Delaware 153rd General Assembly (2025-2026) Status: Passed House 6 D cosponsors

HB 297 — AN ACT TO AMEND TITLES 12 AND 25 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO DECEDENTS’ ESTATES AND PROPERTY.

Last action — Signed by Governor

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has passed the House. Introduced March 05, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.

Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Advancing 58% · moderate confidence
  • Passed House

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 7 sponsors

    7 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (6 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

In plain language

The bill updates rules regarding fiduciaries and properties in decedents' estates.

This bill clarifies how decisions are made by fiduciaries and allows for easier administration of trust mergers. It specifies voting requirements, fiduciary responsibilities, and appointment procedures.

What this means for you
  • Families: This bill clarifies the roles and decision-making processes of fiduciaries, which may affect how family estates are managed.
  • Small Business: If a small business involves trusts, this bill may streamline processes for trust management during ownership transitions.

Summary

Section 1 of this Act amends § 3323 of Title 12 to clarify: (1) that powers vested in 2 fiduciaries or nonfiduciaries must be exercised by agreement of both (that is, unanimously), while actions of 3 or more fiduciaries must be exercised by a majority; and (2) how these rules also apply when fiduciaries or nonfiduciaries are designating 1 or more of them to perform ministerial functions on behalf of all of them. In particular, Section 1 of this Act clarifies that when 2 fiduciaries or nonfiduciaries are serving, they can designate 1 of them to perform ministerial functions on behalf of both of them—in other words, that the statute’s existing mention of such designation being available to a majority does not mean that it is available only when there are 3 or more fiduciaries or nonfiduciaries serving. Section 1 of the Act also clarifies (in subsection (a) of § 3323) that the non-liability of fiduciaries or nonfiduciaries who dissent from an action of the majority (if the dissent is evidenced in writing and delivered to the majority) applies only with respect to such action. Section 1 of the Act also reorganizes and rewords § 3323 to reflect current stylistic and formatting preferences. Section 2 of this Act amends § 3325(29) of Title 12 to allow the trustee to select the governing instrument of either the transferor trust or the transferee trust (those two terms being defined in § 3341 of Title 12) in the context of a merger. The purpose of this amendment is to allow flexibility and improve administrative ease so that the name, EIN, account numbers, and other identifying information of the trust may remain unchanged post-merger. Section 3 of this Act amends § 3326 of Title 12 to: (1) Expand the definition of “officeholder” to include those who are empowered to appoint another officeholder; (2) Add a cross-reference to new § 3327A of Title 12 so that the definition of “officeholder” in § 3326 will also apply to § 3327A; and (3) Reorganize and reword § 3326 to reflect current stylistic and formatting preferences. Section 4 of this Act amends Title 12 by moving the language of § 3336 of Title 12 to new § 3327A of Title 12 and by adding provisions to new § 3327A that expand the subject matter of § 3336. More specifically, new § 3327A: (1) Replaces “trustee” with “officeholder” or “trustee or other officeholder” to parallel §§ 3326 and 3327 of Title 12, so that § 3327A will address the appointment of officeholders generally, and not just the appointment of trustees; (2) For trusts that are not continuing (that is, for trusts to which § 3327A(a)(1) —the existing subject matter of § 3336—does apply), changes the current language so that the appointment mechanism to appoint a distributing trustee can also be used where needed to appoint an officeholder other than a trustee; (3) For such distributing trusts, changes the current language so that the appointment of a distributing trustee or other officeholder is accomplished by unanimous consent, rather than by unanimous vote, because “vote” implies procedural formalities that ought not be necessary in such a situation; (4) For trusts that are continuing (that is, for trusts to which § 3327A(a)(1) —the existing subject matter of § 3336—does not apply), creates a new procedure for the appointment of a trustee or other officeholder where there is a vacancy, without the approval of the Court of Chancery, by unanimous consent of certain beneficiaries, but subject to any restrictions that the governing instrument imposes on the appointee; (5) Emphasizes that the unanimous consent required under § 3327A(c) and (d) may be achieved via representation by one or more designated representatives under § 3339 of Title 12 or by one or more virtual representatives under § 3547 of Title 12; (6) Provides expressly that, subject to certain conditions, § 3327A also applies to the appointment of a trustee or other officeholder where another officeholder is supposed to fill a vacancy but has failed to do so within 60 days of being notified of the vacancy; (7) Confirms that, unless a trustee vacancy is required by law to be filled, nothing within § 3327A shall be construed to require filling trustee or other officeholder vacancies when not expressly required by the trust’s governing instrument; and (8) Confirms that nothing within § 3327A shall be construed to limit the appointment of a trustee or other officeholder by a modification of a trust under § 3342 of Title 12 or by a nonjudicial settlement agreement under § 3338 of Title 12. Section 5 of this Act amends § 3341 of Title 12 to allow the trustee to select the governing instrument of either the transferor trust or the transferee trust in the context of a merger in order to align with the amendment made in Section 2 of this Act. Section 6 of this Act amends § 3345 of Title 12 to include references to both the trustee or adviser of a trust, in each place in the statute where only the trustee was formerly referenced, to avoid any potential ambiguity about the statute’s application to beneficiary well-being trusts that are drafted to provide that the trustee shall provide beneficiary well-being programs at the direction of or with the consent of an adviser. Section 6 of this Act also shortens the first sentence of § 3345(d) of Title 12—the original introductory sentence was intended to convey that the statute is applicable where the trustee is directed by an adviser, but this introductory sentence is no longer necessary in light of the other changes to this statute that more directly spell out the dynamic of a directed trust. It is noted for the sake of clarity, however, that this shortening of the first sentence of § 3345(d) of Title 12 does not change that actions taken under § 3345(d) remain subject to applicable fiduciary duties. Section 6 of this Act also clarifies § 3345(d)(3) of Title 12 that payment for beneficiary well-being programs to a trustee or affiliate or adviser is permitted only if the governing instrument expressly authorizes such payment. Section 6 of this act also amends § 3345(d)(3) of Title 12 by deleting the word “fiduciary” as modifying the term “compensation” to reflect that some advisers who are not fiduciaries may receive compensation (and not to have any effect on whether a trustee or adviser is or is not a fiduciary). Section 6 of this Act also adds the word “prior” before the word “disclosure” in the last clause of § 3345(d)(3) of Title 12 to clarify that payment for beneficiary well-being programs to a trustee or affiliate or adviser is permitted without prior notice or prior disclosure to any beneficiary of the trust. Section 7 of this Act amends § 504 of Title 25 to coordinate one of the methods for opting out of the effect of § 504(a) upon the exercise of a power of appointment. The amendment is that the instrument of exercise of a power of appointment should make express reference to the provisions of § 501(a) of Title 25 and should expressly state that it shall not apply to the exercise of the power in order to effectuate the opt-out of § 504(a). This change replaces the prior provision that referred generally to § 501, rather than specifically to § 501(a). Section 8 of this Act provides an effective date.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Passed By Senate. Votes: 20 YES 1 ABSENT

  2. Reported Out of Committee (Banking, Business, Insurance & Technology) in Senate with 3 Favorable, 4 On Its Merits

  3. Reported Out of Committee (Banking, Business, Insurance & Technology) in Senate with 3 Favorable, 4 On Its Merits

  4. Assigned to Banking, Business, Insurance & Technology Committee in Senate

  5. Passed By House. Votes: 37 YES 4 ABSENT

  6. Reported Out of Committee (Economic Development/Banking/Insurance & Commerce) in House with 11 On Its Merits

  7. Introduced and Assigned to Economic Development/Banking/Insurance & Commerce Committee in House

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

7 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 55 not signed on

Sponsors (7)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (55)

55 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 55 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

SM

Passed 20 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 14001
Republican 6000
Total 20001
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (21)
Member Party Vote
Bryan Townsend Democratic Yea
Daniel Cruce Democratic Yea
Darius J. Brown Democratic Not Voting
David P. Sokola Democratic Yea
John "Jack" Walsh Democratic Yea
Kyra L. Hoffner Democratic Yea
Laura V. Sturgeon Democratic Yea
Marie Pinkney Democratic Yea
Nicole Poore Democratic Yea
Ray Seigfried Democratic Yea
Russell Huxtable Democratic Yea
S. Elizabeth Lockman Democratic Yea
Spiros Mantzavinos Democratic Yea
Stephanie L. Hansen Democratic Yea
Trey Paradee Democratic Yea
Brian Pettyjohn Republican Yea
Bryant L. Richardson Republican Yea
Dave G. Lawson Republican Yea
David L. Wilson Republican Yea
Eric Buckson Republican Yea
Gerald W. Hocker Republican Yea

Official roll call →

SM

Passed 37 Yea · 0 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 25002
Republican 12002
Total 37004
% of votes cast 90%0%0%10%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Alonna Berry Democratic Yea
Claire Snyder-Hall Democratic Yea
Cyndie Romer Democratic Yea
DeShanna U Neal Democratic Yea
Debra Heffernan Democratic Yea
Edward S. Osienski Democratic Yea
Eric Morrison Democratic Yea
Frank Burns Democratic Yea
Franklin D. Cooke Democratic Yea
Josue O Ortega Democratic Not Voting
Kamela T Smith Democratic Yea
Kendra Johnson Democratic Yea
Kerri Evelyn Harris Democratic Not Voting
Kimberly Williams Democratic Yea
Krista Griffith Democratic Yea
Larry Lambert Democratic Yea
Madinah Wilson-Anton Democratic Yea
Mara Gorman Democratic Yea
Melanie Ross Levin Democratic Yea
Melissa Minor-Brown Democratic Yea
Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha Democratic Yea
Sean M. Lynn Democratic Yea
Sherae'a Moore Democratic Yea
Sophie Phillips Democratic Yea
Stephanie T. Bolden Democratic Yea
William Bush Democratic Yea
William J. Carson Democratic Yea
Bryan W. Shupe Republican Yea
Charles S Postles Jr. Republican Yea
Daniel B. Short Republican Yea
Jeff Hilovsky Republican Yea
Jeffrey N. Spiegelman Republican Yea
Jesse R. Vanderwende Republican Not Voting
Kevin S Hensley Republican Yea
Lyndon D. Yearick Republican Yea
Michael F. Smith Republican Yea
Richard G. Collins Republican Yea
Ronald E. Gray Republican Yea
Shannon Morris Republican Yea
Timothy D. Dukes Republican Yea
Valerie Jones Giltner Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 297 do?
Section 1 of this Act amends § 3323 of Title 12 to clarify: (1) that powers vested in 2 fiduciaries or nonfiduciaries must be exercised by agreement of both (that is, unanimously), while actions of 3 or more fiduciaries must be exercised by a majority; and (2) how these rules also apply when fiduciaries or nonfiduciaries are designating 1 or more of them to perform ministerial functions on behalf of all of them. In particular, Section 1 of this Act clarifies that when 2 fiduciaries or nonfiduciaries are serving, they can designate 1 of them to perform ministerial functions on behalf of both of them—in other words, that the statute’s existing mention of such designation being available to a majority does not mean that it is available only when there are 3 or more fiduciaries or nonfiduciaries serving. Section 1 of the Act also clarifies (in subsection (a) of § 3323) that the non-liability of fiduciaries or nonfiduciaries who dissent from an action of the majority (if the dissent is evidenced in writing and delivered to the majority) applies only with respect to such action. Section 1 of the Act also reorganizes and rewords § 3323 to reflect current stylistic and formatting preferences. Section 2 of this Act amends § 3325(29) of Title 12 to allow the trustee to select the governing instrument of either the transferor trust or the transferee trust (those two terms being defined in § 3341 of Title 12) in the context of a merger. The purpose of this amendment is to allow flexibility and improve administrative ease so that the name, EIN, account numbers, and other identifying information of the trust may remain unchanged post-merger. Section 3 of this Act amends § 3326 of Title 12 to: (1) Expand the definition of “officeholder” to include those who are empowered to appoint another officeholder; (2) Add a cross-reference to new § 3327A of Title 12 so that the definition of “officeholder” in § 3326 will also apply to § 3327A; and (3) Reorganize and reword § 3326 to reflect current stylistic and formatting preferences. Section 4 of this Act amends Title 12 by moving the language of § 3336 of Title 12 to new § 3327A of Title 12 and by adding provisions to new § 3327A that expand the subject matter of § 3336. More specifically, new § 3327A: (1) Replaces “trustee” with “officeholder” or “trustee or other officeholder” to parallel §§ 3326 and 3327 of Title 12, so that § 3327A will address the appointment of officeholders generally, and not just the appointment of trustees; (2) For trusts that are not continuing (that is, for trusts to which § 3327A(a)(1) —the existing subject matter of § 3336—does apply), changes the current language so that the appointment mechanism to appoint a distributing trustee can also be used where needed to appoint an officeholder other than a trustee; (3) For such distributing trusts, changes the current language so that the appointment of a distributing trustee or other officeholder is accomplished by unanimous consent, rather than by unanimous vote, because “vote” implies procedural formalities that ought not be necessary in such a situation; (4) For trusts that are continuing (that is, for trusts to which § 3327A(a)(1) —the existing subject matter of § 3336—does not apply), creates a new procedure for the appointment of a trustee or other officeholder where there is a vacancy, without the approval of the Court of Chancery, by unanimous consent of certain beneficiaries, but subject to any restrictions that the governing instrument imposes on the appointee; (5) Emphasizes that the unanimous consent required under § 3327A(c) and (d) may be achieved via representation by one or more designated representatives under § 3339 of Title 12 or by one or more virtual representatives under § 3547 of Title 12; (6) Provides expressly that, subject to certain conditions, § 3327A also applies to the appointment of a trustee or other officeholder where another officeholder is supposed to fill a vacancy but has failed to do so within 60 days of being notified of the vacancy; (7) Confirms that, unless a trustee vacancy is required by law to be filled, nothing within § 3327A shall be construed to require filling trustee or other officeholder vacancies when not expressly required by the trust’s governing instrument; and (8) Confirms that nothing within § 3327A shall be construed to limit the appointment of a trustee or other officeholder by a modification of a trust under § 3342 of Title 12 or by a nonjudicial settlement agreement under § 3338 of Title 12. Section 5 of this Act amends § 3341 of Title 12 to allow the trustee to select the governing instrument of either the transferor trust or the transferee trust in the context of a merger in order to align with the amendment made in Section 2 of this Act. Section 6 of this Act amends § 3345 of Title 12 to include references to both the trustee or adviser of a trust, in each place in the statute where only the trustee was formerly referenced, to avoid any potential ambiguity about the statute’s application to beneficiary well-being trusts that are drafted to provide that the trustee shall provide beneficiary well-being programs at the direction of or with the consent of an adviser. Section 6 of this Act also shortens the first sentence of § 3345(d) of Title 12—the original introductory sentence was intended to convey that the statute is applicable where the trustee is directed by an adviser, but this introductory sentence is no longer necessary in light of the other changes to this statute that more directly spell out the dynamic of a directed trust. It is noted for the sake of clarity, however, that this shortening of the first sentence of § 3345(d) of Title 12 does not change that actions taken under § 3345(d) remain subject to applicable fiduciary duties. Section 6 of this Act also clarifies § 3345(d)(3) of Title 12 that payment for beneficiary well-being programs to a trustee or affiliate or adviser is permitted only if the governing instrument expressly authorizes such payment. Section 6 of this act also amends § 3345(d)(3) of Title 12 by deleting the word “fiduciary” as modifying the term “compensation” to reflect that some advisers who are not fiduciaries may receive compensation (and not to have any effect on whether a trustee or adviser is or is not a fiduciary). Section 6 of this Act also adds the word “prior” before the word “disclosure” in the last clause of § 3345(d)(3) of Title 12 to clarify that payment for beneficiary well-being programs to a trustee or affiliate or adviser is permitted without prior notice or prior disclosure to any beneficiary of the trust. Section 7 of this Act amends § 504 of Title 25 to coordinate one of the methods for opting out of the effect of § 504(a) upon the exercise of a power of appointment. The amendment is that the instrument of exercise of a power of appointment should make express reference to the provisions of § 501(a) of Title 25 and should expressly state that it shall not apply to the exercise of the power in order to effectuate the opt-out of § 504(a). This change replaces the prior provision that referred generally to § 501, rather than specifically to § 501(a). Section 8 of this Act provides an effective date.
Who sponsors HB 297?
HB 297 is sponsored by Stell Parker Selby, John "Jack" Walsh (Democratic), David P. Sokola (Democratic), William J. Carson (Democratic), Bryan Townsend (Democratic), Spiros Mantzavinos (Democratic), and William Bush (Democratic).
What is the current status of HB 297?
This bill has passed the House. Introduced March 05, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
Where can I track HB 297?
Track HB 297 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 297

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 297

Last checked for changes about 1 month ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →