Delaware 153rd General Assembly (2025-2026) Status: Passed Senate Bipartisan · 9 D · 1 R cosponsors

SB 271 — AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 18 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO PHARMACY BENEFITS MANAGERS.

Last action — Passed By House. Votes: 40 YES 1 ABSENT

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced March 26, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.

Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 74% · high confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Passed Senate

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 11 sponsors

    11 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (9 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

In plain language

This bill enhances protections for pharmacies, pharmacists, and consumers regarding pharmacy benefits management.

The bill sets new rules for pharmacy benefits managers, ensuring fair audit procedures, appeals for reimbursements, and protecting pharmacists and pharmacies from retaliation. It aims to improve transparency and accountability in pharmacy benefit processes.

What this means for you
  • Consumers: Consumers may benefit from improved transparency and potentially fairer drug pricing practices.
  • Pharmacies: This means pharmacies will have clearer protocols for audits and reimbursement appeals.
  • Pharmacists: Pharmacists are protected from retaliation when reporting potential violations and have more time to appeal reimbursement decisions.

Summary

This Act strengthens procedural protections for pharmacies, pharmacists, and consumers related to regulation of a pharmacy benefits manager by doing all of the following: Adds definitions for the terms “chronic or long-term condition”, “net amount”, “purchaser”, “recoupment”, “similarly situated contracted pharmacy”, and “wholesale invoice audit.” Applies audit notice requirements uniformly and ensures access to an appropriate point of contact. Requires a pharmacy benefits manager to provide a list of records that the auditing entity seeks to audit at least 5 business days before an audit. Limits activities to once every 12 months and sets standards for wholesale invoice audits. Ensures audit costs are borne solely by the pharmacy benefits manager. Clarifies that a pharmacy can appeal the amount of any reimbursement and that a contracted pharmacy’s representative can take actions and receive notices related to appeals on behalf of a pharmacy. Extends pharmacies’ ability to appeal from 10 days to 40 days to account for entities that complete retroactive billing. When an appeal is denied, requires the parties to provide a detailed reason for the denial and specific information about how the pharmacy can appeal the denial to the Department of Insurance. Prohibits retaliation by a pharmacy benefits manager when a pharmacist or pharmacy discloses information to a government agency or during a proceeding if the person who disclosed the information had reasonable cause to believe that the disclosed information is evidence of a violation of a state or federal law. Requires that a pharmacy benefits manager must provide at least 60 days’ notice before amending a contract with a pharmacy or pharmacist. Clarifies that the prohibition against spread pricing applies to all purchasers contracting with pharmacy benefits managers. Changes the reporting requirements for rebates so that pharmacy benefits managers must file the required reports annually instead of quarterly. This change will reduce the amount of incorrect or unclear reporting because rebates are aggregated and reported at the end of the period of time under each contract. Amends national drug acquisition cost compliance to refer to the date of service. Prohibits pharmacy benefit managers from unit-of-use requirements inconsistent with smallest package size availability and manufacturer recommendations. Requires that pharmacy benefit managers may not require pharmacies to dispense therapeutically equivalent or alternative drugs that cost the enrollee more out of pocket than the prescribed drug except for medical reasons. Ensures that enrollee-identifiable or prescriber-identifiable information is not transferred to or shared with affiliated pharmacies for any commercial purpose other than those defined. This Act also makes technical corrections to conform existing law to the standards of the Delaware Legislative Drafting Manual.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

292 added · 21 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendment to SB 271 clarifies the audit procedures for pharmacy benefits managers and specifies that the provisions do not apply to investigative audits when fraud or misconduct is identified. It also removes a section concerning spread pricing and refines the effective date so that the legislation will apply to contracts related to pharmacies entered into, renewed, amended, or extended six months after enactment. These changes aim to improve the clarity and application of the regulations surrounding pharmacy audits.

→
Previous
Latest
Sokola DELAWARE STATE SENATE 153rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY SENATE AMENDMENT NO.
Sokola & Rep.
1 TO SENATE BILL NO.
Burns Sens.
271 AMEND Senate Bill No.
Sturgeon, Hoffner, Walsh, Hocker, Seigfried;
271 after line 44 and before line 45 by inserting the following:
Reps.
“§ 3310A.
Morrison, Romer, Snyder-Hall, Wilson-Anton, Lambert, Griffith DELAWARE STATE SENATE 153rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY SENATE BILL NO.
Applicability of other laws and regulations.
271 AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 18 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO PHARMACY BENEFITS MANAGERS.
The provisions of this subchapter do not apply to an investigative audit of pharmacy records when any of the following apply:
BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE:
(1) Fraud, waste, abuse, or other intentional misconduct is indicated by physical review or review of claims data or statements.” FURTHER AMEND Senate Bill No.
Section 1.
271 on line 185 by deleting "to the" as it appears therein.
Amend Subchapter I, Chapter 33A, Title 18 of the Delaware Code by making deletions as shown by strike through and insertions as shown by underline as follows and by redesignating accordingly:
FURTHER AMEND Senate Bill No.
§ 3302A.
271 by deleting lines 211 through 217 in their entirety.
Definitions.
FURTHER AMEND Senate Bill No.
For purposes of this subchapter:
271 by deleting lines 235 and 236 in their entirety and inserting in lieu thereof the following:
(4) “Recoupment” means a reduction, offset, adjustment, or other act that lowers or lessens the payment of a claim or any other amount owed to a pharmacy or pharmacist for any reason unrelated to that claim or other amount owed to that pharmacy or pharmacist.
“Section 7.
(5) “Similarly situated contracted pharmacy” includes any contracted pharmacy that has the capability of complying with standard terms and conditions for a pharmacy type, even if the pharmacy does not operate exclusively as that type of pharmacy.
This Act becomes effective upon enactment and applies to contracts between pharmacy benefits managers and pharmacies or pharmacists that are entered into, renewed, amended, or extended 6 months after enactment.” SYNOPSIS This amendment clarifies provisions related to audits.
(6) “Wholesale invoice audit” means review of supplier invoices to verify accuracy, compliance with contracted rates, and receipt of goods.
In addition, it clarifies a reference to a pharmacy benefits manager's obligation to report to the Commissioner.
§ 3304A.
It also removes the provision in Senate Bill No.
Procedure and process for conducting and reporting an audit.
271 that addresses spread pricing.
(a) Audit procedures.
Finally, it revises the effective date and provides that the legislation applies to contracts entered into, renewed, amended, or extended 6 months following enactment.
— Unless otherwise prohibited by federal requirements or regulations, any entity conducting a pharmacy audit must adhere to the following procedures:
(1) A pharmacy must be given notice 14 days before an initial on-site audit is conducted.
(2) An audit that involves clinical or professional judgment must be conducted by or in consultation with a licensed pharmacist.
(3) Each pharmacy shall be audited under the same standards and parameters as other similarly situated pharmacies.
(4) A pharmacy must be given a range of prescription numbers in advance of no less than 5 business days before the audit.
SD :
MD :
ALW Page 1 of 9 Released:
03/26/2026 04:59 PM (5) A pharmacy benefits manager shall provide a pharmacy or pharmacist being audited with a phone number, secured facsimile number, or, if available, access to a secure portal that the pharmacy or pharmacist may use to ask questions regarding the audit.
(6) An entity may not initiate an audit of a pharmacy more often than once every 12 months.
(b) Audit process.
— Unless otherwise prohibited by federal requirements or regulations, for any entity conducting a pharmacy audit all of the following audit items apply:
(2) If an entity uses random sampling as a method for selecting a set of claims for examination, the sample size must be appropriate for a statistically reliable sample.
The auditing entity shall provide the pharmacy a masked list that provides a prescription number or date range that the auditing entity is seeking to audit.
audit no less than 5 business days before an audit.
(3) An on-site audit may not take place during the first 5 business days of the month or on a federal holiday unless consented to by the pharmacy.
(8) If an entity conducts a wholesale invoice audit, the audit must be limited to verification of purchased inventory specific to the pharmacy claims paid by the plan sponsor or pharmacy benefits manager conducting the audit.
Redacted copies of supplier invoices in the pharmacy’s or pharmacist’s possession are acceptable to support the validity of a pharmacy claim.
(9) The cost of any audit subject to this subchapter shall be borne by the pharmacy benefits manager conducting the audit.
The pharmacy benefits manager may not impose a fee or charge, other than a recoupment or chargeback, or pass costs along related to an audit to the audited pharmacy or pharmacist.
§ 3309A.
Disclosures to plan sponsor.
Show all 253 changed rows (213 more)
Previous
Latest
Where contractually required, an auditing entity must provide a copy to the plan sponsor of its all claims that were included in the audit, and any recouped money shall be returned to the plan sponsor.
Section 2.
Amend Subchapter II, Chapter 33A, Title 18 of the Delaware Code by making deletions as shown by strike through and insertions as shown by underline as follows and by redesignating accordingly:
§ 3321A.
Definitions.
As used in For purposes of this subchapter:
(7) “Net amount” means the dollar amount that is the result of the invoice price that the pharmacy paid to the supplier for the prescription drug modified as follows, as are attributable to the drug:
a.
Increased by the dollar amount of all taxes, fees, and other costs.
b.
Decreased by the dollar amount of all discounts and other cost reductions.
SD :
MD :
ALW Page 2 of 9 Released:
03/26/2026 04:59 PM (14) “Similarly situated contracted pharmacy” means as defined in § 3302A of this title.
§ 3324A.
Appeals.
(a) (1)a.
A pharmacy benefits manager must establish a process by which a contracted pharmacy can appeal the amount of the provider’s reimbursement for a drug subject to maximum allowable cost pricing.
that was reimbursed by the pharmacy benefits manager.
b.
A contracted pharmacy’s representative may take actions and receive notices under this section on behalf of the contracted pharmacy.
(2) A contracted pharmacy has 10 40 calendar days after the applicable fill date to appeal a maximum allowable cost reimbursement if the reimbursement for the drug is less than the any of the following:
a.
The net amount that the network provider paid to the supplier of the drug.
b.
The reimbursement amount required under § 3372A(7) of this title.
(3) A pharmacy benefits manager must respond with notice that the appeal has been denied or granted within 10 calendar days of the contracted pharmacy making the claim for which an appeal has been submitted.
(c) (1) If an appeal is denied, the pharmacy benefits manager must provide the a detailed reason for the denial and denial.
If the appeal is related to a maximum allowable cost reimbursement, the pharmacy benefits manager must also provide the name and national drug code number of the national or regional wholesalers operating in this State that have the drug in stock at a price below the maximum allowable cost.
cost at the time the pharmacy or pharmacist purchased the drug.
(2) At the time the pharmacy benefits manager provides the written notice of a final appeal determination under paragraph (c)(1) of this section, the pharmacy benefits manager shall provide notice to the pharmacy of the right to appeal an adverse determination to the Department.
(3) The notice under paragraph (c)(2) of this section may be separate from or a part of the written notice of the final determination under paragraph (c)(1) of this section and must, at a minimum, contain all of the following:
a.
A statement that says “You have the right to appeal the final appeal determination through the Delaware Department of Insurance.
All appeals must be filed with the Department within 10 calendar days from the date you receive the pharmacy benefits manager’s final determination.” b.
The Department website the pharmacy can use to file an appeal.
(d) If the appeal is granted granted, the pharmacy benefits manger manager shall do the following:
(1) a.
Adjust the maximum allowable cost reimbursement for the drug as of the date of the original claim for payment.
SD :
MD :
ALW Page 3 of 9 Released:
03/26/2026 04:59 PM 83 b.
Without requiring the appealing pharmacy to reverse and rebill the claims, provide reimbursement for the claim and any subsequent and similar claims under similarly applicable contracts with the pharmacy benefits manager as follows:
1.
For the original claim, in the first remittance to the pharmacy after the date the appeal was granted.
2.
For subsequent and similar claims under similarly applicable contracts, in the second remittance to the pharmacy after the date the appeal was granted.
(2) For a similarly situated contracted pharmacy in this State, do all of the following:
a.
Adjust the maximum allowable cost reimbursement for the drug as of the date the appeal was granted.
b.
Provide notice to the pharmacy or the pharmacy’s contracted agent of all of the following:
1.
That an appeal was granted.
2.
That without filing a separate appeal, the pharmacy or the pharmacy’s contracted agent may reverse and rebill a similar claim.
(e) A pharmacy benefits manager shall make available provide information on its website information about the appeal process, including all of the following:
(1) A telephone number at which the contracted pharmacy may contact the department or office responsible for processing appeals for the pharmacy benefits manager to speak to an individual specifically or leave a message for an individual or office who is responsible for processing appeals.
(2) An email address of the department or office responsible for processing appeals to which an individual who is responsible for processing appeals has access.
(3) The information required under paragraph (c)(3) of this section.
(h) (1) If a pharmacy benefits manager denies an appeal and a contracted pharmacy files an appeal with the Commissioner, the Commissioner shall do all of the following:
a.
Review the pharmacy benefits manager’s compensation program to ensure that the reimbursement for pharmacy benefits management services paid to the pharmacist or a pharmacy complies with this subchapter and the terms of the contract.
the reimbursement requirements under § 3372A(7) of this title.
b.
Based on a determination made by the Commissioner under paragraph (h)(1)a.
of this section, do 1 of the following:
SD :
MD :
ALW Page 4 of 9 Released:
03/26/2026 04:59 PM 1.
Deny the appeal.
2.
Grant the appeal and order the pharmacy benefits manager to pay the claim in accordance with the Commissioner’s findings.
(2) All pricing information and data collected by the Commissioner during a review required by paragraph (h)(1) of this section is confidential and not subject to subpoena or the Freedom of Information Act, Chapter 100 of Title 29.
(3) The non-prevailing party shall pay the costs incurred by the Department in processing an appeal under this subsection.
(4) On request, parties shall provide the Commissioner all mathematical calculations, accounts, records, documents, files, logs, correspondence, or other information necessary to complete the Commissioner’s review of an appeal under this subsection.
Section 3.
Amend Subchapter III, Chapter 33A, Title 18 of the Delaware Code by making deletions as shown by strike through and insertions as shown by underline as follows:
§ 3331A.
Definitions.
For purposes of this subchapter:
(3) “Pharmacy benefit benefits manager” means as defined under in § 3302A of this title.
§ 3333A.
Prohibited retaliation due to permitted disclosures.
(a) A pharmacy benefits manager may not retaliate against a pharmacist or pharmacy for disclosing information in any proceeding if the pharmacist or pharmacy has reasonable cause to believe that the disclosed information is evidence of a violation of a state or federal law, rule, or regulation.
Proceedings under this subsection include information disclosed as follows:
(1) To a court.
(2) During an administrative investigation or hearing.
(3) To a legislative commission or committee.
(b) A pharmacy benefits manager may not retaliate against a pharmacist or pharmacy for disclosing information to a government, regulatory, or law enforcement agency, if the pharmacist or pharmacy has reasonable cause to believe that the disclosed information is evidence of a violation of a state or federal law, rule, or regulation.
(c) A pharmacist or pharmacy shall, to the extent possible, limit the disclosure of confidential and proprietary information when making a disclosure under subsection (a) or (b) of this section.
SD :
MD :
ALW Page 5 of 9 Released:
03/26/2026 04:59 PM (d) Retaliatory actions against a pharmacist or pharmacy include the cancellation or restriction of, the refusal to renew, or the refusal to offer a contract solely because the pharmacy or pharmacist has done 1 or more of the following:
(1) Disclosed information under subsection (a) or (b) of this section.
(2) Filed complaints with a pharmacy benefits manager.
(3) Filed complaints against an insurer or pharmacy benefits manager with the Department.
(4) Filed an appeal with the Commissioner under § 3324A(h) of this title.
(e) If a contract entered into, amended, extended, or renewed after December 31, 2026, includes a provision that prohibits a disclosure permitted under this section, that provision is against public policy and is void and unenforceable.
Section 4.
Amend Subchapter IV, Chapter 33A, Title 18 of the Delaware Code by making deletions as shown by strike through and insertions as shown by underline as follows and by redesignating accordingly:
§ 3335A.
Definitions.
As used in For purposes of this subchapter:
(1) “Chronic or long-term condition” means any of the following:
a.
A “complex or chronic medical condition” as defined in § 3364(a) of this title.
b.
A “rare medical condition” as defined in § 3364(a) of this title.
(1) “Emergency” (2) “Emergency medical condition” means a situation that will result in loss of life, limb or organ function.
as defined in § 3349(e) of this title.
(2) (3) “Pharmacy benefit benefits manager” has the meaning given means as defined in § 3302A of this title.
§ 3336A.
Prior authorization of emergency prescriptions.
A pharmacy benefit benefits manager may not require prior authorization for coverage of a 72-hour supply of medication that is for a noncontrolled substance in prescribed for an emergency situation.
medical condition.
§ 3337A.
Prior authorization of prescriptions for chronic or long-term conditions.
(a) A prior authorization form for a prescription medication shall must include a question regarding whether the prescription medication is for a chronic or long-term condition for which the prescription medication may be necessary for the life of the patient.
(b) If a prescriber indicates on a prior authorization form that the prescription medication is for a chronic or long- term condition for which the prescription medication may be necessary for the life of the patient, the pharmacy benefit benefits manager may not request a reauthorization for the same prescription medication more frequently than every 12 months.
SD :
MD :
ALW Page 6 of 9 Released:
03/26/2026 04:59 PM (c) In the same communication in which a pharmacy benefit benefits manager or the pharmacy benefit benefits manager’s agent requests a prior authorization for a prescription medication that has therapeutically equivalent medications that do not require a prior authorization from a prescriber, the pharmacy benefit benefits manager or the pharmacy benefit benefits manager’s agent shall provide the prescriber with a list of alternative prescription medications of the same class and family as the requested medication.
(d) Prescribers that utilize e-prescribing shall receive alternate medications from the pharmacy benefit benefits manager for prescription medications that do not require a prior authorization before the completion of the e-prescribing transaction.
(e) A pharmacy benefit benefits manager or the pharmacy benefit manager’s agent shall provide alternative medications for therapeutically equivalent medications to the pharmacy that require prior authorization on the National Council for Prescription Drug Programs response transaction to a denied claim for prior authorization.
Section 5.
Amend Subchapter VI, Chapter 33A, Title 18 of the Delaware Code by making deletions as shown by strike through and insertions as shown by underline as follows and by redesignating accordingly:
§ 3363A.
Reports.
(b) A pharmacy benefits manager shall report to the Commissioner on a quarterly basis all of the following information to the Commissioner for each insurer:
(1) The On an annual basis, no later than March 31, all of the following:
a.
The itemized amount of pharmacy benefits manager revenue sources, including professional fees, administrative fees, processing fees, audits, direct and indirect renumeration fees, or any other fees.
(2) The aggregate amount of rebates distributed to the appropriate insurer.
[Transferred.] (3) The aggregate amount of rebates passed on to insureds of each insurer at the point of sale that reduced the insureds’ applicable deductible, copayment, coinsurance, or other cost-sharing amount.
[Transferred.] (4) b.The individual and aggregate amount the insurer paid to the pharmacy benefits manager for pharmacy goods or services provided in this State, itemized by all of the following:
a.
1.
Pharmacy.
b.
2.
Product.
c.
3, Goods and services.
(5) c.
The individual and aggregate amount a pharmacy benefits manager paid for pharmacy goods or services provided in this State, itemized by all of the following:
a.
1.
Pharmacy.
SD :
MD :
ALW Page 7 of 9 Released:
03/26/2026 04:59 PM b.
2.
Product.
c.
3.
Goods and services.
(2) On an annual basis, all of the following:
a.
The aggregate amount of the rebates distributed to the appropriate insurer.
b.
The aggregate amount of the rebates passed on to insureds of each insurer at the point of sale that reduced the insureds’ applicable deductible, copayment, coinsurance, or other cost-sharing amount.
(c) The information provided under subsection (b) of this section is confidential and not subject to subpoena or the Freedom of Information Act, Chapter 100 of Title 29.
Section 6.
Amend Subchapter VII, Chapter 33A, Title 18 of the Delaware Code by making deletions as shown by strike through and insertions as shown by underline as follows and by redesignating accordingly:
§ 3371A.
Definitions.
For purposes of this subchapter:
(9) “Purchaser” means as defined in § 3351A of this title.
(9) (10) “Spread pricing” means the model of prescription drug pricing in which the pharmacy benefits manager charges a health benefit plan purchaser a contracted price for prescription drugs, and the contracted price for the prescription drugs differs from the amount the pharmacy benefits manager directly or indirectly pays the pharmacist or pharmacy for pharmacy goods or services.
§ 3372A.
Prohibited practices.
A pharmacy benefits manager or representative of a pharmacy benefits manager may not do any of the following:
(7) Pay or reimburse a pharmacy or pharmacist for the ingredient drug product component of pharmacist services less than the national average drug acquisition cost that was in effect on the date of service.
or if If the national average drug acquisition cost is unavailable, the wholesale acquisition cost.
cost should be applied.
The wholesale acquisition cost price must be the price published in effect on the date of service for the drug claim.
(10) Amend a contract between a pharmacy benefits manager and a pharmacy or pharmacist without providing at least 60 days’ notice to the affected pharmacy or pharmacist.
(11) Require pharmacists to break open unit-of-use items beyond manufacturer recommendations if the only commercially available package size exceeds the minimum days’ supply.
Packaging labeled “for single- patient-use only” shall be deemed to be the smallest package size available.
SD :
MD :
ALW Page 8 of 9 Released:
03/26/2026 04:59 PM (12) Require a pharmacy to dispense a therapeutically equivalent or therapeutically alternative drug that costs the enrollee more out-of-pocket than the prescribed drug, unless the substitution is made for medical reasons that benefit the enrollee.
(13) Transfer or share prescription information containing enrollee-identifiable or prescriber-identifiable data to an affiliated pharmacy for any commercial purpose other than the purposes of facilitating pharmacy reimbursement, formulary compliance, or utilization review.
Section 7.
This Act applies to contracts between pharmacy benefits managers and pharmacies or pharmacists that are entered into, renewed, amended, or extended after December 31, 2026.
SYNOPSIS This Act strengthens procedural protections for pharmacies, pharmacists, and consumers related to regulation of a pharmacy benefits manager by doing all of the following:
Adds definitions for the terms “chronic or long-term condition”, “net amount”, “purchaser”, “recoupment”, “similarly situated contracted pharmacy”, and “wholesale invoice audit.” Applies audit notice requirements uniformly and ensures access to an appropriate point of contact.
Requires a pharmacy benefits manager to provide a list of records that the auditing entity seeks to audit at least 5 business days before an audit.
Limits activities to once every 12 months and sets standards for wholesale invoice audits.
Ensures audit costs are borne solely by the pharmacy benefits manager.
Clarifies that a pharmacy can appeal the amount of any reimbursement and that a contracted pharmacy’s representative can take actions and receive notices related to appeals on behalf of a pharmacy.
Extends pharmacies’ ability to appeal from 10 days to 40 days to account for entities that complete retroactive billing.
When an appeal is denied, requires the parties to provide a detailed reason for the denial and specific information about how the pharmacy can appeal the denial to the Department of Insurance.
Prohibits retaliation by a pharmacy benefits manager when a pharmacist or pharmacy discloses information to a government agency or during a proceeding if the person who disclosed the information had reasonable cause to believe that the disclosed information is evidence of a violation of a state or federal law.
Requires that a pharmacy benefits manager must provide at least 60 days’ notice before amending a contract with a pharmacy or pharmacist.
Clarifies that the prohibition against spread pricing applies to all purchasers contracting with pharmacy benefits managers.
Changes the reporting requirements for rebates so that pharmacy benefits managers must file the required reports annually instead of quarterly.
This change will reduce the amount of incorrect or unclear reporting because rebates are aggregated and reported at the end of the period of time under each contract.
Amends national drug acquisition cost compliance to refer to the date of service.
Prohibits pharmacy benefit managers from unit-of-use requirements inconsistent with smallest package size availability and manufacturer recommendations.
Requires that pharmacy benefit managers may not require pharmacies to dispense therapeutically equivalent or alternative drugs that cost the enrollee more out of pocket than the prescribed drug except for medical reasons.
Ensures that enrollee-identifiable or prescriber-identifiable information is not transferred to or shared with affiliated pharmacies for any commercial purpose other than those defined.
This Act also makes technical corrections to conform existing law to the standards of the Delaware Legislative Drafting Manual.
MMS Page 1 of 1 Released:
ALW Page 9 of 9 Released:
06/09/2026 02:00 PM 0961530069
03/26/2026 04:59 PM 2711530202
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Passed By House. Votes: 40 YES 1 ABSENT

  2. Reported Out of Committee (Economic Development/Banking/Insurance & Commerce) in House with 1 Favorable, 9 On Its Merits

  3. Assigned to Economic Development/Banking/Insurance & Commerce Committee in House

  4. Passed By Senate. Votes: 20 YES 1 ABSENT

  5. Amendment SA 1 to SB 271 - Passed By Senate. Votes: 20 YES 1 ABSENT

  6. Amendment SA 1 to SB 271 - Introduced and Placed With Bill

  7. Reported Out of Committee (Executive) in Senate with 6 On Its Merits

  8. Introduced and Assigned to Executive Committee in Senate

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

11 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 51 not signed on

Sponsors (11)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (51)

51 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 51 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

SM

Passed 40 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 26001
Republican 14000
Total 40001
% of votes cast 98%0%0%2%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Alonna Berry Democratic Yea
Claire Snyder-Hall Democratic Yea
Cyndie Romer Democratic Yea
DeShanna U Neal Democratic Yea
Debra Heffernan Democratic Yea
Edward S. Osienski Democratic Yea
Eric Morrison Democratic Yea
Frank Burns Democratic Yea
Franklin D. Cooke Democratic Yea
Josue O Ortega Democratic Yea
Kamela T Smith Democratic Yea
Kendra Johnson Democratic Yea
Kerri Evelyn Harris Democratic Yea
Kimberly Williams Democratic Yea
Krista Griffith Democratic Yea
Larry Lambert Democratic Yea
Madinah Wilson-Anton Democratic Yea
Mara Gorman Democratic Yea
Melanie Ross Levin Democratic Yea
Melissa Minor-Brown Democratic Yea
Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha Democratic Yea
Sean M. Lynn Democratic Yea
Sherae'a Moore Democratic Yea
Sophie Phillips Democratic Not Voting
Stephanie T. Bolden Democratic Yea
William Bush Democratic Yea
William J. Carson Democratic Yea
Bryan W. Shupe Republican Yea
Charles S Postles Jr. Republican Yea
Daniel B. Short Republican Yea
Jeff Hilovsky Republican Yea
Jeffrey N. Spiegelman Republican Yea
Jesse R. Vanderwende Republican Yea
Kevin S Hensley Republican Yea
Lyndon D. Yearick Republican Yea
Michael F. Smith Republican Yea
Richard G. Collins Republican Yea
Ronald E. Gray Republican Yea
Shannon Morris Republican Yea
Timothy D. Dukes Republican Yea
Valerie Jones Giltner Republican Yea

Official roll call →

SM

Passed 20 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 14001
Republican 6000
Total 20001
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (21)
Member Party Vote
Bryan Townsend Democratic Yea
Daniel Cruce Democratic Yea
Darius J. Brown Democratic Not Voting
David P. Sokola Democratic Yea
John "Jack" Walsh Democratic Yea
Kyra L. Hoffner Democratic Yea
Laura V. Sturgeon Democratic Yea
Marie Pinkney Democratic Yea
Nicole Poore Democratic Yea
Ray Seigfried Democratic Yea
Russell Huxtable Democratic Yea
S. Elizabeth Lockman Democratic Yea
Spiros Mantzavinos Democratic Yea
Stephanie L. Hansen Democratic Yea
Trey Paradee Democratic Yea
Brian Pettyjohn Republican Yea
Bryant L. Richardson Republican Yea
Dave G. Lawson Republican Yea
David L. Wilson Republican Yea
Eric Buckson Republican Yea
Gerald W. Hocker Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 271 do?
This Act strengthens procedural protections for pharmacies, pharmacists, and consumers related to regulation of a pharmacy benefits manager by doing all of the following: Adds definitions for the terms “chronic or long-term condition”, “net amount”, “purchaser”, “recoupment”, “similarly situated contracted pharmacy”, and “wholesale invoice audit.” Applies audit notice requirements uniformly and ensures access to an appropriate point of contact. Requires a pharmacy benefits manager to provide a list of records that the auditing entity seeks to audit at least 5 business days before an audit. Limits activities to once every 12 months and sets standards for wholesale invoice audits. Ensures audit costs are borne solely by the pharmacy benefits manager. Clarifies that a pharmacy can appeal the amount of any reimbursement and that a contracted pharmacy’s representative can take actions and receive notices related to appeals on behalf of a pharmacy. Extends pharmacies’ ability to appeal from 10 days to 40 days to account for entities that complete retroactive billing. When an appeal is denied, requires the parties to provide a detailed reason for the denial and specific information about how the pharmacy can appeal the denial to the Department of Insurance. Prohibits retaliation by a pharmacy benefits manager when a pharmacist or pharmacy discloses information to a government agency or during a proceeding if the person who disclosed the information had reasonable cause to believe that the disclosed information is evidence of a violation of a state or federal law. Requires that a pharmacy benefits manager must provide at least 60 days’ notice before amending a contract with a pharmacy or pharmacist. Clarifies that the prohibition against spread pricing applies to all purchasers contracting with pharmacy benefits managers. Changes the reporting requirements for rebates so that pharmacy benefits managers must file the required reports annually instead of quarterly. This change will reduce the amount of incorrect or unclear reporting because rebates are aggregated and reported at the end of the period of time under each contract. Amends national drug acquisition cost compliance to refer to the date of service. Prohibits pharmacy benefit managers from unit-of-use requirements inconsistent with smallest package size availability and manufacturer recommendations. Requires that pharmacy benefit managers may not require pharmacies to dispense therapeutically equivalent or alternative drugs that cost the enrollee more out of pocket than the prescribed drug except for medical reasons. Ensures that enrollee-identifiable or prescriber-identifiable information is not transferred to or shared with affiliated pharmacies for any commercial purpose other than those defined. This Act also makes technical corrections to conform existing law to the standards of the Delaware Legislative Drafting Manual.
Who sponsors SB 271?
SB 271 is sponsored by Stell Parker Selby, Spiros Mantzavinos (Democratic), Madinah Wilson-Anton (Democratic), Cyndie Romer (Democratic), Eric Morrison (Democratic), Ray Seigfried (Democratic), John "Jack" Walsh (Democratic), Claire Snyder-Hall (Democratic), Laura V. Sturgeon (Democratic), Bryant L. Richardson (Republican), and David P. Sokola (Democratic).
What is the current status of SB 271?
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced March 26, 2026. It now moves to the second chamber.
Where can I track SB 271?
Track SB 271 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 271

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 271

Last checked for changes about 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →