Connecticut 2026 Session Status: Enacted Bipartisan · 1 R · 1 D cosponsors

HB 5352 — AN ACT CONCERNING THE AUTHORITY OF THE STATE ELECTIONS ENFORCEMENT COMMISSION AND MANDATORY DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINTS.

Last action — SIGNED BY GOVERNOR

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 26, 2026. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Ned Lamont (Democratic) on June 04, 2026.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 2 sponsors

    2 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (1 R · 1 D) — cross-party backing.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

In plain language

The bill modifies the authority of the State Elections Enforcement Commission regarding complaint dismissals.

This legislation updates the powers of the State Elections Enforcement Commission. It focuses on how complaints related to elections are handled and establishes processes for dismissing certain complaints.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

94 added · 150 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of HB 5352 introduces a new process for handling written complaints regarding state election law violations. The commission staff must complete a preliminary examination of complaints within two weeks and can either dismiss them if they lack sufficient evidence or work to resolve minor issues quickly. If a resolution isn't reached by the forty-fifth day, the complaint will be formally investigated. This change is significant because it aims to streamline how election complaints are processed, potentially leading to quicker resolutions and greater accountability in the election system.

→
Previous
Latest
House of Representatives General Assembly File No.
Substitute House Bill No.
324 February Session, 2026 Substitute House Bill No.
5352 Public Act No.
5352 House of Representatives, April 1, 2026 The Committee on Government Oversight reported through REP.
26-133 AN ACT CONCERNING THE AUTHORITY OF THE STATE ELECTIONS ENFORCEMENT COMMISSION AND MANDATORY DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINTS.
DATHAN of the 142nd Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the House, that the substitute bill ought to pass.
AN ACT CONCERNING THE AUTHORITY OF THE STATE ELECTIONS ENFORCEMENT COMMISSION AND MANDATORY DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINTS.
(g)(1)(A)Inthecaseofawrittencomplaintfiledwiththecommission pursuant to section 9-7b, commission staff shall conduct and complete a preliminary examination of such complaint by the fourteenth day following its receipt, at which time such staff shall, at its discretion, (i) dismiss the complaint for failure to allege any substantial violation of state election law supported by evidence, (ii) engage the respondent in discussions in an effort to speedily resolve any matter pertaining to a de minimis violation, or (iii) investigate and docket the complaint for a determination by the commission that probable cause or no probable sHB5352 / File No.
(g)(1)(A)Inthecaseofawrittencomplaintfiledwiththecommission pursuant to section 9-7b, commission staff shall conduct and complete a preliminary examination of such complaint by the fourteenth day following its receipt, at which time such staff shall, at its discretion, (i) dismiss the complaint for failure to allege any substantial violation of state election law supported by evidence, (ii) engage the respondent in discussions in an effort to speedily resolve any matter pertaining to a de minimis violation, or (iii) investigate and docket the complaint for a determination by the commission that probable cause or no probable cause exists for any such violation.
324 1 sHB5352 File No.
324 cause exists for any such violation.
If commission staff engages a respondent pursuant to subparagraph (A)(ii) of this subdivision but is unable to speedily resolve any such matter described in said subparagraph by the forty-fifth day following receipt of the complaint, such staff shall docket such complaint for a determination by the commission that probable cause or no probable cause exists for any violation of state election law.
If commission staff engages a respondent pursuant to subparagraph (A)(ii) of this subdivision but is unable to Substitute House Bill No.
5352 speedily resolve any such matter described in said subparagraph by the forty-fifth day following receipt of the complaint, such staff shall docket such complaint for a determination by the commission that probable cause or no probable cause exists for any violation of state election law.
sHB5352 / File No.
(C) For any complaint received on or after July 1, 2024, if the commission does not, by the ninetieth day following the commission's determination that probable cause exists for any violation of state Public Act No.
324 2 sHB5352 File No.
26-133 2 of 4 Substitute House Bill No.
324 (C) For any complaint received on or after July 1, 2024, if the commission does not, by the ninetieth day following the commission's determination that probable cause exists for any violation of state election laws, issue a decision on such complaint, the commission shall refer such complaint to the Chief State's Attorney pursuant to subdivision (8) of subsection (a) of section 9-7b for further enforcement action.Not later thantwelve monthsafter thereferralto theChiefState's Attorney of any complaint under this subdivision, or not later than the expiration of the period of time prescribed by section 54-193 for the violationofstate electionlawsallegedinany such complaint, whichever occurs first, the Chief State's Attorney shall submit a report to the joint standing committees of the General Assembly having cognizance of matters relating to elections and the judiciary, in accordance with the provisions of section 11-4a, detailing the status of any enforcement action related to such referred complaint.
5352 election laws, issue a decision on such complaint, the commission shall refer such complaint to the Chief State's Attorney pursuant to subdivision (8) of subsection (a) of section 9-7b for further enforcement action.Not later thantwelve monthsafter the referralto theChiefState's Attorney of any complaint under this subdivision, or not later than the expiration of the period of time prescribed by section 54-193 for the violationofstate electionlawsallegedinany such complaint, whichever occurs first, the Chief State's Attorney shall submit a report to the joint standing committees of the General Assembly having cognizance of matters relating to elections and the judiciary, in accordance with the provisions of section 11-4a, detailing the status of any enforcement action related to such referred complaint.
Nothing in this subsection shall preclude sHB5352 / File No.
Nothing in this subsection shall preclude Public Act No.
324 3 sHB5352 File No.
26-133 3 of 4 Substitute House Bill No.
324 the commission from continuing its investigation or taking any action permitted by section 9-7b, unless otherwise ordered by the court.
5352 the commission from continuing its investigation or taking any action permitted by section 9-7b, unless otherwise ordered by the court.
This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following sections:
Governor's Action:
Section 1 October 1, 2026 9-7a(g) GOS Joint Favorable Subst.
Approved June 4, 2026 Public Act No.
sHB5352 / File No.
26-133 4 of 4
324 4 sHB5352 File No.
324 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 27 $ FY 28 $ Elections Enforcement GF - Potential Minimal Minimal Commission Revenue Gain Note:
GF=General Fund Municipal Impact:
None Explanation The bill eliminates the one-year decision deadline for the State Elections Enforcement Commission (SEEC) for complaints received after October 1, 2026, regarding certain potential violations under state election law, resulting in a minimal potential revenue gain to SEEC beginning in FY 27.
The bill results in a potential revenue gain to the extent that SEEC will no longer end these investigations at the one-year deadline before the work is done, and will issue more decisions, potentially resulting in additional fines imposed.
The Out Years The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would continue into the future subject to inflation and fines imposed.
sHB5352 / File No.
324 5 sHB5352 File No.
324 OLR Bill Analysis sHB 5352 AN ACT CONCERNING THE AUTHORITY OF THE STATE ELECTIONS ENFORCEMENT COMMISSION AND MANDATORY DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINTS.
SUMMARY Existing law generally requires the State Elections Enforcement Commission (SEEC) to dismiss a complaint if it does not issue a final decision within one year of receiving it.
The deadline may be extended for delays caused by (1) SEEC granting an extension or continuance to the respondent or (2) complaint-related subpoenas, litigation, or investigations by, or consultations with, certain prosecutorial agencies.
This bill exempts from this deadline complaints received on or after October 1, 2026, about potential violations of prohibited acts under state election law.
Existing law already exempts complaints regarding potential violations of state election law by foreign nationals.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
October 1, 2026 COMMITTEE ACTION Government Oversight Committee Joint Favorable Substitute Yea 12 Nay 0 (03/17/2026) sHB5352 / File No.
324 6
View plain text versions (4)

Action History

  1. SIGNED BY GOVERNOR

  2. TRANSMITTED BY SECRETARY OF THE STATE TO GOVERNOR

  3. TRANSMITTED TO SECRETARY OF THE STATE

  4. PUBLIC ACT 26-133

  5. ON CONSENT CALENDAR /IN CONCURRENCE

  6. SENATE PASSED

  7. SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 531

  8. FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.

  9. IMMEDIATE TRANSMITTAL TO THE SENATE

  10. HOUSE PASSED

  11. FILE NO. 324

  12. HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 243

  13. FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR

  14. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  15. REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 03/31/26

  16. FILED WITH LCO

  17. Joint Favorable Substitute

  18. PUBLIC HEARING 0303

  19. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Government Oversight

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 185 not signed on

Sponsors (2)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (185)

185 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 185 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 5352?
HB 5352 is sponsored by Tom Delnicki (Republican) and Kenneth Gucker (Democratic).
What is the current status of HB 5352?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 26, 2026. Enacted.
Where can I track HB 5352?
Track HB 5352 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 5352

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 5352

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →