Connecticut 2026 Session Status: In Committee Bipartisan · 1 D · 1 R cosponsors

SB 316 — AN ACT CONCERNING THE TESTING OF SOILS AT CERTAIN SOLAR FACILITIES.

Last action — FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced February 26, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the Senate.

Odds of enactment

Low chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Advancing 34% · moderate confidence
  • In Committee

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 2 sponsors

    2 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (1 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

8 added · 108 removed

Plain-language change summary

The latest version of Bill SB 316 has been simplified and focused on the topic of soil testing at solar facilities. It eliminates a lot of previous content that may have been unnecessary or overly complex, making the bill clearer and easier to understand. This change is important as it allows lawmakers and stakeholders to better grasp the bill's intent and ensures that the focus remains on the critical issue of environmental safety at solar sites.

→
Previous
Latest
Senate General Assembly File No.
General Assembly Substitute Bill No.
220 February Session, 2026 Substitute Senate Bill No.
316 February Session, 2026 AN ACT CONCERNING THE TESTING OF SOILS AT CERTAIN SOLAR FACILITIES.
316 Senate, March 30, 2026 The Committee on Environment reported through SEN.
LOPES of the 6th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the Senate, that the substitute bill ought to pass.
AN ACT CONCERNING THE TESTING OF SOILS AT CERTAIN SOLAR FACILITIES.
The Department of Energy and Environmental Protection shall prescribe the parametersandrequirementsofsuch soiltest andtheresultsofsuch soil test shall be submitted by the applicant or petitioner, as applicable, to the Siting Council and to the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection prior to the issuance of any such certificate or declaratory ruling and in accordance with any procedures established by the Siting sSB316 / File No.
The Department of Energy and Environmental Protection shall prescribe the parametersandrequirementsofsuch soiltest andtheresultsofsuch soil test shall be submitted by the applicant or petitioner, as applicable, to the Siting Council and to the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection prior to the issuance of any such certificate or declaratory ruling and in accordance with any procedures established by the Siting Council and department for submission of such soil test results.
220 1 sSB316 File No.
220 Council and department for submission of such soil test results.
Such second soil test shall determine the presence of the same contaminants tested for in connection with the application for a certificate or petition for a declaratory ruling for such facility, as applicable.
Such second soil test shall determine the presence of the same contaminants tested for in LCO 1 of 2 Substitute Bill No.
316 connection with the application for a certificate or petition for a declaratory ruling for such facility, as applicable.
sSB316 / File No.
APP Joint Favorable LCO 2 of 2
220 2 sSB316 File No.
220 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 27 $ FY 28 $ Department of Energy and GF - Cost 131,304 81,304 Environmental Protection State Comptroller - Fringe GF - Cost 34,001 34,001 Benefits1 CT Siting Council SCF - Cost 50,000 None Note:
GF=General Fund;
SCF=Siting Council Fund Municipal Impact:
None Explanation The bill requires certain applicants and petitioners for solar photovoltaic facilities to conduct soil tests at proposed locations.
This results in a cost to the state of approximately $215,305 in FY 27 and $115,305 annually, thereafter.
Under the bill, the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) and the Connecticut Siting Council (CSC) are responsible for ensuring that applicants and petitioners meet the new requirements of the bill.
It is estimated that DEEP will require one full- time Environmental Analyst 2, with an annual salary of $81,304 and corresponding fringe benefits of $34,001.
The new position will be responsible for overseeing soil collection and working with operators of solar photovoltaic facilities to ensure that requirements of the bill are The fringe benefit costs for most state employees are budgeted centrally in accounts administered by the Comptroller.
The estimated active employee fringe benefit cost associated with most personnel changes is 41.82% of payroll in FY 27.
sSB316 / File No.
220 3 sSB316 File No.
220 being met.
Additionally, both DEEP and the CSC will incur one-time environmental consulting fees (estimated to be $50,000 each based on similar contracts).
The scope of DEEP’s consulting work will include educating involved parties in site investigation and certification procedures, and the CSC will require a consultant to help develop guidelines for applicants and petitioners to provide soil testing results prior to certificate and declaratory ruling submissions, as well as requirements to ensure additional testing after two years, which is required by the bill.
The Out Years The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would continue into the future subject to inflation, except for the consulting fees which would be one-time in nature.
sSB316 / File No.
220 4 sSB316 File No.
220 OLR Bill Analysis sSB 316 AN ACT CONCERNING THE TESTING OF SOILS AT CERTAIN SOLAR FACILITIES.
SUMMARY This bill requires parties seeking the Siting Council’s approval for solar photovoltaic facilities with capacities of at least two megawatts to ensure that soil tests are conducted at the facility’s proposed location.
The requirement applies when they are seeking the council’s approval for a certificate of environmental compatibility and public need (see BACKGROUND), including through a declaratory ruling.
The tests must determine the presence of contaminants, including degraded heavy metalsandtoxicsubstances(for example, cadmium,lead,arsenic, and zinc).
Under the bill, the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) must set the parameters and requirements for these soil tests.
Applicants and petitioners must submit the test results (1) to the Siting Council and DEEP before a certificate or declaratory ruling is issued and (2) following the procedures DEEP and the Siting Council establish.
At least two years after the first soil test, the bill requires the facilities’ owners or operators to ensure a second test is conducted according to DEEP’s parameters and requirements.
Show all 49 changed rows (9 more)
Previous
Latest
The second test must look for the same contaminants described above and be submitted to the Siting Council and DEEP according to any procedure they set for second tests.
Underthebill,therespective applicant,petitioner,owner,oroperator must pay for the soil tests.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
October 1, 2026 sSB316 / File No.
220 5 sSB316 File No.
220 BACKGROUND Environmental Compatibility and Public Need Certificates By law, a certificate of environmental compatibility and public need is generally required for certain activities that the Siting Council determines may have a substantial adverse environmental effect, including exercising eminent domain, preparing a site, beginning facility construction or modifications, or supplying a facility (CGS § 16- 50k).
Among other things, “facilities” generally includes those that generate or store electricity.
COMMITTEE ACTION Environment Committee Joint Favorable Substitute Yea 32 Nay 2 (03/13/2026) sSB316 / File No.
220 6
View plain text versions (4)

Action History

  1. FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.

  2. NO NEW FILE BY COMM. ON Appropriations

  3. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  4. FILED WITH LCO

  5. Joint Favorable

  6. IMMEDIATE TRANSMITTAL TO COMM. ON Appropriations

  7. FILE NO. 220

  8. SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 175

  9. FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.

  10. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  11. REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 03/30/26

  12. FILED WITH LCO

  13. Joint Favorable Substitute

  14. PUBLIC HEARING 0304

  15. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Environment

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 185 not signed on

Sponsors (2)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (185)

185 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 185 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 316?
SB 316 is sponsored by Geraldo C. Reyes (Democratic) and John A. Kissel (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 316?
This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced February 26, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track SB 316?
Track SB 316 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 316

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 316

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →