AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 6 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO MULTILEVEL DISTRIBUTION COMPANIES.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 162 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 162.
You're tracking HB 162
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 162 — AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 6 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO MULTILEVEL DISTRIBUTION COMPANIES.
Last action — Assigned to Banking, Business, Insurance & Technology Committee in Senate
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the House. Introduced June 10, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
ModerateHow often bills like it became law.
-
Passed House
Current position in the legislative process.
-
15 sponsors
15 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (14 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
This Act defines a multilevel distribution company and multilevel marketing program for purposes of this Subchapter. It sets forth mandatory disclosures that must be made by a multilevel distribution company to any potential purchaser that discloses details about the company, sometimes based on certain representations that the company makes. It sets forth that a multilevel distribution company may not require a participant in its marketing program to buy a good or service or pay any other consideration to participate in the marketing program unless it agrees to repurchase the goods, under certain conditions. It provides cancellation rights and guidelines. It permits a civil penalty to be imposed for violations of the required disclosures. It provides a private right of action for violation of the repurchase requirement, including treble damages, attorneys’ fees and costs to be awarded for a prevailing plaintiff. House Substitute No. 1 for House Bill 162 is different from the original in that it reduces some disclosure requirements, specifically the timing, the number of participants who have received the earnings in the amount or range specified within the last 3 years and the total number of participants who have entered into the contract with the seller within the last 3 years; introduces the standard of “clear and conspicuous” for disclosures while removing some specific requirements such as font size to allow for flexibility with a standard; and places the Act in a separate subchapter of Title 6.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
91 added · 38 removedPlain-language change summary
The amended version of the bill changes the definition of a "document" and "contract" referenced in specific subsections to allow for both tangible written instruments and electronic formats. It clarifies that if communication is primarily in person, a written document is required, while electronic communications allow for electronic documents. This adjustment matters because it provides flexibility in how agreements can be made and acknowledged in multilevel distribution arrangements, accommodating modern communication practices.
Ross Levin HOUSE& OFSen. REPRESENTATIVES 153rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE AMENDMENT NO.
2Hansen TOReps. HOUSE SUBSTITUTE NO.
Bush, Carson, Gorman, Heffernan, K.
Johnson, Lambert, Morrison, Snyder-Hall, Wilson-Anton, Chukwuocha, S.
Moore, Hilovsky, Bolden;
Sens.
Sokola, Lockman, Sturgeon, Seigfried HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 153rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE SUBSTITUTE NO.
162 AN ACT TO AMEND HouseTITLE Substitute6 No.OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO MULTILEVEL DISTRIBUTION COMPANIES.
1BE forIT HouseENACTED BillBY No.THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE:
162Section on1. line 24 by deleting “written” as it appears therein.
FURTHERAmend AMENDChapter House25, SubstituteTitle No.6 of the Delaware Code by making deletions as shown by strike through and insertions as shown by underline as follows:
1Subchapter forXI. House Bill No.
162Cumulative byRemedies deleting line 49 in its entirety and insertingEnhanced inPenalties lieuMultilevel thereofDistribution theCompanies following:§ 2598.
“(b)Violation A violation of subsectionorder (a)or ofinjunction; this section shall be deemed an unlawful practice under § 2513 of Title 6 and a violation of subchapter II of Chapter 25 of Title 6.”.
FURTHERpenalty. AMEND House Substitute No.
1Definitions. for House Bill No.
162Repealed on line 53 by deleting77 “inDel. writing” as it appears therein.
FURTHERLaws, AMENDc. House Substitute No.
1282, for§ 4, Houseeffective BillJune No.10, 2010.
162As onused lines 58 and 59 by deleting “the goods in thethis samesubchapter: form of payment as originally purchased.” as it appears therein and inserting in lieu thereof the following “goods received by the participant in the previous 12 months using the same form of payment as used for the original purchase.”.
FURTHER(1) AMEND“Clearly Houseand Substituteconspicuously” No.means as defined in § 2731 of this title.
1(2) for“Consideration” Houseincludes Billall No.of the following:
162a onlinefinder’s 60fee, bybonus, deletingrefund, “The”override, atcommission, itcross- appearscommission, thereindividend, asand insertingany infinancial lieuremuneration. thereof “On cancellation, the”.
FURTHER(3) AMEND“Multilevel Housedistribution Substitutecompany” No.means:
1a. for House Bill No.
162Any afterperson linewho 60does andall beforeof line 61 by inserting the following:
“(e)1. The “document” referenced in subsection (a) of this section and the “contract” referenced in subsection (d) of this section may be a written instrument or an electronic document or transmission, provided that:
(1)Sells, Ifdistributes, theor primarysupplies formfor ofvaluable communicationconsideration betweena thegood partiesor isservice inthrough person,an theindependent documentagent, andcontractor, contractor mustdistributor beat delivereddifferent inlevels. a tangible written instrument.
(2)2. If the primary form of communication between the parties is electronic, then the document and contract may be an electronic transmission.”.
FURTHERPays AMENDconsideration Houseas Substitutea No.result of the sale of such goods or services or the recruitment, action, or performance of an additional participant.
1b. for House Bill No.
162The onterm linedoes 61not byinclude deletinga “(e)”licensed asinsurance itagent, appearsinsurance thereinagency, andlicensed byreal insertingestate thebroker, following:licensed real estate agent, licensed real estate agency, licensed securities dealer, licensed limited securities dealer, licensed securities salesperson, or licensed limited securities salesperson.
“(f)”.
SCD Page 1 of 23 Released:
06/17/202506/10/2025 03:3912:03 PM SYNOPSIS(4) This“Multilevel Amendmentmarketing clarifiesprogram” thatmeans onlythe subsectionmarketing (a)program ofor §plan 2599 is an unlawful practice under § 2513 of Titlea 6multilevel anddistribution subchaptercompany. II of Chapter 25 of Title 6.
The§ other2599. requirements of the Act are enforced by private right of action.
ThisRequired Amendmentconduct also provides that the disclosure required in subsection (a) and thestandards contractfor ina subsectionmultilevel (d)distribution ofcompany; § may be in written or electronic form.
However,disclosure; the transmission of the disclosure or contract must be in physical form if the primary contact between the parties is in person.
Ifrepurchase; the primary form of communication between the parties is electronic, then the document and contract may be an electronic transmission.
Thiscancellation; Amendment further provides that on cancellation of a contract for participation in a marketing program, the multilevel distribution company must agree to repurchase only goods received within the past 12 months.
Show all 81 changed lines (41 more)
and penalties for violations.
(a) At the time the purchaser signs a business opportunity contract or prior to the receipt of any consideration by the seller, whichever occurs first, the seller or the seller’s representative must provide the prospective purchaser a written document, updated quarterly, that clearly and conspicuously discloses the following:
(1) A first page that contains only the following language:
a.
“DISCLOSURE REQUIRED BY DELAWARE LAW.”.
b.
“YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO CANCEL THIS CONTRACT FOR ANY REASON WITHIN THREE MONTHS OF SIGNING IT.”.
(2) The name of the seller, the name under which the seller is doing or intends to do business, and the name of any parent or affiliated company that will engage in a business transaction with a purchaser or accept responsibility for a multilevel marketing program.
(3) A complete description of the compensation plan, including any inventory purchase requirements.
(4) A full and detailed description of the actual service the seller will undertake to perform for the purchaser.
(5) When the seller makes any statement concerning earnings or range of earnings that may be made through the multilevel marketing program, the statement:
“No guarantee of earnings or range of earnings can be made.” (6) If training is promised by the seller, a complete description of the training and the length of the training.
(7) If the seller promises services to be performed in connection with the placement of the equipment, product, or supplies at a location where they will be sold or used, the full nature of those services as well as the nature of the agreements to be made with the owner or manager of the location where the purchaser’s equipment, product, or supplies will be placed.
(8) If the seller represents, when soliciting, offering for sale, or selling or leasing a multilevel marketing program, that there is a “buy-back” arrangement or that the initial payment is protected from loss or “secured,” the entire and precise nature of the “buy-back”, “protection”, or “security” arrangement.
(9) How many other purchasers are selling in the State.
(10) The percentage of buyers who earn more than the initial payment and all inventory purchase requirements.
(11) The median and typical earnings of every person involved in the program.
SCD Page 2 of 23 Released:
06/17/202506/10/2025 03:3912:03 PM 0161530061(b) A violation of this section is deemed a violation of subchapter II of Chapter 25 of this title.
(c) A multilevel distribution company may not require a participant in its marketing program to buy a good or service or pay any other consideration to participate in the marketing program unless the multilevel distribution company agrees to repurchase the goods, in the same form of payment as originally purchased, that are in resalable condition.
(d) A multilevel distribution company must state in writing in each contract of participation in its marketing program all of the following:
(1) A participant may cancel the contract for any reason within 3 months after the date of entering into the contract or the receipt of goods or services first ordered by notice to the multilevel distribution company.
Notice may be sent by electronic mail or first-class mail.
(2) On cancellation, the multilevel distribution company will repurchase the goods in the same form of payment as originally purchased.
(3) The repurchase price will be at least 90% of the original price paid by the participant.
(e) Any person who suffers damage or injury as a result of a violation of this section has a cause of action to recover 3 times the amount of actual damages, court costs, and reasonable attorney’s fees.
Such treble damages shall be in addition to any other damages to which the victim is entitled pursuant to common law or other provisions of the Delaware Code.
SYNOPSIS This Act defines a multilevel distribution company and multilevel marketing program for purposes of this Subchapter.
It sets forth mandatory disclosures that must be made by a multilevel distribution company to any potential purchaser that discloses details about the company, sometimes based on certain representations that the company makes.
It sets forth that a multilevel distribution company may not require a participant in its marketing program to buy a good or service or pay any other consideration to participate in the marketing program unless it agrees to repurchase the goods, under certain conditions.
It provides cancellation rights and guidelines.
It permits a civil penalty to be imposed for violations of the required disclosures.
It provides a private right of action for violation of the repurchase requirement, including treble damages, attorneys’ fees and costs to be awarded for a prevailing plaintiff.
House Substitute No.
1 for House Bill 162 is different from the original in that it reduces some disclosure requirements, specifically the timing, the number of participants who have received the earnings in the amount or range specified within the last 3 years and the total number of participants who have entered into the contract with the seller within the last 3 years;
introduces the standard of “clear and conspicuous” for disclosures while removing some specific requirements such as font size to allow for flexibility with a standard;
and places the Act in a separate subchapter of Title 6.
HD :
RW :
SCD Page 3 of 3 Released:
06/10/2025 12:03 PM 0161530055
Show all 81 changed rows (41 more)
Action History
-
Assigned to Banking, Business, Insurance & Technology Committee in Senate
-
Passed By House. Votes: 27 YES 11 NO 1 NOT VOTING 2 ABSENT
-
Amendment HA 2 to HS 1 - Passed In House by Voice Vote
-
Amendment HA 1 to HS 1 - Stricken in House
-
Amendment HA 1 to HS 1 - Introduced and Placed With Bill
-
was introduced and adopted in lieu of HB 162
Sponsors
- Josue O Ortega · Primary
- Darius J. Brown · Primary
- Laura V. Sturgeon · Primary
- David P. Sokola · Primary
- Madinah Wilson-Anton · Primary
- Claire Snyder-Hall · Primary
- Eric Morrison · Primary
- Spiros Mantzavinos · Primary
- Ray Seigfried · Primary
- Russell Huxtable · Primary
- Mara Gorman · Primary
- William J. Carson · Primary
- William Bush · Primary
- Sarah McBride · Primary
- Melanie Ross Levin · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →15 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 47 not signed on · 11 voted No
Sponsors (15)
- Josue O Ortega Democratic
- Darius J. Brown Democratic
- Laura V. Sturgeon Democratic
- David P. Sokola Democratic
- Madinah Wilson-Anton Democratic
- Claire Snyder-Hall Democratic
- Eric Morrison Democratic
- Spiros Mantzavinos Democratic
- Ray Seigfried Democratic
- Russell Huxtable Democratic
- Mara Gorman Democratic
- William J. Carson Democratic
- William Bush Democratic
- Sarah McBride
- Melanie Ross Levin Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (47)
47 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 47 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 25 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 2 | 11 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 27 | 11 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 66% | 27% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (41)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Stell Parker Selby | — | Not Voting |
| Claire Snyder-Hall | Democratic | Yea |
| Cyndie Romer | Democratic | Yea |
| DeShanna U Neal | Democratic | Yea |
| Debra Heffernan | Democratic | Yea |
| Edward S. Osienski | Democratic | Yea |
| Eric Morrison | Democratic | Yea |
| Frank Burns | Democratic | Yea |
| Franklin D. Cooke | Democratic | Yea |
| Josue O Ortega | Democratic | Yea |
| Kamela T Smith | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Kendra Johnson | Democratic | Yea |
| Kerri Evelyn Harris | Democratic | Yea |
| Kimberly Williams | Democratic | Yea |
| Krista Griffith | Democratic | Yea |
| Larry Lambert | Democratic | Yea |
| Madinah Wilson-Anton | Democratic | Yea |
| Mara Gorman | Democratic | Yea |
| Melanie Ross Levin | Democratic | Yea |
| Melissa Minor-Brown | Democratic | Yea |
| Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha | Democratic | Yea |
| Sean M. Lynn | Democratic | Yea |
| Sherae'a Moore | Democratic | Yea |
| Sophie Phillips | Democratic | Yea |
| Stephanie T. Bolden | Democratic | Yea |
| William Bush | Democratic | Yea |
| William J. Carson | Democratic | Yea |
| Bryan W. Shupe | Republican | Nay |
| Charles S Postles Jr. | Republican | Nay |
| Daniel B. Short | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jeff Hilovsky | Republican | Yea |
| Jeffrey N. Spiegelman | Republican | Yea |
| Jesse R. Vanderwende | Republican | Nay |
| Kevin S Hensley | Republican | Nay |
| Lyndon D. Yearick | Republican | Nay |
| Michael F. Smith | Republican | Nay |
| Richard G. Collins | Republican | Nay |
| Ronald E. Gray | Republican | Nay |
| Shannon Morris | Republican | Nay |
| Timothy D. Dukes | Republican | Nay |
| Valerie Jones Giltner | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 162 do?
- This Act defines a multilevel distribution company and multilevel marketing program for purposes of this Subchapter. It sets forth mandatory disclosures that must be made by a multilevel distribution company to any potential purchaser that discloses details about the company, sometimes based on certain representations that the company makes. It sets forth that a multilevel distribution company may not require a participant in its marketing program to buy a good or service or pay any other consideration to participate in the marketing program unless it agrees to repurchase the goods, under certain conditions. It provides cancellation rights and guidelines. It permits a civil penalty to be imposed for violations of the required disclosures. It provides a private right of action for violation of the repurchase requirement, including treble damages, attorneys’ fees and costs to be awarded for a prevailing plaintiff. House Substitute No. 1 for House Bill 162 is different from the original in that it reduces some disclosure requirements, specifically the timing, the number of participants who have received the earnings in the amount or range specified within the last 3 years and the total number of participants who have entered into the contract with the seller within the last 3 years; introduces the standard of “clear and conspicuous” for disclosures while removing some specific requirements such as font size to allow for flexibility with a standard; and places the Act in a separate subchapter of Title 6.
- Who sponsors HB 162?
- HB 162 is sponsored by Josue O Ortega (Democratic), Darius J. Brown (Democratic), Laura V. Sturgeon (Democratic), David P. Sokola (Democratic), Madinah Wilson-Anton (Democratic), Claire Snyder-Hall (Democratic), Eric Morrison (Democratic), Spiros Mantzavinos (Democratic), Ray Seigfried (Democratic), Russell Huxtable (Democratic), Mara Gorman (Democratic), William J. Carson (Democratic), William Bush (Democratic), Sarah McBride, and Melanie Ross Levin (Democratic).
- What is the current status of HB 162?
- This bill has passed the House. Introduced June 10, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track HB 162?
- Track HB 162 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 162
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 162
Last checked for changes about 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →