Connecticut 2026 Session Status: In Committee Bipartisan · 1 R · 1 D cosponsors

SB 302 — AN ACT REVISING VARIOUS PROVISIONS RELATING TO CERTAIN APPROVALS BY THE BANKING COMMISSIONER AND CONNECTICUT BANK BRANCH APPLICATIONS.

Last action — FILE NO. 126

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced February 26, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the Senate.

Odds of enactment

Low chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Advancing 34% · moderate confidence
  • In Committee

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 2 sponsors

    2 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (1 R · 1 D) — cross-party backing.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

196 added · 94 removed

Plain-language change summary

The latest version of Bill SB 302 includes a new header confirming it is a substitute bill reported by the Committee on Banking, indicating it's been reviewed and amended for further consideration. Additionally, the fiscal impact statement mentions that the bill will have no financial effects on the state or municipalities. This is important because it assures lawmakers and the public that the proposed changes won't strain public finances, making it easier for the bill to gain support and move forward.

→
Previous
Latest
General Assembly Raised Bill No.
Senate General Assembly File No.
302 February Session, 2026 LCO No.
126 February Session, 2026 Substitute Senate Bill No.
2058 Referred to Committee on BANKING Introduced by:
302 Senate, March 23, 2026 The Committee on Banking reported through SEN.
(BA) AN ACT REVISING VARIOUS PROVISIONS RELATING TO CERTAIN APPROVALS BY THE BANKING COMMISSIONER AND CONNECTICUT BANK BRANCH APPLICATIONS.
MILLER of the 27th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the Senate, that the substitute bill ought to pass.
AN ACT REVISING VARIOUS PROVISIONS RELATING TO CERTAIN APPROVALS BY THE BANKING COMMISSIONER AND CONNECTICUT BANK BRANCH APPLICATIONS.
and (2) except as otherwise provided in this subsection, if the entity, and in the case of an approval pursuant to LCO No.
and (2) except as otherwise provided in this sSB302 / File No.
2058 1 of 4 Raised Bill No.302 section 36a-411, the bank or any subsidiary bank of the Connecticut holding company, received [any] an overall rating [other than an assigned rating of "outstanding"] of "needs to improve" or "substantial noncompliance" on its most recent applicable community reinvestment performance evaluation, the resulting entity will provide adequate services to meet the banking needs of all community residents, including low-income residents and moderate-income residents to the extent permitted by its charter, in accordance with a plan submitted by the applicant to the commissioner, in such form and containing such information as the commissioner may require, or, if acceptable to the commissioner, in accordance with an approved strategic plan prepared under federal CRA, or the relevant portion thereof, that is submitted by the applicant to the commissioner.
126 1 sSB302 File No.
126 subsection, if the entity, and in the case of an approval pursuant to section 36a-411, the bank or any subsidiary bank of the Connecticut holding company, received any overall rating other than an assigned rating of "outstanding" on its most recent applicable community reinvestment performance evaluation, or, in the case of an approval under subsection (b), (c) or (d) of section 36a-145, as amended by this act, if the entity received an overall rating of "needs to improve" or "substantial noncompliance" on its most recent applicable community reinvestment performance evaluation, the resulting entity will provide adequate servicesto meet thebanking needsofallcommunity residents, including low-income residents and moderate-income residents to the extent permitted by its charter, in accordance with a plan submitted by the applicant to the commissioner, in such form and containing such information as the commissioner may require, or, if acceptable to the commissioner, in accordance with an approved strategic plan prepared under federal CRA, or the relevant portion thereof, that is submitted by the applicant to the commissioner.
In making such finding, the commissioner shall, unless clearly inapplicable, consider, among other factors, whether the plan identifies specific unmet credit and consumer bankingneedsinthelocalcommunityandspecifieshowsuchneedswill be satisfied, provides for sufficient distribution of banking services among branches or satellite devices, or both, located in low-income neighborhoods, contains adequate assurances that banking services will be offered on a nondiscriminatory basis and demonstrates a commitment to extend credit for housing, small business and consumer purposes in low-income neighborhoods.
In making such finding, the commissioner shall, unless clearly inapplicable, consider, among other factors, whether the plan identifies specific unmet credit and consumer bankingneedsinthelocalcommunityandspecifieshowsuchneedswill be satisfied, provides for sufficient distribution of banking services among branches or satellite devices, or both, located in low-income neighborhoods, contains adequate assurances that banking services will be offered on a nondiscriminatory basis and demonstrates a sSB302 / File No.
The submission of such plan shall not be required in the case of an approval under subsection (d) of LCO No.
126 2 sSB302 File No.
2058 2 of 4 Raised Bill No.302 section 36a-145, provided, the commissioner may require the filing of such information in lieu of a plan as the commissioner deems appropriate.
126 commitment to extend credit for housing, small business and consumer purposes in low-income neighborhoods.
The submission of such plan shall not be required in the case of an approval under subsection (d) of section 36a-145, provided, the commissioner may require the filing of such information in lieu of a plan as the commissioner deems appropriate.
An application by an eligible entity shall be deemed approved on the [twelfth] fifth business day after expiration of the comment period provided in the department's weekly bulletin, unless the commissioner informs the applicant, in writing, prior to such [twelfth] fifth business day, that (1) LCO No.
An application by an eligible entity shall be deemed approved on the [twelfth] fifth business day after expiration of the comment period provided in the sSB302 / File No.
2058 3 of 4 Raised Bill No.
126 3 sSB302 File No.
302 an adverse comment has been received that warrants additional investigation or review;
126 department's weekly bulletin, unless the commissioner informs the applicant, in writing, prior to such [twelfth] fifth business day, that (1) an adverse comment has been received that warrants additional investigation or review;
2 October 1, 2026 36a-145(n) Statement of Purpose:
2 October 1, 2026 36a-145(n) BA Joint Favorable Subst.
To revise various provisions relating to (1) community reinvestment performance evaluation ratings and certain approvals by the Banking Commissioner, and (2) timeframes applicable to certain applications regarding Connecticut bank branches.
sSB302 / File No.
[Proposed deletions are enclosed in brackets.
126 4 sSB302 File No.
Proposed additions are indicated by underline, except that when the entire text of a bill or resolution or a section of a bill or resolution is new, it is not underlined.] LCO No.
126 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
2058 4 of 4
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
None Explanation The bill makes adjustments to Connecticut bank branch applications and shortens certain notification timeframes, resulting in no fiscal impact to the state.
sSB302 / File No.
126 5 sSB302 File No.
126 OLR Bill Analysis sSB 302 AN ACT REVISING VARIOUS PROVISIONS RELATING TO CERTAIN APPROVALS BY THE BANKING COMMISSIONER AND CONNECTICUT BANK BRANCH APPLICATIONS.
SUMMARY This bill:
1.
eliminates the requirement that Connecticut banks with a “satisfactory” Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) rating submit a plan for meeting community banking needs when applying to the Department of Banking (DOB) to establish a branch location in the state (including a limited or special need limited branch) or convert a limited branch to a branch, or vice versa, and 2.
generally shortens, by seven days, the timeframe for the commissioner to notifybanks applying to establish aConnecticut or out-of-state branch of his determination before the applications are deemed approved.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
October 1, 2026 COMMUNITY BANKING NEEDS PLAN Under current law, the commissioner cannot approve certain types of applications from entities that received a rating other than “outstanding” on their most recent community reinvestment performance evaluation unless they submit a plan illustrating how they will provide adequate services to meet the banking needs of all community residents, including those with low or moderate income.
This requirement applies to entities seeking various DOB approvals, including to (1) open a Connecticut branch, (2) merge or sSB302 / File No.
126 6 sSB302 File No.
126 consolidatewithaConnecticutbank,or(3)organizeaholdingcompany.
The bill exempts any entity with a “satisfactory” rating on its most recent applicable community reinvestment performance evaluation from this requirement when applying to (1) establish a Connecticut branch location, including a limited or special need limited branch, or (2) convert a limited branch to a branch, or vice versa.
It retains the requirement for applicants for other DOB approvals.
Existing law authorizes the commissioner to waive this requirement or require the submission of alternative information if the entity has at least a “satisfactory” rating and meets certain other criteria (i.e.
for “eligible entities;” see BACKGROUND — Eligible Entities).
Show all 66 changed rows (26 more)
Previous
Latest
The law also waives this requirement for applications to establish a mobile branch in the state, but allows the commissioner to require applicants to submit other information instead of a plan.
TIMEFRAME FOR BRANCH APPLICATION APPROVALS By law, when the commissioner receives an application from a Connecticut bank to establish a branch here (including a limited, special need limited, or mobile branch) or outside of the state (including a limited or mobile branch), he must publish a notice of the application in the department’s weekly bulletin, determine if the applicant is an eligible entity, and promptly notify the applicant of his determination.
The bill requires that the application be deemed approved on the 5th, rather than the 12th, business day after the end of the comment period provided in the department’s weekly bulletin, unless the commissioner informs the applicant, in writing, before then of certain facts (e.g., that an adverse comment has been received that warrants additional investigation or the application requires additional information).
It similarly allows the application to be deemed approved before the end of the 5th, rather than the 12th, day if the commissioner issues a written notice of his intent not to disapprove it.
sSB302 / File No.
126 7 sSB302 File No.
126 BACKGROUND Eligible Entities By law, an “eligible entity” is an applicant that:
1.
received a composite rating of one or two under the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System as a result of its most recent safety and soundness examination;
2.
received a compliance rating of one or two on its most recent compliance examination;
3.
received a satisfactory or better rating on its most recent community reinvestment performance evaluation;
4.
is well capitalized, as determined under federal law;
5.
is not subject to a cease and desist order, consent order, prompt correction action directive, written agreement, memorandum of understanding, or other administrative agreement with its primary state or federal banking regulator;
and 6.
is not subject to any formal or informal administrative action by that regulator.
CRA Ratings In its CRA ratings, DOB gives each state-chartered bank a score of outstanding, satisfactory, needs to improve, or substantial noncompliance.
As of December 31, 2025, four banks have an outstanding rating;
one has a needs to improve rating;
and the remainder (18) have a satisfactory rating.
No banks received a substantial noncompliance rating.
COMMITTEE ACTION Banking Committee Joint Favorable Substitute Yea 13 Nay 0 (03/10/2026) sSB302 / File No.
126 8
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. FILE NO. 126

  2. SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 99

  3. FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.

  4. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  5. REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 03/23/26

  6. FILED WITH LCO

  7. Joint Favorable Substitute

  8. PUBLIC HEARING 0303

  9. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Banking

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 185 not signed on

Sponsors (2)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (185)

185 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 185 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 302?
SB 302 is sponsored by Eric C. Berthel (Republican) and Fred Gee (Democratic).
What is the current status of SB 302?
This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced February 26, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track SB 302?
Track SB 302 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 302

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 302

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →