Delaware 153rd General Assembly (2025-2026) Status: Passed House Bipartisan · 5 D · 1 R cosponsors

HB 145 — AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 11 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO REVERSE LOCATION AND REVERSE KEYWORD SEARCHES AND COURT ORDERS.

Last action — Passed By Senate. Votes: 11 YES 4 NO 6 ABSENT

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has passed the House. Introduced April 14, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.

Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 74% · high confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

Moderate

How often bills like it became law.

  • Passed House

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 6 sponsors

    6 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (5 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

In plain language

The bill limits law enforcement's use of reverse-keyword searches to protect privacy rights.

This bill prohibits most reverse-keyword court orders that allow broad government searches without specific suspects. It only permits such searches in limited cases involving serious crimes, ensuring privacy protections for the general public.

What this means for you
  • Families: This legislation helps protect personal information in your everyday lives from extensive government surveillance.
  • Consumers: If you value your privacy, this bill aims to limit broad government searches of your data.

Summary

Reverse-keyword court orders enable the government to obtain technology search data without identifying any specific person as to which there is probable cause to believe they have committed or will imminently commit a crime. The profusion of electronic devices and apps in recent years has allowed recordation of numerous details of citizen’s everyday lives, that the government should not be permitted to collect and review at will. Such general searches allow the government to sweep in personal information about hundreds or thousands of people who are not suspected of having committed any crime. These searches are an invasion of privacy, have a potentially chilling effect on civil liberties, and sidestep requirements for individualized suspicion that are otherwise required for a lawful search. This House Substitute for House Bill No. 145 would prohibit law enforcement and courts from requesting, issuing, or enforcing reverse-keyword court orders and reverse-keyword requests, with the exception that reverse-keyword court orders and requests may be utilized to investigate suspected Class A Felonies so long as the search query returns 5 or fewer search hits. It also requires the suppression of evidence derived from an unlawful reverse-keyword search.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

112 added · 55 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendments to HB 145 add specific definitions related to reverse-keyword searches and clarify the types of violent felonies that are associated with this search method. The added text specifies that certain serious crimes, such as class A violent felonies and various sexual offenses, are considered "reverse-keyword designated felonies." This change matters because it defines the scope of crimes that the legislation addresses, impacting how law enforcement may pursue information through reverse-keyword searches.

→
Previous
Latest
Wilson-Anton HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 153rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE AMENDMENT NO.
Wilson-Anton & Sen.
1 TO HOUSE SUBSTITUTE NO.
Pinkney Reps.
Burns, Morrison, Gorman, Harris HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 153rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE SUBSTITUTE NO.
145 AMEND House Substitute No.
145 AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 11 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO REVERSE LOCATION AND REVERSE KEYWORD SEARCHES AND COURT ORDERS.
1 for House Bill No.
WHEREAS, since our Nation’s founding, general warrants, which permit government officials to conduct broad searches without identifying a specific crime or specific suspect that is being investigated, have been deemed a significant threat to personal freedom, privacy, and liberty;
145 by inserting after line 21 and before line 22 the following and redesignating accordingly:
and WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court has repeatedly held that the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits the use of general warrants;
“(2) “Data” means a digital representation of information, whether such data is stored in raw, unstructured, semi-structured, or structured formats.
and WHEREAS, reverse-keyword court orders enable the government to precisely identify an unspecified and unlimited number of persons who have sought information about a specific word or phrase, without identifying any specific person as to which there is probable cause to believe they have committed or will imminently commit a crime;
(3) “Database” means a repository of information or data.”.
and WHEREAS, the mass surveillance that is effectuated by reverse-keyword court orders severely undermines the right to privacy and can adversely impact and chill the exercise of the freedom of speech, association, religion, assembly, movement, and the press;
FURTHER AMEND House Substitute No.
and WHEREAS, the government’s ability to obtain the same mass surveillance information that can be obtained using reverse-keyword court orders through voluntary compliance-based reverse-keyword requests can produce the same adverse impacts and chilling effects upon personal freedom, privacy, and liberty as their court-ordered counterparts.
1 for House Bill No.
NOW, THEREFORE:
145 by inserting after line 28 and before line 29 and redesignating accordingly:
BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE:
“(6) Reverse-keyword designated felony” means any of the following crimes or an offense under the law of another jurisdiction that, if the act had taken place in Delaware, would be eligible to be charged as one of the following crimes:
Section 1.
a.
Amend Chapter 23, Title 11 of the Delaware Code by making deletions as shown by strike through and insertions as shown by underline as follows:
A class A violent felony.
§ 2312.
b.
Reverse-keyword searches prohibited.
Strangulation or suffocation;
(a) For purposes of this section:
§ 607 of this title.
(1) “Class A violent felony” means those felonies designated as class A that appear in § 4201(c) of this title.
c.
Assault in the first degree;
§ 613 of this title.
d.
Promoting suicide;
§ 645 of this title.
e.
Unlawful sexual contact in the first degree;
§ 769 of this title.
f.
Rape in the third degree;
§ 771 of this title.
g.
Rape in the second degree;
§ 772 of this title.
h.
Sexual extortion;
§ 774 of this title.
i.
Continuous sexual abuse of a child;
§ 776 of this title.
j.
Sexual abuse of a child by a person in a position of trust, authority or supervision in the first degree;
Show all 135 changed rows (95 more)
Previous
Latest
§ 778 of this title.
k.
Kidnapping in the second degree;
§ 783 of this title.
l.
Kidnapping in the first degree;
§ 784 of this title.
SCD Page 1 of 2 Released:
SCD Page 1 of 4 Released:
05/19/2026 11:37 AM m.
04/14/2026 11:40 AM (2) “Government entity” means any department or agency of the State or any political subdivision thereof, or any individual acting for or on behalf of the State or a political subdivision thereof.
Trafficking of an individual, forced labor and sexual servitude;
(3) “Reverse-keyword court order” means any court order, including a search warrant or subpoena, compelling the disclosure of records or information identifying any unnamed persons, by name or other unique identifier, who electronically searched for a particular word, phrase, or website, or who visited a particular website through a link generated by such a search, regardless of whether or not the order is limited to a specific geographic area or time frame.
§ 787 of this title.
(4) “Reverse-keyword request” means any request, in the absence of a court order, by any government entity for the voluntary provision of records or information identifying any unnamed persons, by name or other unique identifier, who electronically searched for a particular word, phrase, or website, or who visited a particular website through a link generated by such a search, regardless of whether or not the request is limited to a specific geographic area or time frame.
n.
A “reverse-keyword request” includes an offer to purchase such records or information.
Arson in the first degree;
(5) “Search hit” means a search result that identifies an individual device location or keyword entry that, upon querying of a database that is the subject of a reverse-keyword court order, precisely matches the criteria of the court order’s search query.
§ 803 of this title.
(b) Reverse-keyword court orders prohibited.
o.
(1) A government entity may not seek, from any court, a reverse-keyword court order.
Burglary in the first degree;
(2) A government entity may not seek, secure, obtain, borrow, purchase, or review any information or data obtained through a reverse-keyword court order.
§ 826 of this title.
(3) No court of this State may issue a reverse-keyword court order.
p.
(4) No court or government entity of the State or a political subdivision thereof, may support, assist, or enforce a reverse-keyword court order issued by the State of Delaware or a political subdivision thereof, or any other state or a political subdivision thereof, including the domestication of any such court order.
Robbery in the first degree;
(c) Reverse-keyword requests prohibited.
§ 832 of this title.
(1) A government entity may not make a reverse-keyword request.
q.
(2) A government entity may not seek, secure, obtain, borrow, purchase, or review any information or data obtained through a reverse-keyword request.
Extortion;
(d) Notwithstanding the prohibition in subsection (b) of this section, a government entity may seek, and a court may grant, a reverse-keyword court order in the investigation of a class A violent felony, subject to all of the following conditions:
§ 846 of this title.
r.
Sexual exploitation of a child;
§ 1108 of this title.
s.
Dealing in child pornography;
§ 1109 of this title.
t.
Sexual solicitation of a child;
§ 1112A of this title.
u.
Promoting sexual solicitation of a child;
§ 1112B of this title.
v.
Stalking;
§ 1312 of this title.
x.
Bombs, incendiary devices, Molotov cocktails and explosive devices;
§ 1338 of this title.
y.
Adulteration;
§ 1339 of this title.
z.
Aggravated act of intimidation;
§ 3533 of this title.
aa.
Abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment of an adult who is impaired or incapacitated causing bodily harm, permanent disfigurement, permanent disability or death;
§ 3913(c) of Title 31.”.
FURTHER AMEND House Substitute No.
1 for House Bill No.
145 on line 50 by deleting “class A violent felony” and inserting in lieu thereof “reverse-keyword designated felony”.
FURTHER AMEND House Substitute No.
1 for House Bill No.
145 by inserting after line 62 and before line 63 the following:
“(4) A return received in response to a reverse-keyword court order must be kept under seal with the Court and any evidence unrelated to the case must be immediately destroyed, unless otherwise required to be retained and provided to the defendant as potentially exculpatory evidence as required by law.”.
SYNOPSIS This amendment to House Substitute No.
1 to House Bill No.
145 expands the list of crimes where a reverse-key word order may be granted under the conditions outlined in this Act.
It also provides that returns from a reverse-keyword court order must be kept under seal and destroyed if unrelated to the case unless they are potentially exculpatory.
SCD Page 2 of 2 Released:
SCD Page 2 of 4 Released:
05/19/2026 11:37 AM 0281530199
04/14/2026 11:40 AM (1) If a database query undertaken pursuant to a reverse-keyword court order issued under this subsection results in 5 or fewer search hits, the entity to whom the order was directed must respond to the order by fully producing the information sought by the order.
(2) If a database query that was undertaken pursuant to a reverse-keyword court order issued under this subsection results in more than 5 search hits, the entity to whom the order was directed must respond to the order by only providing the number of search hits produced by the query without any further information.
The government entity may not seek, view, or accept any additional information generated by the search.
A government entity may seek a new reverse-keyword court order with narrower search terms that meets the requirements of paragraph (d)(1) of this section.
(3) A reverse-keyword court order issued under this subsection must prominently state the required limited response mandated under paragraph (d)(2) of this section in the event the search query returns more than 5 search hits.
(e) A government entity may not seek the assistance of any agency of the federal government or any agency of the government of another state or subdivision thereof in obtaining information or data from a reverse-keyword court order or reverse-keyword request if the government entity would be barred from directly seeking such information under this section.
(f) Suppression of evidence.
(1) Except as proof of a violation of this section, no record or information obtained, accessed, or otherwise secured in violation of this section, nor any evidence derived therefrom, is admissible in any criminal, civil, administrative, or other proceeding.
(2) For purposes of this subsection, a record, information, or evidence is “derived from” a reverse-keyword court order or reverse-keyword request where the government entity would not have originally possessed the information or evidence but for the violative court order or request, and regardless of any claim that the record, information, or evidence is attenuated from the unlawful order or request, would inevitably have been discovered, or was subsequently reobtained through other means.
§ 2313.
Notice and enforcement.
(a) A person whose name or other identifying information was obtained by a government entity in violation of § 2312 of this title must be notified of the violation, in writing, by the government entity who committed the violation and of the legal recourse available to that person under this section.
(b) A violation of § 2312 of this title constitutes an injury and a person injured by a violation may institute proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction for any of the following:
HD :
KL :
SCD Page 3 of 4 Released:
04/14/2026 11:40 AM (1) Injunctive relief.
(2) Declaratory relief.
(3) A writ of mandamus.
(4) Reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.
(c) Any data or other information acquired in violation of § 2312 of this title must be immediately deleted and destroyed.
(d) Any officer, employee, or agent of the State or a political subdivision thereof who violates § 2312 of this title is subject to appropriate disciplinary action.
SYNOPSIS Reverse-keyword court orders enable the government to obtain technology search data without identifying any specific person as to which there is probable cause to believe they have committed or will imminently commit a crime.
The profusion of electronic devices and apps in recent years has allowed recordation of numerous details of citizen’s everyday lives, that the government should not be permitted to collect and review at will.
Such general searches allow the government to sweep in personal information about hundreds or thousands of people who are not suspected of having committed any crime.
These searches are an invasion of privacy, have a potentially chilling effect on civil liberties, and sidestep requirements for individualized suspicion that are otherwise required for a lawful search.
This House Substitute for House Bill No.
145 would prohibit law enforcement and courts from requesting, issuing, or enforcing reverse-keyword court orders and reverse-keyword requests, with the exception that reverse-keyword court orders and requests may be utilized to investigate suspected Class A Felonies so long as the search query returns 5 or fewer search hits.
It also requires the suppression of evidence derived from an unlawful reverse-keyword search.
HD :
KL :
SCD Page 4 of 4 Released:
04/14/2026 11:40 AM 0131530114
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Passed By Senate. Votes: 11 YES 4 NO 6 ABSENT

  2. Reported Out of Committee (Judiciary) in Senate with 4 On Its Merits

  3. Assigned to Judiciary Committee in Senate

  4. Passed By House. Votes: 24 YES 12 NO 5 ABSENT

  5. Amendment HA 1 to HS 1 - Passed In House by Voice Vote

  6. Amendment HA 1 to HS 1 - Introduced and Placed With Bill

  7. Reported Out of Committee (Judiciary) in House with 1 Favorable, 5 On Its Merits

  8. Adopted in lieu of the original bill HB 145, and Assigned to Judiciary Committee in House

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

6 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 56 not signed on · 15 voted No

Sponsors (6)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (56)

56 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 56 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

SM

Passed 11 Yea · 4 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 11004
Republican 0402
Total 11406
% of votes cast 52%19%0%29%
How each member voted (21)
Member Party Vote
Bryan Townsend Democratic Yea
Daniel Cruce Democratic Yea
Darius J. Brown Democratic Not Voting
David P. Sokola Democratic Yea
John "Jack" Walsh Democratic Not Voting
Kyra L. Hoffner Democratic Yea
Laura V. Sturgeon Democratic Yea
Marie Pinkney Democratic Yea
Nicole Poore Democratic Not Voting
Ray Seigfried Democratic Yea
Russell Huxtable Democratic Yea
S. Elizabeth Lockman Democratic Yea
Spiros Mantzavinos Democratic Not Voting
Stephanie L. Hansen Democratic Yea
Trey Paradee Democratic Yea
Brian Pettyjohn Republican Not Voting
Bryant L. Richardson Republican Nay
Dave G. Lawson Republican Nay
David L. Wilson Republican Nay
Eric Buckson Republican Not Voting
Gerald W. Hocker Republican Nay

Official roll call →

SM

Passed 24 Yea · 12 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 24003
Republican 01202
Total 241205
% of votes cast 59%29%0%12%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Alonna Berry Democratic Yea
Claire Snyder-Hall Democratic Yea
Cyndie Romer Democratic Yea
DeShanna U Neal Democratic Not Voting
Debra Heffernan Democratic Yea
Edward S. Osienski Democratic Yea
Eric Morrison Democratic Not Voting
Frank Burns Democratic Yea
Franklin D. Cooke Democratic Yea
Josue O Ortega Democratic Yea
Kamela T Smith Democratic Yea
Kendra Johnson Democratic Yea
Kerri Evelyn Harris Democratic Yea
Kimberly Williams Democratic Yea
Krista Griffith Democratic Yea
Larry Lambert Democratic Yea
Madinah Wilson-Anton Democratic Yea
Mara Gorman Democratic Yea
Melanie Ross Levin Democratic Yea
Melissa Minor-Brown Democratic Yea
Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha Democratic Yea
Sean M. Lynn Democratic Yea
Sherae'a Moore Democratic Yea
Sophie Phillips Democratic Not Voting
Stephanie T. Bolden Democratic Yea
William Bush Democratic Yea
William J. Carson Democratic Yea
Bryan W. Shupe Republican Nay
Charles S Postles Jr. Republican Nay
Daniel B. Short Republican Not Voting
Jeff Hilovsky Republican Nay
Jeffrey N. Spiegelman Republican Nay
Jesse R. Vanderwende Republican Nay
Kevin S Hensley Republican Not Voting
Lyndon D. Yearick Republican Nay
Michael F. Smith Republican Nay
Richard G. Collins Republican Nay
Ronald E. Gray Republican Nay
Shannon Morris Republican Nay
Timothy D. Dukes Republican Nay
Valerie Jones Giltner Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 145 do?
Reverse-keyword court orders enable the government to obtain technology search data without identifying any specific person as to which there is probable cause to believe they have committed or will imminently commit a crime. The profusion of electronic devices and apps in recent years has allowed recordation of numerous details of citizen’s everyday lives, that the government should not be permitted to collect and review at will. Such general searches allow the government to sweep in personal information about hundreds or thousands of people who are not suspected of having committed any crime. These searches are an invasion of privacy, have a potentially chilling effect on civil liberties, and sidestep requirements for individualized suspicion that are otherwise required for a lawful search. This House Substitute for House Bill No. 145 would prohibit law enforcement and courts from requesting, issuing, or enforcing reverse-keyword court orders and reverse-keyword requests, with the exception that reverse-keyword court orders and requests may be utilized to investigate suspected Class A Felonies so long as the search query returns 5 or fewer search hits. It also requires the suppression of evidence derived from an unlawful reverse-keyword search.
Who sponsors HB 145?
HB 145 is sponsored by Kerri Evelyn Harris (Democratic), Mara Gorman (Democratic), Eric Morrison (Democratic), Bryant L. Richardson (Republican), Marie Pinkney (Democratic), and Madinah Wilson-Anton (Democratic).
What is the current status of HB 145?
This bill has passed the House. Introduced April 14, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
Where can I track HB 145?
Track HB 145 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 145

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 145

Last checked for changes about 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →