AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 19 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO EMPLOYER-SPONSORED MEETINGS OR COMMUNICATIONS.
Workers may not be required to attend meetings about their employer's political or religious views.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 84 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 84.
You're tracking HB 84
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 84 — AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 19 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO EMPLOYER-SPONSORED MEETINGS OR COMMUNICATIONS.
Last action — Passed By Senate. Votes: 18 YES 1 NO 2 NOT VOTING
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the House. Introduced December 18, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
ModerateHow often bills like it became law.
-
Passed House
Current position in the legislative process.
-
8 sponsors
8 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (6 D · 2 R) — cross-party backing.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
In plain language
The bill limits employer-required meetings on political or religious views.
This legislation prohibits employers from mandating meetings that convey political or religious views. However, there are exceptions for certain communications, like those required by law or related to job duties.
What this means for you
- Workers: Workers may not be required to attend meetings about their employer's political or religious views.
Summary
This Substitute for House Bill No. 84 prohibits employers from requiring meetings or communications the purpose of which is to convey the employer’s political or religious views, including views regarding unionization. The Act enumerates several situations to which the prohibition does not apply, including the communication of religious views by a religious employer, the communication of political views by a political party or organization, and training required to comply with civil rights laws and occupational safety and health laws. The statute also clarifies that the following communications are outside the scope of the prohibition: (1) An employer communicating to its employees any information that the employer is required by law to communicate, but only to the extent of that legal requirement; (2) An employer communicating to its employees any information that is necessary for those employees to perform their job duties; (3) An institution of higher education, or any agent, representative, or designee of that institution, meeting with or participating in any communications with its employees that are part of coursework, any symposia, or an academic program at that institution; (4) An employer that is a public entity communicating to its employees any information related to a policy of the public entity or any law or regulation that the public entity is responsible for administering; and (5) A tax exempt organization, as defined under United States Internal Revenue Code § 501(c)(3) communicating with its employees about policy issues that are relevant to the organization, its mission, or the people the organization serves, provided such communication is done in a non-partisan manner. The provision is added to the existing chapter dealing with discrimination in employment, and the Department of Labor is empowered to investigate employer practices, make rules and regulations, and commence civil actions if necessary. The Department of Labor is instructed to update, within 90 days of the effective date of this Act, the notices it prepares for use by employers regarding unlawful discrimination in employment to include the provisions of this Act.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
91 added · 11 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendments to the bill clarify which organizations are allowed to communicate with employees about policy issues. Specifically, the text removes the requirement that these organizations must be defined under the United States Internal Revenue Code § 501(c)(3) and simplifies the language regarding the communication, stating that it can be done as long as it relates to the organization, its mission, or the people it serves. This change matters because it broadens the scope of organizations permitted to engage in such communications without restrictions.
Morrison HOUSE& OFRep. REPRESENTATIVES 153rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE AMENDMENT NO.
1Osienski TO& HOUSESen. SUBSTITUTE NO.
Walsh Reps.
Burns, Lambert, Phillips, Gorman;
Sens.
Mantzavinos, Townsend HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 153rd GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE SUBSTITUTE NO.
84 AN ACT TO AMEND HouseTITLE Substitute19 No.OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO EMPLOYER-SPONSORED MEETINGS OR COMMUNICATIONS.
1BE forIT HouseENACTED BillBY No.THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE:
84Section on1. line 26 by deleting "organization, as defined under United States Internal Revenue Code § 501(c)(3) " and inserting in lieu thereof "organization ".
FURTHERAmend AMENDSubchapter HouseII, SubstituteChapter No.7, Title 19 of the Delaware Code by making deletions as shown by strike through and insertions as shown by underline as follows and redesignate accordingly:
1§ for711B. House Bill No.
84Employer-sponsored onmeetings lineor 28communications. by deleting "serves, provided such communication is done in a non-partisan manner." and inserting in lieu thereof "serves.".
SYNOPSIS(a) ThisAs amendmentused clarifiesin thatthis thesection: statute does not prohibit any tax exempt organization from communicating with its employees about policy issues that are relevant to the organization, its mission, or the people the organization serves.
(1) “Political matters” means matters relating to political parties, legislation, regulation, public policy, campaigns for election, or the decision to join or support any political party or political, civic, community, fraternal, or labor organization.
(2) “Religious matters” means matters relating to religious belief, affiliation, practice, membership in, or support of any religious organization, association, or other group.
(b) Except as provided in subsections (c) and (d) of this section, it is an unlawful employment practice for an employer to discharge an employee or take any adverse employment action or threaten to take any adverse employment action with respect to an employee that declines to attend an employer-sponsored meeting or declines to participate in, receive, or listen to communications from the employer or the employer’s agents or representatives, the purpose of which is to communicate the employer’s opinion about religious or political matters.
An employee who is working at the time of the meeting and elects not to attend a meeting described in this subsection must continue to be paid while the meeting is held.
(c) This section does not prohibit any of the following:
(1) An employer from communicating to its employees any information that the employer is required by law to communicate, but only to the extent of that legal requirement.
(2) An employer from communicating to its employees any information that is necessary for those employees to perform their job duties.
SCD Page 1 of 13 Released:
01/29/202612/17/2025 10:0201:17 AMPM 0281530163(3) An institution of higher education, or any agent, representative, or designee of that institution, from meeting with or participating in any communications with its employees that are part of coursework, any symposia, or an academic program at that institution.
(4) An employer that is a public entity from communicating to its employees any information related to a policy of the public entity or any law or regulation that the public entity is responsible for administering.
(5) A tax exempt organization, as defined under United States Internal Revenue Code § 501(c)(3) from communicating with its employees about policy issues that are relevant to the organization, its mission, or the people the organization serves, provided such communication is done in a non-partisan manner.
This paragraph does not include the expression of an employer’s views about employees’ formation of or membership in a union.
(d) This section does not apply to any of the following:
(1) A religious corporation, entity, association, educational institution, or society that is exempt from the requirements of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352) pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
2000e-1(a) or is exempt from employment discrimination protections of state law, with respect to speech on religious matters to employees who perform work connected with the activities undertaken by that religious corporation, entity, association, educational institution, or society.
(2) A political organization or party requiring its employees to attend an employer-sponsored meeting or to participate in any communications with the employer or its agents or representatives, the purpose of which is to communicate the employer’s political tenets or purposes.
(3) An educational institution requiring a student or instructor to attend lectures on political or religious matters that are part of the regular coursework at the institution.
(4) A nonprofit, tax-exempt training program requiring a student or instructor to attend classroom instruction, complete fieldwork, or perform community service hours on political or religious matters as it relates to the mission of the training program or sponsor.
(5) An employer requiring employees to undergo training to comply with the employer’s legal obligations, including obligations under civil rights laws and occupational safety and health laws.
§ 712.
Enforcement provisions;
powers of the Department;
administrative process.
(a) The Department of Labor is empowered, as hereinafter provided, to prevent any person from engaging in any unlawful employment practice as set forth in §§ 711, 711A, 711B, 719A, 723, and 724 of this title.
In connection with the performance of its duties, the Department may do all of the following:
HD :
KL :
Show all 64 changed lines (24 more)
SCD Page 2 of 3 Released:
12/17/2025 01:17 PM (1) Investigate employment practices by permitting the Department to enter any place of employment at reasonable times;
inspect and copy records or documents in the possession of the employer, the employment agency, or labor organization;
administer oaths, certify to official acts, take and cause to be taken depositions of witnesses;
issue subpoenas compelling the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of papers, books, accounts, payrolls, documents, and records.
(2) Make, revise, or rescind such rules or regulations necessary or appropriate to administer or enforce this chapter in accordance with the provisions of § 10161(b) of Title 29.
(3) Commence civil actions in Superior Court for violations of this chapter, any published regulations regulations, or for civil penalties provided herein.
Section 2.
Within 90 days from the effective date of this Act, the Department of Labor shall update the notice required under § 716(a) of Title 19 to include excerpts from or summaries of the provisions of Section 1 of this Act.
SYNOPSIS This Substitute for House Bill No.
84 prohibits employers from requiring meetings or communications the purpose of which is to convey the employer’s political or religious views, including views regarding unionization.
The Act enumerates several situations to which the prohibition does not apply, including the communication of religious views by a religious employer, the communication of political views by a political party or organization, and training required to comply with civil rights laws and occupational safety and health laws.
The statute also clarifies that the following communications are outside the scope of the prohibition:
(1) An employer communicating to its employees any information that the employer is required by law to communicate, but only to the extent of that legal requirement;
(2) An employer communicating to its employees any information that is necessary for those employees to perform their job duties;
(3) An institution of higher education, or any agent, representative, or designee of that institution, meeting with or participating in any communications with its employees that are part of coursework, any symposia, or an academic program at that institution;
(4) An employer that is a public entity communicating to its employees any information related to a policy of the public entity or any law or regulation that the public entity is responsible for administering;
and (5) A tax exempt organization, as defined under United States Internal Revenue Code § 501(c)(3) communicating with its employees about policy issues that are relevant to the organization, its mission, or the people the organization serves, provided such communication is done in a non-partisan manner.
The provision is added to the existing chapter dealing with discrimination in employment, and the Department of Labor is empowered to investigate employer practices, make rules and regulations, and commence civil actions if necessary.
The Department of Labor is instructed to update, within 90 days of the effective date of this Act, the notices it prepares for use by employers regarding unlawful discrimination in employment to include the provisions of this Act.
HD :
KL :
SCD Page 3 of 3 Released:
12/17/2025 01:17 PM 0281530137
Show all 64 changed rows (24 more)
Action History
-
Passed By Senate. Votes: 18 YES 1 NO 2 NOT VOTING
-
Reported Out of Committee (Labor) in Senate with 1 Favorable, 3 On Its Merits
-
Assigned to Labor Committee in Senate
-
Passed By House. Votes: 32 YES 6 NO 3 ABSENT
-
Amendment HA 1 to HS 1 - Passed In House by Voice Vote
-
Reported Out of Committee (Labor) in House with 7 Favorable, 1 On Its Merits
-
Amendment HA 1 to HS 1 - Introduced and Placed With Bill
-
Adopted in lieu of the original bill HB 84, and Assigned to Labor Committee in House
Sponsors
- Bryan Townsend · Primary
- Mara Gorman · Primary
- David L. Wilson · Primary
- Spiros Mantzavinos · Primary
- Bryant L. Richardson · Primary
- John "Jack" Walsh · Primary
- Edward S. Osienski · Primary
- Eric Morrison · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →8 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 54 not signed on · 6 voted No
Sponsors (8)
- Bryan Townsend Democratic
- Mara Gorman Democratic
- David L. Wilson Republican
- Spiros Mantzavinos Democratic
- Bryant L. Richardson Republican Voted No
- John "Jack" Walsh Democratic
- Edward S. Osienski Democratic
- Eric Morrison Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (54)
54 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 54 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 18 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 5% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bryan Townsend | Democratic | Yea |
| Daniel Cruce | Democratic | Yea |
| Darius J. Brown | Democratic | Yea |
| David P. Sokola | Democratic | Yea |
| John "Jack" Walsh | Democratic | Yea |
| Kyra L. Hoffner | Democratic | Yea |
| Laura V. Sturgeon | Democratic | Yea |
| Marie Pinkney | Democratic | Yea |
| Nicole Poore | Democratic | Yea |
| Ray Seigfried | Democratic | Yea |
| Russell Huxtable | Democratic | Yea |
| S. Elizabeth Lockman | Democratic | Yea |
| Spiros Mantzavinos | Democratic | Yea |
| Stephanie L. Hansen | Democratic | Yea |
| Trey Paradee | Democratic | Yea |
| Brian Pettyjohn | Republican | Yea |
| Bryant L. Richardson | Republican | Nay |
| Dave G. Lawson | Republican | Not Voting |
| David L. Wilson | Republican | Yea |
| Eric Buckson | Republican | Yea |
| Gerald W. Hocker | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 26 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 6 | 6 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 32 | 6 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 15% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (41)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alonna Berry | Democratic | Yea |
| Claire Snyder-Hall | Democratic | Yea |
| Cyndie Romer | Democratic | Yea |
| DeShanna U Neal | Democratic | Yea |
| Debra Heffernan | Democratic | Yea |
| Edward S. Osienski | Democratic | Yea |
| Eric Morrison | Democratic | Yea |
| Frank Burns | Democratic | Yea |
| Franklin D. Cooke | Democratic | Yea |
| Josue O Ortega | Democratic | Yea |
| Kamela T Smith | Democratic | Yea |
| Kendra Johnson | Democratic | Yea |
| Kerri Evelyn Harris | Democratic | Yea |
| Kimberly Williams | Democratic | Yea |
| Krista Griffith | Democratic | Yea |
| Larry Lambert | Democratic | Yea |
| Madinah Wilson-Anton | Democratic | Yea |
| Mara Gorman | Democratic | Yea |
| Melanie Ross Levin | Democratic | Yea |
| Melissa Minor-Brown | Democratic | Yea |
| Nnamdi O. Chukwuocha | Democratic | Yea |
| Sean M. Lynn | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Sherae'a Moore | Democratic | Yea |
| Sophie Phillips | Democratic | Yea |
| Stephanie T. Bolden | Democratic | Yea |
| William Bush | Democratic | Yea |
| William J. Carson | Democratic | Yea |
| Bryan W. Shupe | Republican | Nay |
| Charles S Postles Jr. | Republican | Nay |
| Daniel B. Short | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jeff Hilovsky | Republican | Nay |
| Jeffrey N. Spiegelman | Republican | Yea |
| Jesse R. Vanderwende | Republican | Nay |
| Kevin S Hensley | Republican | Yea |
| Lyndon D. Yearick | Republican | Not Voting |
| Michael F. Smith | Republican | Yea |
| Richard G. Collins | Republican | Yea |
| Ronald E. Gray | Republican | Nay |
| Shannon Morris | Republican | Yea |
| Timothy D. Dukes | Republican | Yea |
| Valerie Jones Giltner | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 84 do?
- This Substitute for House Bill No. 84 prohibits employers from requiring meetings or communications the purpose of which is to convey the employer’s political or religious views, including views regarding unionization. The Act enumerates several situations to which the prohibition does not apply, including the communication of religious views by a religious employer, the communication of political views by a political party or organization, and training required to comply with civil rights laws and occupational safety and health laws. The statute also clarifies that the following communications are outside the scope of the prohibition: (1) An employer communicating to its employees any information that the employer is required by law to communicate, but only to the extent of that legal requirement; (2) An employer communicating to its employees any information that is necessary for those employees to perform their job duties; (3) An institution of higher education, or any agent, representative, or designee of that institution, meeting with or participating in any communications with its employees that are part of coursework, any symposia, or an academic program at that institution; (4) An employer that is a public entity communicating to its employees any information related to a policy of the public entity or any law or regulation that the public entity is responsible for administering; and (5) A tax exempt organization, as defined under United States Internal Revenue Code § 501(c)(3) communicating with its employees about policy issues that are relevant to the organization, its mission, or the people the organization serves, provided such communication is done in a non-partisan manner. The provision is added to the existing chapter dealing with discrimination in employment, and the Department of Labor is empowered to investigate employer practices, make rules and regulations, and commence civil actions if necessary. The Department of Labor is instructed to update, within 90 days of the effective date of this Act, the notices it prepares for use by employers regarding unlawful discrimination in employment to include the provisions of this Act.
- Who sponsors HB 84?
- HB 84 is sponsored by Bryan Townsend (Democratic), Mara Gorman (Democratic), David L. Wilson (Republican), Spiros Mantzavinos (Democratic), Bryant L. Richardson (Republican), John "Jack" Walsh (Democratic), Edward S. Osienski (Democratic), and Eric Morrison (Democratic).
- What is the current status of HB 84?
- This bill has passed the House. Introduced December 18, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track HB 84?
- Track HB 84 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 84
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 84
Last checked for changes about 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →