Delaware 153rd General Assembly (2025-2026) Status: Passed House 14 D cosponsors

HB 162 — AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 6 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO MULTILEVEL DISTRIBUTION COMPANIES.

Last action — Assigned to Banking, Business, Insurance & Technology Committee in Senate

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has passed the House. Introduced June 10, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.

Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.

Prognosis

Advancing 58% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

Moderate

How often bills like it became law.

  • Passed House

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 15 sponsors

    15 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (14 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 1 recorded vote so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

This Act defines a multilevel distribution company and multilevel marketing program for purposes of this Subchapter. It sets forth mandatory disclosures that must be made by a multilevel distribution company to any potential purchaser that discloses details about the company, sometimes based on certain representations that the company makes. It sets forth that a multilevel distribution company may not require a participant in its marketing program to buy a good or service or pay any other consideration to participate in the marketing program unless it agrees to repurchase the goods, under certain conditions. It provides cancellation rights and guidelines. It permits a civil penalty to be imposed for violations of the required disclosures. It provides a private right of action for violation of the repurchase requirement, including treble damages, attorneys’ fees and costs to be awarded for a prevailing plaintiff. House Substitute No. 1 for House Bill 162 is different from the original in that it reduces some disclosure requirements, specifically the timing, the number of participants who have received the earnings in the amount or range specified within the last 3 years and the total number of participants who have entered into the contract with the seller within the last 3 years; introduces the standard of “clear and conspicuous” for disclosures while removing some specific requirements such as font size to allow for flexibility with a standard; and places the Act in a separate subchapter of Title 6.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

91 added · 38 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amended version of the bill changes the definition of a "document" and "contract" referenced in specific subsections to allow for both tangible written instruments and electronic formats. It clarifies that if communication is primarily in person, a written document is required, while electronic communications allow for electronic documents. This adjustment matters because it provides flexibility in how agreements can be made and acknowledged in multilevel distribution arrangements, accommodating modern communication practices.

→
Previous
Latest
Ross Levin HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 153rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE AMENDMENT NO.
Ross Levin & Sen.
2 TO HOUSE SUBSTITUTE NO.
Hansen Reps.
Bush, Carson, Gorman, Heffernan, K.
Johnson, Lambert, Morrison, Snyder-Hall, Wilson-Anton, Chukwuocha, S.
Moore, Hilovsky, Bolden;
Sens.
Sokola, Lockman, Sturgeon, Seigfried HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 153rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE SUBSTITUTE NO.
162 AMEND House Substitute No.
162 AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 6 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO MULTILEVEL DISTRIBUTION COMPANIES.
1 for House Bill No.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE:
162 on line 24 by deleting “written” as it appears therein.
Section 1.
FURTHER AMEND House Substitute No.
Amend Chapter 25, Title 6 of the Delaware Code by making deletions as shown by strike through and insertions as shown by underline as follows:
1 for House Bill No.
Subchapter XI.
162 by deleting line 49 in its entirety and inserting in lieu thereof the following:
Cumulative Remedies and Enhanced Penalties Multilevel Distribution Companies § 2598.
“(b) A violation of subsection (a) of this section shall be deemed an unlawful practice under § 2513 of Title 6 and a violation of subchapter II of Chapter 25 of Title 6.”.
Violation of order or injunction;
FURTHER AMEND House Substitute No.
penalty.
1 for House Bill No.
Definitions.
162 on line 53 by deleting “in writing” as it appears therein.
Repealed by 77 Del.
FURTHER AMEND House Substitute No.
Laws, c.
1 for House Bill No.
282, § 4, effective June 10, 2010.
162 on lines 58 and 59 by deleting “the goods in the same form of payment as originally purchased.” as it appears therein and inserting in lieu thereof the following “goods received by the participant in the previous 12 months using the same form of payment as used for the original purchase.”.
As used in this subchapter:
FURTHER AMEND House Substitute No.
(1) “Clearly and conspicuously” means as defined in § 2731 of this title.
1 for House Bill No.
(2) “Consideration” includes all of the following:
162 online 60 by deleting “The” at it appears therein as inserting in lieu thereof “On cancellation, the”.
a finder’s fee, bonus, refund, override, commission, cross- commission, dividend, and any financial remuneration.
FURTHER AMEND House Substitute No.
(3) “Multilevel distribution company” means:
1 for House Bill No.
a.
162 after line 60 and before line 61 by inserting the following:
Any person who does all of the following:
“(e) The “document” referenced in subsection (a) of this section and the “contract” referenced in subsection (d) of this section may be a written instrument or an electronic document or transmission, provided that:
1.
(1) If the primary form of communication between the parties is in person, the document and contract must be delivered in a tangible written instrument.
Sells, distributes, or supplies for valuable consideration a good or service through an independent agent, contractor, or distributor at different levels.
(2) If the primary form of communication between the parties is electronic, then the document and contract may be an electronic transmission.”.
2.
FURTHER AMEND House Substitute No.
Pays consideration as a result of the sale of such goods or services or the recruitment, action, or performance of an additional participant.
1 for House Bill No.
b.
162 on line 61 by deleting “(e)” as it appears therein and by inserting the following:
The term does not include a licensed insurance agent, insurance agency, licensed real estate broker, licensed real estate agent, licensed real estate agency, licensed securities dealer, licensed limited securities dealer, licensed securities salesperson, or licensed limited securities salesperson.
“(f)”.
SCD Page 1 of 2 Released:
SCD Page 1 of 3 Released:
06/17/2025 03:39 PM SYNOPSIS This Amendment clarifies that only subsection (a) of § 2599 is an unlawful practice under § 2513 of Title 6 and subchapter II of Chapter 25 of Title 6.
06/10/2025 12:03 PM (4) “Multilevel marketing program” means the marketing program or plan of a multilevel distribution company.
The other requirements of the Act are enforced by private right of action.
§ 2599.
This Amendment also provides that the disclosure required in subsection (a) and the contract in subsection (d) of § may be in written or electronic form.
Required conduct and standards for a multilevel distribution company;
However, the transmission of the disclosure or contract must be in physical form if the primary contact between the parties is in person.
disclosure;
If the primary form of communication between the parties is electronic, then the document and contract may be an electronic transmission.
repurchase;
This Amendment further provides that on cancellation of a contract for participation in a marketing program, the multilevel distribution company must agree to repurchase only goods received within the past 12 months.
cancellation;
Show all 81 changed rows (41 more)
Previous
Latest
and penalties for violations.
(a) At the time the purchaser signs a business opportunity contract or prior to the receipt of any consideration by the seller, whichever occurs first, the seller or the seller’s representative must provide the prospective purchaser a written document, updated quarterly, that clearly and conspicuously discloses the following:
(1) A first page that contains only the following language:
a.
“DISCLOSURE REQUIRED BY DELAWARE LAW.”.
b.
“YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO CANCEL THIS CONTRACT FOR ANY REASON WITHIN THREE MONTHS OF SIGNING IT.”.
(2) The name of the seller, the name under which the seller is doing or intends to do business, and the name of any parent or affiliated company that will engage in a business transaction with a purchaser or accept responsibility for a multilevel marketing program.
(3) A complete description of the compensation plan, including any inventory purchase requirements.
(4) A full and detailed description of the actual service the seller will undertake to perform for the purchaser.
(5) When the seller makes any statement concerning earnings or range of earnings that may be made through the multilevel marketing program, the statement:
“No guarantee of earnings or range of earnings can be made.” (6) If training is promised by the seller, a complete description of the training and the length of the training.
(7) If the seller promises services to be performed in connection with the placement of the equipment, product, or supplies at a location where they will be sold or used, the full nature of those services as well as the nature of the agreements to be made with the owner or manager of the location where the purchaser’s equipment, product, or supplies will be placed.
(8) If the seller represents, when soliciting, offering for sale, or selling or leasing a multilevel marketing program, that there is a “buy-back” arrangement or that the initial payment is protected from loss or “secured,” the entire and precise nature of the “buy-back”, “protection”, or “security” arrangement.
(9) How many other purchasers are selling in the State.
(10) The percentage of buyers who earn more than the initial payment and all inventory purchase requirements.
(11) The median and typical earnings of every person involved in the program.
SCD Page 2 of 2 Released:
SCD Page 2 of 3 Released:
06/17/2025 03:39 PM 0161530061
06/10/2025 12:03 PM (b) A violation of this section is deemed a violation of subchapter II of Chapter 25 of this title.
(c) A multilevel distribution company may not require a participant in its marketing program to buy a good or service or pay any other consideration to participate in the marketing program unless the multilevel distribution company agrees to repurchase the goods, in the same form of payment as originally purchased, that are in resalable condition.
(d) A multilevel distribution company must state in writing in each contract of participation in its marketing program all of the following:
(1) A participant may cancel the contract for any reason within 3 months after the date of entering into the contract or the receipt of goods or services first ordered by notice to the multilevel distribution company.
Notice may be sent by electronic mail or first-class mail.
(2) On cancellation, the multilevel distribution company will repurchase the goods in the same form of payment as originally purchased.
(3) The repurchase price will be at least 90% of the original price paid by the participant.
(e) Any person who suffers damage or injury as a result of a violation of this section has a cause of action to recover 3 times the amount of actual damages, court costs, and reasonable attorney’s fees.
Such treble damages shall be in addition to any other damages to which the victim is entitled pursuant to common law or other provisions of the Delaware Code.
SYNOPSIS This Act defines a multilevel distribution company and multilevel marketing program for purposes of this Subchapter.
It sets forth mandatory disclosures that must be made by a multilevel distribution company to any potential purchaser that discloses details about the company, sometimes based on certain representations that the company makes.
It sets forth that a multilevel distribution company may not require a participant in its marketing program to buy a good or service or pay any other consideration to participate in the marketing program unless it agrees to repurchase the goods, under certain conditions.
It provides cancellation rights and guidelines.
It permits a civil penalty to be imposed for violations of the required disclosures.
It provides a private right of action for violation of the repurchase requirement, including treble damages, attorneys’ fees and costs to be awarded for a prevailing plaintiff.
House Substitute No.
1 for House Bill 162 is different from the original in that it reduces some disclosure requirements, specifically the timing, the number of participants who have received the earnings in the amount or range specified within the last 3 years and the total number of participants who have entered into the contract with the seller within the last 3 years;
introduces the standard of “clear and conspicuous” for disclosures while removing some specific requirements such as font size to allow for flexibility with a standard;
and places the Act in a separate subchapter of Title 6.
HD :
RW :
SCD Page 3 of 3 Released:
06/10/2025 12:03 PM 0161530055
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Assigned to Banking, Business, Insurance & Technology Committee in Senate

  2. Passed By House. Votes: 27 YES 11 NO 1 NOT VOTING 2 ABSENT

  3. Amendment HA 2 to HS 1 - Passed In House by Voice Vote

  4. Amendment HA 1 to HS 1 - Stricken in House

  5. Amendment HA 1 to HS 1 - Introduced and Placed With Bill

  6. was introduced and adopted in lieu of HB 162

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

15 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 47 not signed on · 11 voted No

Sponsors (15)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (47)

47 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 47 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

SM

Passed 27 Yea · 11 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 25001
Republican 21101
Unaffiliated 0001
Total 271103
% of votes cast 66%27%0%7%
How each member voted (41)
Member Party Vote
Stell Parker Selby — Not Voting
Claire Snyder-Hall Democratic Yea
Cyndie Romer Democratic Yea
DeShanna U Neal Democratic Yea
Debra Heffernan Democratic Yea
Edward S. Osienski Democratic Yea
Eric Morrison Democratic Yea
Frank Burns Democratic Yea
Franklin D. Cooke Democratic Yea
Josue O Ortega Democratic Yea
Kamela T Smith Democratic Not Voting
Kendra Johnson Democratic Yea
Kerri Evelyn Harris Democratic Yea
Kimberly Williams Democratic Yea
Krista Griffith Democratic Yea
Larry Lambert Democratic Yea
Madinah Wilson-Anton Democratic Yea
Mara Gorman Democratic Yea
Melanie Ross Levin Democratic Yea
Melissa Minor-Brown Democratic Yea
Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha Democratic Yea
Sean M. Lynn Democratic Yea
Sherae'a Moore Democratic Yea
Sophie Phillips Democratic Yea
Stephanie T. Bolden Democratic Yea
William Bush Democratic Yea
William J. Carson Democratic Yea
Bryan W. Shupe Republican Nay
Charles S Postles Jr. Republican Nay
Daniel B. Short Republican Not Voting
Jeff Hilovsky Republican Yea
Jeffrey N. Spiegelman Republican Yea
Jesse R. Vanderwende Republican Nay
Kevin S Hensley Republican Nay
Lyndon D. Yearick Republican Nay
Michael F. Smith Republican Nay
Richard G. Collins Republican Nay
Ronald E. Gray Republican Nay
Shannon Morris Republican Nay
Timothy D. Dukes Republican Nay
Valerie Jones Giltner Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 162 do?
This Act defines a multilevel distribution company and multilevel marketing program for purposes of this Subchapter. It sets forth mandatory disclosures that must be made by a multilevel distribution company to any potential purchaser that discloses details about the company, sometimes based on certain representations that the company makes. It sets forth that a multilevel distribution company may not require a participant in its marketing program to buy a good or service or pay any other consideration to participate in the marketing program unless it agrees to repurchase the goods, under certain conditions. It provides cancellation rights and guidelines. It permits a civil penalty to be imposed for violations of the required disclosures. It provides a private right of action for violation of the repurchase requirement, including treble damages, attorneys’ fees and costs to be awarded for a prevailing plaintiff. House Substitute No. 1 for House Bill 162 is different from the original in that it reduces some disclosure requirements, specifically the timing, the number of participants who have received the earnings in the amount or range specified within the last 3 years and the total number of participants who have entered into the contract with the seller within the last 3 years; introduces the standard of “clear and conspicuous” for disclosures while removing some specific requirements such as font size to allow for flexibility with a standard; and places the Act in a separate subchapter of Title 6.
Who sponsors HB 162?
HB 162 is sponsored by Josue O Ortega (Democratic), Darius J. Brown (Democratic), Laura V. Sturgeon (Democratic), David P. Sokola (Democratic), Madinah Wilson-Anton (Democratic), Claire Snyder-Hall (Democratic), Eric Morrison (Democratic), Spiros Mantzavinos (Democratic), Ray Seigfried (Democratic), Russell Huxtable (Democratic), Mara Gorman (Democratic), William J. Carson (Democratic), William Bush (Democratic), Sarah McBride, and Melanie Ross Levin (Democratic).
What is the current status of HB 162?
This bill has passed the House. Introduced June 10, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Where can I track HB 162?
Track HB 162 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 162

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 162

Last checked for changes about 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →