AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 11 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO REVERSE LOCATION AND REVERSE KEYWORD SEARCHES AND...
This legislation helps protect personal information in your everyday lives from extensive government surveillance.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 145 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 145.
You're tracking HB 145
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 145 — AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 11 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO REVERSE LOCATION AND REVERSE KEYWORD SEARCHES AND COURT ORDERS.
Last action — Passed By Senate. Votes: 11 YES 4 NO 6 ABSENT
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the House. Introduced April 14, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
ModerateHow often bills like it became law.
-
Passed House
Current position in the legislative process.
-
6 sponsors
6 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (5 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
In plain language
The bill limits law enforcement's use of reverse-keyword searches to protect privacy rights.
This bill prohibits most reverse-keyword court orders that allow broad government searches without specific suspects. It only permits such searches in limited cases involving serious crimes, ensuring privacy protections for the general public.
What this means for you
- Families: This legislation helps protect personal information in your everyday lives from extensive government surveillance.
- Consumers: If you value your privacy, this bill aims to limit broad government searches of your data.
Summary
Reverse-keyword court orders enable the government to obtain technology search data without identifying any specific person as to which there is probable cause to believe they have committed or will imminently commit a crime. The profusion of electronic devices and apps in recent years has allowed recordation of numerous details of citizen’s everyday lives, that the government should not be permitted to collect and review at will. Such general searches allow the government to sweep in personal information about hundreds or thousands of people who are not suspected of having committed any crime. These searches are an invasion of privacy, have a potentially chilling effect on civil liberties, and sidestep requirements for individualized suspicion that are otherwise required for a lawful search. This House Substitute for House Bill No. 145 would prohibit law enforcement and courts from requesting, issuing, or enforcing reverse-keyword court orders and reverse-keyword requests, with the exception that reverse-keyword court orders and requests may be utilized to investigate suspected Class A Felonies so long as the search query returns 5 or fewer search hits. It also requires the suppression of evidence derived from an unlawful reverse-keyword search.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
112 added · 55 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendments to HB 145 add specific definitions related to reverse-keyword searches and clarify the types of violent felonies that are associated with this search method. The added text specifies that certain serious crimes, such as class A violent felonies and various sexual offenses, are considered "reverse-keyword designated felonies." This change matters because it defines the scope of crimes that the legislation addresses, impacting how law enforcement may pursue information through reverse-keyword searches.
Wilson-Anton HOUSE& OFSen. REPRESENTATIVES 153rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE AMENDMENT NO.
1Pinkney TOReps. HOUSE SUBSTITUTE NO.
Burns, Morrison, Gorman, Harris HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 153rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE SUBSTITUTE NO.
145 AN ACT TO AMEND HouseTITLE Substitute11 No.OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO REVERSE LOCATION AND REVERSE KEYWORD SEARCHES AND COURT ORDERS.
1WHEREAS, forsince Houseour BillNation’s No.founding, general warrants, which permit government officials to conduct broad searches without identifying a specific crime or specific suspect that is being investigated, have been deemed a significant threat to personal freedom, privacy, and liberty;
145and byWHEREAS, insertingthe afterUnited lineStates 21Supreme andCourt beforehas linerepeatedly 22held that the followingFourth andAmendment redesignatingto accordingly:the United States Constitution prohibits the use of general warrants;
“(2)and “Data”WHEREAS, meansreverse-keyword acourt digitalorders representationenable the government to precisely identify an unspecified and unlimited number of information,persons whetherwho suchhave datasought information about a specific word or phrase, without identifying any specific person as to which there is storedprobable incause raw,to unstructured,believe semi-structured,they have committed or structuredwill formats.imminently commit a crime;
(3)and “Database”WHEREAS, meansthe amass repositorysurveillance that is effectuated by reverse-keyword court orders severely undermines the right to privacy and can adversely impact and chill the exercise of informationthe orfreedom data.”.of speech, association, religion, assembly, movement, and the press;
FURTHERand AMENDWHEREAS, Housethe Substitutegovernment’s No.ability to obtain the same mass surveillance information that can be obtained using reverse-keyword court orders through voluntary compliance-based reverse-keyword requests can produce the same adverse impacts and chilling effects upon personal freedom, privacy, and liberty as their court-ordered counterparts.
1NOW, forTHEREFORE: House Bill No.
145BE byIT insertingENACTED afterBY lineTHE 28GENERAL andASSEMBLY beforeOF lineTHE 29STATE andOF redesignatingDELAWARE: accordingly:
“(6)Section Reverse-keyword1. designated felony” means any of the following crimes or an offense under the law of another jurisdiction that, if the act had taken place in Delaware, would be eligible to be charged as one of the following crimes:
a.Amend Chapter 23, Title 11 of the Delaware Code by making deletions as shown by strike through and insertions as shown by underline as follows:
A§ class2312. A violent felony.
b.Reverse-keyword searches prohibited.
Strangulation(a) orFor suffocation;purposes of this section:
(1) “Class A violent felony” means those felonies designated as class A that appear in § 6074201(c) of this title.
c.
Assault in the first degree;
§ 613 of this title.
d.
Promoting suicide;
§ 645 of this title.
e.
Unlawful sexual contact in the first degree;
§ 769 of this title.
f.
Rape in the third degree;
§ 771 of this title.
g.
Rape in the second degree;
§ 772 of this title.
h.
Sexual extortion;
§ 774 of this title.
i.
Continuous sexual abuse of a child;
§ 776 of this title.
j.
Sexual abuse of a child by a person in a position of trust, authority or supervision in the first degree;
Show all 135 changed lines (95 more)
§ 778 of this title.
k.
Kidnapping in the second degree;
§ 783 of this title.
l.
Kidnapping in the first degree;
§ 784 of this title.
SCD Page 1 of 24 Released:
05/19/202604/14/2026 11:3711:40 AM m.(2) “Government entity” means any department or agency of the State or any political subdivision thereof, or any individual acting for or on behalf of the State or a political subdivision thereof.
Trafficking(3) “Reverse-keyword court order” means any court order, including a search warrant or subpoena, compelling the disclosure of anrecords individual,or forcedinformation laboridentifying andany sexualunnamed servitude;persons, by name or other unique identifier, who electronically searched for a particular word, phrase, or website, or who visited a particular website through a link generated by such a search, regardless of whether or not the order is limited to a specific geographic area or time frame.
§(4) 787“Reverse-keyword request” means any request, in the absence of thisa title.court order, by any government entity for the voluntary provision of records or information identifying any unnamed persons, by name or other unique identifier, who electronically searched for a particular word, phrase, or website, or who visited a particular website through a link generated by such a search, regardless of whether or not the request is limited to a specific geographic area or time frame.
n.A “reverse-keyword request” includes an offer to purchase such records or information.
Arson(5) in“Search hit” means a search result that identifies an individual device location or keyword entry that, upon querying of a database that is the firstsubject degree;of a reverse-keyword court order, precisely matches the criteria of the court order’s search query.
§(b) 803Reverse-keyword ofcourt thisorders title.prohibited.
o.(1) A government entity may not seek, from any court, a reverse-keyword court order.
Burglary(2) inA thegovernment firstentity degree;may not seek, secure, obtain, borrow, purchase, or review any information or data obtained through a reverse-keyword court order.
§(3) 826No court of this title.State may issue a reverse-keyword court order.
p.(4) No court or government entity of the State or a political subdivision thereof, may support, assist, or enforce a reverse-keyword court order issued by the State of Delaware or a political subdivision thereof, or any other state or a political subdivision thereof, including the domestication of any such court order.
Robbery(c) inReverse-keyword therequests firstprohibited. degree;
§(1) 832A ofgovernment thisentity title.may not make a reverse-keyword request.
q.(2) A government entity may not seek, secure, obtain, borrow, purchase, or review any information or data obtained through a reverse-keyword request.
Extortion;(d) Notwithstanding the prohibition in subsection (b) of this section, a government entity may seek, and a court may grant, a reverse-keyword court order in the investigation of a class A violent felony, subject to all of the following conditions:
§ 846 of this title.
r.
Sexual exploitation of a child;
§ 1108 of this title.
s.
Dealing in child pornography;
§ 1109 of this title.
t.
Sexual solicitation of a child;
§ 1112A of this title.
u.
Promoting sexual solicitation of a child;
§ 1112B of this title.
v.
Stalking;
§ 1312 of this title.
x.
Bombs, incendiary devices, Molotov cocktails and explosive devices;
§ 1338 of this title.
y.
Adulteration;
§ 1339 of this title.
z.
Aggravated act of intimidation;
§ 3533 of this title.
aa.
Abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment of an adult who is impaired or incapacitated causing bodily harm, permanent disfigurement, permanent disability or death;
§ 3913(c) of Title 31.”.
FURTHER AMEND House Substitute No.
1 for House Bill No.
145 on line 50 by deleting “class A violent felony” and inserting in lieu thereof “reverse-keyword designated felony”.
FURTHER AMEND House Substitute No.
1 for House Bill No.
145 by inserting after line 62 and before line 63 the following:
“(4) A return received in response to a reverse-keyword court order must be kept under seal with the Court and any evidence unrelated to the case must be immediately destroyed, unless otherwise required to be retained and provided to the defendant as potentially exculpatory evidence as required by law.”.
SYNOPSIS This amendment to House Substitute No.
1 to House Bill No.
145 expands the list of crimes where a reverse-key word order may be granted under the conditions outlined in this Act.
It also provides that returns from a reverse-keyword court order must be kept under seal and destroyed if unrelated to the case unless they are potentially exculpatory.
SCD Page 2 of 24 Released:
05/19/202604/14/2026 11:3711:40 AM 0281530199(1) If a database query undertaken pursuant to a reverse-keyword court order issued under this subsection results in 5 or fewer search hits, the entity to whom the order was directed must respond to the order by fully producing the information sought by the order.
(2) If a database query that was undertaken pursuant to a reverse-keyword court order issued under this subsection results in more than 5 search hits, the entity to whom the order was directed must respond to the order by only providing the number of search hits produced by the query without any further information.
The government entity may not seek, view, or accept any additional information generated by the search.
A government entity may seek a new reverse-keyword court order with narrower search terms that meets the requirements of paragraph (d)(1) of this section.
(3) A reverse-keyword court order issued under this subsection must prominently state the required limited response mandated under paragraph (d)(2) of this section in the event the search query returns more than 5 search hits.
(e) A government entity may not seek the assistance of any agency of the federal government or any agency of the government of another state or subdivision thereof in obtaining information or data from a reverse-keyword court order or reverse-keyword request if the government entity would be barred from directly seeking such information under this section.
(f) Suppression of evidence.
(1) Except as proof of a violation of this section, no record or information obtained, accessed, or otherwise secured in violation of this section, nor any evidence derived therefrom, is admissible in any criminal, civil, administrative, or other proceeding.
(2) For purposes of this subsection, a record, information, or evidence is “derived from” a reverse-keyword court order or reverse-keyword request where the government entity would not have originally possessed the information or evidence but for the violative court order or request, and regardless of any claim that the record, information, or evidence is attenuated from the unlawful order or request, would inevitably have been discovered, or was subsequently reobtained through other means.
§ 2313.
Notice and enforcement.
(a) A person whose name or other identifying information was obtained by a government entity in violation of § 2312 of this title must be notified of the violation, in writing, by the government entity who committed the violation and of the legal recourse available to that person under this section.
(b) A violation of § 2312 of this title constitutes an injury and a person injured by a violation may institute proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction for any of the following:
HD :
KL :
SCD Page 3 of 4 Released:
04/14/2026 11:40 AM (1) Injunctive relief.
(2) Declaratory relief.
(3) A writ of mandamus.
(4) Reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.
(c) Any data or other information acquired in violation of § 2312 of this title must be immediately deleted and destroyed.
(d) Any officer, employee, or agent of the State or a political subdivision thereof who violates § 2312 of this title is subject to appropriate disciplinary action.
SYNOPSIS Reverse-keyword court orders enable the government to obtain technology search data without identifying any specific person as to which there is probable cause to believe they have committed or will imminently commit a crime.
The profusion of electronic devices and apps in recent years has allowed recordation of numerous details of citizen’s everyday lives, that the government should not be permitted to collect and review at will.
Such general searches allow the government to sweep in personal information about hundreds or thousands of people who are not suspected of having committed any crime.
These searches are an invasion of privacy, have a potentially chilling effect on civil liberties, and sidestep requirements for individualized suspicion that are otherwise required for a lawful search.
This House Substitute for House Bill No.
145 would prohibit law enforcement and courts from requesting, issuing, or enforcing reverse-keyword court orders and reverse-keyword requests, with the exception that reverse-keyword court orders and requests may be utilized to investigate suspected Class A Felonies so long as the search query returns 5 or fewer search hits.
It also requires the suppression of evidence derived from an unlawful reverse-keyword search.
HD :
KL :
SCD Page 4 of 4 Released:
04/14/2026 11:40 AM 0131530114
Show all 135 changed rows (95 more)
Action History
-
Passed By Senate. Votes: 11 YES 4 NO 6 ABSENT
-
Reported Out of Committee (Judiciary) in Senate with 4 On Its Merits
-
Assigned to Judiciary Committee in Senate
-
Passed By House. Votes: 24 YES 12 NO 5 ABSENT
-
Amendment HA 1 to HS 1 - Passed In House by Voice Vote
-
Amendment HA 1 to HS 1 - Introduced and Placed With Bill
-
Reported Out of Committee (Judiciary) in House with 1 Favorable, 5 On Its Merits
-
Adopted in lieu of the original bill HB 145, and Assigned to Judiciary Committee in House
Sponsors
- Kerri Evelyn Harris · Primary
- Mara Gorman · Primary
- Eric Morrison · Primary
- Bryant L. Richardson · Primary
- Marie Pinkney · Primary
- Madinah Wilson-Anton · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →6 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 56 not signed on · 15 voted No
Sponsors (6)
- Kerri Evelyn Harris Democratic
- Mara Gorman Democratic
- Eric Morrison Democratic
- Bryant L. Richardson Republican Voted No
- Marie Pinkney Democratic
- Madinah Wilson-Anton Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (56)
56 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 56 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 11 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Republican | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 11 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 52% | 19% | 0% | 29% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bryan Townsend | Democratic | Yea |
| Daniel Cruce | Democratic | Yea |
| Darius J. Brown | Democratic | Not Voting |
| David P. Sokola | Democratic | Yea |
| John "Jack" Walsh | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Kyra L. Hoffner | Democratic | Yea |
| Laura V. Sturgeon | Democratic | Yea |
| Marie Pinkney | Democratic | Yea |
| Nicole Poore | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Ray Seigfried | Democratic | Yea |
| Russell Huxtable | Democratic | Yea |
| S. Elizabeth Lockman | Democratic | Yea |
| Spiros Mantzavinos | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Stephanie L. Hansen | Democratic | Yea |
| Trey Paradee | Democratic | Yea |
| Brian Pettyjohn | Republican | Not Voting |
| Bryant L. Richardson | Republican | Nay |
| Dave G. Lawson | Republican | Nay |
| David L. Wilson | Republican | Nay |
| Eric Buckson | Republican | Not Voting |
| Gerald W. Hocker | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 24 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 0 | 12 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 24 | 12 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 59% | 29% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (41)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alonna Berry | Democratic | Yea |
| Claire Snyder-Hall | Democratic | Yea |
| Cyndie Romer | Democratic | Yea |
| DeShanna U Neal | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Debra Heffernan | Democratic | Yea |
| Edward S. Osienski | Democratic | Yea |
| Eric Morrison | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Frank Burns | Democratic | Yea |
| Franklin D. Cooke | Democratic | Yea |
| Josue O Ortega | Democratic | Yea |
| Kamela T Smith | Democratic | Yea |
| Kendra Johnson | Democratic | Yea |
| Kerri Evelyn Harris | Democratic | Yea |
| Kimberly Williams | Democratic | Yea |
| Krista Griffith | Democratic | Yea |
| Larry Lambert | Democratic | Yea |
| Madinah Wilson-Anton | Democratic | Yea |
| Mara Gorman | Democratic | Yea |
| Melanie Ross Levin | Democratic | Yea |
| Melissa Minor-Brown | Democratic | Yea |
| Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha | Democratic | Yea |
| Sean M. Lynn | Democratic | Yea |
| Sherae'a Moore | Democratic | Yea |
| Sophie Phillips | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Stephanie T. Bolden | Democratic | Yea |
| William Bush | Democratic | Yea |
| William J. Carson | Democratic | Yea |
| Bryan W. Shupe | Republican | Nay |
| Charles S Postles Jr. | Republican | Nay |
| Daniel B. Short | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jeff Hilovsky | Republican | Nay |
| Jeffrey N. Spiegelman | Republican | Nay |
| Jesse R. Vanderwende | Republican | Nay |
| Kevin S Hensley | Republican | Not Voting |
| Lyndon D. Yearick | Republican | Nay |
| Michael F. Smith | Republican | Nay |
| Richard G. Collins | Republican | Nay |
| Ronald E. Gray | Republican | Nay |
| Shannon Morris | Republican | Nay |
| Timothy D. Dukes | Republican | Nay |
| Valerie Jones Giltner | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 145 do?
- Reverse-keyword court orders enable the government to obtain technology search data without identifying any specific person as to which there is probable cause to believe they have committed or will imminently commit a crime. The profusion of electronic devices and apps in recent years has allowed recordation of numerous details of citizen’s everyday lives, that the government should not be permitted to collect and review at will. Such general searches allow the government to sweep in personal information about hundreds or thousands of people who are not suspected of having committed any crime. These searches are an invasion of privacy, have a potentially chilling effect on civil liberties, and sidestep requirements for individualized suspicion that are otherwise required for a lawful search. This House Substitute for House Bill No. 145 would prohibit law enforcement and courts from requesting, issuing, or enforcing reverse-keyword court orders and reverse-keyword requests, with the exception that reverse-keyword court orders and requests may be utilized to investigate suspected Class A Felonies so long as the search query returns 5 or fewer search hits. It also requires the suppression of evidence derived from an unlawful reverse-keyword search.
- Who sponsors HB 145?
- HB 145 is sponsored by Kerri Evelyn Harris (Democratic), Mara Gorman (Democratic), Eric Morrison (Democratic), Bryant L. Richardson (Republican), Marie Pinkney (Democratic), and Madinah Wilson-Anton (Democratic).
- What is the current status of HB 145?
- This bill has passed the House. Introduced April 14, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track HB 145?
- Track HB 145 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 145
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 145
Last checked for changes about 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →