PR 26-0584 — Open Meetings Clarification Emergency Declaration Resolution of 2026
Last action — Resolution R26-0379, Effective from Mar 31, 2026 Published in DC Register Vol 73 and Page 006089
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Council
-
✓To Executive
-
5Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 30, 2026. Enacted.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
78 added · 83 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendment to the Open Meetings Act clarifies several important points. It now allows public bodies to hold briefings on potential terrorist or public health threats without taking official action, and it exempts meetings between the Council and the Mayor from public access requirements under similar conditions. Additionally, a meeting can be considered open to the public if reasonable steps are taken to ensure public access, even if that access is provided after the meeting. These changes are significant because they enhance the ability of government leaders to discuss sensitive issues while still promoting transparency.
____________________________ENROLLED ChairmanORIGINAL PhilARESOLUTION Mendelson26-379 4 6 APROPOSED RESOLUTION _____ 9 IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ______March 31, 2026 To declare the existence of an emergency with respect to the need to amend the Open Meetings Act of 2010 to clarify the definition of “meeting”;meeting, to provide for a public body’s ability to be briefed about potential terrorist or public health threats so long as no official action is taken, to exempt from the act meetings between the Council and the Mayor provided that no official action is taken at such meetings, and to provide that a meeting shall be deemed open to the public if the public body takes steps reasonably calculated to allow the public to view or hear the meeting while the meeting is taking place, or, if doing so is not technologically feasible, as soon thereafter as reasonably practicable.
to provide for a public body’s ability to be briefed about potential terrorist or public health threats so long as no official action is taken;
to exempt from the act meetings between the Council and the Mayor provided that no official action is taken at such meetings;
and to provide that a meeting shall be deemed open to the public if the public body takes steps reasonably calculated to allow the public to view or hear the meeting while the meeting is taking place, or, if doing so is not technologically feasible, as soon thereafter as reasonably practicable.
(a) D.C.The Open MeetingsAct, effective March 31, 2011 (D.C.
Law 18-350,18-350; the Open MeetingsAmendmentAct of 2010 (the “Open MeetingsAct”), became effective on March 31, 2011.
(b)D.C. The Open Meetings Act requires that any gathering of a quorum of a public body where members consider, conduct or advise on public business offer the opportunity for the public to observe the meeting.
Official Code § 2-571 et seq.), became effective on March 31, 2011.
(b) The Open Meetings Act requires that any gathering of a quorum of a public body where members consider, conduct, or advise on public business offers the opportunity for the public to observe the meeting.
The Open MeetingsAct also exempts several governmental entities from these requirements based on the definition of the term “public body.” Exempted entities include the District of Columbia courts, the Mayor’s cabinet, and Advisory Neighborhood Commissioners (ANC),(“ANC”), but not the Council.
(c) InAprilIn April 2025, the Council passed the Open Meetings Clarification Emergency AmendmentAct of 2025, effectiveApril 7, 2025 (D.C.Act 26-41;
The accompanying temporary act, the Open Meetings Clarification TemporaryAmendmentActTemporary AmendmentAct of 2025, effectiveAugust 16, 2025 (D.C.
72 DCR 9563)7532), took effect inAugust 2025, and will expire on March 29, 2026.
(d) Since early 2025, the District government has had to deal with a variety of consequential, large-scale business and economic development propositions, most notably, the effort to retain Monumental Sports and Entertainment in the District and the negotiation of a deal with the NFL’s Washington Commanders to build a new state-of-the-art stadium and mixed-use ENROLLED ORIGINAL development on the RFK campus.
(e) The District also continues to face unprecedented federal involvement and interference in local affairs, beginning last year with Congress’passageCongress’s passage of a continuing resolution that required federal spending to be consistent with FY 2024 levels and Congress’Congress’s choice to treat the District as a federal agency as opposed to allowing the District to spend local funds at approved levels as had been the case for many years prior, which created the prospect of having to cut approximately $1.1 billion from the FY 2025 budget (in the middle of the fiscal year)year), and continuing with increased federal law enforcement presence leading to purported federal takeover of the Metropolitan Police Department in summer 2025.
While such coordination is a relatively simple for the Executive and the Office of the Attorney General, since these entities are not “public bodies” under the Open MeetingsAct, current law creates significant barriers for 13 members of the Council to prepare to function as a single unit in times of crisis.
In fact, in certain circumstances, particularly circumstances related to threats to the health, safetysafety, and welfare of the public or members of the public body, provisional and pre-decisional information should not be disclosed prematurely.
(i) This emergency legislation remains particularly necessary in the current political climate to allow the Council to be briefed as a body in a timely mannermanner, and to develop appropriate responses to rapidly unfolding issues, and to ensure that other public bodies in the District are able to receive, discuss and analyze relevant information securely, while also ensuring that the process for taking any official action with respect to that information is conducted publicly.
ENROLLED ORIGINAL Sec.
The Council of the District of Columbia determines that the circumstances enumerated in section 2 constitute emergency circumstances making it necessary that the Open Meetings Clarification Emergency AmendmentAct of 2026 be adopted after a single reading.
This resolution shall take effect immediately 43
View plain text versions (2)
- Enrolled Enrollment Current pdf
- Introduced Introduction pdf
Action History
-
Resolution R26-0379, Effective from Mar 31, 2026 Published in DC Register Vol 73 and Page 006089
-
Approved with Resolution Number R26-0379
-
Final Reading
-
Retained by the Council
-
PR26-0584 Introduced by Chairman Mendelson at Office of the Secretary
Sponsors
- Phil Mendelson · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 13 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 15% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anita Bonds | — | Yea |
| Brianne K. Nadeau | — | Yea |
| Brooke Pinto | — | Yea |
| Charles Allen | — | Yea |
| Christina Henderson | — | Yea |
| Doni Crawford | — | Yea |
| Janeese Lewis George | — | Nay |
| Matthew Frumin | — | Yea |
| Phil Mendelson | — | Yea |
| Robert C. White, Jr. | — | Yea |
| Trayon White, Sr. | — | Nay |
| Wendell Felder | — | Yea |
| Zachary Parker | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors PR 26-0584?
- PR 26-0584 is sponsored by Phil Mendelson.
- What is the current status of PR 26-0584?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 30, 2026. Enacted.
- Where can I track PR 26-0584?
- Track PR 26-0584 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on PR 26-0584
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of PR 26-0584
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →