Connecticut 2026 Session Status: In Committee 7 D cosponsors

SB 440 — AN ACT CONCERNING UNEMPLOYMENT FOR STRIKING WORKERS.

Last action — FILE NO. 367

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced March 05, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the Senate.

Prognosis

Stalled 26% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

Low

How often bills like it became law.

  • In Committee

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 7 sponsors

    7 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (7 D).

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

84 added · 10 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of Bill SB 440 now includes specific references to the Senate and the General Assembly, clarifying its official intent and process. This change is important because it helps establish the bill’s legislative context and ensures transparency in how it has progressed through the legislative system. Additionally, the removal of certain wording streamlines the title of the bill, making it clearer and more straightforward for the public to understand its purpose, which is to address unemployment benefits for striking workers.

→
Previous
Latest
General Assembly Raised Bill No.
Senate General Assembly File No.
440 February Session, 2026 LCO No.
367 February Session, 2026 Senate Bill No.
2706 Referred to Committee on LABOR AND PUBLIC EMPLOYEES Introduced by:
440 Senate, April 2, 2026 The Committee on Labor and Public Employees reported through SEN.
(LAB) AN ACT CONCERNING UNEMPLOYMENT FOR STRIKING WORKERS.
KUSHNER of the 24th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the Senate, that the bill ought to pass.
AN ACT CONCERNING UNEMPLOYMENT FOR STRIKING WORKERS.
(B) (i) the individual is not participating in or financing or directly interested in the labor dispute that caused the unemployment, and [(B)] (ii) the individual does not belong to a trade, class or organization of workers, members of which, immediately before the LCO 2706 1 of 2 Raised Bill No.
(B) (i) the individual is not participating in or financing or directly interested in the labor dispute that caused the unemployment, and [(B)] (ii) the individual does not belong to a trade, class or SB440 / File No.
440 commencement of the labor dispute, were employed at the premises at which the labor dispute occurred, and are participating in or financing or directly interested in the dispute;
367 1 SB440 File No.
367 organization of workers, members of which, immediately before the commencement of the labor dispute, were employed at the premises at which the labor dispute occurred, and are participating in or financing or directly interested in the dispute;
Section 1 October 1, 2026 31-236(a)(3) LAB Joint Favorable LCO 2706 2 of 2
Section 1 October 1, 2026 31-236(a)(3) LAB Joint Favorable SB440 / File No.
367 2 SB440 File No.
367 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 27 $ FY 28 $ Labor Dept.
UITF - Potential See Below See Below Revenue Gain Labor Dept.
UITF - Potential See Below See Below Cost Labor Dept.
GF - Cost 205,000 210,000 Note:
UITF=Unemployment Insurance Trust Fund;
GF=General Fund Municipal Impact:
None Explanation The bill, which makes striking workers eligible for unemployment benefits after they have been on strike for 14 consecutive days, results in a potential cost and potential revenue gain to the Unemployment Insurance Trust Fund, starting in FY 27.
In addition, the bill results in a one-time cost of $415,000 to the General Fund ($205,000 in FY 27 and $210,000 in FY 28).
To the extent any striking workers become eligible for unemployment benefits as a result of the bill, this would result in a cost to the trust fund.
Subsequent increases in experience ratings by employers would result in increased tax revenue to the trust fund on a lagged basis.
The amounts are dependent on striking workers' benefits and affected employers' experience ratings.
Additionally, the bill would require the Labor Department to make technology changes to ReEmployCT, the unemployment insurance administration system, which results in a cost of $205,000 in FY 27 and $210,000 in FY 28 ($415,000 in total).
SB440 / File No.
367 3 SB440 File No.
367 The Out Years The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above for the trust fund would continue into the future subject to the number of workers and employers affected.
There are no fiscal impacts to the General Fund beyond FY 28.
SB440 / File No.
367 4 SB440 File No.
367 OLR Bill Analysis SB 440 AN ACT CONCERNING UNEMPLOYMENT FOR STRIKING WORKERS.
SUMMARY Current law generally disqualifies unemployment benefit claimants during any week in which their unemployment resulted from a labor dispute.
For labor disputes that start on or after December 14, 2027, this bill lifts this disqualification once the dispute has lasted for 14 continuous days.
Existing law similarly allows claimants to qualify for benefits during a labor dispute, with no waiting period, if the (1) unemployment is caused by a lockout (for example, the employer closed the employment premises) or (2) claimant is not participating in the dispute and does not belong to a trade, class, or organization of workers participating in, financing, or directly interested in the dispute (for example, non-union employees at a business temporarily closed by a strike).
By law, unchanged by the bill, to be eligible for unemployment benefits a claimant generally must (1) file and claim and register as required by the Department of Labor;
(2) be able to work, available for work, and making reasonable efforts to obtain work;
and (3) have earned a certain amount of wages prior to their unemployment (CGS § 31-235).
EFFECTIVE DATE:
Show all 42 changed rows (2 more)
Previous
Latest
October 1, 2026 COMMITTEE ACTION Labor and Public Employees Committee Joint Favorable Yea 9 Nay 4 (03/19/2026) SB440 / File No.
367 5
View plain text versions (3)

How this bill changes current law

3 changes Share ↗

AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.

The bill modifies conditions under which striking workers can receive unemployment benefits, allowing access after a labor dispute has lasted for fourteen days.

  • 31-236(a)(3)

    [provided] → except that the provisions of this subsection do not apply if it is shown to the satisfaction of the administrator that:

    This change clarifies that benefits will not be provided if certain conditions about the labor dispute are met.

  • 31-236(a)(3)

    (B) (i) the individual is not participating in or financing or directly interested in the labor dispute that caused the unemployment, and [(B)] → (B) (i) the individual is not participating in or financing or directly interested in the labor dispute that caused the unemployment, and (ii) the individual does not belong to a trade, class or organization of workers, members of which, immediately before the commencement of the labor dispute, were employed at the premises at which the labor dispute occurred, and are participating in or financing or directly interested in the dispute; or

    This change adds more specificity to the conditions under which an individual can receive benefits, detailing the relationship to the labor dispute.

  • 31-236(a)(3)

    A lockout exists whether or not such action is to obtain for the employer more advantageous terms when an employer → A lockout exists whether or not such action is to obtain for the employer more advantageous terms when an employer (i) fails to provide employment to its employees with whom the employer is engaged in a labor dispute, either by physically closing its plant or informing its employees that there will be no work until the labor dispute has terminated, or (ii) makes an announcement that work will be available after the expiration of the existing contract only under terms and conditions that are less favorable to the employees than those current immediately prior to such announcement;

    This change expands the definition of a lockout to include specific employer actions related to employment during a labor dispute.

Action History

  1. FILE NO. 367

  2. SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 254

  3. FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.

  4. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  5. REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/01/26

  6. FILED WITH LCO

  7. Joint Favorable

  8. PUBLIC HEARING 0310

  9. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Labor and Public Employees

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

7 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 180 not signed on

Sponsors (7)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (180)

180 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 180 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 440?
SB 440 is sponsored by Martha Marx (Democratic), Sarah Keitt (Democratic), Saud Anwar (Democratic), Nicholas Menapace (Democratic), Kara Rochelle (Democratic), Nick Gauthier (Democratic), and Martin M. Looney (Democratic).
What is the current status of SB 440?
This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced March 05, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track SB 440?
Track SB 440 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 440

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 440

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →