These changes simplify the notification process for property taxes while ensuring that important fiscal measures regarding tax revenue losses in struggling counties still receive attention. This matters because it balances the need for transparency in taxation with the flexibility necessary for local governments to manage their finances effectively.
ENROLLEDFlorida LegislatureSenate - 2026 CS for SB 4-F 20264FerBy 2the AnCommittee acton relatingAppropriations; to property tax administration;
and Senators Avila, Bernard, and Mayfield 576-00029-26F 20264Fc1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to property tax administration;
ENROLLEDFlorida LegislatureSenate - 2026 CS for SB 4-F 20264Fer576-00029-26F 20264Fc1 section 200.001, Florida Statutes, are amended to read:
ENROLLEDFlorida LegislatureSenate - 2026 CS for SB 4-F 20264Fer576-00029-26F 20264Fc1 exclude the revenues required to be contributed to the county public general hospital in the current fiscal year for the purposes of making the maximum millage rate calculation, but shall be added back to the maximum millage rate allowed after the roll back has been applied, the total of which shall be considered the maximum millage rate for such a county for purposes of this subsection.
ENROLLEDFlorida LegislatureSenate - 2026 CS for SB 4-F 20264Fer576-00029-26F 20264Fc1 if the total county ad valorem taxes levied or total municipal ad valorem taxes levied do not exceed the maximum total county ad valorem taxes levied or maximum total municipal ad valorem taxes levied, respectively.
ENROLLEDFlorida LegislatureSenate - 2026 CS for SB 4-F 20264Fer576-00029-26F 20264Fc1 authority established before the effective date of the State Constitution which has a millage that must be approved by a municipality, the governing body of that municipality shall be considered the governing body of the downtown development authority for purposes of this subsection.
ENROLLEDFlorida LegislatureSenate - 2026 CS for SB 4-F 20264Fer576-00029-26F 20264Fc1 Statutes, is reenacted to read:
ENROLLEDFlorida LegislatureSenate - 2026 CS for SB 4-F 20264Fer576-00029-26F 20264Fc1 reference thereto, subsection (2) of section 218.125, Florida Statutes, is reenacted to read:
ENROLLEDFlorida LegislatureSenate - 2026 CS for SB 4-F 20264Fer576-00029-26F 20264Fc1 Section 6.
ENROLLEDFlorida LegislatureSenate - 2026 CS for SB 4-F 20264Fer576-00029-26F 20264Fc1 share shall revert to the fund from which the appropriation was made.
View plain text versions (3)
- S 4F c1 View text pdf
- S 4F er View text Current pdf
- Introduced S 4F Filed pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill revises the definitions and limitations concerning maximum ad valorem taxes for counties and municipalities in Florida.
-
200.001
s. 200.065(5)(a)→ s. 200.065(5)(b)The definition of 'maximum total municipal ad valorem taxes levied' now references a different subsection for calculating taxes.
-
200.065
is the a rolled-back rate computed pursuant to→ is the rolled-back rate computed pursuant toClarifies the definition of the maximum millage rate for levying taxes.
-
200.065
the previous year’s maximum millage rate→ the maximum millage rate for the prior yearUpdates the language for clearer understanding of how the maximum millage rate is computed.
-
200.065
may be adopted if approved by a two-thirds vote of the membership of the governing body of the county, municipality, or independent district;→ may be adopted if approved by not less than a two-thirds vote of the governing body of the county, municipality, or independent district;Changes wording to specify the voting requirement more clearly for adopting a higher millage rate.
-
200.065
may be adopted if approved by a unanimous vote of the membership of the governing body→ may be adopted if approved by unanimous vote of the governing bodyClarifies the voting standards necessary for adopting certain rates.
-
200.068
shall certify compliance with the provisions of this chapter→ shall certify compliance with the provisions of this chapter to the Department of Revenue.Updates the compliance certification requirement by explicitly mentioning to whom it should be submitted.
-
authorizing the ballot summary of a specified proposed amendment or revision of the State Constitution to exceed a specified word limit;
Introduces a new provision allowing longer ballot summaries for constitutional amendments.
Action History
-
Chapter No. 2026-240
-
Approved by Governor
-
Signed by Officers and presented to Governor
-
Ordered enrolled
-
CS passed; YEAS 75, NAYS 27
-
Read 3rd time
-
Read 2nd time
-
Read 1st time
-
Substituted for CS/HB 3F
-
In Messages
-
CS passed; YEAS 30 NAYS 8
-
Read 3rd time
-
Read 2nd time
-
CS by Appropriations read 1st time
-
Placed on Special Order Calendar, 06/02/26
-
Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading
-
Pending reference review -under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS by- Appropriations; YEAS 13 NAYS 5
-
Introduced
-
On Committee agenda-- Appropriations, 06/01/26, 3:00 pm, 110 Senate Building
-
Referred to Appropriations
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Debbie Mayfield · Cosponsor
- Mack Bernard · Cosponsor
- Appropriations · Primary
- Vacant · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 160 not signed on · 38 voted No
Sponsors (2)
- Appropriations
- Vacant Republican
Co-sponsors (2)
- Mayfield, Debbie Republican
- Bernard, Mack Democrat
Not signed on (160)
160 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 160 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 3 | 8 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 26 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| No Party Affiliation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 30 | 8 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 75% | 20% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Arrington, Kristen Aston | Democrat | Nay |
| Berman, Lori | Democrat | Nay |
| Bernard, Mack | Democrat | Yea |
| Bracy Davis, LaVon | Democrat | Nay |
| Davis, Tracie | Democrat | Nay |
| Jones, Shevrin D. "Shev" | Democrat | Nay |
| Nathan, Brian | Democrat | Nay |
| Osgood, Rosalind | Democrat | Nay |
| Polsky, Tina Scott | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Rouson, Darryl Ervin | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharief, Barbara | Democrat | Yea |
| Smith, Carlos Guillermo | Democrat | Nay |
| Pizzo, Jason W. B. | No Party Affiliation | Yea |
| Albritton, Ben | Republican | Yea |
| Boyd, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Bradley, Jennifer | Republican | Yea |
| Brodeur, Jason | Republican | Yea |
| Burgess, Danny | Republican | Yea |
| Burton, Colleen | Republican | Yea |
| Calatayud, Alexis | Republican | Yea |
| DiCeglie, Nick | Republican | Yea |
| Gaetz, Don | Republican | Yea |
| Garcia, Ileana | Republican | Yea |
| Grall, Erin | Republican | Yea |
| Gruters, Joe | Republican | Not Voting |
| Harrell, Gayle | Republican | Yea |
| Hooper, Ed | Republican | Yea |
| Leek, Thomas J. "Tom" | Republican | Yea |
| Martin, Jonathan | Republican | Yea |
| Massullo, Ralph E., Jr. | Republican | Yea |
| Mayfield, Debbie | Republican | Yea |
| McClain, Stan | Republican | Yea |
| Passidomo, Kathleen | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Yea |
| Simon, Corey | Republican | Yea |
| Truenow, Keith L. | Republican | Yea |
| Trumbull, Jay | Republican | Yea |
| Vacant | Republican | Yea |
| Wright, Tom A. | Republican | Yea |
| Yarborough, Clay | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 74 | 1 | 0 | 8 |
| Democrat | 1 | 26 | 0 | 8 |
| Total | 75 | 27 | 0 | 16 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 23% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (118)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| No Party Affiliation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 72% | 28% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (18)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Berman, Lori | Democrat | Nay |
| Polsky, Tina Scott | Democrat | Nay |
| Rouson, Darryl Ervin | Democrat | Nay |
| Sharief, Barbara | Democrat | Nay |
| Smith, Carlos Guillermo | Democrat | Nay |
| Pizzo, Jason W. B. | No Party Affiliation | Yea |
| Brodeur, Jason | Republican | Yea |
| Burgess, Danny | Republican | Yea |
| DiCeglie, Nick | Republican | Yea |
| Garcia, Ileana | Republican | Yea |
| Grall, Erin | Republican | Yea |
| Harrell, Gayle | Republican | Yea |
| Hooper, Ed | Republican | Yea |
| Martin, Jonathan | Republican | Yea |
| Massullo, Ralph E., Jr. | Republican | Yea |
| McClain, Stan | Republican | Yea |
| Trumbull, Jay | Republican | Yea |
| Wright, Tom A. | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 4F do?
- Property Tax Administration; Revising the definitions of the terms "maximum total county ad valorem taxes levied" and "maximum total municipal ad valorem taxes levied" to conform to changes made by the act; revising limitations on the maximum millage rate that may be levied by certain units of government; authorizing the ballot summary of a specified proposed amendment or revision of the State Constitution to exceed a specified word limit, etc.
- Who sponsors SB 4F?
- SB 4F is sponsored by Mayfield, Debbie (Republican), Bernard, Mack (Democrat), Appropriations, and Vacant (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 4F?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced May 28, 2026. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 4F?
- Track SB 4F free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 4F
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 4F
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →