HB 5254 — AN ACT CONCERNING THE PROCESS AND TIMETABLE FOR THE REVIEW OF EXISTING REGULATIONS OF CONNECTICUT STATE AGENCIES.
Last action — FILE NO. 320
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced February 19, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
8 sponsors
8 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (8 D).
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
171 added · 92 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of HB 5254 changes the deadline for agencies to review their existing regulations from July 1, 2017, to February 1, 2027. This adjustment underscores the importance of establishing a new timeline for these important reviews and ensures that regulations are assessed and updated regularly, promoting efficiency and clarity in government operations. Additionally, the requirement for agencies to specify how they can reduce the number and length of regulations remains, highlighting a commitment to regulatory reform and accountability.
House of Representatives General Assembly RaisedFile Bill No.
5254320 February Session, 2026 LCOSubstitute House Bill No.
15335254 ReferredHouse toof Representatives, April 1, 2026 The Committee on GOVERNMENTGovernment OVERSIGHTOversight Introducedreported by:through REP.
(GOS)DATHAN ANof ACTthe CONCERNING142nd THEDist., PROCESSChairperson ANDof TIMETABLEthe FORCommittee THEon REVIEWthe OFpart EXISTINGof REGULATIONSthe OFHouse, CONNECTICUTthat STATEthe AGENCIES.substitute bill ought to pass.
AN ACT CONCERNING THE PROCESS AND TIMETABLE FOR THE REVIEW OF EXISTING REGULATIONS OF CONNECTICUT STATE AGENCIES.
(a)[(a) Not later than [JulyJuly 1, 2017, and not later than every seven years thereafter, each committee of cognizance, in consultation with each agency that iswithinthecognizance ofthecommittee, shallestablishthe date by which each such agency shall submit a review of its existing regulations and shall notify the administrator of the regulation review committee of each such date and any extension thereof.
In establishing such date, or any extension of the date that may be requested by the agency, the committee of cognizance (1) shall consider the volume and complexity of such regulations and the personnel and other resources of the agency that would be available to undertake the review within thesHB5254 agency's/ availableFile appropriations, and (2) may establish a schedule of dates for the review of various portions of such regulations upon the LCO No.
1533320 1 ofsHB5254 4File RaisedNo. Bill No.5254 agreement of the committee of cognizance and the administrative head of the agency.
(b)320 Not later than the dateagency's specifiedavailable byappropriations, theand committee(2) ofmay cognizanceestablish pursuanta toschedule subsection (a) of thisdates section,for each such agency shall submit to the committee of cognizance and to the administrator of the regulation review committee] February 1, 2027, (1) (A) the office of thevarious Governorportions shall prescribe an individual timetable for each agency of the Executive Department that reports to the Governor, and (B) any other agency not in the Executive Department shall prescribe an individual timetableforsuchagency,toconduct areviewofitsexistingregulations, [which] provided any such individualregulations timetableupon shall be not later than every seven years, and (2) the officeagreement of the Governorcommittee shallof notifycognizance the regulation review committee and the jointadministrative standinghead committee of the Generalagency. Assembly having cognizance of matters relating to government oversight of each suchindividual timetable.Any such reviewofexisting regulations shall include, but need not be limited to:
(b) Not later than the date specified by the committee of cognizance pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, each such agency shall submit to the committee of cognizance and to the administrator of the regulation review committee] (a) Not later than February 1, 2027, (1) (A) the office of the Governor shall prescribe an individual timetable for each agency of the Executive Department that reports to the Governor, and (B) any other agency not in the Executive Department shall prescribe an individual timetable for such agency, to conduct a review of its existing regulations, [which] provided any such individual timetable shall be not later than every seven years, and (2) theoffice of the Governor shall notify theregulation review committee and the joint standing committee of the General Assembly having cognizance of matters relating to government oversight ofeachsuchindividualtimetable.Any such reviewofexisting regulations shall include, but need not be limited to:
(c)(b) Not later than the specified initial submission date for the completion of such review determined pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, and, thereafter, the reoccurring scheduled timetable prescribed individually by the office of the Governor or the agency, as applicable, eachsHB5254 agency/ shallFile submit a summary of the results of the review conducted under subsection (a) of this section to the administrator of the regulation review committee, the committee of cognizance and the LCO No.
1533320 2 ofsHB5254 4File RaisedNo. Bill No.5254 joint standing committee of the General Assembly having cognizance of matters relating to government oversight, in accordance with the provisions of section 11-4a.
[(c)]320 (d)each Uponagency receiptshall of(1) ansubmit agency'sa [review] summary of the results of itsthe review,review conducted under subsection (a) of this section to the administrator of the regulation review committee, the committee of cognizance [shall]and maythe schedulejoint standing committee of the General Assembly having cognizance of matters relating to government oversight, in accordance with the provisions of section 11-4a, and (2) post a publiclisting hearing,of which,any ifregulations applicable,recommended shallto be heldrepealed noton laterits thanInternet ninetyweb dayssite followingand the eRegulations System and shall provide a public comment period for interested persons to present their views on the proposed repeal of such receipt.regulations on the eRegulations System.
(c) Upon receipt of an agency's [review] summary of the results of its review, the committee of cognizance [shall] may schedule a public hearing, which, if applicable, shall be held not later than ninety days following such receipt.
[(d)](d) (e)FollowingFollowing thepublichearing,ifapplicable:(1)Thecommittee of cognizance may request the agencypublic tohearing, initiateif theapplicable: process under chapter 54 to carry out a recommendation of the agency under subsection [(b)] (a) of this section to amend or repeal an existing regulation which, in the determination of the committee of cognizance, does not require the enactment of authorizing legislation, and (2) the committee of cognizance shall consider any recommendation by the agency under subsection [(b)] (a) of this section which, in the determination of the committee of cognizance, would require the enactment of authorizing legislation.
[(e)](1) (f)The Ifcommittee anof agencycognizance failsmay torequest submitthe aagency summaryto ofinitiate the resultsprocess ofunder thechapter review54 ofto itscarry regulationsout toa therecommendation committee of cognizance,the [and]agency theunder administratorsubsection of[(b)] the(a) regulationof reviewthis committeesection andto theamend jointor standingrepeal committeean ofexisting theregulation Generalwhich, Assemblyin havingthe cognizancedetermination of mattersthe relatingcommittee toof governmentcognizance, oversightdoes asnot requiredrequire bythe subsectionenactment (b) of thisauthorizing sectionlegislation, orand if(2) the committee of cognizance determinesshall thatconsider theany agencyrecommendation hasby notthe conductedagency aunder satisfactorysubsection review[(b)] (a) of itsthis regulationssection aswhich, requiredin bythe [said]determination subsectionof (a)the committee of thiscognizance, section,would require the committeeenactment of cognizanceauthorizing may:legislation.
(1)(e) ConductIf an agency fails to submit a reviewsummary of the existingresults regulations of the agency,review asof describedits inregulations subsectionto [(b)]the (a)committee of thiscognizance, section,[and] (2)the requestadministrator of the agencyregulation toreview initiatecommittee and the processjoint understanding chaptercommittee 54of the General Assembly having cognizance of matters relating to carrygovernment outoversight aas recommendationrequired by subsection (b) of this section or if the committee of cognizance pursuantdetermines tothat suchthe reviewagency tohas amendnot orconducted repeala ansatisfactory existingreview regulationof which,its inregulations theas determinationrequired ofby thesHB5254 LCO/ File No.
1533320 3 ofsHB5254 4File Raised Bill No.
5254320 committee[said] ofsubsection cognizance,(a) doesof notthis requiresection, the enactmentcommittee of authorizingcognizance legislation,may: and (3) introduce legislation to authorize the agency to amend or repeal existing regulations.
(1) Conduct a review of the existing regulations of the agency, as described in subsection [(b)] (a) of this section, (2) request the agency to initiate the process under chapter 54 to carry out a recommendation of the committee of cognizance pursuant to such review to amend or repeal an existing regulation which, in the determination of the committee of cognizance, does not require the enactment of authorizing legislation, and (3) introduce legislation to authorize the agency to amend or repeal existing regulations.
2 October 1, 2026 4-189h(3) Statement of Purpose:Legislative Commissioners:
ToIn makeSec. modifications to the process for reviewing agency regulations to determine whether they are obsolete, inconsistent or ineffective and change the deadlines for such review.
[Proposed1(b), deletions"eliminated" areand enclosed"elimination" inwere brackets.changed to "repealed" and "repeal", respectively, for consistency.
ProposedGOS additionsJoint areFavorable indicatedSubst. by underline, except that when the entire text of a bill or resolution or a section of a bill or resolution is new, it is not underlined.] LCO No.
1533sHB5254 4/ ofFile 4No.
320 4 sHB5254 File No.
320 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
None Explanation The bill makes procedural changes regarding state agencies' self- reviews of regulations, which result in no fiscal impact to the state or municipalities.
The Out Years State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
None sHB5254 / File No.
320 5 sHB5254 File No.
320 OLR Bill Analysis sHB 5254 AN ACT CONCERNING THE PROCESS AND TIMETABLE FOR THE REVIEW OF EXISTING REGULATIONS OF CONNECTICUT STATE AGENCIES.
SUMMARY By law, agencies must periodically review their regulations and the legislative committee of cognizance must consider the agency’s recommendations.
This bill eliminates the requirement that each committee, in consultation with the agencies within its cognizance, establish a timeline for conducting these reviews at least every seven years.
It instead transfers responsibility for setting the timeline to the governor’s office, if the agency reports to him, or to the agency itself if it does not report to the governor.
Show all 60 changed lines (20 more)
It keeps the maximum seven-year cycle and adds to the legislative committees that receive these reviews and timelines.
The bill also requires agencies, on the same schedule as their required reviews, to (1) post a list of the regulations it recommends for elimination on the agency’s website and the eRegulations system and (2) allow for public comment on the list through the eRegulations system.
The bill also makes technical and conforming changes.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
October 1, 2026 AGENCY REGULATION REVIEWS Current law requires each legislative committee, at least every seven years, to consult with state agencies within its cognizance to set a date by which the agency will submit a review of its existing regulations to the committee.
Committees must notify the Regulation Review sHB5254 / File No.
320 6 sHB5254 File No.
320 Committee administrator about these dates and any extensions.
The bill instead requires, by February 1, 2027, the governor’s office, for each executive branch agency that reports to the governor, to (1) set an agency-specific timeline for reviewing its existing regulations and (2) notify the Regulation Review and Government Oversight committees about these timelines.
Agencies that do not report to the governor must set their own timelines.
As under current law, the review must occur at least every seven years.
By the specified initial submission date for the review’s completion, and as often as set by the governor or agency as applicable, each agency must submit a summary of the review results to the Regulation Review Committee administrator, the committee of cognizance, and the Government Oversight Committee.
As under existing law, the agency’s review must at least include (1) recommendations for reducing regulations’ number and length;
(2) determinations on whether they are obsolete, unused, inconsistent with other laws, no longer effective, or the subject of written complaints;
and (3) recommendations on extraordinary circumstances warranting their waiver.
Current law requires the committee of cognizance to hold a public hearing within 90 days of receiving the agency’s review.
The bill instead allows committees to do so.
The bill otherwise maintains the committee’s authority to act on agency recommendations.
COMMITTEE ACTION Government Oversight Committee Joint Favorable Substitute Yea 12 Nay 0 (03/17/2026) sHB5254 / File No.
320 7
Show all 60 changed rows (20 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- File No. 320 View text pdf
- Raised Bill View text Current pdf
- Substitute GOS Joint Favorable Substitute pdf
Action History
-
FILE NO. 320
-
HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 239
-
FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 03/31/26
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable Substitute
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0224
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Government Oversight
Sponsors
- Christopher Poulos · Primary
- Anne M. Hughes · Primary
- Hector Arzeno · Primary
- Stephen R. Meskers · Primary
- Michael D. Quinn · Primary
- Kerry S. Wood · Primary
- Savet Constantine · Primary
- Lucy Dathan · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →8 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 179 not signed on
Sponsors (8)
- Christopher Poulos Democratic
- Anne M. Hughes Democratic
- Hector Arzeno Democratic
- Stephen R. Meskers Democratic
- Michael D. Quinn Democratic
- Kerry S. Wood Democratic
- Savet Constantine Democratic
- Lucy Dathan Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (179)
179 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 179 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 5254?
- HB 5254 is sponsored by Christopher Poulos (Democratic), Anne M. Hughes (Democratic), Hector Arzeno (Democratic), Stephen R. Meskers (Democratic), Michael D. Quinn (Democratic), Kerry S. Wood (Democratic), Savet Constantine (Democratic), and Lucy Dathan (Democratic).
- What is the current status of HB 5254?
- This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced February 19, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HB 5254?
- Track HB 5254 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 5254
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 5254
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →