SB 363 — AN ACT ALLOWING MUNICIPALITIES TO IMPOSE COMMERCIAL VACANCY ASSESSMENTS IN CERTAIN DISTRICTS.
Last action — FILE NO. 296
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced February 26, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the Senate.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
2 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
144 added · 48 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent changes to Bill SB 363 include adding a note clarifying that the fiscal impacts are based on various information sources and do not reflect the intent of the General Assembly. Additionally, it specifies that there is no immediate financial impact on the state, and municipalities could potentially see no cost associated with the bill. These changes aim to provide better transparency and clarify the bill's financial implications for the public and lawmakers, helping them to understand how it might affect budgets.
Senate General Assembly RaisedFile Bill No.
363296 February Session, 2026 LCOSubstitute Senate Bill No.
2232363 ReferredSenate, toApril 1, 2026 The Committee on PLANNINGPlanning ANDand DEVELOPMENTDevelopment Introducedreported by:through SEN.
(PD)RAHMAN ANof ACTthe ALLOWING4th MUNICIPALITIESDist., TOChairperson IMPOSEof COMMERCIALthe VACANCYCommittee ASSESSMENTSon INthe CERTAINpart DISTRICTS.of the Senate, that the substitute bill ought to pass.
AN ACT ALLOWING MUNICIPALITIES TO IMPOSE COMMERCIAL VACANCY ASSESSMENTS IN CERTAIN DISTRICTS.
(1) "Active renovation" means construction or repair work pursuantlasting tonot anless approvedthan buildingninety permit,consecutive withdays suchand workundertaken ongoingpursuant forto atan leastapproved ninetybuilding consecutivepermit; days;
(b) Any municipality may, by vote of its legislative body, adoptor, anin ordinancea imposingsSB363 an/ assessmentFile on any real property that is (1) vacant, (2) zoned for commercial use and not used for any residential LCO No.
2232296 1 ofsSB363 3File RaisedNo. Bill No.363 purpose, and (3) located in a defined district or zone adopted by the municipality, at the rate of five dollars per square foot for any assessment year during which such property remains vacant.
(c)296 Notwithstandingmunicipality where the provisionslegislative ofbody subsectionis (b)a town meeting, its board of thisselectmen, section,adopt noan ordinance imposing an assessment shallbeon imposedany onrealpropertyreal pursuantproperty tothissectionthat if:is (1) vacant, (2) located in a zone that allows for commercial use and not used for any residential purpose, (3) located at ground level, if such real property is part of a building or structure containing two or more levels, and (4) located in a defined area adopted by the municipality in which such assessment is applicable.
Such assessment shall be at a rate determined by the municipality, provided such rate doesnot exceed five dollarsper square foot for any assessment year during which such property remains vacant.
(c) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (b) of this section, no assessment shallbe imposedonrealproperty pursuant tothissection if:
(2) The owner identifies specific legal or regulatory barriers, including pending litigation, environmental reviews or permitting delaysdelaysthat that have preventedpreventedoccupancy occupancyor ofuse theoftherealproperty real property during the preceding assessment year;
Any such assessment may be appealed pursuant to the provisions of section 12-111 of the generalsSB363 statutes./ File No.
296 2 sSB363 File No.
296 general statutes.
(f) Any assessment collected pursuant to this section shall be deposited into a fund established by the municipality.
Such fund shall be used solely for infrastructure improvements, the remediation of blight or the promotion of development in the area defined by the municipality pursuant to subdivision(4)ofsubsection(b)ofthissection.
The proceeds of such fund shall not be used for operating expenses of any kind or be considered a part of the municipal general fund.
Expenditures from such fund shall be authorized in the same manner as any other capital expenditure of the municipality.
Any income earned by any moneys on deposit in such fund shall accrue to the fund.
LCOSection No.1 October 1, 2026, and New section applicable to assessment years commencing on or after October 1, 2026 Statement of Legislative Commissioners:
2232Subdiv. 2 of 3 Raised Bill No.
363(a)(1) Sectionwas 1rewritten Octoberfor 1,clarity; 2026, and New section applicable to assessment years commencing on or after October 1, 2026 Statement of Purpose:
To allow municipalities to impose a commercial vacancy assessment on vacant commercial property located in districtsSubdiv. designated by the municipality.
[Proposed(b)(2), deletions"zoned" arewas enclosedchangedto"locatedinazonethatallows",foraccuracy;inSubdiv.(b)(4), in"identified" brackets.was changed to "adopted", for accuracy, and "in which such assessment isapplicable"wasadded for clarity;andinSubdiv.(c)(2), "or use" was added after "occupancy", for accuracy.
ProposedPD additionsJoint areFavorable indicatedSubst. by underline, except that when the entire text of a bill or resolution or a section of a bill or resolution is new, it is not underlined.] LCO No.
2232sSB363 3/ ofFile 3No.
296 3 sSB363 File No.
296 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
Municipalities Effect FY 27 $ FY 28 $ All Municipalities Potential None Potential Revenue Gain Explanation The bill allows municipalities to impose a fine on vacant commercial property that meets certain criteria.
This results in a revenue gain to municipalities beginning in FY 28 to the extent this fine is imposed.
Any revenue gain is dependent on the number of fines imposed and the amount of the fine.
1 The bill specifies how the revenue from fines must be spent which does not result in a fiscal impact.
The Out Years The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would continue into the future subject to the number and amount of fines.
1The bill allows the fine to be set at up to $5 per square foot and charge it for each assessment year that the space is vacant.
sSB363 / File No.
Show all 70 changed lines (30 more)
296 4 sSB363 File No.
296 OLR Bill Analysis sSB 363 AN ACT ALLOWING MUNICIPALITIES TO IMPOSE COMMERCIAL VACANCY ASSESSMENTS IN CERTAIN DISTRICTS.
SUMMARY This bill allows municipalities to impose fines on certain property owners if their property (1) is in a municipally defined area;
(2) is zoned for commercial use;
and (3) has been vacant (meaning not occupied or actively used) for more than 180 days, either in a row or nonconsecutively.
Under the bill, municipalities may impose the fine on vacant real property (generally land, buildings, and other improvements permanently attached to the land) that is not used for residential purposes, but only on the ground level of multi-story buildings.
It allows municipalities to set the fine at up to $5 per square foot and charge it for each assessment year the space is vacant.
Revenue from the fines must be used to improve the defined area, as described below.
Under the bill, a property is exempt from the fine if:
1.
its owner is actively renovating it (doing permitted construction or repair work lasting at least 90 consecutive days);
2.
a permit application for it is pending;
3.
a natural disaster impacted it;
4.
its owner identifies specific legal or regulatory barriers that kept it from being occupied or used during the last assessment year (including pending litigation, environmental reviews, or permitting delays);
or sSB363 / File No.
296 5 sSB363 File No.
296 5.
state or local authorities deemed it uninhabitable.
The bill requires municipalities to deposit collected fines into a fund the municipality establishes and use these funds and any interest that accrues solely to improve infrastructure, remediate blight, or promote development in the defined area.
It specifies funds may not be used for the municipality’s operating expenses or treated as part of its general fund.
It requires that authorizations to use these funds be made in the same way as for other capital expenditures.
Under the bill, to establish this fine and defined area, the municipality’s legislative body (or board of selectmen if the legislative body is a town meeting) must (1) vote to adopt an ordinance and (2) establish how owners may claim an exemption.
The bill makes the fines due on the same date as taxes on real property and allows people to appeal the fines to the board of assessment appeals in the same way as property taxes are appealed under existing law.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
October 1, 2026, and applicable to assessment years starting on and after that date.
COMMITTEE ACTION Planning and Development Committee Joint Favorable Substitute Yea 16 Nay 5 (03/13/2026) sSB363 / File No.
296 6
Show all 70 changed rows (30 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- File No. 296 View text pdf
- Raised Bill View text Current pdf
- Substitute PD Joint Favorable Substitute pdf
Action History
-
FILE NO. 296
-
SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 223
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 03/31/26
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable Substitute
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0304
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Planning and Development
Sponsors
- Mccarthy Vahey · Primary
- Jane M. Garibay · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 185 not signed on
Sponsors (2)
- Mccarthy Vahey
- Jane M. Garibay Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (185)
185 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 185 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 363?
- SB 363 is sponsored by Mccarthy Vahey and Jane M. Garibay (Democratic).
- What is the current status of SB 363?
- This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced February 26, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track SB 363?
- Track SB 363 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 363
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 363
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →