Connecticut 2026 Session Status: In Committee Bipartisan · 15 D · 1 R cosponsors

HB 5462 — AN ACT CONCERNING NOISE POLLUTION.

Last action — BILL PASSED TEMPORARILY

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced March 04, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.

Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.

Odds of enactment

Low chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Advancing 42% · moderate confidence
  • In Committee

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 16 sponsors

    16 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (15 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

137 added · 10 removed

Plain-language change summary

The latest version of Bill HB 5462 has made a change involving the number of solar photovoltaic noise barriers that can be included. It now specifies that there must be at least one but no more than three barriers. This adjustment matters because it clarifies the expectations for noise reduction measures, ensuring that there is a minimum level of implementation while also setting a cap to manage costs and feasibility.

→
Previous
Latest
General Assembly Substitute Bill No.
House of Representatives General Assembly File No.
5462 February Session, 2026 AN ACT CONCERNING NOISE POLLUTION.
388 February Session, 2026 Substitute House Bill No.
5462 House of Representatives, April 2, 2026 The Committee on Transportation reported through REP.
BERGER-GIRVALO of the 111th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the House, that the substitute bill ought to pass.
AN ACT CONCERNING NOISE POLLUTION.
The pilot program shall include the design, installation, operation, maintenance and evaluation ofat least one, but not more thanthree, solar photovoltaicnoise barriers.
The pilot program shall include the design, installation, operation, maintenance and evaluation ofat least one,but not more thanthree, solar photovoltaicnoise barriers.
The commissioner may enter into agreements with third parties for the design, installation, operation or maintenance, or any combination thereof, of solar photovoltaic noise barriers.
The commissioner may enter into agreements with third parties for the design, installation, operation or maintenance, or any combination sHB5462 / File No.
388 1 sHB5462 File No.
388 thereof, of solar photovoltaic noise barriers.
(c) Not later than January 1, 2028, the commissioner shall submit a report, in accordance with the provisions of section 11-4a of the general statutes, to the joint standing committee of the General Assembly LCO 1 of 4 Substitute Bill No.
(c) Not later than January 1, 2028, the commissioner shall submit a report, in accordance with the provisions of section 11-4a of the general statutes, to the joint standing committee of the General Assembly having cognizance of matters relating to transportation.
5462 having cognizance of matters relating to transportation.
(3) No person, including a motor vehicle dealer or repairer or a motorcycle dealer, shall remove all or part of any muffler on a motor vehicle except to repair or replace the muffler or part for the more effective prevention of noise.
(3) No person, including a motor vehicle dealer or repairer or a sHB5462 / File No.
388 2 sHB5462 File No.
388 motorcycle dealer, shall remove all or part of any muffler on a motor vehicle except to repair or replace the muffler or part for the more effective prevention of noise.
LCO 2 of 4 Substitute Bill No.
(c) The engine of every motor vehicle shall be equipped and adjusted to prevent excessive fumes or exhaust smoke.
5462 (c) The engine of every motor vehicle shall be equipped and adjusted to prevent excessive fumes or exhaust smoke.
(2) Any motor vehicle may be equipped with a theft alarm signal device which is so arranged that it cannot be used by the driver as an ordinary warning signal.
sHB5462 / File No.
(3) Any authorized emergency vehicle may be equipped with a siren, whistle or bell, capable of emitting sound audible under normal conditions from a distance of not less than five hundred feet and of a LCO 3 of 4 Substitute Bill No.
388 3 sHB5462 File No.
5462 type approved by the Department of Motor Vehicles.
388 (2) Any motor vehicle may be equipped with a theft alarm signal device which is so arranged that it cannot be used by the driver as an ordinary warning signal.
(3) Any authorized emergency vehicle may be equipped with a siren, whistle or bell, capable of emitting sound audible under normal conditions from a distance of not less than five hundred feet and of a type approved by the Department of Motor Vehicles.
-LCO LCO 4 of 4
-LCO sHB5462 / File No.
388 4 sHB5462 File No.
388 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 27 $ FY 28 $ Department of Transportation TF - Cost See Below See Below State Revenues GF&TF - See Below See Below Revenue Gain Note:
TF=Transportation Fund;
GF&TF=General Fund & Transportation Fund Municipal Impact:
None Explanation Section 1 results in costs to the Department of Transportation (DOT) by requiring the agency to establish a solar photovoltaic noise barrier pilot program, which must include the design, installation, operation, maintenance and evaluation of at least one and no more than three barriers.
Costs to establish the pilot program will depend on implementation decisions made by DOT and available funding but could reasonably include the following:
(1) approximately $500,000 annually in consultant and/or staff costs to manage the pilot, including costs for planning, researching, training, evaluation, and reporting, (2) a detailed technical noise study at each site, costing approximately $100,000 per site, (3) construction and installation of the barriers themselves which, according to preliminary DOT research, could be approximately $3 million per mile, and (4) ongoing maintenance costs particular to these Costs for solar photovoltaic noise barriers are difficult to estimate because this technology is not yet widely used on the U.S.
highway system and costs are expected to vary based on local conditions.
For context, traditional noise barrier project costs are approximately $2 million per mile in Connecticut.
sHB5462 / File No.
388 5 sHB5462 File No.
388 barriers, such as more complex vegetative management.
The bill also allows DOT to enter into agreements with third parties for this work which may limit the upfront costs to the state depending on the terms and scope of any agreement.
Section 2 increases the fine, from $150 per offense to $1,000 per offense, for certain noise-related motor vehicle violations, resulting in revenue gain from fines.
2 The Out Years The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would continue into the future subject to the timing and scope of the pilot, ongoing maintenance costs,thetermsofany third-party agreement, and the number of offenses.
Show all 81 changed rows (41 more)
Previous
Latest
2Between FY 22 and FY 25, there were a total of 1,557 offenses recorded and $131,000 in fines collected under CGS § 14-80.
sHB5462 / File No.
388 6 sHB5462 File No.
388 OLR Bill Analysis sHB 5462 AN ACT CONCERNING NOISE POLLUTION.
SUMMARY Thisbillincreasesthefine,from$150peroffenseto$1,000peroffense, for violating certain requirements under existing law related to motor vehicle mechanical equipment, primarily involving mufflers and exhaust pipes (§ 2).
As under existing law, these violations are (1) processed through the Centralized Infractions Bureau (CIB, see BACKGROUND) and (2) subject to a Special Transportation Fund surcharge of 50% of the fine (CGS § 13b-70).
Separately, the bill requires the Department of Transportation commissioner to create a solar photovoltaic noise barrier pilot program to evaluate the feasibility, cost effectiveness, environmental benefits, andeffectiveness ofusing noise barrierswiththistechnology along state roads(§1).(These are generally noise barriersdesignedto bothgenerate electricity and lessen road noise.) Under the bill, the program must include designing, installing, operating, maintaining, and evaluating between one and three of these noise barriers, which may be done with third-party entities.
The commissioner must consult with the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority on electric interconnection and net metering eligibility.
By January 1, 2028, the commissioner must give a report on the pilot program to the Transportation Committee that includes (1) information on its total costs;
electricity generation data;
maintenance and performance, safety, and structural findings;
and environmental impacts and (2) any recommendations for continuing, expanding, or modifying the program.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
October 1, 2026 sHB5462 / File No.
388 7 sHB5462 File No.
388 EQUIPMENT VIOLATIONS SUBJECT TO INCREASED FINE The motor vehicle equipment offenses subject to the increased fine generally include the following:
1.
operating, constructing, equipping, or adjusting a motor vehicle (or its devices) to cause unnecessary or unusual noise;
2.
operating a motor vehicle with an improper muffler;
failing to maintain a muffler in good working order;
installing or using a muffler without interior baffle plates or other effective muffling devices, a gutted muffler, a muffler cutout, or a straight exhaust;
installing or using a mechanical device that amplifies the vehicle’s emitted noise;
removing or replacing all or part of a muffler except to repair or replace it;
or using an extension or device on an exhaust system or tail pipe that will cause excessive or unusual noise;
3.
operating a motor vehicle that emits excessive fumes or exhaust smoke;
4.
violating requirements for constructing, placing, or positioning exhaust pipes on a motor vehicle;
5.
operating a motor vehicle with a defective horn;
and 6.
operating a warning siren, whistle, or bell on a motor vehicle except as the law allows.
BACKGROUND Centralized Infractions Bureau By law, individuals charged with a motor vehicle violation may, generally, pay the fine through CIB without appearing in court.
Payment is considered a plea of nolo contendere (no contest) and is not admissible in any civil or criminal proceeding.
If an individual pleads not guilty, CIB must send the plea and request for trial to the clerk of the geographical area court where the trial is to take place.
The practice, procedure, rules of evidence, and burden of proof applicable in criminal sHB5462 / File No.
388 8 sHB5462 File No.
388 proceedings apply in the trial (CGS § 51-164n).
COMMITTEE ACTION Transportation Committee Joint Favorable Yea 30 Nay 6 (03/16/2026) sHB5462 / File No.
388 9
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. BILL PASSED TEMPORARILY

  2. HOUSE DESIGNATED HO. AMEND. SCH. A

  3. FILE NO. 388

  4. HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 275

  5. FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR

  6. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  7. REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/01/26

  8. FILED WITH LCO

  9. Joint Favorable

  10. PUBLIC HEARING 0309

  11. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Transportation

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

16 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 171 not signed on

Sponsors (16)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (171)

171 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 171 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 5462?
HB 5462 is sponsored by Jaime S. Foster (Democratic), Tom Delnicki (Republican), Christopher Poulos (Democratic), Gary A. Turco (Democratic), Josh Elliott (Democratic), Michael DiGiovancarlo (Democratic), Hector Arzeno (Democratic), Raghib Allie-Brennan (Democratic), Jennifer Leeper (Democratic), Geraldo C. Reyes (Democratic), Mike Demicco (Democratic), Kadeem Roberts (Democratic), Bobby G. Gibson (Democratic), Joseph P. Gresko (Democratic), James Sanchez (Democratic), and Eilish Collins Main (Democratic).
What is the current status of HB 5462?
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced March 04, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Where can I track HB 5462?
Track HB 5462 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 5462

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 5462

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →