HB 5462 — AN ACT CONCERNING NOISE POLLUTION.
Last action — BILL PASSED TEMPORARILY
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced March 04, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
16 sponsors
16 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (15 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
137 added · 10 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of Bill HB 5462 has made a change involving the number of solar photovoltaic noise barriers that can be included. It now specifies that there must be at least one but no more than three barriers. This adjustment matters because it clarifies the expectations for noise reduction measures, ensuring that there is a minimum level of implementation while also setting a cap to manage costs and feasibility.
House of Representatives General Assembly SubstituteFile Bill No.
5462388 February Session, 2026 ANSubstitute ACTHouse CONCERNINGBill NOISENo. POLLUTION.
5462 House of Representatives, April 2, 2026 The Committee on Transportation reported through REP.
BERGER-GIRVALO of the 111th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the House, that the substitute bill ought to pass.
AN ACT CONCERNING NOISE POLLUTION.
The pilot program shall include the design, installation, operation, maintenance and evaluation ofat least one,one,but but not more thanthree, solar photovoltaicnoise barriers.
The commissioner may enter into agreements with third parties for the design, installation, operation or maintenance, or any combination thereof,sHB5462 of/ solarFile photovoltaicNo. noise barriers.
388 1 sHB5462 File No.
388 thereof, of solar photovoltaic noise barriers.
(c) Not later than January 1, 2028, the commissioner shall submit a report, in accordance with the provisions of section 11-4a of the general statutes, to the joint standing committee of the General Assembly LCOhaving 1cognizance of 4matters Substituterelating Billto No.transportation.
5462 having cognizance of matters relating to transportation.
(3) No person, including a motor vehicle dealer or repairer or a motorcyclesHB5462 dealer,/ shallFile removeNo. all or part of any muffler on a motor vehicle except to repair or replace the muffler or part for the more effective prevention of noise.
388 2 sHB5462 File No.
388 motorcycle dealer, shall remove all or part of any muffler on a motor vehicle except to repair or replace the muffler or part for the more effective prevention of noise.
LCO(c) 2The engine of 4every Substitutemotor Billvehicle No.shall be equipped and adjusted to prevent excessive fumes or exhaust smoke.
5462 (c) The engine of every motor vehicle shall be equipped and adjusted to prevent excessive fumes or exhaust smoke.
(2)sHB5462 Any/ motorFile vehicleNo. may be equipped with a theft alarm signal device which is so arranged that it cannot be used by the driver as an ordinary warning signal.
(3)388 Any authorized emergency vehicle may be equipped with a siren, whistle or bell, capable of emitting sound audible under normal conditions from a distance of not less than five hundred feet and of a LCO 3 ofsHB5462 4File Substitute Bill No.
5462388 type(2) approvedAny motor vehicle may be equipped with a theft alarm signal device which is so arranged that it cannot be used by the Departmentdriver ofas Motoran Vehicles.ordinary warning signal.
(3) Any authorized emergency vehicle may be equipped with a siren, whistle or bell, capable of emitting sound audible under normal conditions from a distance of not less than five hundred feet and of a type approved by the Department of Motor Vehicles.
-LCO LCOsHB5462 4/ ofFile 4No.
388 4 sHB5462 File No.
388 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 27 $ FY 28 $ Department of Transportation TF - Cost See Below See Below State Revenues GF&TF - See Below See Below Revenue Gain Note:
TF=Transportation Fund;
GF&TF=General Fund & Transportation Fund Municipal Impact:
None Explanation Section 1 results in costs to the Department of Transportation (DOT) by requiring the agency to establish a solar photovoltaic noise barrier pilot program, which must include the design, installation, operation, maintenance and evaluation of at least one and no more than three barriers.
Costs to establish the pilot program will depend on implementation decisions made by DOT and available funding but could reasonably include the following:
(1) approximately $500,000 annually in consultant and/or staff costs to manage the pilot, including costs for planning, researching, training, evaluation, and reporting, (2) a detailed technical noise study at each site, costing approximately $100,000 per site, (3) construction and installation of the barriers themselves which, according to preliminary DOT research, could be approximately $3 million per mile, and (4) ongoing maintenance costs particular to these Costs for solar photovoltaic noise barriers are difficult to estimate because this technology is not yet widely used on the U.S.
highway system and costs are expected to vary based on local conditions.
For context, traditional noise barrier project costs are approximately $2 million per mile in Connecticut.
sHB5462 / File No.
388 5 sHB5462 File No.
388 barriers, such as more complex vegetative management.
The bill also allows DOT to enter into agreements with third parties for this work which may limit the upfront costs to the state depending on the terms and scope of any agreement.
Section 2 increases the fine, from $150 per offense to $1,000 per offense, for certain noise-related motor vehicle violations, resulting in revenue gain from fines.
2 The Out Years The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would continue into the future subject to the timing and scope of the pilot, ongoing maintenance costs,thetermsofany third-party agreement, and the number of offenses.
Show all 81 changed lines (41 more)
2Between FY 22 and FY 25, there were a total of 1,557 offenses recorded and $131,000 in fines collected under CGS § 14-80.
sHB5462 / File No.
388 6 sHB5462 File No.
388 OLR Bill Analysis sHB 5462 AN ACT CONCERNING NOISE POLLUTION.
SUMMARY Thisbillincreasesthefine,from$150peroffenseto$1,000peroffense, for violating certain requirements under existing law related to motor vehicle mechanical equipment, primarily involving mufflers and exhaust pipes (§ 2).
As under existing law, these violations are (1) processed through the Centralized Infractions Bureau (CIB, see BACKGROUND) and (2) subject to a Special Transportation Fund surcharge of 50% of the fine (CGS § 13b-70).
Separately, the bill requires the Department of Transportation commissioner to create a solar photovoltaic noise barrier pilot program to evaluate the feasibility, cost effectiveness, environmental benefits, andeffectiveness ofusing noise barrierswiththistechnology along state roads(§1).(These are generally noise barriersdesignedto bothgenerate electricity and lessen road noise.) Under the bill, the program must include designing, installing, operating, maintaining, and evaluating between one and three of these noise barriers, which may be done with third-party entities.
The commissioner must consult with the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority on electric interconnection and net metering eligibility.
By January 1, 2028, the commissioner must give a report on the pilot program to the Transportation Committee that includes (1) information on its total costs;
electricity generation data;
maintenance and performance, safety, and structural findings;
and environmental impacts and (2) any recommendations for continuing, expanding, or modifying the program.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
October 1, 2026 sHB5462 / File No.
388 7 sHB5462 File No.
388 EQUIPMENT VIOLATIONS SUBJECT TO INCREASED FINE The motor vehicle equipment offenses subject to the increased fine generally include the following:
1.
operating, constructing, equipping, or adjusting a motor vehicle (or its devices) to cause unnecessary or unusual noise;
2.
operating a motor vehicle with an improper muffler;
failing to maintain a muffler in good working order;
installing or using a muffler without interior baffle plates or other effective muffling devices, a gutted muffler, a muffler cutout, or a straight exhaust;
installing or using a mechanical device that amplifies the vehicle’s emitted noise;
removing or replacing all or part of a muffler except to repair or replace it;
or using an extension or device on an exhaust system or tail pipe that will cause excessive or unusual noise;
3.
operating a motor vehicle that emits excessive fumes or exhaust smoke;
4.
violating requirements for constructing, placing, or positioning exhaust pipes on a motor vehicle;
5.
operating a motor vehicle with a defective horn;
and 6.
operating a warning siren, whistle, or bell on a motor vehicle except as the law allows.
BACKGROUND Centralized Infractions Bureau By law, individuals charged with a motor vehicle violation may, generally, pay the fine through CIB without appearing in court.
Payment is considered a plea of nolo contendere (no contest) and is not admissible in any civil or criminal proceeding.
If an individual pleads not guilty, CIB must send the plea and request for trial to the clerk of the geographical area court where the trial is to take place.
The practice, procedure, rules of evidence, and burden of proof applicable in criminal sHB5462 / File No.
388 8 sHB5462 File No.
388 proceedings apply in the trial (CGS § 51-164n).
COMMITTEE ACTION Transportation Committee Joint Favorable Yea 30 Nay 6 (03/16/2026) sHB5462 / File No.
388 9
Show all 81 changed rows (41 more)
Action History
-
BILL PASSED TEMPORARILY
-
HOUSE DESIGNATED HO. AMEND. SCH. A
-
FILE NO. 388
-
HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 275
-
FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/01/26
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0309
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Transportation
Sponsors
- Jaime S. Foster · Primary
- Tom Delnicki · Primary
- Christopher Poulos · Primary
- Gary A. Turco · Primary
- Josh Elliott · Primary
- Michael DiGiovancarlo · Primary
- Hector Arzeno · Primary
- Raghib Allie-Brennan · Primary
- Jennifer Leeper · Primary
- Geraldo C. Reyes · Primary
- Mike Demicco · Primary
- Kadeem Roberts · Primary
- Bobby G. Gibson · Primary
- Joseph P. Gresko · Primary
- James Sanchez · Primary
- Eilish Collins Main · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →16 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 171 not signed on
Sponsors (16)
- Jaime S. Foster Democratic
- Tom Delnicki Republican
- Christopher Poulos Democratic
- Gary A. Turco Democratic
- Josh Elliott Democratic
- Michael DiGiovancarlo Democratic
- Hector Arzeno Democratic
- Raghib Allie-Brennan Democratic
- Jennifer Leeper Democratic
- Geraldo C. Reyes Democratic
- Mike Demicco Democratic
- Kadeem Roberts Democratic
- Bobby G. Gibson Democratic
- Joseph P. Gresko Democratic
- James Sanchez Democratic
- Eilish Collins Main Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (171)
171 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 171 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 5462?
- HB 5462 is sponsored by Jaime S. Foster (Democratic), Tom Delnicki (Republican), Christopher Poulos (Democratic), Gary A. Turco (Democratic), Josh Elliott (Democratic), Michael DiGiovancarlo (Democratic), Hector Arzeno (Democratic), Raghib Allie-Brennan (Democratic), Jennifer Leeper (Democratic), Geraldo C. Reyes (Democratic), Mike Demicco (Democratic), Kadeem Roberts (Democratic), Bobby G. Gibson (Democratic), Joseph P. Gresko (Democratic), James Sanchez (Democratic), and Eilish Collins Main (Democratic).
- What is the current status of HB 5462?
- This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced March 04, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HB 5462?
- Track HB 5462 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 5462
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 5462
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →