AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 30 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO EXCLUSION OF MILITARY PENSIONS FROM TAXABLE INCOME.
Military families may benefit from the increased tax exemption on pensions, providing them with greater financial support.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 219 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 219.
You're tracking SB 219
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 219 — AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 30 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO EXCLUSION OF MILITARY PENSIONS FROM TAXABLE INCOME.
Last action — Signed by Governor
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced January 08, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Passed Senate
Current position in the legislative process.
-
26 sponsors
26 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (15 D · 8 R) — cross-party backing.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
In plain language
The bill increases the tax exemption for military pensions in Delaware over three years.
This bill phases in a higher exemption for military pensions from state income tax, raising it to $25,000 by 2029. It also expands the definition of qualifying pensions to include certain commissioned corps.
What this means for you
- Families: Military families may benefit from the increased tax exemption on pensions, providing them with greater financial support.
Summary
Of the 41 states with a state income tax, 27 states fully exempt military retirement pay from state income taxes and 12 states partially exempt military retirement pay. In 2022, Delaware increased the pension exclusion for military pensioners under 60 to $12,500, and in 2024, Delaware expanded the definition of a United States military pension to include a pension received for an individual’s service in the commissioned corps of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the commissioned corps of the Public Health Service and clarified that the armed forces of the United States includes the Space Force and Coast Guard. This Act phases in, over 3 years, an increased exemption for military pensions from state income taxation, regardless of age, which is currently $12,500, so that in taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2029, the exemption will be $25,000 for all military pensioners.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
83 added · 26 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment clarifies that for couples filing jointly, each spouse can separately claim the subtraction limits for military pensions, allowing them to potentially double their eligible amounts. Additionally, it introduces residency requirements for individuals aged 60 or older to qualify for this pension exemption: those domiciled in Delaware before January 1, 2027, must meet a three-year residency, while those moving to Delaware after that date must have been residents for five years. This means that eligibility for the tax benefits is now linked to specific residency durations based on when they establish their domicile in the state.
Buckson DELAWARE& STATESen. SENATE 153rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY SENATE AMENDMENT NO.
1Mantzavinos TO& SENATERep. BILL NO.
219Hilovsky AMENDSens. Senate Bill No.
219Brown, byCruce, insertingHansen, theHocker, followingHoffner, afterHuxtable, lineLawson, 57:Lockman, Paradee, Pettyjohn, Pinkney, Poore, Richardson, Seigfried, Sokola, Sturgeon, Townsend, Walsh, Wilson;
“3.Reps.
TheBerry, dollarCarson, limitsChukwuocha, ofGray, theGriffith, subtractionLambert, modificationsOrtega, specifiedD. in this paragraph (b)(3) apply individually to each spouse who is receiving a United States military pension on a joint return.
TheShort, totalMichael subtractionSmith, modificationK. may not exceed twice the relevant limit.
4.A.Williams, Wilson-Anton DELAWARE STATE SENATE 153rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY SENATE BILL NO.
A219 personAN whoACT isTO ageAMEND 60TITLE or30 olderOF isTHE eligibleDELAWARE forCODE theRELATING subtractionTO underEXCLUSION thisOF paragraphMILITARY (b)(3)PENSIONS onlyFROM ifTAXABLE oneINCOME. of the following applies:
I.BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE:
ForSection a1. person who is age 60 or older and legally domiciled in this State before January 1, 2027, the person is legally domiciled in this State for at least 3 years.
II.Amend § 1106, Title 30 of the Delaware Code by making deletions as shown by strike through and insertions as shown by underline as follows:
For§ a1106. person who is age 60 or older and legally domiciled in this State on or after January 1, 2027, the person is legally domiciled in this State for at least 5 years.
Modifications [For application of this section, see 83 Del.
Laws, c.
338, § 2].
(b) Subtractions.
— There shall be subtracted from federal adjusted gross income:
(3) a.
For taxable years beginning before January 1, 2022:
1.
Amounts received, not to exceed $2,000, by persons under age 60 as pensions from employers, the United States, this State, or any subdivision of this State;
or 2.
Amounts received, not to exceed $12,500, by persons age 60 or older as pensions from employers, the United States, this State, or any subdivision of this State, or as eligible retirement income.
b.
For taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2022:
taxable years beginning on January 1, 2022, and ending before January 1, 2027:
1.
For persons under age 60, the greater of:
A.
Amounts received, not to exceed $2,000, as pensions from employers, the United States, this State, or any subdivision of this State;
or B.
Amounts received, not to exceed $12,500, as a United States military pension.
2.
For persons age 60 or older, amounts received, not to exceed $12,500, as pensions from employers, the United States, this State, or any subdivision of this State, or as eligible retirement income.
c.
For the taxable year beginning on January 1, 2027:
1.
For persons under age 60, the greater of:
DLS :
Show all 101 changed lines (61 more)
MJC :
AF Page 1 of 3 Released:
01/07/2026 03:14 PM A.
Amounts received, not to exceed $2,000, as pensions from employers, the United States, this State, or any subdivision of this State;
or B.
Amounts received, not to exceed $15,000, as a United States military pension.
2.
For persons age 60 or older, the greater of:
A.
Amounts received, not to exceed $12,500, as pensions from employers, the United States, this State, or any subdivision of this State, or as eligible retirement income;
or B.
Amounts received, not to exceed $15,000, as a United States military pension.
d.
For the taxable year beginning on January 1, 2028:
1.
For persons under age 60, the greater of:
A.
Amounts received, not to exceed $2,000, as pensions from employers, the United States, this State, or any subdivision of this State;
or B.
Amounts received, not to exceed $20,000, as a United States military pension.
2.
For persons age 60 or older, the greater of:
A.
Amounts received, not to exceed $12,500, as pensions from employers, the United States, this State, or any subdivision of this State, or as eligible retirement income;
or B.
Amounts received, not to exceed $20,000, as a United States military pension.
e.
For taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2029:
1.
For persons under age 60, the greater of:
A.
Amounts received, not to exceed $2,000, as pensions from employers, the United States, this State, or any subdivision of this State;
or B.
Amounts received, not to exceed $25,000, as a United States military pension.
2.
For persons age 60 or older, the greater of:
A.
Amounts received, not to exceed $12,500, as pensions from employers, the United States, this State, or any subdivision of this State, or as eligible retirement income;
or B.
Amounts received, not to exceed $25,000, as a United States military pension.
c.
f.
For the purposes of this paragraph (b)(3):
1.
A.
“Eligible retirement income” includes distributions received from qualified retirement plans defined in § 4974 of the federal Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) (26 U.S.C.
§ 4974) or a successor provision, cash or deferred arrangements described in IRC § 401(k) (26 U.S.C.
§ 401(k)) or a successor provision, DLS :
MJC :
AF Page 2 of 3 Released:
01/07/2026 03:14 PM government deferred compensation plans described in IRC § 457 (26 U.S.C.
§ 457) or a successor provision, dividends, capital gains, interest, and rental income from real property less deductible rental expenses.
For purposes of this paragraph (b)(3)f.4.(b)(3)c., (b)(3)f., eligible retirement income received by spouses as joint tenants with right of survivorship or as tenants by the entirety is deemed to have been received ½ by each.
of2. this section, a person is legally domiciled in this State if the person is a “resident individual” under § 1103 of this title.”.
SYNOPSIS“United ThisStates Amendmentmilitary doespension” means a pension received as a result of an individual’s service in the following:Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Space Force, Coast Guard, the commissioned corps of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the commissioned corps of the Public Health Service, or the National Guard.
(1)SYNOPSIS ClarifiesOf that the subtraction41 modificationstates limitswith undera thisstate Actincome applytax, individually27 tostates eachfully spouseexempt whomilitary isretirement receivingpay afrom Unitedstate Statesincome militarytaxes pensionand onstates apartially jointexempt return.military retirement pay.
EachIn spouse2022, mayDelaware claimincreased the pension exclusion for military pensioners under 60 to $12,500, and in 2024, Delaware expanded the definition of a subtractionUnited upStates military pension to include a pension received for an individual’s service in the lessercommissioned corps of theirthe qualifyingNational incomeOceanic orand Atmospheric Administration and the per-personcommissioned limit.corps of the Public Health Service and clarified that the armed forces of the United States includes the Space Force and Coast Guard.
TheThis totalAct subtractionphases onin, aover joint3 returnyears, equalsan theincreased sumexemption offor themilitary individualpensions limitsfrom andstate mayincome nottaxation, exceedregardless of age, which is currently $12,500, so that combinedin amount.taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2029, the exemption will be $25,000 for all military pensioners.
(2) Requires that to be eligible for this exemption, an individual who is age 60 or older and legally domiciled in this State before January 1, 2027, must be legally domiciled in this State for at least 3 years and an individual who is age 60 or older and legally domiciled in this State on or after January 1, 2027, must be legally domiciled in this State for at least 5 years.
AF Page 13 of 13 Released:
03/24/202601/07/2026 05:0903:14 PM 48015301704801530132
Show all 101 changed rows (61 more)
Action History
-
Passed By House. Votes: 40 YES 1 ABSENT
-
Reported Out of Committee (Appropriations) in House with 1 Favorable, 5 On Its Merits
-
Assigned to Appropriations Committee in House
-
Reported Out of Committee (Revenue & Finance) in House with 5 Favorable, 2 On Its Merits
-
Assigned to Revenue & Finance Committee in House
-
Passed By Senate. Votes: 19 YES 1 NOT VOTING 1 ABSENT
-
Amendment SA 1 to SB 219 - Passed By Senate. Votes: 19 YES 1 NOT VOTING 1 ABSENT
-
Reported Out of Committee (Finance) in Senate with 1 Favorable, 3 On Its Merits
-
Assigned to Finance Committee in Senate
-
Reported Out of Committee (Executive) in Senate with 3 Favorable, 2 On Its Merits
-
Amendment SA 1 to SB 219 - Introduced and Placed With Bill
-
Introduced and Assigned to Executive Committee in Senate
Sponsors
- Stell Parker Selby · Primary
- Madinah Wilson-Anton · Primary
- Michael F. Smith · Primary
- Daniel B. Short · Primary
- Ronald E. Gray · Primary
- William J. Carson · Primary
- David L. Wilson · Primary
- John "Jack" Walsh · Primary
- Bryan Townsend · Primary
- David P. Sokola · Primary
- Ray Seigfried · Primary
- Bryant L. Richardson · Primary
- Nicole Poore · Primary
- Marie Pinkney · Primary
- Brian Pettyjohn · Primary
- Trey Paradee · Primary
- Josue O Ortega · Primary
- Dave G. Lawson · Primary
- Russell Huxtable · Primary
- Claire Snyder-Hall · Primary
- Melanie Ross Levin · Primary
- Darius J. Brown · Primary
- Laura V. Sturgeon · Primary
- Spiros Mantzavinos · Primary
- Eric Buckson · Primary
- Sarah McBride · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →26 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 36 not signed on
Sponsors (26)
- Stell Parker Selby
- Madinah Wilson-Anton Democratic
- Michael F. Smith Republican
- Daniel B. Short Republican
- Ronald E. Gray Republican
- William J. Carson Democratic
- David L. Wilson Republican
- John "Jack" Walsh Democratic
- Bryan Townsend Democratic
- David P. Sokola Democratic
- Ray Seigfried Democratic
- Bryant L. Richardson Republican
- Nicole Poore Democratic
- Marie Pinkney Democratic
- Brian Pettyjohn Republican
- Trey Paradee Democratic
- Josue O Ortega Democratic
- Dave G. Lawson Republican
- Russell Huxtable Democratic
- Claire Snyder-Hall Democratic
- Melanie Ross Levin
- Darius J. Brown Democratic
- Laura V. Sturgeon Democratic
- Spiros Mantzavinos Democratic
- Eric Buckson Republican
- Sarah McBride
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (36)
36 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 36 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 13 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
How each member voted (41)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alonna Berry | Democratic | Yea |
| Claire Snyder-Hall | Democratic | Yea |
| Cyndie Romer | Democratic | Yea |
| DeShanna U Neal | Democratic | Yea |
| Debra Heffernan | Democratic | Yea |
| Edward S. Osienski | Democratic | Yea |
| Eric Morrison | Democratic | Yea |
| Frank Burns | Democratic | Yea |
| Franklin D. Cooke | Democratic | Yea |
| Josue O Ortega | Democratic | Yea |
| Kamela T Smith | Democratic | Yea |
| Kendra Johnson | Democratic | Yea |
| Kerri Evelyn Harris | Democratic | Yea |
| Kimberly Williams | Democratic | Yea |
| Krista Griffith | Democratic | Yea |
| Larry Lambert | Democratic | Yea |
| Madinah Wilson-Anton | Democratic | Yea |
| Mara Gorman | Democratic | Yea |
| Melanie Ross Levin | Democratic | Yea |
| Melissa Minor-Brown | Democratic | Yea |
| Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha | Democratic | Yea |
| Sean M. Lynn | Democratic | Yea |
| Sherae'a Moore | Democratic | Yea |
| Sophie Phillips | Democratic | Yea |
| Stephanie T. Bolden | Democratic | Yea |
| William Bush | Democratic | Yea |
| William J. Carson | Democratic | Yea |
| Bryan W. Shupe | Republican | Yea |
| Charles S Postles Jr. | Republican | Yea |
| Daniel B. Short | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Hilovsky | Republican | Yea |
| Jeffrey N. Spiegelman | Republican | Yea |
| Jesse R. Vanderwende | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin S Hensley | Republican | Yea |
| Lyndon D. Yearick | Republican | Yea |
| Michael F. Smith | Republican | Yea |
| Richard G. Collins | Republican | Yea |
| Ronald E. Gray | Republican | Yea |
| Shannon Morris | Republican | Not Voting |
| Timothy D. Dukes | Republican | Yea |
| Valerie Jones Giltner | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 14 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 19 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bryan Townsend | Democratic | Yea |
| Daniel Cruce | Democratic | Yea |
| Darius J. Brown | Democratic | Not Voting |
| David P. Sokola | Democratic | Yea |
| John "Jack" Walsh | Democratic | Yea |
| Kyra L. Hoffner | Democratic | Yea |
| Laura V. Sturgeon | Democratic | Yea |
| Marie Pinkney | Democratic | Yea |
| Nicole Poore | Democratic | Yea |
| Ray Seigfried | Democratic | Yea |
| Russell Huxtable | Democratic | Yea |
| S. Elizabeth Lockman | Democratic | Yea |
| Spiros Mantzavinos | Democratic | Yea |
| Stephanie L. Hansen | Democratic | Yea |
| Trey Paradee | Democratic | Yea |
| Brian Pettyjohn | Republican | Yea |
| Bryant L. Richardson | Republican | Yea |
| Dave G. Lawson | Republican | Not Voting |
| David L. Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Eric Buckson | Republican | Yea |
| Gerald W. Hocker | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 219 do?
- Of the 41 states with a state income tax, 27 states fully exempt military retirement pay from state income taxes and 12 states partially exempt military retirement pay. In 2022, Delaware increased the pension exclusion for military pensioners under 60 to $12,500, and in 2024, Delaware expanded the definition of a United States military pension to include a pension received for an individual’s service in the commissioned corps of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the commissioned corps of the Public Health Service and clarified that the armed forces of the United States includes the Space Force and Coast Guard. This Act phases in, over 3 years, an increased exemption for military pensions from state income taxation, regardless of age, which is currently $12,500, so that in taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2029, the exemption will be $25,000 for all military pensioners.
- Who sponsors SB 219?
- SB 219 is sponsored by Stell Parker Selby, Madinah Wilson-Anton (Democratic), Michael F. Smith (Republican), Daniel B. Short (Republican), Ronald E. Gray (Republican), William J. Carson (Democratic), David L. Wilson (Republican), John "Jack" Walsh (Democratic), Bryan Townsend (Democratic), David P. Sokola (Democratic), Ray Seigfried (Democratic), Bryant L. Richardson (Republican), Nicole Poore (Democratic), Marie Pinkney (Democratic), Brian Pettyjohn (Republican), Trey Paradee (Democratic), Josue O Ortega (Democratic), Dave G. Lawson (Republican), Russell Huxtable (Democratic), Claire Snyder-Hall (Democratic), Melanie Ross Levin, Darius J. Brown (Democratic), Laura V. Sturgeon (Democratic), Spiros Mantzavinos (Democratic), Eric Buckson (Republican), and Sarah McBride.
- What is the current status of SB 219?
- This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced January 08, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track SB 219?
- Track SB 219 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 219
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 219
Last checked for changes about 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →