HB 133 — AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 11 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO FINES, FEES, RESTITUTION, AND OTHER COURT-RELATED MONETARY OBLIGATIONS.
Last action — Passed By Senate. Votes: 16 YES 5 NO
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the House. Introduced May 01, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Passed House
Current position in the legislative process.
-
23 sponsors
23 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (18 D · 3 R) — cross-party backing.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
In plain language
The bill allows judges to waive court fines and fees based on a defendant's financial situation.
This legislation gives Delaware courts the discretion to waive mandatory fines and fees when defendants demonstrate financial hardship. It also sets up a process for those already sentenced to request a waiver of these payments.
What this means for you
- Workers: If you struggle financially, this bill may allow you to avoid mandatory court-imposed fines and fees.
- Families: Families facing economic hardship may benefit from the ability to waive certain court-related monetary obligations.
Summary
Currently, even when a defendant or individual obviously does not have the means to pay a financial penalty or fee, Delaware Courts are unable to waive certain mandatory minimum fines or fees at sentencing. This can create a constitutional crossroads, as our justice system has long recognized that the Fourteen Amendment prohibits “punishing a person for his poverty.” Bearden v. Georgia, 461 U.S. 660, 671 (1983). This Act gives courts the discretion to waive fines and fees, in whole or in part, in appropriate circumstances. It also creates a presumption that fines and fees will not be imposed when a defendant shows evidence of certain conditions, including receiving a public assistance benefit (like Medicaid, SNAP, or veterans’ benefits) or being represented by the Office of Defense Services. It also creates a hearing process for anyone already sentenced to pay a fine or fee. The changes in this Act are based on recommendations of the Criminal Legal System Imposed Debt Study Group created by House Bill 244, as amended by House Amendment No 2, of the 151st General Assembly, in its December 7, 2023, report. This Act takes effect 180 days after its enactment.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
111 added · 27 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to House Bill No. 133 clarifies that the term “fee” does not include restitution, ensuring that hardship waivers do not apply to restitution payments. It also specifies that certain offenses, including toll violations and red light camera violations, cannot be waived or modified under this legislation. Additionally, it exempts assessments related to the Victims Compensation Fund from being waived or modified by the courts, and it removes a reporting requirement for the courts. Overall, these changes outline which financial obligations may be adjusted and which are to remain strictly enforced.
Snyder-Hall HOUSE& OFRep. REPRESENTATIVES 153rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE AMENDMENT NO.
4Lynn TO& HOUSERep. BILL NO.
133Lambert AMEND& HouseSen. Bill No.
133Brown by& deletingSen. lines 22 and 23 in their entirety and inserting in lieu thereof the following:
“(a)Townsend (1)Reps. For purposes of this section “fee” includes a cost, penalty, assessment, or any other monetary obligation that is related to a criminal case or a motor vehicle offense.
“Fee”Burns, doesMorrison, notRoss includeLevin, restitutionWilson-Anton, orGorman, aNeal, fine.Phillips, Romer, Harris, Bolden, Griffith, Heffernan, Kamela Smith, Berry, Ortega, Chukwuocha;
(2)Sens. A hardship waiver under this section may not be applied to an offense that is eligible for voluntary assessment under § 709 of Title 21, a civil penalty under § 4129 of Title 21, or to any electronic monitoring violation under Chapter 41 of Title 21.”.
FURTHERCruce, AMENDLockman, HouseSokola, BillPinkney, No.Sturgeon, Hoffner, Seigfried HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 153rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE BILL NO.
133 atAN lineACT 61TO byAMEND deletingTITLE “subsection”11 asOF itTHE appearsDELAWARE thereinCODE andRELATING insertingTO inFINES, lieuFEES, thereofRESTITUTION, “paragraph”.AND OTHER COURT-RELATED MONETARY OBLIGATIONS.
FURTHERBE AMENDIT HouseENACTED BillBY No.THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE:
133Section by1. deleting lines 67 through 69 in their entirety and inserting in lieu thereof the following:
“(f)Amend (1)Subchapter ExceptI, asChapter set41, forthTitle under11 paragraph (f)(2) of this section and notwithstanding any law or court rule to the contrary,Delaware theCode courtby maymaking choosedeletions notas toshown imposeby orstrike maythrough atand anyinsertions timeas waive,shown suspend,by orunderline modifyas anyfollows: fine or fee including those otherwise deemed mandatory or not subject to waiver or suspension.
(2) The penalty assessment under § 90164101. of this title may not be waived, suspended, or modified under this section.”.
FURTHERPayment AMENDof Housefines, Billfees, No.costs, assessments, and restitution on conviction.
133(a) byOn deletingconviction lineson 78indictment throughor 81information infor theirany entirety.crime or offense, a defendant must pay all costs imposed by a court.
SYNOPSIScourt Thisunless amendmentthe todefendant Housequalifies Billfor No.a hardship waiver under § 4104A of this title.
133(b) does(3) allIf not paid promptly on its imposition or in accordance with the terms of the following:order of the court, or immediately if so requested by the State, the clerk or Prothonotary may cause the judgment to be entered on the civil judgment docket of the court.
(1)If clarifiesa thatstay of execution is otherwise permitted by law, the wordstay “fee”may not be granted as useda inmatter theof hardshipright waiverbut statuteonly doeswithin notthe includediscretion restitution;of the court.
(2)(5) clarifiesJudgments thatfor tollrestitution violations,docketed offensesunder eligiblethis forsubsection voluntaryare assessment,exempt redfrom lightthe camera,provisions andof speed§ camera4711 violationsof areTitle not10, eligiblewhich formandate waiverthe orexpiration modificationof underjudgments thisand Act;require the renewal of judgments;
(3)however, makesno such judgment will attach to a technicalparcel correction;of real property for more than 7 years after the convicted person has sold, transferred, or lost ownership interest in that specific parcel of real property.
(4)judgments. exempts assessments related to the Victims Compensation Fund from the courts’ authority to waive, modify, and suspend fines and fees;
Judgments that include restitution as well as other fines and (5)fees removesare anexempt additionalfrom reportthe requiredprovisions of § 4711 of Title 10 only as to the courts.restitution portion of the judgment.
§ 4104.
Fines, fees, costs, assessments, or restitution;
how collected;
suspending driver’s license for nonpayment prohibited.
(a) (1) When a court imposes a fine, fee, cost, assessment, or restitution on a defendant, the court may order any of the following:
a.
That the defendant pay the entire amount at the time sentence is imposed.
imposed where the court finds that the defendant has the ability to pay.
DSSCD Page 1 of 14 Released:
03/17/202605/01/2025 11:4009:12 AM 3501530104§ 4104A.
Hardship waiver.
(a) For purposes of this section “fee” includes a cost, penalty, assessment, or any other monetary obligation that is related to a criminal case or a motor vehicle offense that does not originate in the voluntary assessment center.
(b) When a defendant is sentenced to pay fines or fees, the sentencing court shall advise the defendant on the record and in writing of the availability of a hardship waiver under this section.
Defense counsel must also advise the defendant of the availability of a hardship waiver and the evidence required to obtain a hardship waiver.
(c) (1) The courts shall administer a hardship waiver process to allow a defendant to submit evidence at sentencing or post-sentencing showing that a defendant is unable to pay a fine, fee, or both.
(2) If a defendant submits evidence of any of the following, the court shall find the defendant presumptively qualifies for a hardship waiver and may not order fines or fees unless the court in its discretion finds that a fine, fee, or both, in whole or in part, are in the interest of justice:
a.
The defendant receives a public assistance benefit, including any of the following:
Show all 119 changed lines (79 more)
1.
Medicaid, including Medicare cost-sharing programs.
2.
Low-income subsidy for Medicare Part D.
3.
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).
4.
SNAP benefits for Women, Infants, and Children.
5.
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF).
6.
Veterans Affairs Pension or Service-Connected Disability Compensation.
7.
Residence in subsidized or public housing, including units that have less than market rental as a result of the owner receiving a Low Income Housing Tax Credit.
8.
Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program.
9.
A public transportation reduced fare card.
10.
General assistance under § 503 of Title 31.
11.
Supplemental Security Income (SSI).
12.
Social Security Disability Benefits (SSDI).
13.
Subsidized daycare (Purchase of care).
b.
The defendant was represented in the matter that gave rise to a fine or fee through the Office of Defense Services.
c.
The defendant was detained pretrial in Delaware for more than 3 days at any time in the 6 months prior to sentencing in the matter which gave rise to the fine, fee, or both.
HD :
KL :
SCD Page 2 of 4 Released:
05/01/2025 09:12 AM d.
The defendant was sentenced to incarceration in the matter which gave rise to the fine, fee, or both.
(3) If a defendant does not qualify for a presumption of hardship under paragraph (c)(2) of this section, the court may consider any of the following factors in determining whether a hardship waiver should be granted:
a.
The defendant was previously or is incarcerated.
b.
The defendant spent any period of time in a residential mental health facility in the preceding 6 months.
c.
The defendant is currently homeless or was homeless at any time in the preceding 6 months.
d.
The defendant’s income is too low to afford payments against fines, fees, or both without undue hardship.
e.
Any other demonstration of undue hardship deemed persuasive by the court.
(d) After consideration of the evidence relating to ability to pay, and any presumption of hardship under subsection (c)(2) of this section, the court may impose a fine, fee, or both, in whole or in part.
Where a defendant otherwise would have qualified for a presumption of hardship under paragraph (c)(2) of this section, but the court exercises its discretion to impose monetary penalties despite the evidence of hardship, the court must document the reason in its sentencing order.
(e) A defendant who is not granted a hardship waiver at the time of sentencing may apply for such a waiver at a later time pursuant to rules prescribed by the court.
(f) Notwithstanding any law or court rule to the contrary, the court may choose not to impose or may at any time waive, suspend, or modify any fine or fee including those otherwise deemed mandatory or not subject to waiver or suspension.
(g) The courts may promulgate rules relating to evidence, standards, and procedure for hardship hearings.
A copy of the rules, if promulgated, must be given to a defendant at or before sentencing.
§ 4105.
Default in payment of fine;
inability to pay.
(d) Notwithstanding subsection (a) of this section, where a defendant sentenced to be imprisoned is ordered to pay a fine, costs, restitution or all 3, the court may order an additional sentence of imprisonment in lieu of requiring the payment of the fine, costs, restitution or all 3;
provided, however, that this additional sentence of imprisonment may not exceed 30 days, to be served concurrently or consecutively with the sentence originally imposed, as the court may order.
[Repealed.] § 4107.
Annual report.
(b) The report under subsection (a) of this section must include information on the following:
HD :
KL :
SCD Page 3 of 4 Released:
05/01/2025 09:12 AM (4) The number of cases in which a hardship waiver was granted and the amount of fines, fees, or other monetary penalties that were waived or not imposed pursuant to § 4104A of this title.
Section 2.
This Act takes effect 180 days after its enactment.
SYNOPSIS Currently, even when a defendant or individual obviously does not have the means to pay a financial penalty or fee, Delaware Courts are unable to waive certain mandatory minimum fines or fees at sentencing.
This can create a constitutional crossroads, as our justice system has long recognized that the Fourteen Amendment prohibits “punishing a person for his poverty.” Bearden v.
Georgia, 461 U.S.
660, 671 (1983).
This Act gives courts the discretion to waive fines and fees, in whole or in part, in appropriate circumstances.
It also creates a presumption that fines and fees will not be imposed when a defendant shows evidence of certain conditions, including receiving a public assistance benefit (like Medicaid, SNAP, or veterans’ benefits) or being represented by the Office of Defense Services.
It also creates a hearing process for anyone already sentenced to pay a fine or fee.
The changes in this Act are based on recommendations of the Criminal Legal System Imposed Debt Study Group created by House Bill 244, as amended by House Amendment No 2, of the 151st General Assembly, in its December 7, 2023, report.
This Act takes effect 180 days after its enactment.
HD :
KL :
SCD Page 4 of 4 Released:
05/01/2025 09:12 AM 0281530073
Show all 119 changed rows (79 more)
Action History
-
Passed By Senate. Votes: 16 YES 5 NO
-
Reported Out of Committee (Judiciary) in Senate with 4 On Its Merits
-
Assigned to Judiciary Committee in Senate
-
Passed By House. Votes: 24 YES 13 NO 1 NOT VOTING 3 ABSENT
-
Amendment HA 4 to HB 133 - Passed In House by Voice Vote
-
Amendment HA 3 to HB 133 - Stricken in House
-
Amendment HA 2 to HB 133 - Stricken in House
-
Amendment HA 1 to HB 133 - Stricken in House
-
Amendment HA 4 to HB 133 - Introduced and Placed With Bill
-
Amendment HA 3 to HB 133 - Introduced and Placed With Bill
-
Amendment HA 2 to HB 133 - Introduced and Placed With Bill
-
Reported Out of Committee (Judiciary) in House with 3 Favorable, 4 On Its Merits
-
Not Worked in Committee
-
Amendment HA 1 to HB 133 - Introduced and Placed With Bill
-
Introduced and Assigned to Judiciary Committee in House
Sponsors
- Stell Parker Selby · Primary
- Ray Seigfried · Primary
- Laura V. Sturgeon · Primary
- David P. Sokola · Primary
- Josue O Ortega · Primary
- Dave G. Lawson · Primary
- Russell Huxtable · Primary
- Nicole Poore · Primary
- Kerri Evelyn Harris · Primary
- Cyndie Romer · Primary
- David L. Wilson · Primary
- Marie Pinkney · Primary
- Mara Gorman · Primary
- Madinah Wilson-Anton · Primary
- Eric Morrison · Primary
- Bryant L. Richardson · Primary
- Bryan Townsend · Primary
- Darius J. Brown · Primary
- Spiros Mantzavinos · Primary
- Sean M. Lynn · Primary
- Claire Snyder-Hall · Primary
- Melanie Ross Levin · Primary
- Sarah McBride · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →23 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 39 not signed on · 16 voted No
Sponsors (23)
- Stell Parker Selby
- Ray Seigfried Democratic
- Laura V. Sturgeon Democratic
- David P. Sokola Democratic
- Josue O Ortega Democratic
- Dave G. Lawson Republican Voted No
- Russell Huxtable Democratic
- Nicole Poore Democratic
- Kerri Evelyn Harris Democratic
- Cyndie Romer Democratic
- David L. Wilson Republican Voted No
- Marie Pinkney Democratic
- Mara Gorman Democratic
- Madinah Wilson-Anton Democratic
- Eric Morrison Democratic
- Bryant L. Richardson Republican
- Bryan Townsend Democratic
- Darius J. Brown Democratic
- Spiros Mantzavinos Democratic
- Sean M. Lynn Democratic
- Claire Snyder-Hall Democratic
- Melanie Ross Levin Democratic
- Sarah McBride
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (39)
39 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 39 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 76% | 24% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bryan Townsend | Democratic | Yea |
| Daniel Cruce | Democratic | Yea |
| Darius J. Brown | Democratic | Yea |
| David P. Sokola | Democratic | Yea |
| John "Jack" Walsh | Democratic | Yea |
| Kyra L. Hoffner | Democratic | Yea |
| Laura V. Sturgeon | Democratic | Yea |
| Marie Pinkney | Democratic | Yea |
| Nicole Poore | Democratic | Yea |
| Ray Seigfried | Democratic | Yea |
| Russell Huxtable | Democratic | Yea |
| S. Elizabeth Lockman | Democratic | Yea |
| Spiros Mantzavinos | Democratic | Yea |
| Stephanie L. Hansen | Democratic | Yea |
| Trey Paradee | Democratic | Yea |
| Brian Pettyjohn | Republican | Nay |
| Bryant L. Richardson | Republican | Yea |
| Dave G. Lawson | Republican | Nay |
| David L. Wilson | Republican | Nay |
| Eric Buckson | Republican | Nay |
| Gerald W. Hocker | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 24 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 0 | 13 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 24 | 13 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 59% | 32% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (41)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alonna Berry | Democratic | Yea |
| Claire Snyder-Hall | Democratic | Yea |
| Cyndie Romer | Democratic | Yea |
| DeShanna U Neal | Democratic | Yea |
| Debra Heffernan | Democratic | Yea |
| Edward S. Osienski | Democratic | Yea |
| Eric Morrison | Democratic | Yea |
| Frank Burns | Democratic | Yea |
| Franklin D. Cooke | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Josue O Ortega | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Kamela T Smith | Democratic | Yea |
| Kendra Johnson | Democratic | Yea |
| Kerri Evelyn Harris | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Kimberly Williams | Democratic | Yea |
| Krista Griffith | Democratic | Yea |
| Larry Lambert | Democratic | Yea |
| Madinah Wilson-Anton | Democratic | Yea |
| Mara Gorman | Democratic | Yea |
| Melanie Ross Levin | Democratic | Yea |
| Melissa Minor-Brown | Democratic | Yea |
| Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha | Democratic | Yea |
| Sean M. Lynn | Democratic | Yea |
| Sherae'a Moore | Democratic | Yea |
| Sophie Phillips | Democratic | Yea |
| Stephanie T. Bolden | Democratic | Yea |
| William Bush | Democratic | Yea |
| William J. Carson | Democratic | Yea |
| Bryan W. Shupe | Republican | Nay |
| Charles S Postles Jr. | Republican | Nay |
| Daniel B. Short | Republican | Nay |
| Jeff Hilovsky | Republican | Nay |
| Jeffrey N. Spiegelman | Republican | Nay |
| Jesse R. Vanderwende | Republican | Nay |
| Kevin S Hensley | Republican | Nay |
| Lyndon D. Yearick | Republican | Nay |
| Michael F. Smith | Republican | Nay |
| Richard G. Collins | Republican | Nay |
| Ronald E. Gray | Republican | Nay |
| Shannon Morris | Republican | Nay |
| Timothy D. Dukes | Republican | Nay |
| Valerie Jones Giltner | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 133 do?
- Currently, even when a defendant or individual obviously does not have the means to pay a financial penalty or fee, Delaware Courts are unable to waive certain mandatory minimum fines or fees at sentencing. This can create a constitutional crossroads, as our justice system has long recognized that the Fourteen Amendment prohibits “punishing a person for his poverty.” Bearden v. Georgia, 461 U.S. 660, 671 (1983). This Act gives courts the discretion to waive fines and fees, in whole or in part, in appropriate circumstances. It also creates a presumption that fines and fees will not be imposed when a defendant shows evidence of certain conditions, including receiving a public assistance benefit (like Medicaid, SNAP, or veterans’ benefits) or being represented by the Office of Defense Services. It also creates a hearing process for anyone already sentenced to pay a fine or fee. The changes in this Act are based on recommendations of the Criminal Legal System Imposed Debt Study Group created by House Bill 244, as amended by House Amendment No 2, of the 151st General Assembly, in its December 7, 2023, report. This Act takes effect 180 days after its enactment.
- Who sponsors HB 133?
- HB 133 is sponsored by Stell Parker Selby, Ray Seigfried (Democratic), Laura V. Sturgeon (Democratic), David P. Sokola (Democratic), Josue O Ortega (Democratic), Dave G. Lawson (Republican), Russell Huxtable (Democratic), Nicole Poore (Democratic), Kerri Evelyn Harris (Democratic), Cyndie Romer (Democratic), David L. Wilson (Republican), Marie Pinkney (Democratic), Mara Gorman (Democratic), Madinah Wilson-Anton (Democratic), Eric Morrison (Democratic), Bryant L. Richardson (Republican), Bryan Townsend (Democratic), Darius J. Brown (Democratic), Spiros Mantzavinos (Democratic), Sean M. Lynn (Democratic), Claire Snyder-Hall (Democratic), Melanie Ross Levin (Democratic), and Sarah McBride.
- What is the current status of HB 133?
- This bill has passed the House. Introduced May 01, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track HB 133?
- Track HB 133 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 133
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 133
Last checked for changes about 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →