SB 483 — AN ACT ESTABLISHING THE CRIME OF DIGITAL DEFRAUDING.
Last action — SIGNED BY GOVERNOR
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 11, 2026. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Ned Lamont (Democratic) on June 04, 2026.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
11 sponsors
11 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (7 R · 4 D) — cross-party backing.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
In plain language
This bill establishes the crime of digital defrauding.
The bill creates legal penalties for digital defrauding activities, focusing on crimes that occur online. This aims to address fraudulent actions carried out through digital platforms.
What this means for you
- Consumers: Consumers may see increased protection from online fraud due to the establishment of legal penalties for digital defrauding.
- Small Business: Small businesses are likely to benefit from improved legal recourse against digital fraud targeting their operations.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
36 added · 134 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendment to Bill SB 483 changes the title from "digital forgery" to "digital defrauding" and clarifies the definition of the crime. It emphasizes that the act involves intentionally creating fake visual or audio representations that can mislead others for financial gain, and it introduces a specific affirmative defense for defendants who notify viewers that the content is fake. This matters because it strengthens legal protections against deceptive practices involving digital media and helps ensure that individuals are aware when content may not be genuine.
Substitute Senate GeneralBill Assembly File No.
578483 FebruaryPublic Session,Act 2026 Substitute Senate Bill No.
48326-119 Senate,AN AprilACT 9,ESTABLISHING 2026THE TheCRIME CommitteeOF onDIGITAL JudiciaryDEFRAUDING. reportedthrough SEN.
WINFIELD of the 10th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the Senate, that the substitute bill ought to pass.
AN ACT ESTABLISHING THE CRIME OF DIGITAL FORGERY.
(NEW)Section (Effective53a-119 Octoberof 1,the 2026)general (a)statutes A person is guiltyamended ofby digitaladding forgerysubdivision when(19) suchas person,follows with(Effective intentOctober to1, cause2026): financial injury to another person, creates and disseminates a visual representation or audio recording that such person knows or should have known is a digitally forged likeness.
(b)(NEW) For(19) purposesDigital ofdefrauding. this section:
(1)(A) "Disseminate"A meansperson is guilty of digital defrauding when such person, with intent to sell,cause give,financial provide,injury lend,to trade,another mail,person, deliver,creates transfer,and publish,distribute,disseminates circulate,a present,exhibit,advertisevisual representation or otherwiseaudio offer;recording that such person knows or should have known is a digitally forged likeness.
and(B) (2)"DigitallyFor forgedpurposes likeness" means any photograph, film, videotape or other visual representation of athis personsubdivision, or(i) an"disseminate" audiomeans recordingto ofsell, agive, person'svoiceprovide, thatlend, (A)is(i)nottrade, whollymail, recordedbydeliver, acameraortransfer, anaudiopublish, recorder,distribute, orcirculate, (ii)present, eitherexhibit, partiallyadvertise or whollyotherwise generatedoffer; by a computer sSB483 / File No.
578and 1(ii) sSB483"Digitally Fileforged No.likeness" means any photograph, film, videotape or other visual representation of a person or an audio recording of a person's voice that (I) is not wholly recorded by a camera or anaudio recorder,or either partially or wholly generated by a computer system, (II) depicts, and is virtually indistinguishable from what a reasonable person would believe is the actual depiction of an identifiable person's image or voice, and (III) is created without the consent of the person whose image or voice is depicted.
578(C) system,In (B)any depicts,prosecution andfor isan virtuallyoffense indistinguishableunder fromthis whatsubdivision, ait reasonableshall personbe would believe is the actual depiction of an identifiableaffirmative person'sdefense imagethat or voice, and (C) is created without the consentdefendant oftook thereasonable personaction whoseto imageplace orSubstitute voiceSenate isBill depicted.No.
(c)483 Theviewers provisionsor listeners of subsectiona (a)digitally offorged thislikeness sectionon shallnotice notthat applysuch tovisual anyrepresentation visualrepresentationoror audio recording createdoris disseminatedby a lawdigitally enforcementforged officerlikeness. while in the performance of such law enforcement officer's official duties.
(d)(D) DigitalNothing forgeryin isthis asubdivision (1)shall classbe Aconstrued misdemeanor,to orimpose (2)liability classon Ethe felonyprovider ifof an interactive computer service, as defined in 47 USC 230, an information service, as defined in 47 USC 153, or a persontelecommunications violatedservice, subsectionas (a)defined in section 16-247a, for the creation of thiscontent sectionat asthe partrequest of aanother schemeperson initiatedor the dissemination of content provided by another person, provided such provider did not know that such content was being created or participateddisseminated in byviolation suchof person.this subdivision.
(e)Governor's InAction: any prosecution for an offense under this section, it shall be an affirmative defense that the defendant took reasonable action to place viewers or listeners of a digitally forged likeness on notice that such visual representation or audio recording is a digitally forged likeness.
(f)Approved NothingJune in4, this2026 sectionPublic shallAct beNo. construed to impose liability on the provider of an interactive computer service, as defined in 47 USC 230, an information service, as defined in 47 USC 153, or a telecommunications service, as defined in section 16-247a of the general statutes, for the creation of content at the request of another person or the dissemination of content provided by another person, provided such provider did not know that such content was being created or disseminated in violation of subsection (a) of this section.
This26-119 act2 shallof take2 effect as follows and shall amend the following sections:
Section 1 October 1, 2026 New section JUD Joint Favorable Subst.
sSB483 / File No.
578 2 sSB483 File No.
578 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 27 $ FY 28 $ Correction, Dept.;
Judicial Dept.
GF - Potential Minimal Minimal (Probation) Cost Resources of the General Fund GF - Potential Minimal Minimal Revenue Gain Note:
GF=General Fund Municipal Impact:
None Explanation The bill creates a new crime of digital forgery, punishable as a class A misdemeanor or class E felony, which results in a potential cost to the Department of Correction and the Judicial Department for incarceration or probation and a potential revenue gain to the General Fund from fines.
On average, the marginal cost to the state for incarcerating an offender for the year is $3,300 while the average marginal cost for supervision in the community is less than $600 each year for adults and $450 each year for juveniles.
The Out Years 1Inmate marginal cost is based on increased consumables (e.g., food, clothing, water, sewage, living supplies, etc.) This does not include a change in staffing costs or utility expenses because these expenses would only be realized if a unit or facility opened.
2Probation marginal cost is based on services provided by private providers and only includes costs that increase with each additional participant.
This does not include a cost for additional supervision by a probation officer unless a new offense is anticipated to result in enough additional offenders to require additional probation officers.
sSB483 / File No.
578 3 sSB483 File No.
578 The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would continue into the future subject to the number of offenses and fines collected.
sSB483 / File No.
578 4 sSB483 File No.
578 OLR Bill Analysis sSB 483 AN ACT ESTABLISHING THE CRIME OF DIGITAL FORGERY.
SUMMARY This bill creates a new crime of digital forgery, which is when someone, intending to financially injure someone else, makes and disseminates a visual representation or audio recording that he or she knows or should have known is a digitally forged likeness.
Under the bill, a “digitally forged likeness” is visual representation (sucha photo, film, orvideotape)or anaudiorecording,createdwithout consent from the person whose image or voice is included, that is (1) not entirely recordedby a camera or audio recorder or (2) generated, at least in part, by a computer system.
Show all 52 changed lines (12 more)
It appears the same as what a reasonable person would think is the actual image or sound of the person involved.
The bill makes committing digital forgery generally a class A misdemeanor, which is punishable by up to three months in prison, a fine of up to $500, or both.
It is a class E felony, however, to commit it as part of a scheme, either as the initiator or as a participant.
A class E felony is punishable by up to three years in prison, a fine of up $3,500, or both.
The bill exempts representations or recordings created or disseminated by law enforcement as part of official duties.
It also gives a defendant to this crime an affirmative defense that he or she took reasonable steps to inform viewers or listeners that the representation or recording is a digitally forged likeness.
(In general, an affirmative defense allows a defendant to introduce evidence, which, if found to be credible, will negate the defendant’s liability, even if the defendant committed the alleged acts.) sSB483 / File No.
578 5 sSB483 File No.
578 Lastly, the bill specifies that it does not make interactive computer or telecommunication services providers liable for creating content at someone’s request or disseminating content from someone unless they knew that doing so violated the bill.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
October 1, 2026 COMMITTEE ACTION Judiciary Committee Joint Favorable Substitute Yea 41 Nay 0 (03/23/2026) sSB483 / File No.
578 6
Show all 52 changed rows (12 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- Chaptered Public Act No. 26-119 Current pdf
- File No. 578 View text pdf
- Raised Bill View text pdf
- Substitute JUD Joint Favorable Substitute pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill establishes the crime of digital defrauding and defines its parameters within existing law.
-
Section 53a-119
(19) Digital defrauding. (A) A person is guilty of digital defrauding when such person, with intent to cause financial injury to another person, creates and disseminates a visual representation or audio recording that such person knows or should have known is a digitally forged likeness. (B) For purposes of this subdivision, (i) "disseminate" means to sell, give, provide, lend, trade, mail, deliver, transfer, publish, distribute, circulate, present, exhibit, advertise or otherwise offer; and (ii) "Digitally forged likeness" means any photograph, film, videotape or other visual representation of a person or an audio recording of a person's voice that (I) is not wholly recorded by a camera or an audio recorder, or either partially or wholly generated by a computer system, (II) depicts, and is virtually indistinguishable from what a reasonable person would believe is the actual depiction of an identifiable person's image or voice, and (III) is created without the consent of the person whose image or voice is depicted. (C) In any prosecution for an offense under this subdivision, it shall be an affirmative defense that the defendant took reasonable action to place viewers or listeners of a digitally forged likeness on notice that such visual representation or audio recording is a digitally forged likeness. (D) Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to impose liability on the provider of an interactive computer service, as defined in 47 USC 230, an information service, as defined in 47 USC 153, or a telecommunications service, as defined in section 16-247a, for the creation of content at the request of another person or the dissemination of content provided by another person, provided such provider did not know that such content was being created or disseminated in violation of this subdivision.
This addition creates a specific offense for digital defrauding and outlines definitions, defenses, and protections for certain service providers.
Action History
-
SIGNED BY GOVERNOR
-
TRANSMITTED BY SECRETARY OF THE STATE TO GOVERNOR
-
TRANSMITTED TO SECRETARY OF THE STATE
-
PUBLIC ACT 26-119
-
IN CONCURRENCE
-
HOUSE PASSED, SEN. AMEND. SCH. A
-
HOUSE ADOPTED SEN. AMEND. SCH. A
-
RULES SUSPENDED
-
HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 581
-
FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR
-
TRANSMITTED PURSUANT TO JOINT RULE 17
-
SEN. PASSED, SEN. AMEND. SCH. A
-
SEN. ADOPTED SEN. AMEND. SCH. A
-
FILE NO. 578
-
SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 344
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/08/26
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable Substitute
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0318
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Judiciary
Sponsors
- Stephen G. Harding · Primary
- Heather S. Somers · Primary
- Kathy Kennedy · Primary
- William Pizzuto · Primary
- Kaitlyn Shake · Primary
- Henry J. Genga · Primary
- Tony J. Scott · Primary
- Anthony L. Nolan · Primary
- Hubert D. Delany · Primary
- Paul Cicarella · Primary
- John A. Kissel · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →11 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 176 not signed on
Sponsors (11)
- Stephen G. Harding Republican
- Heather S. Somers Republican
- Kathy Kennedy Republican
- William Pizzuto Republican
- Kaitlyn Shake Democratic
- Henry J. Genga Democratic
- Tony J. Scott Republican
- Anthony L. Nolan Democratic
- Hubert D. Delany Democratic
- Paul Cicarella Republican
- John A. Kissel Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (176)
176 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 176 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 483?
- SB 483 is sponsored by Stephen G. Harding (Republican), Heather S. Somers (Republican), Kathy Kennedy (Republican), William Pizzuto (Republican), Kaitlyn Shake (Democratic), Henry J. Genga (Democratic), Tony J. Scott (Republican), Anthony L. Nolan (Democratic), Hubert D. Delany (Democratic), Paul Cicarella (Republican), and John A. Kissel (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 483?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 11, 2026. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 483?
- Track SB 483 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 483
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 483
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →