Open Meetings Clarification Emergency Amendment Act of 2025
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when B 26-0199 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on B 26-0199.
You're tracking B 26-0199
We'll email you the moment it moves.
B 26-0199 — Open Meetings Clarification Emergency Amendment Act of 2025
Last action — Act A26-0041 Published in DC Register Vol 72 and Page 004070, Expires on Jul 06, 2025
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Council
-
✓To Executive
-
5Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 28, 2025. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Mixed recorded votes
2 passed, 1 failed in recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
103 added · 127 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendment to the Open Meetings Act clarifies what qualifies as a "meeting" and establishes that public bodies can be informed about potential threats without taking official action. It also allows meetings between the Council and the Mayor to be exempted from public accessibility rules under the same conditions. These changes are significant because they aim to improve transparency while also ensuring that critical discussions around safety and governance can occur without unnecessary delays or public exposure to sensitive matters.
___________________________ENROLLED ____________________________ORIGINAL CouncilmemberANACT Kenyan___________ R.IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ___________ To amend, on an emergency basis, the Open MeetingsAct to clarify the definition of meeting, to provide for a public body’s ability to be briefed about potential terrorist or public health threats so long as no official action is taken, to exempt from the act meetings between the Council and the Mayor provided that no official action is taken at such meetings, and to provide that a meeting shall be deemed open to the public if the public body takes steps reasonably calculated to allow the public to view or hear the meeting while the meeting is taking place, or, if doing so is not technologically feasible, as soon thereafter as reasonably practicable.
McDuffie Chairman Phil Mendelson 4 ____________________________ ____________________________ CouncilmemberAnita Bonds Councilmember Christina Henderson 8 ____________________________ ____________________________ Councilmember Robert C.
White, Jr.
Councilmember Brianne K.
Nadeau ____________________________ ____________________________ Councilmember Brooke Pinto Councilmember Matthew Frumin ___________________________ _____________________________ Councilmember Janeese Lewis George Councilmember Zachary Parker ___________________________ ___________________________ Councilmember Charles Allen Councilmember Wendell Felder ABILL ____________ IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________ To amend, on an emergency basis, the Open MeetingsAct to clarify the definition of “meeting”;
to provide for a public body’s ability to be briefed about potential terrorist or public health threats so long as no official action is taken;
to exempt from the act meetings between the Council and the Mayor provided that no official action is taken at such meetings;
and to provide that a meeting shall be deemed open to the public if the public body takes steps reasonably calculated to allow the public to view or hear the meeting while the meeting is taking place, or, if doing so is not technologically feasible, as soon thereafter as reasonably practicable.
(a)(1)(a) Section 404(1)404 (D.C.
Official Code § 2-574(1))2-574) is amended to read as follows:
“(1)(A)(1) “Meeting”Paragraph means(1) anyis gatheringamended ofto aread quorumas offollows: the members of a public body, including hearings and roundtables, whether formal or informal, regular, special, or emergency, at which the members consider, conduct, or advise on public business, including gathering information, taking testimony, discussing, deliberating, recommending, and voting, regardless whether held in person, by telephone, electronically, or by other means of communication.
“(1)(A) “Meeting” means any gathering of a quorum of the members of a public body, including hearings and roundtables, whether formal or informal, regular, special, or emergency, at which the members consider, conduct, or advise on public business, including gathering information, taking testimony, discussing, deliberating, recommending, and voting, regardless of whether held in person, by telephone, electronically, or by other means of communication.
or “(ii)Apress conference;conference.
“(iii)“(C) FieldFor trips,the sitepurposes visits,of the Council of the District of Columbia, the term “meeting” means a regular or similaradditional activitieslegislative tomeeting, gatherand information;committee meetings where votes are taken.”.
orENROLLED “(iv)AretreatORIGINAL of(2) theParagraph public(3) body where there are discussions and briefings (but no action is taken)amended aboutas policy,follows: issues or organizational matters.
“(C)(A) ForSubparagraph the(E) purposesis ofamended theby Councilstriking of the Districtphrase of“; Columbia, the term “meeting” means a regular or additional legislative meeting, and committee meetings where votes are taken.” (2) Section 404(3) is amended as follows:
(A)or” Paragraphand (E)inserting isa amendedsemicolon byin strikingits theplace. word “or” at the end of the phrase;
(B) ParagraphSubparagraph (F) is amended by striking the period at the end,end and inserting the phrase “;
“(G) theThe Criminal Justice Coordinating Council.”.
(A) Paragraph (2) is amended by striking “or” at the endphrase of“; the paragraph.
(B)Paragraphor” (3) is amended by striking the phrase “televised.” and inserting thea phrasesemicolon "televised;in its place.
(B) Paragraph (3) is amended by striking the phrase “televised.” and inserting the phrase “televised;
(C)(C)Anew Anew paragraph (4) is added to read as follows:
(2) Subsection (b)(b)(8) is amended to read as follows:
(A) Paragraph (8) is amended to read as follows:
provided, that disclosure could endanger the public or the public body;”body;”. (B) Strike the phrase “;
and”(3) inSubsection paragraph(f) (15)is andamended insertto “;”read inas itsfollows: place.
(C) Strike the period at the end of paragraph (16)(B) and insert the phrase “;
and” in its place.
88 (D)Anew paragraph (17) is added to read as follows:
“(b)(17) To be briefed about confidential negotiations, provided that no official action is taken.” (3) Subsection (f) is amended to read as follows:
providedprovided, that unless the Council adopts rules pursuant to this subsection, this title shall apply to the Council.”Council.”. (4) Anew subsection (h) is added to read as follows:
“(h)(4)Anew Thissubsection act(h) shallis notadded apply to aread meetingas betweenfollows: members of the Council and the Mayor, provided that no official action is decided at the meeting.” (c) Section 406 (D.C.
“(h) This title shall not apply to a meeting between members of the Council and the Mayor;
provided, that no official action is decided at the meeting.” (c) Section 406 (D.C.
(1) Paragraph (1) is amended by striking the phrase "Except“Except for emergency meetings,”meetings, ata thepublic beginningbody ofshall theprovide” second sentence, and inserting the phrase "attempt“Apublic to”body aftershall theattempt wordto “shall”provide” in theits secondplace. sentence.
(2) Paragraph (3) is amended by striking the phrase "Notwithstanding“Notwithstanding the notice requirement of paragraph (2) of this subsection, except”,except” and inserting the phraseword “Except” in its place.
ENROLLED ORIGINAL (3) Paragraph (4) is amended by striking the phrase “urgent matter,” and inserting the phrase "and“urgent matter, and notwithstanding paragraphs (1) and (3) of this subsection,” afterin theits wordplace. “matter,”.
“(1) Reasonable arrangements are made to accommodate the public’s right to attend the meeting,meeting or steps are taken that are reasonably calculated to allow the public to view or to hear the meeting while the meeting is taking place, oror, if doing so is not technologically feasible, as soon thereafter as reasonably practicable;”practicable;”. (2) Paragraph (3) is amended by striking the phrase "taken by roll call” and inserting the word “recorded” in its place.
(2) Paragraph (3) is amended by striking the phrase “taken by roll call” and inserting the word “recorded” in its place.
Show all 44 changed lines (4 more)
Official Code § 2-579(a)) is amended by striking the phrase “Council meetings.”meetings” and inserting the phrase "meetings“meetings and gatherings of councilmembers.”councilmembers” in its place.
The Council adopts the fiscal impact statement inof the committeeBudget reportDirector as the fiscal impact statement required by section 4a of the General Legislative ProceduresActProcedures Act of 1975, approved October 16, 2006 (120 Stat.
This act shall take effect following approval of the Mayor (or in the event of veto by the Mayor, action by the Council to override the veto), and shall remain in effect for no longer than 90ENROLLED ORIGINAL days, as provided for emergency acts of the Council of the District of Columbia in section 412(a) of the District of Columbia Home RuleAct, approved December 24, 1973 (87 Stat.
___________________________________ Chairman Council of the District of Columbia _________________________________ Mayor District of Columbia 4
Show all 44 changed rows (4 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Enrolled Enrollment Current pdf
- Introduced Introduction pdf
Compared against the D.C. Code as published AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill amends the Open Meetings Act to clarify definitions, allow for meetings between the Council and the Mayor under certain conditions, and establish additional criteria for a meeting to be considered open to the public.
-
D.C. Official Code § 2-574
“(1)(A) “Meeting” means any gathering of a quorum of the members of a public body, including hearings and roundtables, whether formal or informal, regular, special, or emergency, at which the members consider, conduct, or advise on public business, including gathering information, taking testimony, discussing, deliberating, recommending, and voting, regardless of whether held in person, by telephone, electronically, or by other means of communication.→ “(1)(A) “Meeting” means any gathering of a quorum of the members of a public body, including hearings and roundtables, whether formal or informal, regular, special, or emergency, at which the members consider, conduct, or advise on public business, including gathering information, taking testimony, discussing, deliberating, recommending, and voting, regardless whether held in person, by telephone, electronically, or by other means of communication.Clarifies that the definition of a meeting includes modern communication methods.
-
D.C. Official Code § 2-574
“(2) “Office of Open Government” means the Office of Open Government established by § 1-1162.05b.No change to this definition.
-
D.C. Official Code § 2-575
“(2) The news media, as defined by § 16-4701, is permitted to be physically present;→ “(2) The news media, as defined by § 16-4701, is permitted to be physically present;No substantive change to this requirement.
-
D.C. Official Code § 2-575
“(3) The meeting is televised;”→ “(3) The meeting is televised; or”Adds an option for meetings to be open if they are televised.
-
D.C. Official Code § 2-575
“(4) The public body takes steps reasonably calculated to allow the public to view or hear the meeting while the meeting is taking place, or, if doing so is not technologically feasible, as soon thereafter as reasonably practicable.”
Introduces a new criterion to define an open meeting based on public access efforts.
-
D.C. Official Code § 2-575
“(8) To discuss and take action regarding specific methods and procedures to protect the public or a public body from existing or potential terrorist activity or other substantial dangers to public health and safety, or to receive briefings by staff members, legal counsel, law enforcement officials, or emergency service officials concerning these methods and procedures; provided, that disclosure could endanger the public or the public body;”.
Allows public bodies to discuss threats to safety without violating open meeting requirements.
-
D.C. Official Code § 2-575
“(h) This title shall not apply to a meeting between members of the Council and the Mayor; provided, that no official action is decided at the meeting.”
Exempts meetings between the Council and the Mayor from Open Meetings Act requirements if no official actions are decided.
-
D.C. Official Code § 2-576
“Except for emergency meetings, a public body shall provide”→ “A public body shall attempt to provide”Softens the requirement for advance notice by stating that public bodies shall attempt to provide notice.
-
D.C. Official Code § 2-576
“Notwithstanding the notice requirement of paragraph (2) of this subsection, except”→ “Except”Clarifies language regarding notice requirements.
-
D.C. Official Code § 2-576
“urgent matter,”→ “urgent matter, and notwithstanding paragraphs (1) and (3) of this subsection,”Clarifies and expands exceptions regarding notice for emergency meetings.
Action History
-
Act A26-0041 Published in DC Register Vol 72 and Page 004070, Expires on Jul 06, 2025
-
Returned from Mayor
-
Signed by the Mayor and Enacted with Act Number A26-0041, Expires on Jul 06, 2025
-
Transmitted to Mayor, Response Due on Apr 18, 2025
-
Final Reading
-
Amendment (Mendelson)
-
Amendment (Allen)
-
Retained by the Council
-
B26-0199 Introduced by Chairman Mendelson at Office of the Secretary
Sponsors
- Phil Mendelson · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 13 not signed on · 8 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Phil Mendelson Voted No
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (13)
- Charles Allen Voted No
- Anita Bonds Voted No
- Doni Crawford
- Wendell Felder Voted No
- Matthew Frumin
- Janeese Lewis George Voted No
- Christina Henderson
- Brianne K. Nadeau Voted No
- Zachary Parker Voted No
- Brooke Pinto Voted No
- Elissa Silverman
- Robert C. White, Jr. Voted No
- Trayon White, Sr.
"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 33% | 67% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (12)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anita Bonds | — | Nay |
| Brianne K. Nadeau | — | Nay |
| Brooke Pinto | — | Nay |
| Charles Allen | — | Yea |
| Christina Henderson | — | Yea |
| Janeese Lewis George | — | Yea |
| Kenyan R. McDuffie | — | Nay |
| Matthew Frumin | — | Yea |
| Phil Mendelson | — | Nay |
| Robert C. White, Jr. | — | Nay |
| Wendell Felder | — | Nay |
| Zachary Parker | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 17% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (12)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anita Bonds | — | Yea |
| Brianne K. Nadeau | — | Yea |
| Brooke Pinto | — | Yea |
| Charles Allen | — | Nay |
| Christina Henderson | — | Yea |
| Janeese Lewis George | — | Nay |
| Kenyan R. McDuffie | — | Yea |
| Matthew Frumin | — | Yea |
| Phil Mendelson | — | Yea |
| Robert C. White, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Wendell Felder | — | Yea |
| Zachary Parker | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (12)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anita Bonds | — | Yea |
| Brianne K. Nadeau | — | Yea |
| Brooke Pinto | — | Yea |
| Charles Allen | — | Yea |
| Christina Henderson | — | Yea |
| Janeese Lewis George | — | Yea |
| Kenyan R. McDuffie | — | Yea |
| Matthew Frumin | — | Yea |
| Phil Mendelson | — | Yea |
| Robert C. White, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Wendell Felder | — | Yea |
| Zachary Parker | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors B 26-0199?
- B 26-0199 is sponsored by Phil Mendelson.
- What is the current status of B 26-0199?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 28, 2025. Enacted.
- Where can I track B 26-0199?
- Track B 26-0199 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on B 26-0199
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of B 26-0199
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →