AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 26 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO PUBLIC UTILITIES AND BATTERY ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS.
This means that if battery storage systems are used, Delmarva Power is incentivized to maximize savings and benefits for ratepayers.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 470 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 470.
You're tracking HB 470
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 470 — AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 26 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO PUBLIC UTILITIES AND BATTERY ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS.
Last action — Assigned to Environment, Energy & Transportation Committee in Senate
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the House. Introduced June 04, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
ModerateHow often bills like it became law.
-
Passed House
Current position in the legislative process.
-
8 sponsors
8 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (6 D · 2 R) — cross-party backing.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
In plain language
The bill defines and regulates utility battery energy storage systems in Delaware.
This Act adds a definition for utility battery energy storage systems and allows Delmarva Power to operate such systems. It aims to ensure cost-effectiveness and benefits for ratepayers through maximized value streams.
What this means for you
- Consumers: This means that if battery storage systems are used, Delmarva Power is incentivized to maximize savings and benefits for ratepayers.
Summary
This Act adds a definition of “utility battery energy storage system” to Chapter 10 of Title 26 of the Delaware Code. Under the definition of “utility battery energy storage system,” battery storage systems that store electricity from the electric grid and discharge the electricity at a later time are not considered generation or a generation unit for electricity when owned and operated by a public electric utility. This Act also authorizes Delmarva Power to own and operate battery energy storage systems after appropriate review and approval by the Delaware Public Service Commission. To mitigate any cost shifts or negative impacts on ratepayers, the Act requires Delmarva Power to make best efforts to maximize all applicable value streams from any battery energy storage systems, including participating in applicable PJM markets and utilizing its battery energy storage systems to realize potential savings through distribution-level services.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
73 added · 26 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment modifies the definition of a utility battery energy storage system (U-BESS) to clarify its role in energy storage and market participation. It also introduces a requirement for the Delaware Public Service Commission to consider cost-effectiveness when approving U-BESS projects. Additionally, the amendment specifies that cost recovery for these systems must be approved by the Commission and distributed across the entire Delmarva Power customer base, while also requiring periodic reports to assess effectiveness and generated revenue. These changes aim to ensure that the implementation of U-BESS is both prudent and beneficial to ratepayers.
Osienski HOUSE& OFRep. REPRESENTATIVES 153rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE AMENDMENT NO.
3Heffernan TO& HOUSERep. BILL NO.
470Minor-Brown AMEND& HouseSen. Bill No.
470Walsh byReps. deleting lines 7 and 8 in their entirety and inserting in lieu thereof the following:
“energyCarson, fromCollins, theYearick, gridHarris andHOUSE dischargingOF itREPRESENTATIVES at153rd aGENERAL laterASSEMBLY time.HOUSE BILL NO.
U-BESS470 isAN notACT consideredTO generationAMEND orTITLE a26 generationOF unit.”.THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO PUBLIC UTILITIES AND BATTERY ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEMS.
FURTHERBE AMENDIT HouseENACTED BillBY No.THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE:
470Section by1. deleting lines 33 through 46 in their entirety and inserting in lieu thereof the following:
“c.Amend § 1001, Title 26 of the Delaware Code by making deletions as shown by strike through and insertions as shown by underline as follows:
DP&L§ may,1001. after appropriate review and approval of the Commission, own and operate U-BESS.
TheDefinitions. Commission’s review shall include a determination of cost-effectiveness measured by whether the U-BESS are prudent and provide net value to ratepayers.
IfAs U-BESSused arein approved,this costschapter, shallunless be distributed among the entirecontext DP&Lotherwise Delawarerequires: customer base in a manner prescribed by the Commission.
To(28) mitigate“Utility anybattery costenergy shiftsstorage system” or negative“U-BESS” impactsmeans onequipment ratepayers,or DP&Lsystems shallowned makeand bestoperated effortsby toa maximizepublic allelectric applicableutility valuewhich streamsequipment’s fromprimary anyfunction U-BESS,is includingto participatingparticipate in allwholesale availableenergy PJM Interconnection markets andby utilizingstoring itsenergy U-BESSfrom tothe realizegrid potentialand savings,discharging includingit anyat applicablea taxlater credits.time.
AfterU-BESS approvalis ofnot anyconsidered U-BESS,generation DP&Lor shall submit to the Commission, on a schedulegeneration determinedunit bynor theis Commission,it reportsconsidered containingdistribution informationor prescribeda bydistribution theunit Commissionunder tothis determinetitle. the effectiveness of the U-BESS, including benefits and revenue generated.”.
SYNOPSISSection This2. amendment to HB 470 does the following:
(1)Amend Clarifies§ the1008, definitionTitle 26 of athe utilityDelaware batteryCode energyby storagemaking system.deletions as shown by strike through and insertions as shown by underline as follows:
(2)§ Requires1008. any approval to include consideration of cost-effectiveness.
(3)Duties Removesof costelectric recoverydistribution languagecompanies. more favorable to Exelon shareholders than Delmarva Power customers.
(4)(a) AddsEach languageelectric providingdistribution thatcompany costshall recoverymaintain shallits befacilities inand aprovide mannerproducts approvedand byservices thewhich Commissionare fromsafe, theefficient, entiresufficient, DP&Ladequate, customerand base.reliable.
(5)Each Requireselectric Delmarvadistribution Powercompany shall implement procedures to submitrequire reportsall detailingelectric costsuppliers effectiveness.to deliver energy to the electric distribution company at locations and in amounts which are adequate to meet each supplier’s obligations to its customers.
(b) (1) The Commission is hereby granted the authority to require DP&L subject to its jurisdiction to develop and implement demand-side management programs designed to reduce overall electricity consumption by its customers and/or to reduce usage by customers during peak periods, such as time of use rates, advanced metering infrastructure, central air- conditioning and hot water heating cycling off and on programs, interruptible rates, etc.
However, in no such instance shall electric distribution companies subject to the Commission’s jurisdiction be authorized to implement peak time billing.
Upon development of such demand-side management program or programs, DP&L shall file such program or programs with the Commission for the Commission’s review and approval.
KLLTK :
SCD Page 1 of 13 Released:
06/18/202606/03/2026 05:5005:41 PM 0131530154a.
The costs that DP&L incurs in developing and implementing their demand-side management programs, as well as the costs incurred by DP&L in administering all demand-side management programs approved for implementation by the Commission, shall be included and recovered in DP&L’s distribution rates.
b.
By June 5, 2006, the Commission shall open a docket to evaluate the desirability, feasibility and cost effectiveness of requiring advanced metering technology, including time of use metering to be utilized throughout or selectively in the service territories of DP&L.
The Commission may require that such a technology be deployed in a cost effective manner after such evaluation has been made and hearings have been held.
As part of the evaluation, the Commission shall review all customer pricing implications of any particular metering technology investigated.
The Commission shall not authorize such technology to be deployed in a manner that permits 30-day peak demand billing except as approved by the General Assembly.
c.
DP&L may, after appropriate review and approval of the Commission, own and operate utility battery energy storage systems.
On an annual basis, DP&L may petition the Commission for approval of a proposed rider applicable to all of DP&L’s U-BESS portfolio, which is comprised of all DP&L’s U-BESS with a collective capacity of 10 MW or greater.
Upon a finding by the Commission that the proposed rider is in the public interest, the Commission shall enter an order approving a surcharge that authorizes DP&L to recover the prudent and reasonable costs that DP&L incurs for the development, construction, ownership, operation, and maintenance of its U-BESS portfolio.
At a minimum, the rider shall recover the U-BESS-related overall cost of service-based revenue requirements including a return on rate base, operating, depreciation, and tax expenses, with the U-BESS- related wholesale energy market revenues lowering the U-BESS-related revenue requirement for the benefit of DP&L’s customers.
The U-BESS-related return on equity shall be no less than the return on equity approved in DP&L’s most recent electric base rate case.
To mitigate any cost shifts or negative impacts on ratepayers, DP&L shall make best efforts to maximize all applicable value streams from any battery energy storage systems, including participating in applicable PJM Interconnection markets and utilizing its battery energy storage systems to realize potential savings, including any applicable tax credits.
c.
Show all 55 changed lines (15 more)
d.
The Commission shall have the authority to promulgate any rules and regulations it deems necessary to accomplish the development and implementation of demand-side management programs by DP&L.
(2) DEC shall, at a minimum, maintain its current efforts in providing demand-side management programs.
DEC shall report on its demand-side management efforts to the Public Service Commission, Controller General and Director of the Office of Management and Budget by January 31, 2007, and January 31 of each subsequent year thereafter.
HD :
LTK :
SCD Page 2 of 3 Released:
06/03/2026 05:41 PM SYNOPSIS This Act adds a definition of “utility battery energy storage system” to Chapter 10 of Title 26 of the Delaware Code.
Under the definition of “utility battery energy storage system,” battery storage systems that store electricity from the electric grid and discharge the electricity at a later time are not considered generation or a generation unit for electricity when owned and operated by a public electric utility.
This Act also authorizes Delmarva Power to own and operate battery energy storage systems after appropriate review and approval by the Delaware Public Service Commission.
To mitigate any cost shifts or negative impacts on ratepayers, the Act requires Delmarva Power to make best efforts to maximize all applicable value streams from any battery energy storage systems, including participating in applicable PJM markets and utilizing its battery energy storage systems to realize potential savings through distribution-level services.
HD :
LTK :
SCD Page 3 of 3 Released:
06/03/2026 05:41 PM 3491530152
Show all 55 changed rows (15 more)
Action History
-
Assigned to Environment, Energy & Transportation Committee in Senate
-
Passed By House. Votes: 39 YES 2 ABSENT
-
Amendment HA 3 to HB 470 - Passed In House by Voice Vote
-
Amendment HA 3 to HB 470 - Introduced and Placed With Bill
-
Amendment HA 2 to HB 470 - Stricken in House
-
Amendment HA 1 to HB 470 - Stricken in House
-
Amendment HA 2 to HB 470 - Introduced and Placed With Bill
-
Amendment HA 1 to HB 470 - Introduced and Placed With Bill
-
Reported Out of Committee (Natural Resources & Energy) in House with 8 On Its Merits
-
Introduced and Assigned to Natural Resources & Energy Committee in House
Sponsors
- Kerri Evelyn Harris · Primary
- Lyndon D. Yearick · Primary
- Richard G. Collins · Primary
- William J. Carson · Primary
- John "Jack" Walsh · Primary
- Trey Paradee · Primary
- Russell Huxtable · Primary
- Edward S. Osienski · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →8 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 54 not signed on
Sponsors (8)
- Kerri Evelyn Harris Democratic
- Lyndon D. Yearick Republican
- Richard G. Collins Republican
- William J. Carson Democratic
- John "Jack" Walsh Democratic
- Trey Paradee Democratic
- Russell Huxtable Democratic
- Edward S. Osienski Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (54)
54 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 54 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 12 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (41)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alonna Berry | Democratic | Yea |
| Claire Snyder-Hall | Democratic | Yea |
| Cyndie Romer | Democratic | Yea |
| DeShanna U Neal | Democratic | Yea |
| Debra Heffernan | Democratic | Yea |
| Edward S. Osienski | Democratic | Yea |
| Eric Morrison | Democratic | Yea |
| Frank Burns | Democratic | Yea |
| Franklin D. Cooke | Democratic | Yea |
| Josue O Ortega | Democratic | Yea |
| Kamela T Smith | Democratic | Yea |
| Kendra Johnson | Democratic | Yea |
| Kerri Evelyn Harris | Democratic | Yea |
| Kimberly Williams | Democratic | Yea |
| Krista Griffith | Democratic | Yea |
| Larry Lambert | Democratic | Yea |
| Madinah Wilson-Anton | Democratic | Yea |
| Mara Gorman | Democratic | Yea |
| Melanie Ross Levin | Democratic | Yea |
| Melissa Minor-Brown | Democratic | Yea |
| Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha | Democratic | Yea |
| Sean M. Lynn | Democratic | Yea |
| Sherae'a Moore | Democratic | Yea |
| Sophie Phillips | Democratic | Yea |
| Stephanie T. Bolden | Democratic | Yea |
| William Bush | Democratic | Yea |
| William J. Carson | Democratic | Yea |
| Bryan W. Shupe | Republican | Yea |
| Charles S Postles Jr. | Republican | Yea |
| Daniel B. Short | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Hilovsky | Republican | Yea |
| Jeffrey N. Spiegelman | Republican | Yea |
| Jesse R. Vanderwende | Republican | Yea |
| Kevin S Hensley | Republican | Not Voting |
| Lyndon D. Yearick | Republican | Yea |
| Michael F. Smith | Republican | Yea |
| Richard G. Collins | Republican | Yea |
| Ronald E. Gray | Republican | Yea |
| Shannon Morris | Republican | Not Voting |
| Timothy D. Dukes | Republican | Yea |
| Valerie Jones Giltner | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 470 do?
- This Act adds a definition of “utility battery energy storage system” to Chapter 10 of Title 26 of the Delaware Code. Under the definition of “utility battery energy storage system,” battery storage systems that store electricity from the electric grid and discharge the electricity at a later time are not considered generation or a generation unit for electricity when owned and operated by a public electric utility. This Act also authorizes Delmarva Power to own and operate battery energy storage systems after appropriate review and approval by the Delaware Public Service Commission. To mitigate any cost shifts or negative impacts on ratepayers, the Act requires Delmarva Power to make best efforts to maximize all applicable value streams from any battery energy storage systems, including participating in applicable PJM markets and utilizing its battery energy storage systems to realize potential savings through distribution-level services.
- Who sponsors HB 470?
- HB 470 is sponsored by Kerri Evelyn Harris (Democratic), Lyndon D. Yearick (Republican), Richard G. Collins (Republican), William J. Carson (Democratic), John "Jack" Walsh (Democratic), Trey Paradee (Democratic), Russell Huxtable (Democratic), and Edward S. Osienski (Democratic).
- What is the current status of HB 470?
- This bill has passed the House. Introduced June 04, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track HB 470?
- Track HB 470 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 470
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 470
Last checked for changes about 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →